:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:產品複合感性意象之滿意度推論模式
書刊名:設計學研究
作者:陳俊智莊明振 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, Chun-chihChuan, Ming-chuen
出版日期:2012
卷期:15:2
頁次:頁27-50
主題關鍵詞:使用者感性滿意度Kano品質模式多屬性決策模糊層級分析法感性工學Affective user satisfactionKano modelMultiple-attribute decision makingFAHPKansei engineering
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:34
  • 點閱點閱:41
產品造形所誘發的感性特質是影響使用者滿意度品質項目之一,亦是產品能否成功銷售的重要關鍵。使用者對於產品造形的感性評價是具備多屬性的特質,而相關產品複合感性意象研究中,多以感性意象品質與滿意度之間為一維(線性)關係之假設,進行使用者感性滿意度之推論,此假設並不能完整地解釋使用者之需求差異性。因此,本研究導入二維Kano品質模式,提出一使用者滿意度推論模式,並以手機設計為例,進行產品複合感性意象之滿意度推論,並藉由FAHP權重模式(線性)與二維Kano推論模式之預測績效比較,以驗證方法之可行性。研究結果指出,在使用者感性滿意度之預測上,Kano「迴歸分析」模式是比FAHP權重模式有較佳之績效,這說明了以Kano品質績效與滿意度的函數關係,轉換為效益函數之推論模式是具可行性。最後,研究進一步利用Kano品質分類之結果,結合數量化一類分析,建立不同Kano品質分類(一元的與魅力的品質因子)與造形因子/水準之數值關係,協助設計者了解產品各造形因子對於使用者感性滿意度的影響性,以為設計者手機造形設計與品質改善設計參數選擇的權衡依據。
Facing the equivalency of product function, Kansei image elicited by a product form has become one of the important quality attributes affecting user satisfaction, also being the critical factor for product success. Users' Kansei perception with product form has a multidimensional nature. Most of the studies related with multi-Kansei of product used to infer user satisfaction basing on the assumption of the linear relationship between Kansei quality and user satisfaction. However, from the viewpoint of linear assumption, it is not always sufficient to explain the different relationship between user requirements and overall satisfaction. To overcome these shortcomings, the model integrated with the additive multi-attribute utility function and two-dimensional Kano model is proposed to infer user satisfaction of product in multi-Kansei. To verify the validity of the proposed model, the inference models of the additive weighting method, FAHP and Kano's inference model, are also constructed for comparisons. The performance of the proposed approach is illustrated and validated by using a mobile phone design example. The result of verification shows that the proposed integrative model based on the Kano model can infer the affective user satisfaction more accurately than the other models. While, Quantitative Theory Type Ι analysis was used to explore the effect of each form level belonging to each form item on different Kano quality classifications(one-dimensional and attractive quality categories). The results show that it can help designers resolve the trade-offs dilemma of choosing the optimal combination of product form design in multiple-attribute optimization of user satisfaction.
期刊論文
1.陳正男、丁學勤(2002)。The asymmetrical and non-linear effects of store quality attributes on customer satisfaction。Total Quality Management,13(4),547-569。  new window
2.Nagamachi, M.(2002)。Kansei engineering in consumer product design。Ergonomics in Design: The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications,10(2),5-10。  new window
3.Yun, M. H.、Han, S. H.、Hong, S. W.、Kim, J.(2003)。Incorporating user satisfaction into the look-and-feel of mobile phone design。Ergonomics,46(13/14),1423-1440。  new window
4.蕭坤安、Chen, Lin Lin(2006)。Fundamental dimensions of affective responses to product shapes。International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics,36(6),553-564。  new window
5.Jiao, J.、Zhang, Y.、Helander, M.(2006)。A Kansei mining system for affective design。Expert Systems with Applications,30,658-673。  new window
6.Schutte, S.、Eklund, J.(2005)。Design of rocker switches for work-vehicles--an application of Kansei Engineering。Applied Ergonomics,36(5),557-567。  new window
7.莊明振、陳俊智(2004)。產品形態特徵與構成關係影響消費者感性評價之研究--以水壺的設計為例。設計學報,9(3),43-58。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Bloch, Peter H.(1995)。Seeking the ideal form: Product design and consumer response。Journal of Marketing,59(3),16-29。  new window
9.Chuang, M. C.、Chang, C. C.、Hsu, S. H.(2001)。Perceptual factors underlying user preferences toward product form of mobile phones。International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics,27(4),247-258。  new window
10.徐村和(19980800)。模糊德菲層級分析法。模糊系統學刊,4(1),59-72。  延伸查詢new window
11.Mittal, Vikas、Ross, William T. Jr.、Baldasare, Patrick M.(1998)。The Asymmetric Impact of Negative and Positive Attribute-level Performance on Overall Satisfaction and Repurchase Intentions。Journal of Marketing,62(1),33-47。  new window
12.Slack, N.(1994)。The importance-performance matrix as a determinant of improvement priority。International Journal of Operations & Production Management,14(5),59-75。  new window
13.Sampson, S. E.、Showalter, M. J.(1999)。The performance-importance response function: observations and implications。The Service Industries Journal,19(3),1-25。  new window
14.陳俊智、李依潔(20081200)。應用Kano品質模式探討文化產品設計之魅力因子。設計學報,13(4),25-41。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Crilly, Nathan、Moultrie, James、Clarkson, P. John(2004)。Seeing things: Consumer response to the visual domain in product design。Design Studies,25(6),547-577。  new window
16.Matzler, Kurt、Hinterhuber, Hans H.(1998)。How to make product development projects more successful by integrating Kano's model of customer satisfaction into quality function deployment。Technovation,18(1),25-38。  new window
17.Petiot, J. F.、Yannou, B.(2004)。Measuring consumer perceptions for a better comprehension, specification and assessment of product semantics。International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics,33(6),507-525。  new window
18.Anderson, Eugene W.、Sullivan, Mary W.(1993)。The Antecedents and Consequences of Customer Satisfaction for Firms。Marketing Science,12(2),125-143。  new window
19.狩野紀昭、瀬楽信彦、高橋文夫、辻新一(1984)。魅力的品質と当り前品質。品質,14(2),147-156。  延伸查詢new window
20.Chang, H. C.、Lai, H. H.、Chang, Y. M.(2006)。Expression modes used by consumers in conveying desire for product form: A case study of a car。International Journal of Industrial Ergonomic,36,3-10。  new window
21.Chen, C.、Chuan, M.(2011)。A design decision-making support model for prioritizing affective qualities of product。Lecture Notes in Computer Science,6677,21-30。  new window
22.Hsu, T. H.(1997)。Transportation project evaluations: a fbzzy measure AHP。Proceedings of NSC, Part C,7(1),26-34。  new window
23.Lai, H. H.、Lin, Y. C.、Yeh, C. H.、Wei, C. H.(2006)。User-oriented design for the optimal combination on product design。International Journal of Industrial Ergonomic,100,253-267。  new window
24.Lin, M.、Wang, C.、Chen, M.、Chang, C. A.(2008)。Using AHP and TOPSIS approaches in customer-anven product design process。Computers in Industry,59(1),17-31。  new window
25.Lin, Y.、Lai, ri.、Yeh, C.(2007)。Consumer-oriented product form design based on fuzzy logic: A case study of mobile phones。International Journal of Industrial Ergonomic,37(6),531-543。  new window
26.Llinares, C.、Page, A. F.(2011)。Kano's model in Kansei Engineering to evaluate subjective real estate consumer preferences。International Journal of Industrial Ergonomic,41,233-246。  new window
27.Ma, M.、Chen, C.、Wu, F.(2007)。A design decision-making support model for customized product color combination。Computers in Industry,58(6),504-518。  new window
28.You, H.、Ryu, T.、Oh, K.、Yun, M. H.、Kim, K. J.(2006)。Development of customer satisfaction models for automotive interior materials。International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics,36,323-330。  new window
圖書
1.Nagamachi, M.(1989)。Kansei engineering。Tokey:hebunhoru publishing limited。  new window
2.Saaty, Thomas L.(1980)。The Analysis Hierarchy Process。New York:McGraw Hill。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE