臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：父母支持性的性溝通、溝通信念與親子性溝通關係之探討--以臺北市高中、職親屬為範例
書刊名：中華輔導與諮商學報
作者：鄭其嘉／晏涵文／劉潔心 引用關係／張興榮
作者(外文)：Cheng, J. Chi-chia／Yen, Han-wen／Liu, Chieh-hsing／Chang, Hsing-jung
出版日期：2012
卷期：32
頁次：頁151-172
主題關鍵詞：支持性溝通；親子性溝通；驗證性因素分析；Confirmatory factor analysis；Parent-child sex communication；Supportive communication
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:88
  • 點閱點閱:201
過往親子性溝通的研究多半注重溝通的量，而忽略溝通的質，使研究結果無法告訴父母該如何溝通。本研究旨在了解溝通因素對父母親子性溝通之影響，以做為學校或機構設計親職教育與輔導之參考。研究樣本為159位台北市高中職父母。研究工具包括：性溝通主題、支持性的性溝通（Supportive Sex Communication）量表、家庭性溝通信念、性溝通態度、溝通過程與人口學變項等。支持性的性溝通量表驗證性因素分析（Confirmatory Factor Analysis）顯示量表符合理論架構。統計分析控制性別、年齡、社會經濟地位等人口學變項。研究發現，性溝通議題可依據其敏感程度分為三類：廣泛性議題、狹義性議題與禁忌性議題，其中廣泛性議題溝通頻率最高，禁忌性議題率最低。複迴歸控制社會人口變項後顯示，影響這三類議題的因素不同，其中支持性的性溝通分數愈高，則廣泛性議題與狹義性議題溝通頻率亦愈高。母親以及對自己的溝通效果愈沒有期待的，廣泛性溝通頻率亦愈高。對禁忌性議題而言，沒有一個變項具有預測力。另外，支持性性溝通分數高的父母對孩子較信任、對溝通效果較沒有期待、溝通過程較願意開放自己、較尊重孩子想法，其性溝通滿意度亦愈高。本研究對研究限制提出討論，並對親職教育如何協助父母跟孩子談「性」，以及未來研究提出建議。
The purpose of the study was to investigate the relationships between parental supportive sex communication, family sex communication beliefs, sex communication attitude, and parent-child communication about sex topics. Participants were 159 parents of high school students from a senior high school and a vocational high school in Taipei City, Taiwan. Research tools included the Supportive Sex Communication Scale, Sexual Communication Topic Questionnaire, Parental Beliefs about Family Sex Communication Scale, and General Sex Communication Attitude Scale. An exploratory factor analysis of the sexual communication topics generated three factors: General sex topics, Specific sex topics, and Taboo sex topics. General sex topics obtained the highest communication frequency mean score and the Taboo sex topics obtained the lowest. Multiple regression analyses controlling for demographic variables indicated that the three sex topics differed in predictor variables. Supportive communication was positively related to communication frequencies on General sex topic and Specific sex topics. The less expectation parents held for their talks, the more frequently they talked about General sex topics. However, none of the predictor variables significantly predicted communication frequencies on Taboo sex topics. Furthermore, ANCOVA and chi-square analyses showed that supportive parents were characterized as being more open and honest, having more trust toward their children, having more respect for their children's opinions, and having less expectation for effects of their talks. They also had higher satisfactory scores on parent-child sex communication. Suggestions for future research and school parental education and counseling programs were also made according to research findings.
期刊論文
1.廖梨伶、洪栩隆(20060900)。主要照顧者與青少年於性議題之溝通現況調查研究--以彰化縣國中小學生為主要對象。臺灣性學學刊，12(2)，1-12。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.晏涵文、蘇鈺婷、李佳容(20010900)。國小高年級學生性教育現況及需求之研究。臺灣性學學刊，7(2)，1-22。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.張允中、林燕卿(20060900)。單親家長對青春期子女「性」溝通之探討。中華輔導學報，20，175-200。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.林燕卿、晏涵文(19990500)。親職性教育介入效果之研究。衛生教育學報，12，159-181。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.晏涵文、劉潔心、鄭其嘉(20090300)。臺北市五專五年級學生近三十年約會與性行為變化趨勢研究。中華輔導與諮商學報，25，251-274。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Miller, K. S.、Kotchick, B. A.、Dorsey, S.、Forehand, R.、Ham, A. Y.(1998)。Family communication about sex: What are parents saying and are their adolescents listening?。Family Planning Perspectives，30，218-222+235。  new window
7.單玉安、鄭其嘉、孫鳳卿(20080300)。高中職學生性溝通、性態度及其受同儕關係類型影響研究--以高雄市為例。臺灣性學學刊，14(1)，23-36。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.羅樊妮(2004)。父母管教方式、異性交往之親子溝通與青少年異性交往態度之相關研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.晏涵文(2004)。性、兩性關係與性教育。臺北：心理。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States(2004)。Guidelines for Comprehensive Sexuality Education。  new window
其他
1.阮芳賦、蘇敏慧(2004)。SAR（性態度重建過程）在臺灣的應用。  延伸查詢new window
2.林惠生(200205)。臺灣地區高中、高職及五專在校學生之性知識、性態度及危害健康行為與網路之使用。  延伸查詢new window
3.晏涵文、黃富源(2002)。家庭性教育。  延伸查詢new window
4.張美皓、晏涵文(1995)。臺北市國二學生與母親溝通與「性」有關主題之研究。  延伸查詢new window
5.羅于惠、鄧鳳苓、瞿馥苓、林雪蓉、史麗珠(2008)。桃園地區高職學生性知識及性教育需求的調查研究。  延伸查詢new window
6.Alexander, J. F.(1973)。Defensive and supportive communications in family systems。  new window
7.Alexander, J. F.(1979)。The reduction of cognitive conflict: Effects of various types of communication。  new window
8.Baker, W. H.(1980)。Defensiveness in communication: Its causes, effects, and cures。  new window
9.Barton, C., Alexander, J. F., & Turner, C. W.(1988)。Defensive communication in normal and delinquent families: The impact of context and family role。  new window
10.Becker, J. A. H., Ellevold, B., & Stamp, G. H.(2008)。The creation of defensiveness in social interaction II: A model of defensive communication among romantic couples。  new window
11.Becker, J. A. H., Halbesleben, J. R. B., & O'Har, H. D.(2005)。Defensive communication and burnout in the workplace: The mediating role of leader-member exchange。  new window
12.Brody, E. B., Ottey, F., & Lagranade, J.(1976)。Early sex education in relationship to later coital and reproductive behavior: Evidence from Jamaican women。  new window
13.Darling, C. A., & Hicks, M. W.(1982)。Parental influences on adolescent sexuality: Implication for parents as educators。  new window
14.DeSalvo, F. J., & Zurcher, L. A.(1984)。Defensive and supportive parental communication in a discipline situation。  new window
15.Dubbe, M. C.(1956)。What teen-agers can't tell parents and why?。  new window
16.Eadie, W. F.(1982)。Defensive communication revisited: A critical examination of Gibb's theory。  new window
17.Fisher, T. D.(1998)。Weighted topics measure of family sex communication。  new window
18.Foston, N. A.(2004)。How and when to have 'the big talk': Answering the tough questions and finding the right answers for your children。  new window
19.Fox, G. L.(1981)。The family's role in adolescent sexual behavior。  new window
20.Gibb, J. R.(1961)。Defensive communication。  new window
21.Guzman, B. L., Schlehofer-Sutton, M. M., Villanueva, C. M., Stritto, M. E. D., Casad, B. J., & Feria, A.(2003)。Let's talk about sex: How comfortable discussions about sex impact teen sexual behavior。  new window
22.Huberman, B.(2005)。Are you an askable parent?。  new window
23.Jaccard, J., Dodge, T., & Dittus, P.(2002)。Parent-adolescent communication about sex and control。  new window
24.Kingstone, J. C., & Endler, N. S.(1997)。Supportive vs. defensive communications in depression: An assessment of Coyne's interactional model。  new window
25.Lefkowitz, E. S.(2002)。Beyond the yes-no question: Measuring parent-adolescent communication about sex。  new window
26.Neer, R. M., & Warren, C.(1988)。The relationship of supportive communication to sex discussion in the home。  new window
27.Newcomer, S. F., & Udry, J. R.(1985)。Parent-child communication and adolescent sexual behavior。  new window
28.Pistella, C. L. Y., & Bonati, F. A.(1999)。Adolescent women's recommendations for enhanced parentadolescent communication about sexual behavior。  new window
29.Rosenthal, D. A., Feldman, S. S., & Dewards, D.(1998)。Mum's the word: Mothers' perspectives on communication about sexuality with adolescents。  new window
30.Rosenthal, D., Senserrick, T., & Feldman, S.(2001)。A typology approach to describing parents as communicators about sexuality。  new window
31.Rozema, H. J.(1986)。Defensive communication climate as a barrier to sex education in home。  new window
32.Robbins, M . S., Alexander, J. F., & Turner, C. W.(2000)。Disrupting defensive family interactions in family therapy with delinquent adolescents。  new window
33.Spanier, G. B.(1977)。Sources of sex information and premarital sexual behavior。  new window
34.Stamp, G. H., Vangelisti, A. L., & Daly, J. A.(1992)。The creation of defensiveness in social interaction。  new window
35.Warren, C., & Neer, R. M.(1986)。Family sex communication orientation。  new window
36.Whitaker, D. J., & Miller, K. S.(2000)。Parent-adolescent discussions about sex and condoms。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：925（臺灣：915，外國：10） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1972506 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67789489
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上