臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：後設理論在國際關係學科中的認知與應用：以Morgenthau與Waltz之理論版本為例
書刊名：國際關係學報
作者：徐子軒
作者(外文)：Hsu, Lucian T. H.
出版日期：2012
卷期：34
頁次：頁159-194
主題關鍵詞：後設理論；科學哲學；理論版本；古典現實主義；新現實主義；Meta-theory；Philosophy of science；Theory version；Classical realism；Neorealism
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:38
  • 點閱點閱:69
對於後設理論的陌生，是國際關係學界普遍的情形，而對於後設理論的誤解，則影響了國關理論的進步。為了改善這些問題，本文將先對於傳統的科學哲學進行系統性的分析與批判，繼而引介一個嶄新的科學哲學：理論版本，並做為國際關係理論的判准。不同於拉卡托斯(Imre Lakatos)式的研究綱領，理論版本不認為有所謂的硬核(hard core)存在，它比較偏向於孔恩(Thomas Kuhn)式的典範(paradigm)，卻進一步的避免了相對主義，其探討的科學現象在於理論和理論之間的變遷與繼承，以及理論家族之間的競爭。由此觀之，古典現實主義與新現實主義代表著兩個不同的理論版本，從通則到方法論，兩者都具有殊異的特徵；此外，新現實主義吸引了研究社群的投入，成為新一代的原型版本，也顯示了兩者分屬於不同的理論家族，並非是在現實主義架構下的典範轉移。
It's a common situation to be unfamiliar with meta-theory in the discipline of International Relations. Also, to misunderstand meta-theory is also influenced the progress of the IR theory. To correct these defects, this paper, first, will analyze and criticize the traditional philosophy of science systematically. Then, this study intends to introduce a new philosophy called Theory Version as the criterion of IR theory. Unlike Lakatosian research programs, the Theory Version denies the existence of the ＂hard core＂. It prefers Kuhnian paradigm but avoids the relativism. The Theory Version aims to explain not only the change and succession between theory and theory but the competition among theory families. According to this, the theory version of classical realism is not the same as the one of neorealism. From the principle to methodology, they have different characteristics. Neorealism becomes a new prototypical version and thus attracts the research community to follow; moreover, it belongs to the theory family not like classical realism's. Briefly, neorealism's rising is not so-called paradigm shift under the framework of realism.
期刊論文
1.Elman, Colin、Elman, Miriam F.(2002)。How Not to Be Lakatos Intolerant: Appraising Progress in IR Research。International Studies Quarterly，46(2)，231-262。  new window
2.Bull, Hedley(1966)。International Theory: The Case for a Classical Approach。World Politics，18(3)，361-177。  new window
圖書
1.Waltz, Kenneth N.(1979)。Theory of International Politic。Reading, Mass：Addison-Wesley Pub. Co。  new window
2.Waltz, Kenneth N.(2001)。Man, the State and War: A Theoretical Analysis。New York：Columbia University Press。  new window
3.Buzan, Barry、Little, Richard、Jones, Charles(1993)。The Logic of Anarchy: Neorealism to Structural Realism。New York：Columbia University Press。  new window
4.Morgenthau, Hans J.(1946)。Scientific Man vs. Power Politics。Chicago：University of Chicago Press。  new window
5.Wendt, Alexander E.(1999)。Social Theory of International Politics。Cambridge：Harvard University Press。  new window
6.Buzan, Barry、Little, Richard(2000)。International Systems in World History: Remaking the Study of International Relations。Oxford University Press。  new window
7.倪世雄(2001)。當代西方國際關係理論。復旦大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.Lobell, Steven E.、Ripsman, Norrin M.、Taliaferro, Jeffrey W.(2009)。Neoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign Policy。Cambridge University Press。  new window
9.King, Gary、Keohane, Robert O.、Verba, Sidney(1994)。Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific inference in Qualitative Research。Princeton University Press。  new window
10.陳瑞麟(20040000)。科學理論版本的結構與發展。臺北：國立臺灣大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Gerring, John(2001)。Social Science Methodology: A Criterial Framework。Cambridge University Press。  new window
其他
1.Hans J. Morgenthau 著，李暉、孫芳譯(2008)。國家間政治: 為了權力與和平的鬥爭，海口市：海南出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.Imre Lakatos 著，周寄中譯(2001)。批判與知識的增長，臺北：桂冠。  延伸查詢new window
3.Iver B. Neumann、OleWver 主編，肖鋒，石泉譯(2003)。未來國際思想大師，北京：北京大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.Thomas Kuhn 著，範岱年、紀樹立譯(2004)。必要的張力，北京：北京大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.Barkin, Samuel(2010)。Realist Constructivism，Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
6.Chernoff, Fred(2005)。The Power of International Theory: Reforging the Link to Foreign Policy-making through Scientific Enquiry，London：Routledge。  new window
7.Elman, Colin & Miriam F. Elman(2003)。Introduction: Appraising Progress in International Relations Theory。  new window
8.Keohane, Robert O.(1989)。Theory of World Politics: Structural Realism and Beyond。  new window
9.Little, Richard,(2007)。The Balance of Power in International Relations: Metaphors, Myths, and Models，Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
10.Turner, Stephen(2006)。The Importance of Social Philosophy to Morgenthau and Waltz。  new window
11.Vasquez, John A(2003)。Kuhn or Lakatos? The Case for Multiple Frames in Appraising IR Theory。  new window
12.Waltz, Kenneth N(1959)。Political Philosophy and the Study of International Relations。  new window
13.Jervis, Robert,(1991)。The Future of World Politics: Will It Resemble the Past?。  new window
14.Käpyläa, Juha & Harri Mikkolab(201110)。Getting Things Right?’: A Reconsideration of Critical Realism as A Metatheory for IR。  new window
15.Krishna, Daya,(1971)。The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy” and the Nature of Society。  new window
16.Schuett, Robert(201004)。Classical Realism, Freud and Human Nature in International Relations。  new window
17.Wæver, Ole(200906)。Waltz’s Theory of Theory。  new window
18.Waltz, Kenneth N.(1990)。Realist Thought and Neo-Realist Theory。  new window
19.Waltz, Kenneth N.(198804)。The Origin and Prevention of Major Wars。  new window
20.Weber, Cynthia(1994)。Good Girls, Little Girls, and Bad Girls: Male Paranoia in Robert Keohane's. Critique of Feminist International Relations。  new window
圖書論文
1.Smith, Steve(1996)。Positivism and beyond。International theory: Positivism and beyond。Cambridge University Press。  new window
2.Smith, Steve(1995)。The Self-Images of a Discipline: A Genealogy of International Relations Theory。International Relations Theory Today。University Park, PA：Penn State University Press。  new window
3.Waltz, Kenneth N.(1986)。Reflections on Theory of International Politics: A Response to My Critics。Neorealism and Its Critics。New York：Columbia University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：745（臺灣：696，外國：49） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2133566 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67937442
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上