:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:以多層面Rasch分析的角度來評估標準設定之變異性
書刊名:教育心理學報
作者:謝名娟 引用關係
作者(外文):Hsieh, Ming-chuan
出版日期:2013
卷期:44:4
頁次:頁793-811
主題關鍵詞:多層面Rasch標準設定Yes/No AngoffMany facet RaschStandard setting
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:46
  • 點閱點閱:182
執行標準設定時,研究者常需檢視標準設定成員之間的變異性。研究者希望標準設定成員在設定切斷分數時,彼此之間對於決斷分數的判斷能夠達到一致性,也就是成員之間的變異性越小越好。此外,在舉行標準設定時,成員之間為了要能夠達到共識,必須經過好幾輪的討論。因此,如何提供有用的訊息回饋,供標準設定成員參考,以節省成員的討論時間,也是研究的重點。在本文中,將多層面Rasch分析應用於標準設定上,並使用Yes/No Angoff的方法來進行操作,研究發現透過多層面Rasch之分析,除了能檢視標準設定成員之間的變異性,也可提供有用的訊息供標準設定成員參考。除此之外,對於標準設定成員自身內的衝突決定亦能提供有效率的檢視。
When conducting the standard setting, the variability of judgments between standard setting panelists is always an issue needed to be addressed. The researcher has to examine whether the variability between panelists is under the accepted range. In addition, standard setting is a time-consuming process. It usually takes several rounds to discuss the judgments. How to provide the useful feedback for panelists to review their judgments is crucial. In this study, the many facet Rasch model was applied on the Yes/No Angoff standard setting procedure. The result shows that the many facet Rasch model has advantages on examining the variability between panelists. It also provides useful feedback to review the internal conflict decisions within each panelist.
期刊論文
1.鄭明長、余民寧(199401)。各種通過分數設定方法之比較。測驗年刊,41,19-40。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.林惠芬(199301)。通過分數設定方法在護理人員檢覈筆試測驗之研究。測驗年刊,40,253-262。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.郭伯臣、楊思偉、白曉珊、張鈺卿(200812)。BIB與NEAT設計在不同年度測驗連結效果之比較。測驗統計年刊,16(下),125-154。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Kozaki, Y.(2010)。An alternative decision making procedure for performance assessments: Using the multifaceted Rasch model to generate cut estimates。Language Assessment Quarterly,7,75-95。  new window
5.Stone, G. E.、Beltyukova, S.、Fox, C. M.(2008)。Objective standard setting for judge-mediated examinations。International Journal of Testing,8,180-196。  new window
6.Berk, Ronald A.(1996)。Standard Setting: The Next Generation (Where Few Psychometricians Have Gone Before!)。Applied Measurement in Education,9(3),215-235。  new window
7.Impara, J. C.、Plake, B. S.(1997)。Standard setting: An alternative approach。Journal of Educational Measurement,34(4),353-366。  new window
8.Näsström, G.、Nyström, P.(2008)。A comparison of two different methods for setting performance standards for a test with constructed-response items。Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation,13(9),1-12。  new window
9.吳宜芳、鄒慧英、林娟如(20100300)。標準設定效度驗證之探究--以大型數學學習成就評量為例。測驗學刊,57(1),1-27。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.吳毓瑩、陳彥名、張郁雯、陳淑惠、何東憲、林俊吉(20090900)。以常態混組模型討論書籤標準設定法對英語聽讀基本能力標準設定有效性之輻合證據。教育心理學報,41(1),69-89。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.曾建銘、陳清溪(20091200)。2007年臺灣學生學習成就評量結果之分析。教育研究與發展期刊,5(4),1-38。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.郭伯臣、王暄博(20081200)。大型測驗中同時進行垂直與水平等化效果之探討。教育研究與發展期刊,4(4),87-119。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Yates, F.(1936)。A new method of arranging variety trials involving a large number of varieties。Journal of Agricultural Science,26,424-455。  new window
14.謝進昌、謝名娟、林世華、林陳涌、陳清溪、謝佩蓉(201103)。大型資料庫國小四年級自然科學習成就評量標準設定結果之效度評估。教育科學研究期刊,56(1),1-32。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Linacre, J. M.(1999)。Investigating Rating Scale Category Utility。Journal of Outcome Measurement,3,103-122。  new window
16.Tennant, A.、Pallant, J. F.(2006)。Unidimensionality matters! (A tale of two Smiths?)。Rasch Measurement Transactions,20(1),1048-1051。  new window
學位論文
1.吳裕益(1986)。標準參照測驗通過分數設定方法之研究(博士論文)。國立政治大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.陳彥名(2006)。臺灣學生學習成就資料庫(TASA)英語聽讀能力標準設定之效度探究(碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.謝進昌(2005)。以最大測驗訊息量決定通過分數之研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Council of Chief State School Officers(2001)。State student assessment programs annual survey。Washington, DC:Council of Chief State School Officers。  new window
2.Linacre, J. M.(2006)。Winsteps: Rasch model statistical software。Chicago, IL:MESA。  new window
3.Raymond, M. R.、Reid, J. B.(2001)。Who made thee a judge? Selecting and training participants for standard-setting。Standard-setting: Concepts, methods, and perspectives。Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
4.de Ayala, R. J.(2009)。The theory and practice of item response theory。New York, NY:Guilford。  new window
5.Cizek, G. J.、Bunch, M. B.(2007)。Standard setting: A guide to establishing and evaluating performance standards on tests。Sage。  new window
6.余民寧(2009)。試題反應理論(IRT)及其應用。心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.Linacre, J. M.(1989)。Many-facet Rasch measurement。Chicago:MESA Press。  new window
其他
1.(2012)。臺灣學生學習成就評量資料庫建置計畫,http://tasa.naer.edu.tw/labout-l.asp?id=2, 2012/05/22。  延伸查詢new window
2.Linacre, J. M.(2007)。Facets Rasch measurement computer program,Chicago, IL:Winsteps。  new window
3.Linacre, J. M.(2012)。A User's Guide to FACETS,http://www.winsteps.com, 2012/07/01。  new window
圖書論文
1.Engelhard, G. Jr.(2009)。Evaluating the judgments of standard setting panelists using Rasch measurement theory。Criterion referenced testing: Practice analysis to score reporting using Rasch measurement models。Maple Grove, Minnesota:JAM Press。  new window
2.Angoff, William H.(1971)。Scales, norms, and equivalent scores。Educational measurement。Washington, DC:American Council on Education。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE