:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:內線交易的所得計算
書刊名:中原財經法學
作者:賴英照 引用關係
作者(外文):Lai, In-jaw
出版日期:2013
卷期:31
頁次:頁1-63
主題關鍵詞:內線交易犯罪所得市場吸收法淨利法關聯所得法實際所得法擬制所得法Insider tradingGain from the offenseMarket absorption methodNet profit methodRelated gain methodActual gain methodPresumptive gain method
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(10) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:9
  • 共同引用共同引用:515
  • 點閱點閱:79
期刊論文
1.王志誠(20120315)。證券交易法第171條「犯罪所得」之計算爭議。臺灣法學雜誌,196,21-30。  延伸查詢new window
2.台灣法學雑誌編輯部(2010)。證券交易法上各種犯罪「類型犯罪所得」之認定研討會。台灣法學雑誌,156,71-92。  延伸查詢new window
3.李開遠(2010)。證券交易法第一百七十一條有關内線交易罪「犯罪所得」金額計算相關問題之探討。銘傳大學法學論叢,14,267-310。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.武永生(2010)。證券市場内線交易與公開原則規範之財產權特徴。銘傳大學法學論叢,14,79-198。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.陳俊仁(2009)。論Dura Pharmaceuticals v.Brcudo :美國證券詐欺因果關係要件之再麵與對我國證券交易法制之啟示。歐美研究,39(4),713-767。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Bainbridge, Stephen M(1999)。Insider Trading Regulation: The Path Devendent Choice Between Property Rights and Securities Fraud。SMU. L. Rev,52,1589-1652。  new window
7.Black, Nicole、United States v(2010)。Nacchio and the Implications of an Emerging Circuit Split: Practical and Policy Considerations of Amending Financial Gain as a Measure of Culpability。DENVER UNI. L. Rev,87,633-668。  new window
8.Chattin, Danielle DeMasi(2010)。the More You Lose: Sentencing Insider Trading Under the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines。FORDHAM L.REV,79,165-215。  new window
9.Connolly, Erica(2012)。Playing Hot Potato in the Market: The Ninth Circuit s Better Approach to Calculating Loss for Securities Fraud Sentencing。Hastings Law Journal,63(2),567-594。  new window
10.Debold, David、Benjamin, M.(2011)。"Losing Ground"-- In Search of a Remedy for the Overemphasis on Loss and Other Culpability Factors in the Sentencing Guideline for Fraud and Theft。University Pennsylvania Law Review PENNumbra,160(1),141-157。  new window
11.Freeman, Lana L.(2012)。Sentences Should Be Reasonable, Not Shocking: A De-Emphasis on Loss for Federal Securities Fraud Sentencing。U. III. L. Rev.,2012(3),969-1002。  new window
12.Jones, James A. II(2011)。United States v. Berger: The rejection of civil loss causation principles in connection with criminal securities fraud。Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts,6(4),273-284。  new window
13.Langevoort, Donald C.(2013)。‘Fine Distinctions' in the Contemporary Law of Insider Trading。COLUM. Bus. L. Rev,2013(2),429-462。  new window
14.Law, Andrew(2010)。Insider Trading and Soft Information: U.S. v. Nacchio。Brigham Young Univ. L. Rev,2010(1),149-166。  new window
15.Nevins, Stephanie(2010)。Nacchio Profits: The Tenth Circuit in United States v. Nacchio properly departs from the Eighth Circuit in United States v. Mooney and adopts the civil remedy of disgorgement to measure an inside trad。Creighton Law Review,43,1107-1155。  new window
16.Padgett, Amy Dominick(2011)。United States v. Nacchio: The Tenth Circuits Civil Approach to Sentencing for Insider Trading。Oklahoma Law Review,63(3),579-606。  new window
17.Pellicani, Nicholas P.(2010)。No Pain, No Gain: The Criminal Absence of the Efficient Capital Markets Theory from Insider Trading Sentencing。St. John's Law Review,84(3),1057-1098。  new window
18.Richman, Daniel C.(2013)。Federal White Collar Sentencing in the United States: A Work in Progress。Law and CONTEMPORARY PROBLEMS,76(1),53-73。  new window
19.薛智仁(20121000)。內線交易之犯罪所得概念。政大法學評論,129,245-299。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.林志潔(20110900)。美國聯邦最高法院判決與內線交易內部人定義之發展--以O'Hagan案為核心。歐美研究,41(3),849-883。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.陳彥良(20110100)。內線交易犯罪所得計算爭議研析--最高法院九十八年度臺上字第四八〇〇號判決。月旦法學,188,201-220。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.吳天雲(20090315)。追徵內線交易犯罪所得的計算時點與方法。臺灣法學雜誌,124,103-117。  延伸查詢new window
23.林孟皇(20080400)。內線交易實務問題之研究--以我國刑事責任規定的解釋適用取向為中心。法學叢刊,53(2)=210,31-72。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.柯耀程(20110800)。沒收、追徵、追繳與抵償法理詮釋系列(2)--剝奪犯罪工具與不法利益之思維。軍法專刊,57(4),94-115。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.柯耀程(20110600)。沒收、追徵、追繳與抵償法理詮釋系列(1)--沒收與追徵之法律效果定性。軍法專刊,57(3),143-163。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.柯耀程(20111000)。沒收、追徵、追繳與抵償法理詮釋系列(3)--不法所得與連帶追徵。軍法專刊,57(5),21-43。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.Splinder, James C.(2007)。Why Shareholders Want their CEOs to Lie More after Dura Pharmaceuticals。GEO. L. J.,95,653-691。  new window
28.涂春金(2010)。證券交易法第171條第2項有關「犯罪所得」之研究----以台開案判決為例。證交資料,576,56-67。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.趙松山(2012)。證券交易法第一百七十一條第二項「犯罪所得」認定之研究—以內線交易罪為探討中心(碩士論文)。東吳大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.謝伊婷(2012)。論內線交易之犯罪所得計算(碩士論文)。國立臺北大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.林芳瑜(2011)。內線交易罰則立法之妥適性暨其犯罪所得之認定:以台開案為例(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.李禮仲、李傑清、呂秋藤同(2010)。證卷交易法第171條第2項犯罪所得之研究。  延伸查詢new window
2.劉連恩(2012)。内線交易構成要件。元照出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.賴英照(2011)。最新證卷交易法解析。  延伸查詢new window
4.Bloomenthal, Harold S.、Wolff, Samuel(2002)。Securities and Federal Corporate Law。Eagan, Minn.:West Group。  new window
5.Bodenheimer, Edgar(1974)。Jurisprudence。Harv. U. Press。  new window
6.Breyer, Stephen(2010)。Making Our Democracy Work。  new window
7.Breyer, Stephen(2005)。Active Liberty。NY。  new window
8.Coffee, John C. Jr.、Seligman, Joel、Sale, Hillary A.(2007)。Securities Regulation, Cases and Materials。Foundation Press。  new window
9.Coffee, John C.。Loss Causation after Dura: Something for Everyone。New YORK L. J.。  new window
10.江朝聖(2012)。論内線交易之犯罪所得--美國法的觀察。甘添貴教授七秩華誕祝壽論文集(下)。承法出版文化有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
11.Cox, James D.、Hillman, Robert W.、Langevoort, Donald C.(2009)。Securities Regulation, Cases and Materials。New York:Aspen Publishers。  new window
12.Larenz, Karl、陳愛娥(2010)。法學方法論。五南出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
13.黃茂榮(2011)。法學方法與現代民法。台北:黃茂榮:國立臺灣大學法律系法學叢書編輯委員會。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.楊仁壽(2010)。法學方法論。臺北:楊仁壽。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.郭土木(2011)。證券交易法論著選輯。台北:郭土木。  延伸查詢new window
16.Loss, Louis、Seligman, Joel(2004)。Fundamentals of Securities Regulation。Aspen Publishers。  new window
17.甘添貴(2010)。刑法各論。三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
18.林孟皇(2010)。金融犯罪與刑事審判。台北:元照。  延伸查詢new window
19.Scalia, Antonin、Gutmann, Amy(1997)。A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and The Law。Princeton University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE