:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:登山團隊成員身分組構之探析
書刊名:屏東科大體育學刊
作者:歐宗明 引用關係
作者(外文):Ou, Tzong-ming
出版日期:2014
卷期:3
頁次:頁93-105
主題關鍵詞:登山身分地位登山領隊登山嚮導MountaineeringStatusPositionMountaineering leaderMountaineering guide
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:92
  • 點閱點閱:20
登山蘊涵許多不同於現代運動的獨特活動型式和身體經驗,就某種程度而言,已遠離社會,在這樣的環境中,對於原有的社會學問題可能須重新思考。故本文旨在從社會結構觀點出發,採理論分析法,透過理論的視角來解析登山團隊成員活動時身分的組構。經分析後發現,登山成員處在特殊的團隊體系結構中,此體系依其現存結構的運作方式,鋪陳著一條讓登山成員遵循的路,為了順利完成預定計畫及安全下山,促使成員們選擇較可行之路。登山成員在領隊依據團隊工作的分配,授予其特定職掌後,取得團隊中的特定身分,在山下原先外掛的各種先賦身分及成就身分,被隱匿了。在山上發言權力,通常是依據山上的生活實力重新進行排序,而非沿襲山下的身分,因而暫時切斷登山者原有的人際關係及社會脈絡所帶來的優越和困擾,讓登山者回到人的最原始-裸身的人。
Mountaineering was a unique style of physical activity. In some ways, the activity was far away from society, and was much different with modern sports in body experience. In this kind of special environment, the sociological questions and problems in mountaineering had to be rethought and discussed. The purpose of this study was to analyze, through the theory viewpoint of social structure, the constructing and deconstructing of member's status in mountaineering activity, and the method of theory analysis was used. After the analysis and examination, the findings were as follow. The members of mountaineering were in a special structure of team system. The system operated by the existing structure and set a road to be followed by mountaineering members. In order to accomplish the journey and return safely, the members picked a workable road to walk. The members in the mountaineering team were designated specific status and missions by the leader. And the ascribed and achieved status attached to a member would be removed. In the mountaineering journey, the speaking and allocating of right was re-arranged by the mountaineering capability, not by the status in the real society. The superiority and inferiority of social relationship also would be disconnected from the real society, and the member of mountaineering team would be the naked person.
期刊論文
1.歐宗明(20121200)。登山經驗的現象學探索--在身與心之間。運動文化研究,21,37-67。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Merton, R. K.(1957)。The role-set: Problem in sociological theory。British Journal of Sociology,8,106-120。  new window
學位論文
1.張蕙芳(2000)。逃離與追尋--登山的社會學研究(以兩個登山團體為例)(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.何英傑(1999)。丹大札記。臺北:玉山社。  延伸查詢new window
2.崔祖錫(2012)。登山,才看得見最美的臺灣:從郊山到高山66條經典路線和不可不知的登山常識。臺北市:高寶國際。  延伸查詢new window
3.高銘和(2009)。一座山的勇氣。臺北市:寶瓶文化。  延伸查詢new window
4.張致遠(2008)。臺灣屋脊行腳:中央山脈大縱走全紀錄。苗栗縣:苗栗縣文化觀光局。  延伸查詢new window
5.潘俊琳(2013)。戴勝益十座大山十大決策。新北市:經濟日報。  延伸查詢new window
6.Linton, R.(1964)。The study of man: An introduction。New York:D. Appleton-Century。  new window
7.Landis, J. R.(1995)。Sociology: Concepts and characteristics。Belmont, CA:Wadsworth。  new window
8.Schaefer, R. T.(2007)。Sociology。Boston:McGraw-Hill。  new window
9.黃漢青(2008)。臨界天堂。台北市:晴天。  延伸查詢new window
10.Jary, D.、Jary, J.(2005)。Collins dictionary of sociology。Glasgow:Collins。  new window
11.Johnson, Allan G.(1997)。The forest and the trees: Sociology as life, practice, and promise。Philadelphia, Pennsylvania:Temple University Press。  new window
12.Turner, J. H.(1994)。Sociology: Concepts and uses。New York:McGraw-Hill。  new window
13.Nixon, Howard L. II、Frey, James H.(1996)。A Sociology of Sport。Wadsworth Publishing Company。  new window
14.Elias, Norbert、Dunning, Eric(1986)。Quest for Excitement: Sport and Leisure in the Civilizing Process。Basil Blackwell。  new window
15.陳國強(2002)。文化人類學辭典。臺北:恩楷股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
16.蔡文輝(2002)。社會學。台北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
17.葉啟政(20040000)。進出「結構-行動」的困境--與當代西方社會學理論論述對話。臺北:三民。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.何文男、李天賞(1999)。社會學概要。臺北:三民。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Sarbin, T. R.、Allen, V. L.(1968)。Role theory。The handbook of social psychology。Reading, MA:Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.。  new window
2.王振寰(2003)。社會學是什麼?。社會學與臺灣社會。臺北市:巨流。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE