:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:公共行政領域碩士論文主題與方法的研究趨勢--多層次分析觀點
書刊名:公共行政學報
作者:莊文忠 引用關係張順全
作者(外文):Juang, Wen-jongChang, Shun-chuan
出版日期:2013
卷期:45
頁次:頁75-107
主題關鍵詞:多層次分析脈絡變數縱橫資料公共行政研究碩士論文Multilevel analysisContextual variablePanel dataPublic administration researchGraduate theses
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:56
  • 點閱點閱:58
從研究方法的觀點,欲探討某一學術領域之論文寫作的研究趨勢,倘若不考慮時間因素,祇是單純合併不同時間點之資料進行分析,會拘泥於橫斷面的觀察,僅能利用靜態比較方式反映出研究主題與方法選擇的差異,恐無法檢證時間遞移對論文研究趨勢變化的具體效應;另一方面,若祇單純考慮時間序列資料的分析方法,仍未將環境系絡的結構因素納入考量,則又無可避免地會喪失攸關縱橫時空之資料(panel data)的完整訊息。因之,本研究嘗試以台灣公共行政領域的碩士論文為分析標的,提出一個有待檢驗的基本命題:雖然影響各校相關公共行政系所碩士論文總產量,如招生人數或畢業生多,論文數量自然就會增加,但是,論文產量研究趨勢的歷年變化會依研究主題、研究方法、研究對象而有所不同;尚且,由於各校發展時空環境不同,如學校所在區域、公行系所歷史、指導教授背景等屬結構性總體脈絡變數仍存有交互影響的效果。 本研究利用多層次分析(multilevel analysis)的方法,檢證出各校公共行政碩士論文產量的增加,並不全然是隨著時間而等比例增加,而是依硏究主題、資料分析方法、硏究對象而有不同比例的增加趨勢,反映了議題與方法選擇的消長變化;且伴隨著結構性脈絡變數的變化也可能會影響論文產出,而非單純取決於研究生個人的興趣。經由此篇應用多層次分析方法的引介,不但可對台灣公共行政學領域相關校系的長期研究走向的變異來源和意涵提供更深刻的理解,也可確認總體層次與個體層次的變數對論文產量的影響大小及方向。
From a methodological point of view, when examining the overallresearch output and trends of a growing academic discipline, the effects of timeshould be taken into consideration, for otherwise analysis is reduced to crosssectional,comparative static analysis of differences in research topics andmethods. On the other hand, if time effects were the only variables taken intoaccount, analysis would also, inevitably, squander vast information that iscontained in various contextual variables affecting research production. Thefundamental proposition of this paper is that the choice of research topic andmethod is strongly influenced by contextual and other environmental factors.Using graduate theses in Taiwan public administration as data, this study seeksto investigate not only the dynamic interaction of time-environment effects, butalso those contextual factors that shape Taiwanese students’ selection ofresearch topics and methods. Our research includes both micro-level variables (i.e., research topic and method) and macro-level variables, such as background of students’ thesisadvisors, location and historical background of graduate programs andinstitutes. By taking a multilevel perspective, this study demonstrates that thenumber of graduate theses in public administration does not necessarilyincrease proportionally over time; rather it is subject to the growth and declineof research topics and methods. Moreover, thesis output is also influenced bystructural changes in the contextual variables, and does not entirely hinge onstudents’ personal research interests. We conclude that the introduction ofmulti-level analysis does not only provide a deeper understanding of thesources of variation in long-term research trends, but also can determine theimpact –both size and direction– of macro- and micro-level variables ongraduate thesis production in Taiwan’s public administration.
期刊論文
1.Streib, G.、Slotkin, B. J.、Rivera, M.(2001)。Public administration research from a practitioner perspective。Public Administration Review,61(5),515-525。  new window
2.White, Jay D.(1986)。Dissertations and publications in public administration。Public Administration Review,46(3),227-234。  new window
3.Wright, Bradley E.、Manigault, Lepora J.、Black, Tamika R.(2004)。Quantitative research measurement in public administration: An assessment of journal publications。Administration & Society,35(6),747-764。  new window
4.謝俊義、王俊元(20040400)。美國與臺灣公共行政博士教育研究品質的對照分析。中國行政,74,135-164。  延伸查詢new window
5.Bernick, E.、Krueger, S.(2010)。An assessment of journal quality in public administration。International Journal of Public Administration,33,98-106。  new window
6.Bingham, R. D.、Bowen, W. M.(1994)。Mainstream public administration over time: a topical content analysis of public administration review。Public Administration Review,54(2),204-208。  new window
7.Cleary, Robert E.(2000)。The public administration doctoral dissertation reexamined: An evaluation of the dissertations of 1998。Public Administration Review,60(5),446-455。  new window
8.Houston, D. J.、Delevan, S. M.(1990)。Public administration research: An assessment of journal publications。Public Administration Review,50(6),674-681。  new window
9.McCurdy, H. E.、Cleary, R. E.(198401)。Why can’t we resolve the research issue in public administration?。Public Administration Review,44(1),49-55。  new window
10.Morcöl, G.、Ivanova, N. P.(2010)。Methods taught in public policy programs: Are quantitative methods still prevalent?。Journal of Public Affairs Education,16(2),255-277。  new window
11.Stallings, R. A.、Ferris, J. M.(1988)。Public administration research: Work in PAR。Public Administration Review,48(1),580-587。  new window
12.Forrester, J. P.、Watson, S. S.(1994)。An assessment of public administration journals: The perspective of editors and editorial board members。Public Administration Review,54(5),474-482。  new window
13.Cleary, Robert E.(1992)。Revisiting the Doctoral Dissertation in Public Administration: An Examination of the Dissertations of 1990。Public Administration Review,52(1),55-61。  new window
14.莊文忠、吳穎年(20120300)。臺灣公共行政暨公共事務碩士生研究什麼及如何研究:以1997至2008年碩士論文分析。公共行政學報,42,33-71。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Denhardt, Robert B.(2001)。The big questions of public administration education。Public Administration Review,61(5),526-534。  new window
16.Flash, Jr. E. S.(1971)。Evolution in public administration。Public Administration Review,31(6),665-668。  new window
17.Forrester, J. P.(1997)。The rich diversity of the public administration journals: Departments and institutional settings。Public Administration Quarterly,21(1),3-26。  new window
18.Forrester, J. P.(1997)。The rich diversity of the public administration journals: Departments and institutional settings。Public Administration Quarterly,21(2),209-226。  new window
19.Jennings, E. T. Jr.(1989)。Accountability, program quality, outcome assessment, and graduate education of public affairs and administration。Public Administration Review,49(5),438-446。  new window
20.Perry, J. L.(2012)。How can we improve our science to generate more usable knowledge for public professionals?。Public Administration Review,72(4),479-482。  new window
21.Raadschelders, J. C.(2011)。The study of public administration in the United States。Public Administration,89(1),140-155。  new window
22.Stallings, R. A.(1986)。Doctoral programs in public administration: An outsider’s perspective。Public Administration Review,46(3),235-240。  new window
23.Wright, B. E.(2011)。Public administration as an interdisciplinary field: Assessing its relationship with the fields of Law, management, and political science。Public Administration Review,71(1),96-101。  new window
24.Wu, X.、He, J.(2009)。Paradigm shift in public administration: Implications for teaching in professional training programs。Public Administration Review,69(1),521-528。  new window
25.Adams, Guy B.、White, Jay D.(1994)。Dissertation research in public administration and cognate fields: an assessment of methods and quality。Public Administration Review,54(6),565-576。  new window
26.Raadschelders, J. C. N.、Lee, K.-H.(2011)。Trends in the Study of Public Administration: Empirical and Qualitative Observations from "Public Administration Review," 2000-2009。Public Administration Review,71(1),19-33。  new window
27.Perry, James L.、Kraemer, Kenneth L.(1986)。Research Methodology in the "Public Administration Review," 1975-1984。Public Administration Review,46(3),215-226。  new window
28.邱皓政、溫福星(20070300)。脈絡效果的階層線性模型分析:以學校組織創新氣氛與教師創意表現為例。教育與心理研究,30(1),1-35。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.詹中原(2005)。臺灣公共行政研究的回顧與展望。我國公共行政的傳承與展望研討論壇,(會議日期: 11月26日)。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.施能傑(2012)。公共行政學領域發展概況。政治學的回顧與前瞻學術研討會,(會議日期: 8月6-7日)。台北。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳敦源、張智凱(201208)。公共行政研究的方法定位與理論趨勢:以TASPAA 年會論文(2003-2012)為例。政治學的回顧與前瞻學術研討會。台北。  延伸查詢new window
4.詹中原(2012)。我國公共行政典範之遞移與建構。政治學的回顧與前瞻學術研討會,(會議日期: 8月6-7日)。台北。  延伸查詢new window
5.彭錦鵬(201208)。行政組織與文官制度研究之十年回顧。政治學的回顧與前瞻學術研討會。台北。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.吳穎年(2007)。台灣公共行政研究領域與研究方法之分析--以1997至2006年碩士論文為例(碩士論文)。世新大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Littell, C. R.、Milliken, G. A.、Stroup, W. W.、Wolfinger, R. D.(1996)。SAS system for mixed models。Cary, NC:SAS Institute Inc.。  new window
2.Luke, Douglas A.(2004)。Multilevel Modeling。CA:Sage。  new window
3.Kreft, Ita G. G.、De Leeuw, Jan(1998)。Introducing Multilevel Modeling。Sage。  new window
4.Raudenbush, Stephen W.、Bryk, Anthony S.(2002)。Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods。Sage。  new window
圖書論文
1.謝雨生(2012)。研究設計。社會及行為科學研究法:總論與量化研究法。台北:東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.謝雨生(2012)。多層次分析。社會及行為科學研究法:資料分析。台北:東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
1. 不同效能非結構諮商團體歷程自我揭露類型探究與行為互動之社會網絡分析
2. 國小組長知覺校長正向領導、學校組織健康、人境適配與工作幸福感之關係:階層線性模式的驗證
3. 影響中學生學業成就成長曲線之因素探討-以TEPS為例
4. 我國高級中等學校教師與直屬處室主任關係品質、職場自尊、團體凝聚力與教學效能關聯性之研究
5. 我國技術型高中機械科學生創造性人格特質及教師創造力教學對學生技術創造力影響之研究—以學校組織創新氣氛為調節變項
6. 臺灣高等教育機構國際品質保證之研究
7. 網路霸凌受害經驗、社會支持對網路霸凌受害反應 影響之研究
8. 組織人才管理措施與組織及員工績效關連性之研究
9. 我國高級中等學校校長賦權領導、學校組織創新氛圍、教師心理賦權、教師創造性人格特質與教師創造力教學行為關聯性之探討
10. 顧客參與產品創新模糊前端之研究:對偶階層線性模式之觀點
11. 影響成人學習者求助行為因素之跨層次研究
12. 影響幼兒語言能力發展因素之研究—多層次分析取向
13. 護理之家照顧服務品質之多層級分析_以中部地區四縣市為例
14. 組織動態能力、組織創新氣候、預應人格特質與知識分享對創新行為影響之跨層次分析
15. 憂鬱反芻反應之促發與維持因素:探討憂鬱疾病狀態對個體憂鬱反芻調控歷程之影響
 
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE