:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣公共行政領域智識流動的研究:治理概念擴散與連接之初探
書刊名:行政暨政策學報
作者:謝儲鍵 引用關係張鐙文陳敦源
作者(外文):Hsieh, Chu-chienChang, Teng-wenChen, Don-yun
出版日期:2018
卷期:66
頁次:頁39-83
主題關鍵詞:公共行政知識轉移與分享後設分析社會網絡分析治理Public administrationKnowledge transfer and sharingMeta analysisSocial network analysisGovernance
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:548
  • 點閱點閱:19
自1930年代,「公共行政」從「政治科學」的領域分離之後,「認同危機」(identity crisis)持續地備受關注而成為研究主題,對此,Dwight Waldo便大聲疾呼樹立公共行政之獨特核心價值的必要性,以舒緩自我認同的問題。然而,在二十一世紀初,隨著「治理」時代的來臨,這兩門共生的學科的相互影響,自然就更值得加以關注。爰此,本研究以當代公共行政炙手可熱的概念-治理,作為觀察公共行政與政治科學之間智識連結的基礎,並聚焦於「誰影響誰」(who influence whom)的課題。藉由回顧臺灣2001年到2017年政治學門TSSCI收錄期刊與治理議題相關之論文,透過後設分析、書目計量學與社會網絡分析等方法,試圖回答:1.治理研究在政治學門的發展趨勢為何?2.相關作者的屬性為何?3.從知識轉移的觀點觀察,存在何種智識網絡的結構?以及4.公共行政在該智識網絡中的角色與功能?根據本研究的實證結果,第一,治理概念在2001-2005年出現,超過十篇文章發表於七個主要的TSSCI期刊中。第二,治理概念初期(2001-2005年)由政治科學領域的學者引入,並應用於國際關係與地方政府的研究。然而,在2011-2017年,大量的公共行政領域學者投入治理研究,並將其應用於各式各樣的學術議題。第三,透過網絡結構的分析,說明公共行政學者不僅扮演關鍵角色,同時也發揮知識掮客的功能,尤其鑽研於公私合夥與社區治理等議題的公共行政學者,更是舉足輕重。整體而言,本研究發現臺灣公共行政領域在引介治理概念到學術界的過程中,具備十分重要的角色與功能。其藉由知識形塑與轉化的歷程,促成治理概念跨領域的流動,也就是,先將治理概念「內向引進」(inbound)於公共行政領域,接著經歷理論的磨合及融合,再將治理概念「向外輸出」(outbound)至其他相關領域。此一結果,說明公共行政在政治科學的領域中,扮演智識掮客之特殊角色。
As the public administration (PA) separated from the field of political science (PS) in 1930s, the problem of identity crisis is an ongoing subject of research that leads to Dwight Waldo's call for efforts to build distinct core values for PA to ease the crisis. However, as both fields moving into the "governance" era in the beginning of the twenty-first century, the interplay between the sibling disciplines is worthy of scholarly attention. In this research, the key question is to unveil "who influence whom" issue in the moving of concept "governance" between the two disciplines by tracking the publications from 2001 through 2017 of Taiwan Social Science Index (TSSCI) journals in the category of PS. The idea of meta-analysis and social network analysis technique will be utilized to discuss 1) the developing trend, the percentage of publication related to the concept of governance; 2) the dynamic process of knowledge transfer between the two disciplines concerning the governance concept. Based on the empirical evidence collected in this research, first, the concept of governance appeared in 2001-2005 through more than ten papers published in seven TSSCI journals in the beginning from 2001 through 2005, PS scholars bring the concept to the filed such as international relation and local government. However, in the later stage of the development in 2011-2017, PA scholars flood in and help to popularize the concept in the academia. Third, through the network analysis of structural hole, the PA scholars not only play the critical role, but perform the function of knowledge broker as well. Especially for those PA scholars who are specialized in researching PPPs and community governance contributed the most. Through the empirical investigation of this research, we found that the field of PA has play an critical role to introduce the governance concept to Taiwanese academia by shaping the knowledge flow and transforming from "inbound" of receiving governance perspectives into PA field to "outbound" of affecting scholars in adjusting fields. The unique role of PA as knowledge broker in the field of PS is realized.
期刊論文
1.Bathelt, Harald、Malmberg, Anders、Maskell, Peter(2004)。Clusters and Knowledge: Local Buzz, Global Pipelines and the Process of Knowledge Creation。Progress in Human Geography,28(1),31-56。  new window
2.袁大鈺、唐牧群(20101200)。跨領域學術社群之智識網絡結構初探:以臺灣科技與社會研究為例。圖書資訊學刊,8(2),125-163。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Morgan, K.(2004)。The exaggerated death of geography: learning, proximity and territorial innovation systems。Journal of Economic Geography,4(1),3-21。  new window
4.Ferrel, Heady(1975)。Paradigms of public administration。Public administration Review,,35,378-386。  new window
5.孫同文(19980300)。臺灣公共行政研究成果的回顧與評估。暨大學報,2(1),133-159+328-329。  延伸查詢new window
6.Raadschelders, Jos C. N.(1999)。A coherent framework for the study of public administration。Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,9(2),281-303。  new window
7.陳世榮(20071200)。探究環境治理中的知識溝通:臺灣氣候變遷研究的網絡分析。公共行政學報,25,1-30。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Verkasalo, M.、Lappalainen, P. A.(1998)。A Method of Measuring the Efficiency of the Knowledge Utilization Process。IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management,45(4),414-423。  new window
9.Zack, Michael H.(1999)。Developing a knowledge strategy。California Management Review,41(3),125-145。  new window
10.Waldo, Dwight(1968)。Public Administration。The Journal of Politics,30(2),443-479。  new window
11.謝儲鍵、陳敦源(2016)。虛擬網絡行動者角色與政策審議品質關係之研究:一個應用社會網絡分析法的探索。民主與治理,3(1),63-109。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Frederickson, H. G.(1976)。The Lineage of New Public Administration。Administration and Society,8(2),149-174。  new window
13.White, Harrison C.、Boorman, Scott A.、Breiger, Ronald L.(1976)。Social structure from multiple networks: I Blockmodels of roles and positions。American Journal of Sociology,81(4),730-780。  new window
14.Fukuyama, Francis(2013)。What is Governance?。Governance,26(3),347-368。  new window
15.Storper, M.、Venables, A. J.(2004)。Buzz: face-to-face contact and the urban economy。Journal of Economic Geography,4,351-370。  new window
16.Inkpen, A. C.、Dinur, A.(1998)。Knowledge Management Processes and International Joint Ventures。Organization Science,9(4),454-468。  new window
17.柯佩均、熊瑞梅、盧科位(20120600)。臺灣社會學門專業期刊間引用網絡之結構分析。教育資料與圖書館學,49(4),533-561。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.莊文忠、張順全(20130900)。公共行政領域碩士論文主題與方法的研究趨勢--多層次分析觀點。公共行政學報,45,75-107。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.Mitton, C.、Adair, C. E.、McKenzie, E.、Patten, S. B.、Perry, B. W.(2007)。Knowledge transfer and exchange: Review and synthesis of the literature。The Milbank Quarterly,85(4),729-768。  new window
20.蔡敦浩、李慶芳、藍紫堂(20041200)。知識管理路徑圖:一個整合性的新模式。產業論壇,6(4),47-74。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.Georgiou, Ion(2014)。Seeing the Forest for the Trees: An Atlas of the Politics-Administration Dichotomy。Public Administration Review,74(2),156-175。  new window
22.何中馨(20070300)。跨界的知識傳遞--臺灣奧美廣告學習經驗之個案研究。地理學報,47,59-83。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.陳重安、許成委(20160900)。公共服務動機:回顧、反思與未來方向。公共行政學報,51,69-96。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.謝儲鍵、林煥笙、陳敦源(20160600)。緊急災害管理中之協力網絡分析:以莫拉克風災災後的教育重建為例。行政暨政策學報,62,59-125。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.Andrews, R.、Esteve, M.(2014)。Still Like Ships that Pass in the Night? The Relationship between Public Administration and Management Studies。International Public Management Journal,18,31-60。  new window
26.Bushouse, B. K.、Jacobson, W. S.、Lambright, K. T.、Llorens, J. J.、Morse, R. S.、Poocharoen, O. O.(2011)。Crossing the Divide: Building Bridges between Public Administration Practitioners and Scholars。Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,21(1),99-112。  new window
27.Findlay, R.(1978)。Relative backwardness, direct foreign investment and transfer of technology: A simple dynamic model。Quarterly Journal of Economics,92(1),1-16。  new window
28.Nesbit, R.、Moulton, S.、Robinson, S.、Smith, C.、DeHart-Davis, L.、Feeney, M. K.、Gazley, B.、Hou, Y.(2011)。Wrestling with intellectual diversity in public administration: Avoiding Disconnectedness and Fragmentation While Seeking Rigor, Depth, and Relevance。Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,21(S1),13-28。  new window
29.Pollitt, C.、Hupe, P.(2011)。Talking About Government: The Role of Magic Concepts。Public Management Review,13(5),641-658。  new window
30.Szulanski, G.(1996)。Exploring Onternal Stickness: Impediments to the Transfer of Best Practice within the Firm。Strategic Management Journal,17,27-43。  new window
31.Peters, B. Guy、Pierre, John(1998)。Governance Without Government? Rethinking Public Administration。Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,8(2),223-243。  new window
32.Wilson, Woodrow(1887)。The Study of Administration。Political Science Quarterly,2(2),197-222。  new window
33.Frederickson, H. George(1999)。The Repositioning of American Public Administration。PS: Political Science & Politics,32(4),701-712。  new window
34.Rhodes, Robert A. W.(1996)。The New Governance: Governing without Government。Political Studies,44(4),652-667。  new window
35.王光旭(20151000)。社會網絡分析在公共行政領域研究的應用。調查研究:方法與應用,34,67-134。new window  延伸查詢new window
36.Gilbert, Myrna、Cordey-Hayes, Martyn(1996)。Understanding the process of knowledge transfer to achieve successful technological innovation。Technovation,16(6),301-312。  new window
37.Argote, L.、Ingram, P.(2000)。Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage for firms。Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes,82(1),150-169。  new window
38.Grant, Robert M.(1996)。Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm。Strategic Management Journal,17(Suppl 2),109-122。  new window
39.Freeman, Linton C.(1978)。Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification。Social Networks,1(3),215-239。  new window
40.Coleman, James S.(1988)。Social capital in the creation of human capital。American Journal of Sociology,94(suppl.),S95-S120。  new window
41.Lynch, Thomas D.、Omdal, Richard、Cruise, Prter L.(1997)。Secularization of Public Administration。Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,7(3),473-487。  new window
42.Doreian, P.、Fararo, T. J.(1985)。Structural Equivalence in a Journal Network。Journal of the American Society for Information Science,36(1),28-37。  new window
會議論文
1.Morgan, K.(2001)。The Exaggerated Death of Geography: Localised Learning, Innovation and Uneven Development。The Future of Innovation Studies Conference,(會議日期: September 20-23)。Eindhoven。  new window
圖書
1.Moreno, J. L.(1934)。Who Shall Survive?。Washington, D. C.:Nervous and Mental Disease Publishing Company。  new window
2.Golembiewski, Robert T.(1977)。Public Administration as a Developing Discipline。New York:Marcel Dekker, Inc.。  new window
3.Goodnow, Frank J.(1990)。Politics and Administration: A Study in Government。New York:The Macmillan Company。  new window
4.Ostrom, Vincent(2008)。The Intellectual Crisis in American Public Administration。University of Alabama Press。  new window
5.Wasserman, Stanley、Faust, Katherine(1994)。Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications。Cambridge University Press。  new window
6.Allen, T. J.(1977)。Managing the Flow of Technology。MIT Press。  new window
7.孫本初(2013)。新公共管理。一品文化出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Riccucci, N. M.(2010)。Public administration: Traditions of inquiry and philosophies of knowledge。Washington, DC:Georgetown University Press。  new window
9.Granovetter, M. S.(1974)。Getting a job: A study of contacts and careers。Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press。  new window
10.陳敦源(2005)。民主與官僚:新制度論的觀點。韋伯文化國際出版有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Bevir, M.(2011)。The SAGE Handbook of Governance。London:Sage。  new window
12.Burt, R. S.(1992)。Structure Hole: The Social Structure of Competition。Cambridge:The Harvard University Press。  new window
13.Henry, N.(2010)。Public Administration and Public Affairs。New York:Longman。  new window
14.Lasswell, H. D.(1985)。Politics--Who Gets What, When, How。New York:Meridian Press。  new window
15.Levi-Faur, D.(2012)。Oxford Handbook of Governance。Oxford:Oxford University Press。  new window
16.Shafritz, J. M.、Hyde, A. C.、Parkes, S. J.(2004)。Classics of Public Administration。Belmont, CA:Wadsworth。  new window
17.Easton, David(1965)。A Framework for Political Analysis。Prentice-Hall。  new window
18.江明修(1997)。公共行政學:理論與社會實踐。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
19.陳敦源(2012)。民主治理:公共行政與民主政治的制度性調和。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Bevir, Mark(2011)。Governance as theory, practice, and dilemma。The Sage Handbook of Governance。Sage。  new window
2.施能傑(2013)。公共行政學領域發展概況。政治學的回顧與前瞻。臺北:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.詹中原(2013)。我國公共行政典範之遞移與建構(2000~)。政治學的回顧與前瞻。臺北:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Holzer, M.、Gabrielyan, V.、Yang, K.(2007)。Five Great Ideas in American Public Administration。Handbook of Public Administration。Florida:CRC Press。  new window
5.Waldo, Dwight(1975)。Political Science: Tradition, Discipline, Profession, Science, Enterprise。Handbook of Political Science, Political Science: Scope and Theory。Reading, MA:Addison-Wesley。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE