:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:顧客參與產品創新模糊前端之研究:對偶階層線性模式之觀點
作者:蔡青姿
作者(外文):Ching-Tzu Tsai
校院名稱:國立中正大學
系所名稱:企業管理研究所
指導教授:何雍慶
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2013
主題關鍵詞:模糊前端產品鑲嵌顧客參與對偶層階線性模式多層次調節式中介效果調節複迴歸分析Fuzzy Front EndProduct EmbeddednessCustomer ParticipationDyads Hierarchical Linear ModelingMultilevel Moderated MediationModerated Multiple Regression (MMR)
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:27
隨著全球化高度競爭的環境下,新產品開發(New Product Development, NPD)被視為公司存續與競爭優勢的根本,但至今NPD失敗率仍居高不下,其多數開發失敗源於新產品開發的模糊前端。企業與顧客在互動點上,以獲得顧客知識能力,也是NPD獲利關鍵成功因素。但由於模糊前端之模糊性及顧客參與,在以往相關文獻僅少數個案研究,缺乏結合顧客互動與模糊前端兩個重要領域的實證,故本研究以模糊前端、資訊處理、顧客導向及環境不確定性理論,運用對偶的行動者-同伴者互依模型(Actor-Partner Interdependence Model, APIM),驗證高科技產業顧客參與模糊前端階段,參與互動與資訊品質之間的關係,進而對模糊前端之模糊性與績效之影響。
透過PLS(Partial Least Squares)分析與階層線性模式(基本模型及多層次調節中介效果模型)處理對偶APIM模型,進行117對偶廠商資料分析。結果顯示顧客參與模糊前端階段,整體的互動性越高,資訊品質越高,但顧客參與互動是有行動者效應而無同伴者效應;雖然無同伴者效應,但卻有多層次調節式中介效果,不確定的互動氛圍對互動性有直接正面的影響,也干擾了互動性對資訊品質的影響;資訊品質越高,進而降低模糊前端之模糊性及提高模糊前端之績效;顧客參與角色是高度資訊提供者時,是否兼具有高低度的共同製造者都無所謂,與研發人員互動都能提升「資訊品質」。特別的是在「高度資訊提供者且低度共同製造者」的角色之下,互動性對資訊品質的正向影響最強;在低度互動時,「高度新產品對廠商是新穎的」不如「低度新產品對廠商是新穎的」,反而在高度互動之下,「高度新產品對廠商是新穎的」卻比「低度新產品對廠商是新穎的」資訊品質更佳;開發的產品對巿場是新穎的程度不會干擾互動性對資訊品質的影響,特別在模糊前端階段,無論是顧客或研發人員皆不會受到產品是否對巿場是新穎的影響,而特別進行互動以獲得資訊品質的提升。從本研究樣本剖析結果發現,大部份的公司都進行改良式新產品開發。此結果可能是公司只對自己公司的產品線進行產品的改良,較不會考慮巿場新穎產品的改變;經銷商為了銷售產品,並與消費者直接接觸,所獲得資訊會回饋給研發團隊。經銷商是不費吹灰之力即可蒐集到顧客的需求資料,企業可加強經銷商蒐集顧客資訊的能力,以利回饋給研發團隊,在FFE階段特別顯得重要。
最後,本研究是以資料導向的探索性研究與理論導向的驗證性研究,顛覆過去一般論文的研究方法論,更深入瞭解顧客參與FFE階段互動的全貌,對未來的研究有更進一步的啟發。另外,本研究結果深入瞭解NPD團隊及顧客參與模糊前端互動之內涵,期盼對NPD管理提供實務的參考價值。
The new product development (NPD) is considered fundamental the surviving company and competitive advantage under the highly competitive environment of globalization. The failure rate of NPD is still high but so far, most of its development failure stems from the fuzzy front end (FFE) of new product development. In order to obtain customer knowledge and ability, the points of enterprise and customer interaction is the key success factors of NPD profitability. However, due to the literature in the past only a few case studies on the fuzziness of FFE and participation of customer, combined with the lack of evidence of these two important areas. Therefore, this study building upon front-end fuzziness, information processing, customer orientation and uncertainty theory, the use of dual Actor-Partner Interdependence Model (APIM), to verification the interaction with the relationship between customer participation and information quality on FFE of tech industry, and than affecting the FFE of fuzziness and performance.
Through Partial Least Squares (PLS) analysis and Hierarchical Linear Modeling (full model and Multilevel Moderated Mediation) deal with duality APIM model for analyzing 117 pairs of dual data of firm.
The results showed that the higher the overall interaction, the higher the information quality under customer participation in the FFE, but there are actors effect without partners effect in APIM. Although there is no partners effect, but has the multilevel moderated mediation. Interactive atmosphere of uncertainty has direct positive impact on interactive, but also interferes effects with the interaction on the quality of information; the higher the quality of information, thus reducing the fuzziness of FFE and to improve the performance of FFE; Customer participation is the role of high degree of an information resource (CPI), whether and codeveloper (CPC) with low degree or high degree does not matter, the interaction with R&D personnel can improve the quality of information. Particularly, it is the strongest that interactive positive effect on the quality of information under the roles of the high degree of CPI and low degree of CPC; the high degree of new products of new-to-firm not as the low degree of new products of new-to-firm under the low degree of interaction, instead, it is better information quality that the low degree of new products of new-to-firm than the high degree of new products of new-to-firm under the high degree of interactive. Whether customers or R&D personnel are not affected by new products of new-to-market in the FFE phase, in particular, interact to achieve information quality improvement. From this study sample analysis found that the majority of companies have develop improved new product, the company is probably only of their company's product lines improved products, are less likely to consider changing market innovative products, may be only on their own company's product lines improved products, are less likely to consider changing new-to-market of products.
Dealers and consumers direct contact in order to sell their products and the obtained information is feedback to the R&D team. It is particularly important that dealers are effortless to gather information on the needs of customers. Companies can enhance the ability of dealers to collect customer information to facilitate feedback to the R&D team in the FFE phase.
Finally, this study is based on data-oriented exploratory research and theory-oriented confirmatory research, subversion in the past general thesis research methodology, it is better picture that understanding interaction of customer participation in the FFE phase, with further inspiration for future research. In addition, the results of this study that understanding the interactive content of NPD team and customers participate in the FFE, and provide value of referral for the NPD management practices.
一、中文部份
李曄淳(2007),服務互動階層模式之實證研究,國立中正大學企業管理研究所博士論文。new window
林鉦棽與彭台光(2006),多層次管理研究:分析層次的概念、理論和方法,管理學報,第23卷6期,頁649-675。
邱志聖(2008),行銷研究—實務與理論應用。台北:智勝文化出版。
邱皓政與溫福星(2007),脈絡效果的階層線性模型分析:以學校組織創新氣氛與教師創意表現為例,教育與心理研究,第30卷1期,頁1-35。
黃淑琴(2004),新產品發展創意產生之研究:顧客價值知識途徑,國立中正大學企業管理研究所博士論文。new window
溫福星(2006),階層線性模式:原理、方法與應用。台北:雙葉書廊。
溫福星與邱皓政(2009),組織研究中的多層次調節式中介效果:以組織創新氣氛、組織承諾與工作滿意的實證研究為例,管理學報,26卷2 期,頁189-211。
溫福星與邱皓政(2012),多層次模式方法論。台北:前程文化出版。
經濟部(2000),世界高科技產業發展趨勢對我國經貿之影響,經濟部八十八年度下半年及八十九年度委况研究報告,經濟部研發會及中華經濟研究院。

二、英文部份
Achrol, R. S. (1997), Changes in the theory of interorganizational relations in marketing: Toward a network paradigm, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25, 56-71.
Aiken, L. S., West, S. G., and Reno, R. R. (1991), Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Akgün, A. E., Byrneb, J. C., Lynnc, G. S., amd Keskina, H.(2007), Team stressors, management support, and project and process outcomes in new product development projects, Technovation, 27, 628-639.
Alam, I. (2002), An exploratory investigation of user involvement in new service development, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30(3), 250-261.
Alam, I. (2006), Removing the fuzziness from the fuzzy front-end of service innovations through customer interactions, Industrial Marketing Management, 35, 468-480.
Alferes, V. R. and Kenny, D. A. (2009), SPSS programs for the measurement of nonindependence in standard dyadic designs, Behavior Research Methods, 41(1), 47-54.
Artto, K., Kulvik, I., Poskela, J., and Turkulainen, V. (2011), The integrative role of the project management office in the front end of innovation, International Journal of Project Management, 29, 408-421.
Atuahene-Gima, K. (1996), An exploratory analysis of the impact of market orientation on new product performance: A contingency approach, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 12(4), 275-303.
Atuahene-Gima, K., Slater, S. F., and Olson, E. M. (2005), The contingent value of responsive and proactive market orientations for new product program performance, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22(6), 464-482.
Avolio, B., Yammarino, F. J., and Bass, B. M. (1991), Identifying common methods variance with data collected from a single source: An unresolved sticky issue, Journal of Management, 17, 571-587.
Balbontin, A., Yazdani, B., Cooper, R., and Souder, W. E. (1999), New product development success factors in American and British firms, International Journal of Technology Management, 17(3), 259-280.
Bendapudi, N. and Leone, R. P. (2002), Managing business-to-business customer relationships following key contact employee turnover in a vendor firm, Journal of Marketing, 66, 83-101.
Bendapudi, N. and Leone, R. P. (2003), Psychological implications of customer participation in co-production, Journal of Marketing, 67(1), 14-28.
Berthon, P., Hulbert, J., and Pitt, L. (1999), To serve or to create? Strategic orientations towards customers and innovation, California Management Review, 42(1), 37-58.
Biemans, W. G. (1991), User and third party involvement in developing medical equipment innovations, Technovation, 11(3), 163-182.
Bonner, J. M. (2009), Customer interactivity and new product performance: Moderating effects of product newness and product embeddedness, Industrial Marketing Management, 39(3), 485-492.
Booz, Allen, and Hamilton. (1982), New product management for the 1980’s. New York: Booz, Allen & Hamilton, Inc.
Bowen, H. K., Clark, B., Holloway, C. A., and Wheelwright, S. C. (1994), Development projects: the engine of renewal, Harvard Business Review, September/October, 110-120.
Brockhoff, K. (2003), Customers' perspectives of involvement in new product development, International Journal of Technology Management, 26, 464-481.
Calantone, R. J., Schmidt, J. B., and Song, X. M. (1996), Controllable factors of new product success: A cross-national comparison, Marketing Science, 15(4), 341-358.
Chandy, R. K. and Tellis, G. J. (1998), Organizing for radical product innovation: The overlooked role of willingness to cannibalize, Journal of Marketing Research, 35(4), 474-487.
Chase, R. B. and Tansik, D. A. (1983), The customer contact model for organizational design, Management Science, 29(9), 1037-1050.
Chen, C. -H., Chang, Y. -Y., and Lin, M. J. (2010), The performance impact of post-M&A interdepartmental integration: An empirical analysis, Industrial Marketing Management, 39(7), 1150-1161.
Christensen, C. M. and Bower, J. L. (1996), Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms, Strategic Management Journal, 17, 197-218.
Churchill, G. A. (1979), A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs, Journal of Marketing Research, 16, 64-73.
Clark, K. B. and Fujimoto, T. (1991), Product development performance: Strategy, organization and management in the world auto industry. Boston’ Harvard Business School Press.
Clark, K. B. and Wheelwright, S. C. (1994), Accelerating the design-build-test cycle for effective product, International Marketing Review, 11(1), 32-46.
Comer, J. M. and Zirger, B. J. (1997), Building a supplier–customer relationship using joint new product development, Industrial Marketing Management, 26(2), 203-211.
Cooper, R. G. (1988), Predevelopment activities determine new product success, Industrial Marketing Management, 17, 237-247.
Cooper, R. G. (2001), Winning at new products: Accelerating the process from idea to launch (3rd ed.). Perseus Books, Reading, MA.
Cooper, R. G. and Edgett, S. J. (2008), Maximizing Productivity in Product Innovation, Research Technology Management, 52(2), 47-58.
Cooper, R. G. and Kleinschmidt E. J. (1990), New product: The key factors in success, American Marketing Association, Chicago, IL.
Cooper, R. G. and Kleinschmidt, E. J. (1987), New product: What separates winners from losers? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 4, 169-184.
Cooper, R. G. and Kleinschmidt, E.J. (1995), Benchmarking the firm's critical success factors in new product development, The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 12(5), 374-391.
Crawford M. and Benedetto, A. D. (2011), New Products Management (10th ed), Boston: McGraw-Hill Irwin.
Crawford, C. M. (1996), New product management. New York: McGraw Hill.
Daft, R. L. and Lengel, R. H. (1986), Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design, Management Science, 32(5), 554-571.
Dahan, E. and Hauser, J. R. (2002), The virtual customer, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19(5), 332-353.
Dahl, D. W. and Moreau, P. (2002), The influence and value of analogical thinking during new product ideation, Journal of Marketing Research, 39(1), 47-60.
Dawson, J.F. and Richter, A.W. (2006), Probing three-way interactions in moderated multiple regression analysis: development and application of a slope difference test, Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 917-926.
Deppe, L., Kohn, S., and Paoletti, F. (2002), The holistic view of the front end of innovation, paper presented at The Conference on IMTs and New Product Development. Mantova, Italy, 17-18 October 2002.
Deshpande, R. and Zaltman, G. (1982), Factors affecting the use of market research information: A path analysis, Journal of Marketing Research, 14(1), 4-31.
Dodge, K.A. (1986), A social information processing model of social competence in children, In M.Perlmutter (Eds.), The Minnesota symposium on child psychology (Vol.18, pp.77-125).
Elmquist, M. and Segrestin, B. (2007), Towards a new logic for front end management: From drug discovery to drug design in pharmaceutical R&D, Journal of Creativity and Innovation Management, 16(2), 106-120.
Fang, E. (2008), Customer participation and the trade-off between new product innovativeness and speed to market, Journal of Marketing, 72(4), 90-104.
Fornell, C. and Larcker, D. F. (1981), Evaluating structural equations models with unobservable variables and measurement error, Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
Füller, J., Bartl, M., Ernst, H., and Muhlbacher, H. (2006), Community based innovation: How to integrate members of virtual communities into new product development, Electron Commerce Research, 6, 57-73.
Galbraith, J.R. (1977), Organization Design. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
Gales, L. and Mansour-Cole, D. (1995), User involvement in innovation projects: Toward an information processing model, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 12, 77-109.
George, J. (1990), Personality, affect, and behavior in groups, Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(2), 107-116.
Gerwin, D. and Tarondeau, J. C. (1982), Case studies of computer integrated manufacturing systems: a view of uncertainty and innovation processes, Journal of Operations Management, 2(2), 87-99.
Gifford, W. E., Bobbit, H. R., and Slocum, J. W. (1979), Message characteristics and perceptions of uncertainty by organizational decision makers, Academy of Management Journal, 22(3), 458-481.
Gordon, S., Tarafdar, M., Cook, R., Maksimoski, R., and Rogowitz, B. (2008), Improving the front end of innovation with information technology, Research Technology Management, 51(3), 50-58.
Griffin, A. and Hauser, J. (1993), The voice of the customer, Marketing Science, 12(1), 1- 27.
Gruner, K. E. and Homburg, C. (2000), Does customer interaction enhance new product success? Journal of Business Research, 49(1), 1-14.
Gupta, A. K. and Wilemon, D. L. (1990), Accelerating the development of technology-based new products, California Management Review, 32(2), 24-44.
Guthrie, D. E. (1997), Human resource management and performance: A review and research agenda, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 8(3), 263-276.
Hair, J. E., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., and Black, W. C. (1998), Multivariate Data Analysis (5th ed.). New York: Prentice-Hall.
Hauser, J. R. and Clausing, D. P. (1988), The house of quality, Harvard Business Review, 66, 3-13.
Heising, W. (2012), The integration of ideation and project portfolio management—A key factorfor sustainable success, International Journal of Project Management, 30, 582-595.
Ho, Y.-C. and Tsai, C.-T. (2011), Front end of innovation of high technology industries: The moderating effect of front-end fuzziness, Journal of High Technology Management Research, 22(1), 47-58.
Hofmann, D. A. (1997), An overview of the logic and rationale of hierarchical linear models, Journal of Management, 23, 723-744.
Hunt, S. D. (1991), Modern marketing theory: Critical issues in the philosophy of marketing science. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western Publishing Co.
Hurly, R. F. and Hult, T. G. (1998), Innovation, market orientation and organizational learning: An integration and empirical examination, Journal of Marketing, 62(3), 42-55.
James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., and Wolf, G. (1984), Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias, Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(1), 85-98.
Jaworski, B. J. and Kohli, A. K. (1993), Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences, Journal of Marketing, 57, 53-70.
Jeppesen, L. and Molin, M. (2003), Consumers as co-developers: Learning and innovation outside the firm, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 15(3), 363-383.
John, G. and Martin, J. (1984), Effects of organizational structure of marketing planning on credibility and utilization of plan output, Journal of Marketing Research, 21(2), 170-183.
Jöreskog, K. G. and Sörbom, D. (1979), Advances in factor analysis and structural equation models. New York: University Press of America.
Joshi, A. W. and Sharma, S. (2004), Customer knowledge development: Antecedents and impact on new product performance, Journal of Marketing, 68(4), 47-59.
Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., and Cook, W. (2006), Dyadic Data Analysis. New York: The Guilford Press.
Kenny, D. A., Mannetti, L., Pierro, A., Livi, S., and Kashy, D. A. (2002), The statistical analysis of data from small groups, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(1), 126-137.
Khurana, A. and Rosenthal, S. R. (1997), Integrating the fuzzy front end of new product development, Sloan Management Review, 38(2), 103-120.
Khurana, A. and Rosenthal, S. R. (1998), Towards holistic “front ends” in new product development, The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15(1), 57-74.
Kim, J. and Wilemon, D. (2002), Strategic issues in managing innovation's fuzzy front-end, European Journal of Innovation Management, 5(1), 27-40.
Kim, W. C. and Mauborgne, R. A. (2005), Value innovation: A leap into the blue ocean, The Journal of Business Strategy, 26(4), 22-29.
Koen, P.A., Ajamian, G. M., Boyce, S., Clamen, A., Fisher, E., Fountoulakis, S., Johnson A., Puri. P., and Seibert, R. (2002), Fuzzy-front end: Effective methods, tools and techniques. In P. Belliveau, A Griffin and S. Sorermeyer, eds. PDMA Toolbook for New Product Development. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 2-35.
Kosonen, M. and Ellonen, H. -K. (2007), In IFIP International federation for information processing, volume 243, Establishing the foundation of collaborative networks; eds. Camarinha-Matos, L., Afsarmanesh, H., Novais, P., Analide, C.; (Boston: Springer), 391-398.
Kotler, P. and Armstrong, G. (2008), Principles of marketing (12th ed.). NG: Prentice Hall.
Kozlowski, S. W. J. and Klein, K. J. (2000), A multi-level approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In K. J. Klein, and S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 3-90). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Krackhardt, D. (1992), The strength of strong ties: The importance of philos in organizations. In Nohria, N. and Eccles, R. (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form and action. Boston, MA’ Harvard Business School Press.
Krone, K., Jablin, F., and Putnam, L. (1987), Communication theory and organizational communication: Multiple perspectives. In F. Jablin (Ed.), Handbook of organizational communication: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 11-17). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Lengnick-Hall, C. (1996). Customer contribution to quality: A different view of the customer-oriented firm. Academy of Management Review, 21, 791-824.
Leonard, D. and Rayport, J. F. (1997), Spark innovation through empathic design, Harvard Business Review, 75(6), 102-113.
Li, T. and Calantone, R. J. (1998), The impact of marketing knowledge competence on new product advantage: Conceptualization and empirical examination, Journal of Marketing, 62(4), 13-29.
Lin, X. and Germain, R. (2004), Antecedents to customer involvement in product development: Comparing US and Chinese firms, European Management Journal, 22(2), 244-255.
Lukas, B. A. and Ferrell, O. C. (2000), The effect of market orientation on product innovation, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(2), 239-247.
Lynn, G. S. and Akgun, A. E. (1998), Innovation strategies under uncertainty: a contingency approach for new product development, Engineering Management Journal, 10(3), 11-17.
Lynn, G. S., Morone, J. G., and Paulson, A. S. (1996), Marketing and discontinuous innovation: The probe and learn process, California Management Review, 38(3), 8-35.
Maltz, E. and Kohli, A. K. (1996), Market intelligence dissemination across functional boundaries, Journal of Marketing Research, 32(1), 47-61.
McKenna, U. (1995), Real-time marketing, Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 87-95.
McQuarrie, E. F. and McIntyre, S. H. (1990), Implementing the marketing concept through a program of customer visits, Marketing Science Institute Working Paper, Report No. 90-107, (March).
Medina, M. Q. and Chaparro, J. P. (2007/2008), The impact of the human Element in the information systems quality for decision making and user satisfaction, The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 48(2), 44-53.
Menon, A. and Varadarajan, P. R. (1992), A model of marketing knowledge use within firms, Journal of Marketing, 56(4), 53-71.
Moenaert, R. K., Meyer, A. D., Souder, W. E., and Deschoolmeester, D. (1995), R&D/marketing communication during the fuzzy front-end, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 42(3), 243-258.
Mohr, J. and Nevin, J. R. (1990), Communication strategies in marketing channels: A theoretical perspective, Journal of Marketing, 54(4), 36-51.
Montoya-Weiss, M. M. and O’Driscoll, T. M. (2000), Applying performance support technology in the fuzzy front-end, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 17(2), 143-161.
Moorman, C. M. (1995), Organizational market information processes: Cultural antecedents and new product outcomes, Journal of Marketing Research, 32(3), 318-335.
Moorman, C. M. and Miner, A. S. (1999), The convergence of planning and execution: Improvisation in new product development, Journal of Marketing, 62(3), 1-20.
Murphy, S. A. and Kumar, V. (1997), The front end of new product development: A canadian survey, R&D Management, 27 (1), 5-16.
Nambisan, S. (2002), Designing virtual customer environments for new product development: Toward a theory, Academy of Management Review, 27(3), 392-413.
Nambisan, S. and Baron, R. A. (2007), Interactions in virtual customer environments Implications for product support and customer relationship management, Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21(2), 42-62.
Nambisan, S. and Nambisan P. (2008), How to profit from a better 'Virtual Customer Environment', MIT Sloan Management Review, 49(3), 53-61.
Narver, J. C. and Slater, S. F. (1990), The effect of a market orientation business profitability, Journal of Marketing, 54, 20-35.
Narver, J. C., Slater, S. F., and MacLachlan, D. L. (2004), Responsive and proactive market orientation and new product success, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21, 334-347.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978), Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Olson, E. M., Slater, S. F., and Hult, G. T. M. (2005), The performance implications of fit among business strategy, marketing organization structure, and strategic behavior, Journal of Marketing, 69(3), 49-65.
Park, M. H., Lim, J. W., and Birnbaum-More, P. H. (2009), The effect of multiknowledge individuals on performance in cross-functional new product development teams, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26, 86-96.
Pavlou, P. A. and Fygenson, M. (2006), Understanding and predicting electronic commerce adoption: An extension of the theory of planned behavior, MIS Quarterly, 30(1), 115-143.
Podsakoff, P. M. and Organ, D. W. (1986), Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects, Journal of Management, 12, 531-544.
Poskela, J. and Martinsuo, M. (2009), Management control and strategic renewal in the front end of innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(6), 671-684.
Prahalad, C. K. and Ramaswamy, V. (2004), The future of competition: Co-creating unique value with customers. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Qiu, T., Qualls, W., Bohlmann, J., and Rupp, D. E. (2009), The effect of interactional fairness on the performance of cross-functional product development teams: A multilevel mediated model, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(2), 173-187.
Ramaswamy, V. (2008), Co-creating value through customers' experiences: The Nike case, Strategy & Leadership, 36(5), 9-15.
Raudenbush, S. W. and Bryk, A. S. (2002), Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Reinertsen, D. G. (1999), Taking the fuzziness out of the fuzzy front-end, Research Technology Management, 42(6), 25-31.
Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., and Will, S. (2005), SmartPLS 2.0 (M3) Beta, Hamburg, http://www.smartpls.de.
Rochford, L. and Rudelius, W.(1992), How involving more functional areas within a firm affects the new product process, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 9, 287-299.
Rosenau, M. D. (2000), Successful product development. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Rumberger, R. W. and Thomas, S. L. (1993), The economic returns to college major, quality and performance: A multilevel analysis of recent graduates, Economics of Education Review, 12(1), 1-19.
Russell, R. K. and Tippett, D. D. (2008), Critical success factors for the fuzzy front end of innovation in the medical device industry, Engineering Management Journal, 20(3), 36-43.
Sarin, S. and O’Connor, G. C. (2009), First among equals: The effect of team leader characteristics on the internal dynamics of cross-functional product development teams, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26, 188-205.
Sawhney, M., Verona, G., and Prandelli, E. (2005), Collaborating to create: The internet as a platform for customer engagement in product innovation, Journal of Interactive Marketing, 19(4), 4-17.
Schriesheim, C. A. (1979), The similarity of individual directed and group directed leader behavior descriptions, Academy of Management Journal, 22(2), 345-355.
Simonson, I. (1993), Get closer to your customers by understanding how they make choices, California Management Review, 35(4), 68-84.
Slater, S. and Narvar, J. (1994), Does competitive environment moderate the marketing orientation-performance relationship? Journal of Marketing, 58(1), 46-55.
Smith P. G. and Reinertsen, D. G. (1998), Developing products in half the time: New rules, new tools (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Sobel, M. E. (1982), Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models, In S. Leinhardt (Ed.), Sociological Methodology, Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
Song, X. M. and Montoya-Weiss, M. (2001), An examination of the effect of perceived technological uncertainty on Japanese new product development, Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 61-80.
Sperry, R and Jetter, A. J.(2009),Theoretical framework for managing the front end of innovation under uncertainty, Management of Engineering & Technology, Portland International Conference on, Proceedings of PICMET 2009, August 2-6, 2021-2028.
Thompke, S. and von Hippel, E. (2002), Customers as innovators: a new way to create value, Harvard Business Review, 80(4), 74-81.
Thompson, J. P. (1967), Organizations in action. New York: McGrawHill.
Troy, L. C., Hirunyawipada, T., and Paswan, A. K. (2008), Cross-functional integration and new product success: An empirical investigation of the findings, Journal of Marketing, 72(6), 132-146.
Trueman, M. and Jobber, D. (1998), Competing through design, Long Range Planning, 31(4), 594-605.
Tu, C. (2009), A multilevel investigation of factors influencing creativity in NPD teams, Industrial Marketing Management, 38, 119-126.
Tushman, M. L. and Nadler, D.A. (1978), Information processing as an integrating concept in organization design, Academy of Management Review, 3(3), 613-624.
Ulwick, A.W. (2002), Turn customer input into innovation, Harvard Business Review, 80(1), 91-97.
van Aken, J, E. and Nagel, A. P. (2004), Organising and managing the fuzzy front-end of new product development, Eindhoven Centre for Innovation Studies,Working paper 04.12, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Verworn, B. (2009), A structural equation model of the impact of the ‘fuzzy front end on the success of new product development, Research Policy, 38, 1571-1581.
Verworn, B., Herstatt, C., and Nagahira, A. (2008), The fuzzy front end of Japanese new product development projects: Impact on success and differences between incremental and radical projects, R&D Management, 38(1), 1-19.
von Hippel, E. (1986), Lead users: A source of novel product concepts, Management Science, 32(7), 791-805.
von Hippel, E. (1992), Adapting market research to the rapid evolution of needs for new products and services, MIT Sloan School of Management Working Paper, No. 3374-92-BPS.
Wagner, S. M. (2010), Supplier traits for better customer firm innovation performance, Industrial Marketing Management, 39(7), 1139-1149.
Wind, J. and Mahajan, V. (1997), Issues and opportunities in new product development: An introduction to the special issue, Journal of Marketing Research, 34, 1-13.
Yan, T. and Dooley, K. J. (2013), Communication intensity, goal congruence, and uncertainty inbuyer–supplier new product development, Journal of Operations Management, 31, 523-542
Yu, F., Chen, J., and Shen, H. (2006), Idea management model for NPD fuzzy front end: Empirical analysis based on all-key-elements innovation in TIM., Chinese Journal of Management, 3(5), 573-579.
Zahay, D., Griffin, A., and Fredricks, E. (2004), Sources, uses, and forms of data in the new product development process, Industrial Marketing Management, 33(7), 657-666.
Zhang, Q. and Doll, W. J. (2001), The fuzzy front end and success of new product development: A causal model, European Journal of Innovation Management, 4(2), 95-113.
Zhang, Q., Vonderembse, M. A., and Cao, M. (2009), Product concept and prototype flexibility in manufacturing: Implications for customer satisfaction, European Journal of Operational Research, 194, 143-154.

 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
1. 學校支持對教師創造力教學行為影響之研究:角色認定與專業學習社群的多層次中介分析
2. 國小教師參與專業學習社群對學生學習動機與學習行為影響之研究
3. 運動心理資本對高中運動員知覺自我運動表現影響:教練家長式領導行為的跨層次分析
4. 教師協作在校長教學領導對教師自我效能影響的多層次中介效果研究:兼論教育階段的調節效果
5. 創意自我效能、工作價值觀對教師創造力教學影響之研究:專業學習社群與教師信任的跨層次分析
6. 高級中等學校教師實行翻轉教室行為意圖之跨層次研究
7. 若即若離?探索TSSCI商管社群網絡結構及知識活動--編輯群重疊的策略觀點
8. 學生學習投入、好奇心、教師集體層級變項與科學探究能力的關係:跨層級調節式中介效果之探討
9. 知覺教育訓練成效與離職傾向關係之調節式中介模式:心理契約觀點
10. 雇主品牌管理與員工品牌權益:跨層次之中介與調節影響效果
11. 國民中小學普通班教師的學校融合教育態度、教學效能對其教學調適表現關聯之多層次分析
12. 國軍社會責任對部屬工作敬業與留任意願之影響:以企業社會責任視角探討
13. 轉化型領導對群體成員企業社會責任價值觀的雙向影響:程序公正與領導者-部屬企業社會責任價值觀一致性的中介效果
14. 建言行為與員工創新行為績效:一個探討促進型建言、抑制型建言、領導與部屬交換關係與員工創新行為績效的三階交互作用模型
15. 國中學校組織支持、教師正向心理資本與組織承諾關係之跨層次分析:兼任行政教師與一般教師之比較
 
1. 不同效能非結構諮商團體歷程自我揭露類型探究與行為互動之社會網絡分析
2. 道德領導力對團隊績效與員工建言影響之探索 -以團隊關係衝突為跨層次中介模式
3. 以跨層次模型探討職涯使命感與組織公平氛圍對公部門員工個人工作行為之影響
4. 跨層次觀點下家長式領導、倫理氣候、組織承諾與組織公民行為關係之研究
5. 創造性探究教學模組對高中社團學生科學探究能力、科學創造力與科學學習動機之影響
6. 大學生品味、創意自我效能、廚藝創造力關係之研究
7. 威權領導對任務績效之影響:以LMX及部屬職場偏差行為為中介因子
8. 職場個人學習、創新效能感、工作動機、創造力及工作績效間之關係—以組織創新氛圍為跨層次調節效果
9. 科技大學教師專業背景、教師教學表現與學生學習成就之關聯:階層線性模式分析
10. 國民小學校長學習領導、學校組織學習與教師教學效能關係之研究
11. 國小組長知覺校長正向領導、學校組織健康、人境適配與工作幸福感之關係:階層線性模式的驗證
12. 公部門團隊成員行動化知識分享行為之研究-科技信任與雙元性知識分享之調節效果
13. 幼兒園園長分布式領導、教師領導與教師專業發展關係之研究—以中彰投地區為例
14. 團隊中的自主性與成員效能:家長式領導的調節
15. 競爭氣候如何燃起員工績效?檢驗競爭氣候與競爭特質交互對工作重塑、工作敬業與工作績效的關係
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE