:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:我國技術型高中機械科學生創造性人格特質及教師創造力教學對學生技術創造力影響之研究—以學校組織創新氣氛為調節變項
作者:鍾欣男
作者(外文):Hsin-Nan Chung
校院名稱:國立彰化師範大學
系所名稱:工業教育與技術學系
指導教授:蕭錫錡博士
梁滄郎博士
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2015
主題關鍵詞:技術型高中機械科學生創造性人格特質教師創造力教學學生技術創造力學校組織創新氣氛Technical High School Machine TechnologyStudents’ Creative PersonalityTeacher Teaching for CreativityStudents’ Skill CreativityCreative Organizational Climate of School
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:161
本研究主要研究目的為:(一)瞭解我國技術型高中機械科學生創造性人格特質、教師創造力教學、學生技術創造力與學校組織創新氣氛之現況;(二)探究學生創造性人格特質與教師創造力教學對技術型高中機械科學生技術創造力之預測力;(三)以跨層次分析方法,分析學校組織創新氣氛對於學生創造性人格特質、教師創造力教學與學生技術創造力之間的調節作用。
本研究主要採問卷調查法,研究工具為「我國技術型高中機械科學生創造性人格特質及教師創造力教學對學生技術創造力影響之研究」調查問卷,係以全國公、私立技術型高中機械科學生與教師為取樣對象,共計抽取機械科教師195名;機械科高三學生1170位;回收教師樣本數170份;學生樣本數958份。回收率分別為:教師87%,學生82%,剔除無效問卷後,教師有效問卷131份,有效回收率為77%;學生有效問卷743份,有效回收率為78%。本研究統計方法採:描述性統計、驗證性因素分析(CFA)及階層線性模式分析(HLM)。
研究結果歸納如下:
一、我國技術型高中機械科學生創造性人格特質情況皆尚屬普通
二、我國技術型高中機械科學生知覺教師創造力教學情況尚可
三、我國技術型高中機械科學生技術創造力表現尚屬普通
四、我國技術型高中機械科教師對學校組織創新氣氛知覺情況尚可
五、技術型高中機械科學生創造性人格特質對學生技術創造力有正向預測力
六、我國技術型高中機械科教師創造力教學對學生技術創造力有正向預測力
七、學校組織創新氣氛對學生創造性人格特質和教師創造力教學與學生技術創造力之間具有部分調節作用
最後根據研究的結果,提出具體建議,以作為學校、教育行政相關單位及未來研究的參考。
The aims of the study were as follows: First of all, trying to realize situations on Students’ Creative Personal-ity (SCP), Teacher Teaching for Creativity (TTC), Students’ Skill Creativity (SSC) and Creative Organizational Climate of School (COCS), within technical high schools machine technology in Taiwan. The second, predicting the SCP and TTC were effective on SSC. The third, analyzing moderating effect of COCS on the relationship between SCP and TTC on SSC.
Literature review and questionnaire survey were con-ducted in this study. The sample consisted of 195 teachers and 1170 students of technical high schools machine tech-nology in Taiwan, 170 and 958 feedback data with teachers and students, the percentage was 87% for teachers, the other was 82% for students; and with 131and 743 valid feedback data, the valid percentage was 77% and 78% for teachers and students respectively. The instrument of this study was “Questionnaire on the study of The Effect of Students’ Creative Personality and Teacher Teaching for Creativity on Students’ Skill Creativity in Technical High School Machine Technology: The Creative Organizational Climate of School as A Moderator.” The data were analyzed by using descriptive statistic, Confirmatory Factory Anal-ysis (CFA), and Hierarchical Linear Modeling (HLM) re-gression.
The results of the study were as follows:
1.There were common perceptions of SCP in technical high school machine technology in Taiwan.
2.There were good perceptions of TTC in technical high school machine technology in Taiwan.
3.There were common perceptions of SSC in technical high school machine technology in Taiwan.
4.The technical high school machine technology teachers had good perceptions of COCS.
5.The correlation between SCP and SSC was positive.
6.The correlation between TTC and SSC was positive.
7.Parts of moderating effects of COCS on the relationship between SCP and TTC on SSC were existed.
Finally, based on the results, suggestions for educa-tional administration agencies, teachers and future studies were proposed.
壹、中文部分:
毛連塭(1984)。臺北市國民小學推展創造性教學研討會結論報告—創造性教學資料彙編。臺北:臺北市教師研習中心。
毛連塭(1989)。實施創造思考教育的參考架構。創造思考教育,創刊號,2-9。
毛連塭、郭有遹、陳龍安、林幸台(2000)。創造力研究。臺北:心理。new window
王文科、王智弘(2010)。教育研究法(十四版)。臺北: 五南。new window
王俐珍(2010)。國民中學教師人格特質、思考風格與創造力教學之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化。
王揚仁(2006)。製造業員工技術創造力態度、組織學習能力與組織創新氣氛對組織創新績效影響之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化。
王瑞(2002)。創造思考教學策略對學生創造力之影響。臺灣教育,612,24-28。
江明曄(2006)。中等以下學校校長創造性領導、學校創造性組織氣氛與教師創意教學關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺中教育大學教育,臺中。new window
吳宗原(2011)組織創新氣氛與組織效能關係之研究-以高雄市公私立高中職學校為例(未出版之碩士論文)。實踐大學,臺北。
吳怡瑄、葉玉珠(2003)。主題統整教學、教室氣氛、年級及父母社經地位與國小學童科技創造力之關係。師大學報,48(2),239-260。new window
吳明雄(2002)。技術型高中學生機械技術創造力培訓之研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告(編號NSC 91-2522-S-003-013),未出版。
吳明雄(2007)。第十六章:技術創造力評量探討。取自http://3q.creativity.edu.tw/teach/3/
吳明雄、許碧珊、饒達欽、簡明忠、陳建宏、張中一、 黃秀玉(2008)。技術型高中學生技術創造力指標建構之研究。師大學報教育類,53(3),67-93。new window
吳明雄、陳科仁、陳鈺琳、陳柏志(2008)。職業學校專業科目教師啟發學生創造探討。2008行動研究學術研討會。取自http://ci.nttu.edu.tw/2008ar/7.htm。
吳清山(2002)。創意教學的重要理念與實施策略。臺灣教育,614,2-8。new window
吳裕益(2004)。線性結構模式基本概念及模式適合度之評鑑。國立高雄師範大學特殊教育研究所上課講義。高雄。
吳蓉燕(2003)。文學創造力的條件與創作的歷程(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北。
吳靜吉(1983)。創造性人格量表。34-35。
吳靜吉(2002)。華人學生創造力的發掘與培育。應用心理研究,15,17-42。new window
技術及職業教育法(2015年1月14 日)。取自http://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?
技術發展名詞解釋(2014)。科技部學術統計資料庫-名詞定義。取自https://ap0512.most.gov.tw/WAS2/acade-
mia/AsNoun.aspx
李大偉、張玉山(2000),科技創造力的意涵與教學(上)。生活科技教育,33(9),7-14。
李宛蓉(2007)工作環境對技術創造力影響之研究-以思考風格為中介變項(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化。
李堅萍(2006)。培育科技創造力應重視實作技能的教學與自我效能的激發。生活科技教育,39(8),21-28。
李賢哲(2001)。以動手做(DIY)工藝的興趣培養中小學童具科學創造力之人格特質。科學教育月刊,243,1-7。
林子敬(2000)。技術移轉模式、技術能力與移轉績效關係之研究—以台灣電子資訊廠商為例(未出版之碩士論文)。私立長榮管理學院,台南。
林幸台(1998)。傑出科學家之創造力特性及開發創造力模式之研究-子計劃三:歷史角度之探討。行政院國家科學委員會專題計畫成果報告(編號NSC87-2511-5-003-063),未出版。
林幸台(2002)。青少年的創造力發展,載於吳靜吉、丁興祥、邱皓政(主編),創造力的發展與實踐,應用心理研究季刊,15,63-66。臺北:五南。
林偉文(2007)。教學創新的梅迪奇效應:以英國創意夥伴計畫為例。教育研究月刊,157,31-41。
邱紹一(2010)。產業導向高等技術教育機械技術人力之技術基本能力培育模式。臺北海洋技術學院學報,1(3),124-151。new window
邱皓政(2000)。量化研究與統計分析。臺北:五南。
邱皓政(2001)。校園中的創造性環境與文化:從技職學校到普通高中校園創造性組織氣氛之評量與相關因素之研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告(編號:NSC89-2519-S-128-002),未出版。
邱皓政(2002a)。創造力研究的創造力釋放與再聚。應用心理研究,16,15-16。
邱皓政(2002b)。學校組織創新氣氛的內涵與教師創造力的實踐-另一件國王的新衣?。應用心理研究,15,191-224。new window
邱皓政(2011)。「結構方程模式: LISREL/SIMPLIS的原理與應用」(第二版)。臺北 :雙葉書廊。
邱皓政、陳燕禎、林碧芳(2009)。組織創新氣氛量表的發展與信效度衡鑑。測驗學刊,56(1),69-97。
邱皓政、溫福星(2007)。脈絡效果的階層線性模型分析:以學校組織創新氣氛與教師創意表現為例。教育與心理研究,30(1),1-35。new window
邱皓政、溫福星(2012)。多層次模式方法論:階層線性模式的關鍵問題與試解。臺北:前程文化。new window
邱皓政、葉玉珠、蔡明宏(1998年11月)。技術創造力:概念與定義。「技術創造力」研討會發表之論文,國立中山大學,高雄。
段蘊康(2007)。全國高職學生技術創造力培訓與競賽活動滿意度調查研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北。
洪榮昭(2001)。知識創新與學習型組織。臺北:五南。new window
洪榮昭、朱永裕、鄭廉鐙(2002)。科技創作能力發展分析-以第二屆「POWER TECH:全國少年科技創作競賽」為例。臺灣教育,614,16-23。
洪榮昭、康鳳梅、林展立(2003)。傑出科技創作學童創造特質分析-以機器人競賽為例。師大學報:科學教育類,48(2),239-254
胡夢蕾(2006)。我國創造力與人格特質研究之回顧與探析。教育學刊,26,215-240。new window
胡蘭沁、黃建皓(2007)。校長領導、組織文化、知識管理與學校效能關係之探討-研究文獻的回顧。學校行政,50,145-166。
徐志文(2009)。教師教學效能與學校組織創新氣氛對創造力教學行為之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北。
徐志文,張雨霖,巫宜錚,許芳彬(2011)。以階層線性模式分析學校組織創新氣氛、教師教學效能對創造力教學之影響。創造學刊,2(2),87-112。
涂君暐(2005)。內外在動機、創造力工作環境與創造力之相關研究-以第八屆創思設計與製作競賽之參賽學生為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中央大學, 桃園。
秦夢群(1997)。教育行政-理論部分。臺北:五南。
袁宇熙(2011)。技術型高中機械科學生個人創造力及其影響因素之研究-以奈米科技概念知識學習為例(未出版之博論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北。
康光輝(2002)。陶塑創造教學方案對國小高年級兒童創造力之影響∼以高雄市博愛國小為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學,新竹。
張仁家(2005)。學校組織創新氣候與經營成效之關係-以技術型高中研究為例。臺北:學富
張世彗(2003)。創造力—理論、技術技法與培育。臺北:五南
張世慧(2007)。創造力--理論、技法與教學。臺北:五南。
張雨霖(2007)。國中教師創造力信念、創造力教學自我效能對創造力教學行為影響之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北。new window
張春興(1997)。教育心理學。臺北:東華。
張原誠(2014)。學生美感經驗、創意自我效能與創造力之研究:教師創造力教學的多層次調節式中介效果(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺南大學,臺南。new window
張偉豪(2011)。SEM論文寫作不求人。臺北:鼎茂。
教育部(2011)。高中職免學費方案。臺北:教育部
教育部(2013)。行政院第二期技職教育再造計畫。取自http://www.ey.gov.tw/Upload/RelFile/27/702399/ceba3428-e2c6-4507-b505-7ade307963e9.pdf
教育部(2013)。教育部人才培育白皮書。臺北:教育部。
教育部技職司(2008)。高職群科課程綱要。臺北:教育部。
教育部統計處(2014)。教育部統計處網站。取自https://stats.moe.gov.tw/
曹焰、郭春陵(1999)。實用英語辭典。臺北:水牛。
莊謙本(1994)。我國工職學校資訊科畢業生所需具備就業技術能力之分析研究,行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告(編號:NSC83-011-S-003-015 TG),未出版。
許士軍(1982)。管理學。臺北:東華。
許信德(2006)。異質分組之合作學習對高職學生技術創造力之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣科技大學,臺北。
陳文家(2010)。國民小學學生創造力傾向及其影響模式之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺北教育大學教育,臺北。new window
陳玉樹、胡夢鯨(2008)。任務動機與組織創新氣候對成人教師創意教學表現之影響:階層線性模式分析。教育心理學報,40(2),179-198。new window
陳春蓮(2006)。國小校長轉型領導、組織創新氣氛與學校效能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄。
陳昭儀(1991)。我國傑出發明家之人格特質、創造歷程及生涯發展之研究。特殊教育研究學刊,7,211-227。new window
陳昭儀、陳琦、張素華(1995)。瞭解創意人。臺北: 心理。
陳科仁(2008)。高職學生技術創造力培訓與競賽活動指導教師對創造力教育觀點之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北。
陳寬裕、王正華(2010)。結構方程模式分析實務:AMOS 的應用。臺北:五南。
陳霞鄢(2003)。國小資優班教師創造力教學行為之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北。
陳霞鄢、王振德(2004)。國小資優班教師創造力教學行為之研究。資優教育研究,4(1),29-50。
曾孟嫻(2010)。臺北市國民小學組織創新氣氛與創新績效之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。臺北市立大學, 臺北。
湯誌龍(1998)。高工機械科學生專業創造力及其相關因素之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北。
黃天助(2010)。技術型高中教師知覺校長轉型領導、組織創新氣氛對創新經營成效影響之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化。new window
黃芳銘(2007)。結構方程模式理論與應用(第五版)。臺北:五南。
黃家齊(1990)。技術引進成效影響之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。私立中原大學,桃園。
黃振盛(2006)技術型高中工業類科學生技術創造力之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化。new window
楊山琪(2007)。公私立高中職學校教職員知識管理與學校組織創新氣氛相關之研究-以台中地區為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化。
楊玉玲(2012) 科技大學組織創新氣氛、學生創意自我效能與學生創新行為關係之研究:以遠東科技大學為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北科技大學,臺北。
溫福星(2006)。階層線性模式:原理、方法與應用。臺北:雙葉書廊。
溫福星、邱皓政(2012)。多層次模式方法論:階層線性模式的關鍵問題與試解。臺北:前程文化。new window
葉玉珠(2000)。「創造力發展的生態系統模式」及其應用於科技與資訊領域之內涵分析。教育心理學報,32(1),95-122。new window
葉玉珠(2002)。國小中高年級學童科技創造力發展與其主要影響生態系統之動態關係。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告(編號:NSC 91-2522-S-110-004),未出版。
葉玉珠(2006)。創造力教學—過去、現在與未來。臺北:心理。
葉玉珠、吳靜吉(2002)。「創意發展組織因素量表」之編製。應用心理學研究,15,225-247。
葉玉珠、吳靜吉、鄭英耀(2000)。影響科技與資訊產業人員創意發展的因素之量表編制。師大學報:科學教育類,45(2),39-63。
董奇(1995)。兒童創造力發展心理。臺北:五南。
廖勝能(2000)。學校組織創新氣氛與知識管理關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺南大學,臺南。new window
趙志揚、劉丙燈、張彩珠、邱紹一(2010)。技術型高中「專題製作」課程融入技術創造力教學成效之研究。高雄師大學報,29,51-71。new window
劉丙燈(2013)。我國高級中等學校校長賦權領導、學校組織創新氛圍、教師心理賦權、教師創造性人格特質與教師創造力教學行為關聯性之探討(未出版之博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化。new window
蔡宜貞、林珊如(2005)。學校組織創新氛圍與教師工作動機之相關研究。第三屆創新與創造力研討會發表之論文,國立政治大學,臺北市。
蔡啟通(1997)。組織因素、組織成員整體創造性與組織創新之關係(未出版之博士論文)。國立台灣大學,臺北。new window
蔡啟通、高泉豐(2004)。動機取向、組織創新氣候與員工創新行為之關係:Amabile 動機綜效模型之驗證。管理學報,21(5),571-592。new window
蔡碧璉(2005)。從第四波創意教師行動研究計畫之演化兼論其創意評鑑歷程。第三屆創新與創造力研討會發表之論文,國立政治大學,臺北市。
鄭友超(1989)。高級工業技術型高中鑄造基礎技術能力發展之研究。技術學刊,13(1),23-30。
鄭友超、李國樑(2003)行為改變技術與企業人力資源管理的探討。品質月刊,39(9),64-68
盧美枝(2011)。美容從業人員人格特質、人際關係與技術創造力之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。私立環球科技大學,雲林。
蕭佳純(2011)。學生創造力影響因素之研究:三層次分析架構。特殊教育學報,33,151-177。new window
蕭錫錡(1999)。專題製作之創意發展-合作創作之研究,行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告(編號:NSC88-2516-018-001),未出版。
蕭錫錡(2007)。技術型高中學校本位課程領導實踐之研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告,(編號:NSC-95-2516-S-230-001),未出版。
蕭錫錡、楊豪森、陳慕能(2008)。高職學校本位課程校長課程領導能力研究-以高職校長觀點為例。彰化師大教育學報,12,25-46。new window
賴慕回(2008)「電機電子技術創造力」量表發展之研究─以臺北市高職學校電機電子群學生為對象(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北。
謝文凱(1993)。技術移轉過程互動程度與技術移轉績效關係之研究—以共同研發聯盟為例(未出版之碩士論文)。私立中原大學,桃園。
謝俊義(2010)。HLM多層次線性分析:理論、方法與實務。臺北:鼎茂。new window
簡文娟(1999)。組織創新氣候評鑑量表之建立—以高科技產業為實證研究對象(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中央大學,桃園。


貳、英文部分
Aguilar-Alonso, A. (1996). Personality and creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 21(6), 959-969.
Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innova-tion in organizations. In B. M. Staw, &; L. L. Cum-mings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol.10 pp.123-167). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Amabile, T. M. (1993). Motivational synergy: Toward new conceptualizations of intrinsic and extrinsic motiva-tion in the workplace. Human Resource Management Review, 3, 185-201.
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Amabile, T. M., &; Gryskiewicz, S. S. (1989). The creative environment scales: Work environment inventory. Creativity Research Journal, 2, 231-253.
Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Lazenby, J., &; Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativi-ty. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154-1184.
Amabile, T. M., Schatzel, E. A., Moneta, G. B., &; Kramer, S. J. (2004). Leader behaviors and the work envi-ronment for creativity: Perceived leader support. The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 5-32.
Anderson, J., &; Gerbing, D. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.
Andiliou, A., &; Murphy, P. K. (2010). Examining varia-tions among researchers’ and teachers’ conceptuali-zations of creativity: A review and synthesis of con-temporary research. Educational Research Review, 5(3), 201–219
Barak, M., &; Goffer, N. (2002). Fostering systematic in-novative thinking and problem solving: Lessons edu-cation can learn from industry. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 12(3), 227-247.
Baranson, J. (1996). Transfer of technical knowledge by international corporations to developing economics. American Economics Review, 56, 311.
Barron, F. (1995). No rootless flower: An ecology of crea-tivity. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Batey, M., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., &; Furnham, A. (2009). Intelligence and personality as predictors of divergent thinking: the role of general, fluid and crystallized intelligence. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 4(1), 60−69.
Bharadwaj, S., &; Menon, A. (2000). Making innovation happen in organizations: Individual creativity mech-anisms, organizational creativity mechanisms or both? The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 17(6), 424-434.
Black, S. (2005). Teaching students to think critically. Education Digest, 70(6), 42–27.
Burgelman, R. A., &Rosenbloom, R. S. (1989). Technol-ogy strategy: An evolutionary process perspective. Research on Technological Innovation Management and Policy, 4, 1-23.
Calderhead, J. (1996). Teachers: Beliefs and knowledge. In B. C. Berliner &; R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology (pp.709-725). New York: Macmillan.
Cattell, R. B., Eber, H. W., &; Tatsuoka, M. M. (1970). Handbook for the Sixteen Personality Factor Ques-tionnaire (16PF). Champaign, IL: IPAT.
Chan, S. &;Yuen, M. (2014). Creativity beliefs, creative personality and creativity-fostering practices of gifted education teachers and regular class teachers in Hong Kong. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 14, 109-118.
Chen, I. S., &; Chen, J. K. (2010). Creativity strategy se-lection for the higher education system. Quality &; Quantity, 46(3), 739–750.
Cheng, V. M. Y. (2011). Infusing creativity into classroom of Eastern context: Evaluations from student per-spectives. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 6, 67-87.
Cheung, C. K., Rudowicz, E., Yue, X. &; Kwan, S. F. (2003). Creativity of university students: What is the impact of field and of study? Journal of Creative Behavior, 37(1), 42-63.
Cheung, R. H. P. (2012). Teaching for creativity: Examining the beliefs of early childhood teachers and their in-fluence on teaching practices. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 37(3), 43–51.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the be-havioral sciences (2nd ed.). NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
Comrey, A., &; Lee, H. (1992). A first course in factor analysis(2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Craft, A., Hall, E., &; Costello, R. (2014). Passion: Engine of creative teaching in an English university? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 13, 91–105.
Creativity, (n.d.). In Merriam-Webster's online dictionary (11th ed.). Retrieved from http://www.m-w.com/dic-
Cropley, A. J. (1992). More ways than one: Fostering cre-ativity. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Cropley, A. J. (1997). Fostering creativity in the classroom: General principles. In M. A. Runco. (Ed.) The crea-tivity research handbook (Vol.1, pp.83-114). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. NY: Harper Collins.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2006). A system perspective on cre-ativity. In J. Henry (3rd Eds.), Creativity management and development. London, UK: Sage.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., &; Wolfe, R. (2000). New conceptions and research approaches to creativity: Implications of a systems perspective for creativity in education. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Monks, R. J. Sternberg, &; R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talents (pp. 81-93). NY: Pergamon
Dasgupta, S. (1996). Technology and Creativity. New York: Oxford Universiry Press.
DeVellis, R. F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and ap-plications. CA: Sage.
Dosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories. Research Policy, 11, 147-162.
Enders, C., &; Tofighi, D. (2007). Centering predictor var-iables in cross- sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12, 21-138.
Eteläpelto, A., &; Lahti, J. (2008). The resources and ob-stacles of creative collaboration in a long-term learning community. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3, 226-240.
Eysenck, H. J. (1994). Personality: Biological foundations. In P. A. Vernon (Ed.), The neuropsychology of indi-vidual differences. London: Academic Press.
Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in sci-entific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(4), 290−309.
Feist, G. J., &; Barron, F. (1996). Longitudinal study of 1950 graduate students. Unpublished raw data.
Feldhusen, J. F., &; Treffinger, D. J. (1980). Creative thinking and problem-solving in gifted education. Dobuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
Flor, M. L., &; Oltra, M. J. (2004). Identification of inno-vating firms through technological innovation indi-cators: An application to the Spanish ceramic tile industry. Research Policy, 33, 323-336.
Florida, R. (2004). America’s looming creativity crisis. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 122-130.
Fornell, C., &; Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50.
Frankel, E. G. (1990). Management of technological change. New York, NY: Kluwer.
Fraser, B. J. (1998). Classroom environment instruments: Development, validity and applications. Learning Environments Research, 1(1), 7-34.
Furman, A. (1998), Teacher and pupil characteristics in the perception of the creativity of classroom climate, Journal of Creative Behavior, 32(4), 258-277.
Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds. New York: Basic Books.
Gough, H. G. (1979). A creative personality scale for the adjective check list. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1398–1405.
Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. NY: McGraw Hill.
Hair, J. F., Black, B., Babin, B., Anderson, R. E., &; Tat-ham, R. L. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Halford, G. S. &; Wilson, W. H. (2002). Creativity, rela-tional knowledge, and capacity: Why are humans so creative? In Dartnall, T. (ed.), Creativity, cognition, and knowledge. (pp.153-180). UK: Praeger.
Hamza, K. N., &; William, R. (1996), Creating and fostering a learning environment that promates creative thinking and problem solving skills, (ERIC Document Re-production Service No. ED406435).
Helmreich, R. L., Spence, J. T., &; Pred, R. S. (1988). Making it without losing it: Type A, achievement mo-tivation and scientific attainment revisited. Person-ality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14, 495-504
Helson, R., &; Crutchfield, R. S. (1970). Mathematicians: The creative researcher and the average Ph. D. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 34, 250-257.
Holatius, K. (1995). Cultural adjustment in international technology transfer. International Journal of Tech-nology Management, 10, 676-686.
Howe, R. (1997, November). Creative problem solving ap-proaches processes for teaching and doing creative activity. Paper presented at the seminar of Instruction for Creative Thinking. Taipei: NTNU.
Hox, J. (2002), Multilevel analysis: Techniques and ap-plications, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associ-ates.
Hsiao, H. C. (1997). The improvement of creativity and productivity of technological workers through part-nership between university and industry. Paper pre-sented at the International Conference on Creativity Development in Technological Education and Train-ing. Taipei, Taiwan.
Huang, X. H., &; Lee, C.K. (2015). Disclosing Hong Kong teacher beliefs regarding creative teaching: Five dif-ferent perspectives. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 15, 37–47.
Hunter, S. T., Bedell, K. E., &; Mumford, M. D. (2007). Climate for creativity: A quantitative review. Crea-tivity Research Journal, 19, 69-90.
Isaksen, S. G., &; Ekvall, G. (2010). Managing for innova-tion: The two faces of tension within creativity cli-mates. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(2), 73-88.
Hoseinifar J., Mohammad S. M., Rasoul Z. S., Nowrozi M., Ali Shakerc, Meamar E., &; Ghaderi E. (2011). An investigation of the relation between creativity and five factors of personality in students. Proce-dia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 2037-2041
Jamieson, S. (2004). Likert scales: How to (ab) use them. Medical Education, 38(12), 1217-1218.
Jane, B., &; Robbins, J. (2004). Block play as a potential for learning for innovation in technology education in early childhood classrooms. Centre for Learning Re-search. Gold Coast: Griffith University.
Janssen, D. H. (1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and ill-structured problem solving learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research &; Development, 45(1), 45-94.
Jeffrey, B., &; Graft, A. (2004). Teaching creatively and teaching for creativity: Distinctions and relationships. Educational Studies, 30, 78-87.
Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31-36.
Karwowski, M., Gralewski, J., Lebuda, I., &; Wiśniewska, E. (2007). Creative teaching of creativity teachers: Polish perspective. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2, 57-61.
Katz, A.N. (1984). Creativity styles: Relating tests of cre-ativity to the work pattern of scientist, Personality and Individual Differences, 5(3), 281-292.
Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.
Knapp, R. (1962). A factor analysis of Thorndike’s ratings of eminentmen. Journal of Social Psychology, 56, 67-71.
Lee, I. R., &; Kemple, K. (2014). Preservice teachers' per-sonality traits and engagement in creative activities as predictors of their support for children's creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 26(1), 82–94.
Lewis. T. (1999). Research in Technology Education: Some areas of need. Journal of Technology Education, 10(2), 41-56.
Lim, S. &;Eo, S. (2013). The mediating roles of collective teacher efficacy in the relations of teachers' percep-tions of school organizational climate to their burn-out. Teaching and Teacher Education, 44, 138-147.
Litwin, G., &; Stringer, R. (1968). Motivation and organi-zational climate. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lodico, M.G., Spaulding, D.T., &; Voegtle, K.H.(2010). Methods in educational research:From theory to practice. San Francisco(2nd), CA:Jossey-Bass.
Lubke, G. H., &; Muthén, B. O. (2004). Applying multigroup confirmatory factor models for continuous outcomes to Likert scale data complicates meaningful group comparisons. Structural Equation Modeling, 11(4), 514-534.
Luke, D. A. (2004). Multilevel modeling, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Macmillan Education (Ed.). (2003). Macmillan Essential Dictionary. Oxford, UK: MacMillan Education.
Madjar, N., &; Ortiz-Walters, R. (2009). Trust in supervi-sors and trust in customers: Their independent, rela-tive, and joint effects on employee performance and creativity. Human Performance, 22, 128-142.
Mansfield, R. S., &; Busse, T.V. (1981): The psychology of creativity and discovery: Scientists and their work. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
Martindale, C. (1995). Creativity and connectionism. In S. M. Smith, T.B. Ward and R. A. Finke (Eds.) The cre-ative cognition approach. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Martinsen, L. (2011). The Creative personality: A synthesis and development of the creative person profile. Cre-ativity Research Journal, 23(3), 185-202
Matheson, B. (2002). Creative pedagogies. Journal of Fu-ture Studies, 6(4), 125-138.
Mayer, R.E. (1999). Fifty years of creativity research.In R. J. Sternberg (1999). Handbook of Creativity (p.450). New York: Cambridge University Press.
McEvoy, A., &; Welker, R. (2000). Antisocial behavior, academic failure, and school climate: A critical review. Journal of Emotional and Behavior Disorders, 8(3), 130-140.
McLeod, J., & Cropley, A. J. (1989). Fostering academic excellence. Oxford: Pergamon.
Montes, F. J. L., Moreno, A. R. &Fernandez, L. M. M. (2003). Assessing the organizational climate and contractual relationship for perceptions of support for innovation, International Journal of Manpower, 25, 167-180.
Morgan, G. (1986). Images of organization. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Niu, W., &; Sternberg, R. J. (2001). Cultural influences on artistic creativity and its valuation. International Journal of Psychology, 36(4), 225-241.
Oldham, G. R., &; Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativ-ity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 607–634.
Ounjian, M. L., &; Carne, E. B. (1987). A study of the fac-tors which affect technology transfer in a multiloca-tion unit corporation. IEEE Transactions on Engi-neering Management, 34(3), 194-201.
Parnes, S. J. (1967). Creative behavior guidebook. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Peno, J. D., &; Wallender, H. W. (1977). A contingent ap-proach to technology policy proposing a cost/benefit analysis. New York: FMME.
Peterson, R. E. (2002, December/January). Establishing the creative environment in technology education. The Technology Teacher, 7-10.
Petrowski, M. J. (2000). Creativity research: Implication for teaching, learning, and thinking. Reference Services Review, 28(4), 304-312
Prabhu, V., Sutton, C., &; Sauser, W (2008). Creativity and certain personality traits: Understanding the mediat-ing effect of intrinsic motivation. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 53-66.
Raiziene, S., &; Grigaite, B. (2005). Developing child’s thinking skills by semantic mapping strategies. TRAMES: A Journal of the Humanities &; Social Sci-ences, 9(2), 192–206.
Raja, U. (2010). The joint effects of personality and job scope on in –role performance, citizenship behaviors, and creativity. Human Relations, 63, 981-1005
Ram, A., &; Leake, D. B. (1995). Goal-driven learning. London: A Bradford Book.
Reeves, J. B. (2010). Academic optimism and organizational climate: An elementary school effectiveness test of two measures. Doctoral Thesis, The University of Alabama.
Robinson, J. R. (2008). Webster's dictionary definition of creativity. Online Journal of Workforce Education and Development, 3(2), Retrieved from http://web.siu.edu/Journal/VolIIInum2/Article_1.pdf.
Robock, S. H., &; Simmonds, K. (1983). International business and multinational enterprises, 3rd Ed., homewood: Richard D. Irwin, Inc. 460-461, 462-463.
Ronquillo, J. C. (2011). The innovation climate in public and nonprofit organisations. Paper presented at the 11th Public Management Research Conference Syra-cuse, NY.
Rosenberg, N., &; Frischtak, C. (1985). International technology transfer: Concepts, measures and com-parisons. New York: Praeger.
Rudowicz, E., Tokarz, A., &; Beauvale, A. (2009). Desira-bility of personal characteristics associated with cre-ativity: through the eyes of Polish and Chinese uni-versity students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 4, 104-115
Runco, M. A. (2004). Creativity. Annual Review of Psy-chology, 55, 657-687.
Rushton, J. P., Murray, H. G., &; Paunonen, S. V. (1987). Personality characteristics associated with high re-search productivity. In Jackson, D. N., and Rushton, J. P. (Eds.), Scientific excellence. origins and assess-ment (pp.129-148), Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Ryan, R. M., &; Deci, E. L. (2000a). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54-67.
Ryan, R. M., &; Deci, E. L. (2000b). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psy-chologist, 55, 68-78.
Sagnak, M. (2012). The empowering leadership and teach-ers' innovative behaviour: The mediating role of in-novation climate. African Journal of Business Man-agement, 6 (4), 1635-1641.
Santikarn, M. (1981). Technology transfer: A case study. Singapore University Press, 4-5.
Sawyer, R. (2006). Educating for innovation. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 1, 41-48.
Schneider, B. (1990). Organizational climate and culture. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Schon, D. A. (1967). Technology and change. New York: Delacorte.
Scott, S. G., &; Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of in-novation behavior: A path model of individual inno-vation in workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 580-667.
Shalley, C. E., Gilson, L. L., &; Blum, T. C. (2000). Matching creativity requirement and the work envi-ronment: Effects on satisfaction and intentions to leave. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 215-223.
Sharif, M. N. (1988). Basis for techno-economic policy analysis. Science and Public Policy, 15(4), 217-229.
Siau, K. L. (1995). Group creativity and technology. Journal of Creative Behavior, 29(3), 201-216.
Simonton, D. K. (2000). Cognitive, personal, developmen-tal, and social aspects. American Psychologist, 55(1), 151-158.
Simonton, D. K. (2003). Expertise, competence, and crea-tive ability. In R. Sternberg, &; E. Grigorenko (Eds.), The psychology of abilities, competencies, and ex-pertise (pp.213-239). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Soobik, M. (2012). Modern design of technology education: Interplay between creativity, intellect, and handiwork. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences ,45 , 296-305.
Starko, A. J. (2000). Creativity in the Classroom: School in the curious delight. NJ: LEA.
Starko, A. J. (2005). Creativity in the classroom. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Sternberg, R. J. (1988). A three-facet model of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 125-147). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. J. (2000). Identifying and developing creative giftedness. Roeper Review, 23, 60-64.
Sternberg, R. J. (2003). Wisdom, intelligence, and creativity synthesized. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. J. (2006). The nature of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 18(1), 87-98.
Sternberg, R. J., &; Gordeeva, T. (1996).The anatomy of impact: What makes an article influential? Psycho-logical Science, 7, 69-75.
Sternberg, R. J., &; Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd: cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York, NY: The Free Press.
Sternberg, R. J., &; Lubart, T. I. (1996). Investing in crea-tivity. American Psychologist, 51(7), 677–688.
Sternberg, R. J., &; Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Creativity research handbook (pp.1–19). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. J., &; Lubart, T. I.(1999). The concept of creativating: Prospects and paradigms. In R.J.Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp.3-15). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Stokols, D., Clitheroe, C., &; Zmuidzinas, M. (2002). Qualities of work environments that promote per-ceived support for creativity, Creativity Research Journal, 14(2), 137-147.
Strassman, W. P. (1968). Technology change and economic development: The manufacturing experience of Mexico and Puerto Rico. NY: Cornell University Press.
Sung. S. Y. &; Choi, J. N. (2009). Do big 5 personality factors affect individual creativity? The moderating role of extrinsic motivation. Social Behavior and Personality, 37, 941-956
Terman, L. (1955). Are scientists different? Scientist America, 192(1), 25-29.
Tesluk, P. E., Farr, J. L., &; Klein, S. R. (1997). Influences of organizational culture and climate on individual creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 31(1), 27-41.
Timberlake, P. (1982). Fifteen ways to cultivate creativity in your classroom. Childhood Education, 9, 19-21.
tionary/creativity
Tokoro, M., &; Mogi, K. (2007). Creativity and the brain. Singapore: World Scientific.
Ullman, J. B. (2001). Structural equation modeling. In B. G. Tabachnick &; L. S. Fidell (2001). Using Multivariate Statistics (4th ed; pp.653-771). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn &; Bacon.
Vista, C. (2000). Teaching classroom educators how to be more effective and creative teacher. Education, 120(4), 675-680.
Webster, A., Campbell, C., &; Jane, B. (2006). Enhancing the creative process for learning in primary technol-ogy education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 16, 221-235.
Wilson, V., &; Harris, M. (2003). Designing the best: A re-view of effective teaching and learning of design and technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 13(3), 223–241.
Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., &; Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18, 293-321.
Wright, C., &; Fesler, L. L. (1990). Nurturing creative po-tentials: A model early childhood program. In C. W. Taylor (Ed.), Expanding awareness of creative poten-tials worldwide (pp. 138-142). Salt Lake, UT: Brain Talent-powers.
Wu, H. Y., Chen, J. K., &; Chen, I. S. (2010). Innovation capital indicator assessment of Taiwanese universi-ties: A hybrid fuzzy model application. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(2), 1635-1642
Wu, H. Y., Wu, H. S., Chen, I. S., &; Chen, H. C. (2014). Exploring the critical influential factors of creativity for college students: A multiple criteria decision- making approach, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 11, 1-21
Yi, X., Cai, S., Scheithauer H., Schwarzer, R., Luo, L., Huang, S., &; Chen, G. (2008). Creative organisational climate of schools, general self-efficacy, creativity self-efficacy, and cultural efficacy of teachers. Edu-cational Research Journal, 23 (2), 227-251
Yuan, Y. H., Wu, M. H., &; Lee. J. C. (2014). The essential difference on public or private vocational school - The students’ creativity of mechanical engineering. Pro-cedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 2321–2329.
Yukl, G. A. (2010). Leadership in organizations (5th Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE