:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:脈絡效果的階層線性模型分析:以學校組織創新氣氛與教師創意表現為例
書刊名:教育與心理研究
作者:邱皓政 引用關係溫福星 引用關係
作者(外文):Chiou, HawjengWen, Fur-hsing
出版日期:2007
卷期:30:1
頁次:頁1-35
主題關鍵詞:脈絡效果脈絡變數迴歸同質假設組織創新氣氛階層線性模式Assumption of homogeneity of regressionContextual effectsContextual variablesHierarchical linear modelingOrganizational climate of creativity
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(28) 博士論文(22) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:27
  • 共同引用共同引用:23
  • 點閱點閱:448
社會科學研究所使用的量化資料多涉及階層性或叢集性的結構,階層資料的一個重要特性,是低階層次的解釋變數可以透過組內聚合程序,產生相同測量內容的「脈絡變數」(contextual variable)。透過脈絡變數與個體解釋變數相互間統計控制,得出解釋變數對於依變項的影響,稱為脈絡效果。本文的目的,主要在陳述脈絡變數的處理對於階層資料結構分析的重要性,並以688位來自22個學校的中學教師的組織創新氣氛調查資料為例,以傳統的分析取向(ANOVA、多元迴歸分析)與「階層線性模式」(Hierarchical Linear Modeling, HLM),進行脈絡效果的分析。研究數據指出,利用HLM的脈絡效果模型,證明了脈絡變數與個體解釋變數的相互影響,影響了各變數對於依變項(教師創意表現)的解釋,以致得出不同的研究結論,同時也發現脈絡變數會因為組間差異的存在,造成參數估計的變動。此外,本研究也發現組內迴歸不同質現象會影響變數的解釋,但可利用HLM分析來加以處理,是HLM優於其他分析技術之處。本文的結論指出,脈絡效果的檢驗,應被視為HLM分析的必要程序。其他有關HLM方法學與技術層面的考量,也影響數據分析與解釋的正確性,進一步的研究可再就脈絡效果在實際研究中的檢驗策略,以及HLM的原理與假設問題深入探究。
The data collected in social research frequently involve multilevel or cluster structure. One of the features of multilevel data is that the predictive variables in the individual level could be aggregated into the group level, served as a contextual variable. In turn, contextual effects, defined as the net effect of a group analytic variable after having controlled for the effect of the same variable on the individual level, may confound with other predictive variables in the model. The purpose of present paper is to clarify the significance of the contextual effects in the social research. A dataset based on a nation-wise survey on organizational climate of creativity, consisted of 688 high-school teachers at 22 high-schools, was taken for examining the contextual effects. Traditional analytic strategies such as ANOVA and multiple regression along with hierarchical linear modeling were applied. Results indicated that contextual variables on the group level have significantly confounding effects on the parameter estimates of predictive variables in the models, resulting in the different conclusions. Violation of the assumption of homogeneity of regression homogerenality may also affect the analysis of contextual effects. The present study proved that the HLM approach could be used to explore the contextual effects. However, further study on the basic technical issue of HLM for applying to the examination of contextual effects is expected. It is noted that the methodological issues of HLM have to be emphasized while the contextual effects been in interest.
期刊論文
1.Forehand, Garlie A.、Gilmer, Beverly Von Haller(1964)。Environmental variation in studies of organizational behavior。Psychological Bulletin,62(6),361-382。  new window
2.Denison, D. R.(1996)。What is the Difference between Organizational Culture and Organizational Climate? A Native's Point of View on a Decade of Paradigm War's。Academy of Management Review,21(3),619-654。  new window
3.Ferron, J.、Dailey, R. F.、Yi, Q.(2002)。Effects of Misspecifying the First-level Error Structure in Twolevel Models of Change。Multivariate Behavioral Research,37(3),379-403。  new window
4.Piantadosi, S.、Byar, D. P.、Green, S. B.(1988)。The ecological fallacy。American Journal of Epidemiology,127(5),893-904。  new window
5.Robinson, William S.(1950)。Ecological Correlations and the Behavior of Individuals。American Sociological Review,15(3),351-357。  new window
6.劉子鍵、林原宏(19970600)。階層線性模式之理論與應用:以「影響自然科成績之因素的研究」為分析實例。教育與心理研究,20(上),1-21。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Shalley, C. E.、Zhou, J.、Oldham, G. R.(2004)。The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here?。Journal of Management,30(6),933-958。  new window
8.Amabile, T. M.、Gryskiewicz, N. D.(1989)。The creative environment scales: Work environment inventory。Creativity Research Journal,2(4),231-253。  new window
9.James, K.、Clark, K.、Cropanzano, R.(1999)。Positive and Negative Creativity in Groups, Institutions, and Organizations: A Model and Theoretical Extension。Creativity Research Journal,12(3),211-226。  new window
10.Lewin, Kurt、Lippitt, Ronald、White, Ralph K.(1939)。Patterns of Aggressive Behavior in Experimentally Created "Social Climates"。The Journal of Social Psychology,10(2),269-299。  new window
11.林原宏(19970600)。教育研究資料的階層線性模式分析。臺中師院學報,11,489-510。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.王文中(19950900)。學校效率研究中的因果推論:以階層線性模式為例。教育與心理研究,18,51-81。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Burstein, L.、Linn, R. L.、Capell, F. J.(1978)。Analyzing Multilevel Data in the Presence of Heterogeneous within-class Regressions。Journal of Educational Statistics,3,347-383。  new window
14.Montes, F. J. L.、Moreno, A. R.、Fernandez, L. M. M.(2003)。Assessing the Organizational Climate and Contractual Relationship for Perceptions of Support for Innovation。International Journal of Manpower,25(2),167-180。  new window
15.Diez-Roux, A. V.(1998)。Bring Context Back into Epidemiology: Variables and Fallacies in Multilevel Analysis。American Journal of Public Health,88,216-222。  new window
16.Snijders, T. A. B.、Bosker, R.(1994)。Modeled Variance in Two-level Models。Journal of Educational Statistics,18,273-259。  new window
17.DiPrete, T. A.、Forristal, J. D.(1994)。Multilevel Models: Methods and Substance。Annual Review of Sociology,20,331-357。  new window
18.Roberts, J. K.(2002)。The Importance of the Intraclass Correlation in Multilevel and Hierarchical Linear Modeling Design。Multiple Linear Regression Viewpoints,28(2),19-31。  new window
會議論文
1.邱皓政(2000)。組織創新環境的概念建構與測量工具發展。國科會整合型計劃「創新與創造力-技術創造力的涵義與開發」研討會,國立政治大學 。台北:政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.Ferron, J.、Hess, M. R.、Hogarty, K. Y.、Dedrick, R. F.、Kromrey, J. D.、Lang, T. R.、Niles, J.(2004)。Hierarchical Linear Modeling: A Review of Methodological Issues and Applications。0。  new window
研究報告
1.邱皓政(2001)。校園中的創造性環境與文化:從技職學校到普通高中校園創造性組織氣氛之評量與相關因素之研究。臺北縣新莊市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Lieberson, Stanley(1985)。Making it count: The improvement of social research and theory。Berkeley, CA:University of California Press。  new window
2.邱皓政(2005)。量化研究法,統計原理與分析技術:SPSS中文視窗版操作實務詳析。臺北市:雙葉書廊。  延伸查詢new window
3.Courgeau, D.(2003)。Methodology and Epistemology of Multilevel Analysis: Approaches from Different Social Sciences。Kluwer。  new window
4.Iversen, Gudmund R.(1991)。Contextual Analysis。Newbury Park, CA:Sage。  new window
5.Morgan, G.(1991)。Images of organization。Beverly Hills, CA:Sage。  new window
6.Heck, Ronald H.、Thomas, Scott L.(2000)。An introduction to multilevel modeling techniques。Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
7.溫福星(2006)。階層線性模式:理論、方法與應用。臺北市:雙葉書廊有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
8.Kreft, I. G. G.(1996)。Are Multilevel Techniques Necessary? An Overview, Including Simulation Studies。Los Angeles, CA:California State University。  new window
9.Goldstein, H.(2003)。Multilevel statistical models。London, UK:Edward Arnold。  new window
10.Bryk, Anthony S.、Raudenbush, Stephen W.(1992)。Hierarchical Linear Models in Social and Behavioral Research: Applications and Data Analysis Methods。Newbury Park, CA:Sage Publications。  new window
11.Argyris, C.(1958)。Personality and organization。New York:Harper。  new window
12.Pedhazur, E. J.(1982)。Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research: Explanation and prediction。Holt, Rinehart & Winston。  new window
13.Cook, T. D.、Campbell, D. T.(1979)。Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings。Boston:Houghton Mifflin Company。  new window
14.Raudenbush, S. W.、Bryk, A. S.、Cheong, Y. F.、Congdon, R. T. Jr.、Du Toit, M.(2004)。HLM 6: Hierarchical Linear and Nonlinear Modeling。Scientific Software International, Inc.。  new window
15.Kreft, Ita G. G.、De Leeuw, Jan(1998)。Introducing Multilevel Modeling。Sage。  new window
16.Raudenbush, Stephen W.、Bryk, Anthony S.(2002)。Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods。Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage Press。  new window
17.克佛特(2006)。多層次模型分析導論。多層次模型分析導論。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
18.Lewin, K.(1947)。Group Decision and Social Change。Reading in Social Psychology。New York, NY:Holt, Rinehart and Winston。  new window
19.Seltzer, M.(2004)。The Use of Hierarchical Models in Analyzing Data from Experiments and Quasi-experiments Conducted in Field Settings。The SAGE Handbook of Quantitative Methodology for the Social Sciences。Newbury Park, CA。  new window
其他
1.Mok, M.(1995)。Sample Size Requirements for 2-level Designs in Educational Research,0。  new window
2.Preacher, K. J.,Curran, P. J.,Bauer, D. J.(2004)。Simple Intercepts, Simple Slopes, and Regions of Significance in HLM 2-way Interactions,0。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE