臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：公共服務模式之興替：以西門商圈街道家具治理為例
書刊名：東吳政治學報
作者：曾冠球 引用關係／黃玉龍
作者(外文)：Tseng, Kuan-chiu／Huang, Yu-long
出版日期：2016
卷期：34:1
頁次：頁155-208
主題關鍵詞：交易成本；政府治理模式；協力的分配政治；Transaction cost；Modes of government governance；Politics of distribution
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:80
  • 點閱點閱:48
政府當局為何及如何選擇特定的治理模式？政府治理模式的演進是否吻合主流文獻（如新公共服務、協力公共管理）的倡議或主張？學者們經常提到政府治理模式至少有三種比較明確的類型，並主張｢信任導向的協力治理｣會比｢競爭導向的市場治理｣與傳統的｢權威導向的層級治理｣更具有相對優勢。此外，根據新制度經濟學與契約管理的文獻看法，｢交易成本｣與｢市場競爭｣很可能影響到治理模式的選擇。遺憾的是，公共管理實務中欲找到這樣一個歷經｢多元治理模式｣的個案並不容易，以致於研究者殊難針對上述命題進行檢驗。基於理論抽樣的原則，本研究特意挑選｢臺北市西門商圈街道家具治理模式｣個案進行探究，有趣的研究發現主要有二：（1）主流文獻主張在某些情形下，政府｢協力治理模式｣的運作優於｢市場競爭模式｣，但本研究結果卻顯示，｢協力治理模式｣最終仍不敵公共管理者對｢市場競爭模式｣的傳統偏好。（2）主流文獻上指稱的｢交易成本風險｣，實務上未必是影響治理模式選擇的關鍵問題。伴隨公私協力成效卓著所衍生的｢分配政治｣(politics of distribution)，反而被公共管理者視為燙手山芋的難題，此乃促使原本全臺首創的協力創新之商圈自治模式，不得不走向回頭路之主因。對於上述研究發現的意涵，本文也作了一些討論，期能豐富化既有的文獻與知識體系。
How and why do government authorities would like to choose a specific mode of governance? Whether the evolution of governance modes in the government sector corresponds with the normative assertion of mainstream perspectives (i.e. new public service, collaborative public management). Scholars often propose that there are at least three typical modes of governance, and argue that the mode of ＂trust-oriented collaborative governance＂ is superior to those modes of ＂competition-oriented market governance＂ and traditional ＂authority-oriented hierarchical governance＂. Plus, according to theories in new institutional economics and contract management, ＂transaction costs＂ and ＂market competition＂ will severely affect the selection of governance modes. Unfortunately, a case, characterized by multiple modes of governance, which can be provided for researchers to systematically validate the proposition mentioned above, seems hard to find. Therefore, it is difficult to discern why the modes of governance would like to change in reality. Against this background, based on theoretical sampling, the case of ＂Governance Mode of the Pedestrian Sidewalk Area for Street Furniture, Ximending District in Taipei＂ is consciously utilized to solve the puzzles. Two interesting findings derived from the case are as follows: a) under certain contexts, public managers may prefer the mode of ＂market governance＂ better than the mode of ＂collaborative governance＂; b) transaction costs are not always key factors influencing the selection of the mode of governance. Actually, ＂politics of distribution＂ is a serious obstacle that may force public manager to cease the collaborative practice. Managerial implications are also provided at the end of the paper.
期刊論文
1.Considine, Mark、Lewis, J. M.(2003)。Bureaucracy, Network, or Enterprise? Comparing Models of Governance in Australia, Britain, the Netherlands, and New Zealand。Public Administration Review，63(2)，131-140。  new window
2.Lamothe, M.、Lamothe, S.(2010)。Competing for What? Linking Competition to Performance in Social Service Contracting。American Review of Public Administration，40(3)，326-350。  new window
3.Osborne, Stephen P.(2006)。The New Public Governance?。Public Management Review，8(3)，377-387。  new window
4.Girth, A. M.、Hefetz, A.、Johnston, J. M.、Warner, M. E.(2012)。Outsourcing Public Service Delivery: Management Responses in Noncompetitive Markets。Public Administration Review，72(6)，887-900。  new window
5.Brown, Trevor L.、Potoski, Matthew、Van Slyke, David M.(2006)。Managing Public Service Contracts: Aligning Values, Institutions, and Markets。Public Administration Review，66(3)，323-331。  new window
6.Brown, T. L.、Potoski, M.(2003)。Transaction Costs and Institutional Explanations for Government Service Production Decisions。Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory，13(4)，441-468。  new window
7.Bozeman, B.(2013)。What organization theorists and public policy researchers can learn from one another: Publicness theory as a case-in-point。Organization Studies，34(2)，169-188。  new window
8.Lowndes, V.、Skelcher, C.(1998)。The Dynamics of Multi-Organizational Partnerships: An Analysis of Changing Models of Governance。Public Administration，76(2)，313-334。  new window
9.Entwistle, T.、Martin, Steven(2005)。From Competition to Collaboration in Public Service Delivery: A New Agenda for Research。Public Administration，83(1)，233-242。  new window
10.Goetz, Charles J.、Scott, Robert E.(1981)。Principles of Relational Contracts。Virginia Law Review，67(6)，1089-1150。  new window
11.Haque, M. Shamsul(2001)。The Diminishing Publicness of Public Service under the Current Mode of Governance。Public Administration Review，61(1)，65-82。  new window
12.O'Leary, Rosemary、Vij, Nidhi(2012)。Collaborative Public Management: Where Have We Been and Where Are We Going?。American Review of Public Administration，42(5)，507-522。  new window
13.Kooiman, J.、Bavinck, M.、Chuenpagdee, R.、Mahon, R.、Pullin, R.(2008)。Interactive Governance and Governability: an Introduction。The Journal of Transdisciplinary Environmental Studies，7(1)，1-11。  new window
14.Milward, H. B.、Provan, K. G.(2003)。Managing the hollow state: Collaboration and contracting。Public Management Review，5(1)，1-18。  new window
15.李志恒(2004)。從鴉片到搖頭丸--台灣百年物質濫用史。國立歷史博物館館刊：歷史文物，14(7)，72-77。  延伸查詢new window
16.陳重安(20110900)。政府契約委外的再檢視：目標、理論應用、績效衡量、與知識論基礎。公共行政學報，40，111-143。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.Vigoda, Eran(2002)。From Responsiveness to Collaboration: Governance, Citizens, and the Next Generation of Public Administration。Public Administration Review，62(5)，527-540。  new window
18.Denhardt, Janet V.、Denhardt, Robert B.(2015)。The New Public Service Revisited。Public Administration Review，75(5)，664-672。  new window
19.O'FLYNN, J.(2007)。From New Public Management to Public Value: Paradigmatic Change and Managerial Implications。The Australian Journal of Public Administration，66(3)，353-366。  new window
20.Yang, Y. H.、Hou, Y.、Wang, Y.(2013)。On the development of public-private partnerships in transitional economies: An explanatory framework。Public Administration Review，73(2)，301-310。  new window
21.Allen, Pauline、Hughes, David、Vincent-Jones, Peter、Petsoulas, Christina、Doheny, Shane、Roberts, Jennifer A.(2016)。Public Contracts as Accountability Mechanisms: Assuring Quality in Public Health Care in England and Wales。Public Management Review，18(1)，20-39。  new window
22.Alam, Q.(2014)。Managing Infrastructure Projects in Australia: A Shift from a Contractual to a Collaborative Public Management Strategy。Administration and Society，46(4)，422-449。  new window
23.Bryson, J. M.(2015)。Designing and Implementing Cross-Sector Collaborations: Needed and Challenging。Public Administration Review，75(5)，647-663。  new window
24.Denis, J. L.(2015)。Understanding Hybridity in Public Organizations。Public Administration，93(2)，273-289。  new window
25.Ferris, J. M.、Graddy, E.(1991)。Production Costs, Transaction Costs, and Local-government Contractor Choice。Economic Inquiry，29，541-554。  new window
26.Fledderus, J.(2014)。Restoring Trust through the Co-Production of Public Services: A Theoretical Elaboration。Public Management Review，16(3)，424-443。  new window
27.Geddes, L.(2012)。In Search of Collaborative Public Management。Public Management Review，14(7)，947-966。  new window
28.Getha-Taylor, H.(2011)。Focusing the Public Leadership Lens: Research Propositions and Questions in the Minnowbrook Tradition。Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory，21，83-97。  new window
29.Hartley, J.(2013)。Collaborative Innovation: A Viable Alternative to Market-Competition and Organizational Entrepreneurship。Public Administration Review，73(6)，821-830。  new window
30.Hefetz, A.、Warner, M. E.(2011)。Contracting or Public Delivery? The Importance of Service, Market and Management Characteristics。Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory，22(2)，289-317。  new window
31.Jakobsen, M.、Andersen, S. C.(2013)。Coproduction and Equity in Public Service Delivery。Public Administration Review，73(5)，704-713。  new window
32.Joaquin, M. E.、Greitens, T. J.(2012)。Contract Management Capacity Breakdown? An Analysis of U.S。Local Governments. Public Administration Review，72(6)，807-816。  new window
33.Johansen, M.、Zhu, L.(2014)。Market Pressure, Political Constraints, and Managerial Responses to the External Environment: Evidence from American Hospitals。Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory，24(1)，159-184。  new window
34.Johnston, E.(2010)。Managing the Inclusion Process in Collaborative Governance。Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory，21，699-721。  new window
35.Kamarck, E. C.(2002)。The End of Government as We Know It: Market-Based Governance。  new window
36.Kelleher, C. A.、Yackee, S. W.(2009)。A Political Consequence of Contracting: Organized Interests and State Agency Decision Making。Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory，19(3)，579-602。  new window
37.Lamothe, M.、Lamothe, S.(2012)。To Trust or Not to Trust? What Matters in Local Government-Vendor Relationships。Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory，22(4)，867-892。  new window
38.Lamothe, S.(2015)。How Competitive is "Competitive" Procurement in the Social Services。The American Review of Public Administration，45(5)，584-606。  new window
39.O'Leary, R.(2010)。Teaching Collaborative Leadership: Ideas and Lessons for the Field。Journal Public Affairs Education，16(4)，565-592。  new window
40.Osborne, S. P.(2013)。A New Theory for Public Service Management? Toward a (Public) Service-Dominant Approach。American Review of Public Administration，43(2)，135-158。  new window
41.Petersen, O. H.(2015)。Contracting Out Local Services: A Tale of Technical and Social Services。Public Administration Review，75(4)，560-570。  new window
42.林虹伶(2009)。政府與民間聯手打造西門町新貌。臺北畫刊，497，58-59。  延伸查詢new window
43.林珊汝(2013)。專訪行政院江院長宜樺。公共治理季刊，1(1)，3-10。  延伸查詢new window
44.陳敦源、張世杰(20100700)。公私協力夥伴關係的弔詭。文官制度季刊，2(3)，17-71。new window  延伸查詢new window
45.Denhardt, Robert B.、Denhardt, Janet Vinzant(2000)。The New Public Service: Serving Rather Than Steering。Public Administration Review，60(6)，549-559。  new window
46.Ansell, Chris、Gash, Alison(2008)。Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice。Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory，18(4)，543-571。  new window
47.Warner, Mildred E.、Hefetz, Amir(2008)。Managing Markets for Public Service: The Role of Mixed Public-Private Delivery of City Services.。Public Administration Review，68(1)，155-166。  new window
圖書
1.Kettl, Donald F.(1993)。Sharing Power: Public Governance and Private Markets。Washington, DC：The Brookings Institution Press。  new window
2.Peters, B. Guy(1996)。The Future of Governing: Four Emerging Models。University Press of Kansas。  new window
3.Box, R.(1998)。Citizen Governance: Leading America Communities into the 21st Century。Thousand Oaks, CA：SAGE。  new window
4.Donahue, J. D.、Zeckhauser, R. J.(2011)。Collaborative Governance: Private Sector Roles for Public Goals in Turbulent Times。Princeton University Press。  new window
5.Torfing, J.(2012)。Interactive Governance: Advancing the Paradigm。Oxford：Oxford University Press。  new window
6.Kickert, W. J. M.(1997)。Managing Complex Network: Strategies for the Public Sector。Calif：Sage Publications。  new window
7.Yin, Robert K.(2003)。Case Study Research: Design and Methods。Sage Publications。  new window
8.Gerring, John(2007)。Case Study Research: Principles and Practices。Cambridge University Press。  new window
9.Freeman, Robert Edward(1984)。Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach。Pitman。  new window
其他
1.臺北市萬華區公所(2013)。臺北市萬華區公所提升服務品質績效報告，台北市萬華區公所。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Rhodes, R.(1997)。Foreword。Managing Complex Networks: Strategies for the Public Sector。London：Sage。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：412（臺灣：412，外國：0） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2111296 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67907480
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上