:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:公共政策棘手問題界定理論之研究:以我國觀光博弈產業政策與個案為例
書刊名:行政暨政策學報
作者:李衍儒 引用關係趙永茂 引用關係
作者(外文):Lee, Yen-juChao, Yung-mau
出版日期:2016
卷期:62
頁次:頁1-58
主題關鍵詞:公民投票問題界定政策問題政策弔詭棘手問題ReferendumProblem definitionPolicy problemPolicy paradoxWicked problem
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:6
  • 共同引用共同引用:264
  • 點閱點閱:147
當代公共政策問題幾乎都是所謂的「棘手問題」,由於大家對問題是否存在沒有共識,即使有部分共識認為問題存在,但對問題的本質仍無一致的看法,這些棘手問題使問題分析在政策過程的早期階段即遭遇困難,從而凸顯政策問題本質與認定的重要性。本文嘗試從政策過程的問題認定階段,梳理棘手問題的解決之道,除就政策問題相關理論進行文獻回顧,以剖析我國觀光博弈產業政策的歷史脈絡與法制規範外,並以我國觀光博弈產業的2個公民投票個案為例,進行深度訪談與分析,最後,提出具體研究發現與研究建議。總之,作者希望本研究在理論上,能增益棘手問題、政策問題界定的理論、政府政策態度及政策弔詭等相關知識之累積;同時在實務上,能有助於未來我國整體觀光博弈產業政策的發展。
Contemporary public policy problems tend to be what may be called "wicked problems". Even there may be general awareness of the existence of a problem, it is often hard to reach consensus on the nature of the problem. Such wicked problems make it more difficult to analyze the problem at the early stage of the policy process, which highlights the importance of recognizing and defining the nature of policy problems. In this article, we explore solutions for wicked problems in the stage of problem identification in the policy process. To do this, we first conduct a literature review on relevant theories, with a focus on the historical contexts and regulations of tourism and gambling industry policy in Taiwan. We then discuss in detail two cases of referendum about tourism and gambling industry policy, using in-depth interviews and analysis on the pros and cons of setting up tourist casinos. Finally, we offer research findings and advices for future studies. We also hope that this study will offer contributions to the theories of wicked problems and policy problem definition, attitudes of the government, and policy paradox. In the meantime, we hope that this article will provide practical advices on the development of overall tourism and gambling industry policy in Taiwan.
期刊論文
1.Rochefort, David A.、Cobb, Roger W.(1993)。Problem Definition, Agenda Access and Policy Choice。Policy Studies Journal,21(1),56-71。  new window
2.陳敦源、韓智先(20000200)。是誰告訴人民他們要什麼?媒體、民意與公共議程設定。研考雙月刊,24(1)=215,19-31。  延伸查詢new window
3.Chisholm, D.(1995)。Problem Solving and Institutional Design。Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,5(4),451-491。  new window
4.Rittel, H. W. J.、Webber, M. M.(1973)。Dilemmas in a general theory of planning。Policy Sciences,4,155-169。  new window
5.林水波(20110200)。協力治理。研習論壇,122,8-22。  延伸查詢new window
6.Stone, D. A.(1989)。Causal Stories and the Formation of Policy Agendas。Political Science Quarterly,104(2),281-300。  new window
7.Bachrach, Peter、Baratz, Morton S.(1962)。Two Faces of Power。The American Political Science Review,56(4),947-952。  new window
8.莊文忠、徐明莉、張鐙文(20091200)。非營利組織的議程設定與政策倡議的形成:質化研究的檢證。公共行政學報,33,121-163。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Blackman, T.、Greene, A.、Hunter, D.、McKee, L.、Elliott, E.、Harrington, B.、Marks, L.、Williams, G.(2006)。Performance Assessment and Wicked Problems: The Case of Health Inequalities。Public Policy and Administration,21(2),66-80。  new window
10.Bovens, M.、Hart, Paul't(1995)。Frame Multiplicity and Policy Fiascos: Limits to Explanation。Knowledge and Policy,8(4),61-83。  new window
11.Churchman, C. W.(1967)。Free For All。Management Science,14,141-142。  new window
12.Head, Brian W.、Alford, John(2015)。Wicked Problems: Implications for Public Policy and Management。Administration and Society,47(6),711-739。  new window
13.Kettl, D.(2006)。Managing Boundaries in American Administration: The Collaborative Imperative。Public Administration Review,66,10-19。  new window
14.王美珍(2013)。要快,就要慢慢來。遠見雜誌,325,292。  延伸查詢new window
15.Bachrach, Peter、Baratz, Morton S.(1963)。Decisions and Nondecisions: An Analytical Framework。American Political Science Review,57(3),632-642。  new window
16.Dahl, Robert Alan(1957)。The Concept of Power。Behavioral Science,2(3),201-215。  new window
研究報告
1.交通部(2012)。博弈專法研究委託法律暨專業顧問服務案期末工作成果報告書。臺北:交通部。  延伸查詢new window
2.澎湖縣選舉委員會(2009)。澎湖要不要設置國際觀光度假區附設觀光賭場第1案開票結果統計表。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Rein, Martin(1976)。Social Science and Public Policy。Penguin Books。  new window
2.Ackoff, Russell L.(1974)。Redesigning the Future: A Systems Approach to Societal Problems。New York, NY:Willey。  new window
3.Lindblom, C. E.、Cohen, D. K.(1979)。Usable knowledge: Social science and social problem solving。London。  new window
4.McAvoy, Gregory E.(1999)。Controlling Technocracy: Citizen Rationality and the NIMBY Syndrome。Washington, DC:Georgetown University Press。  new window
5.Australian Public Service Commission(2007)。Tackling wicked problems: a public policy perspective。Canberra:Commonwealth of Australia。  new window
6.懷德(2013)。馬祖夜未眠。臺北:時英。  延伸查詢new window
7.Heineman, Robert A.、Bluhm, William T.、Peterson, Steven A.、Kearny, Edward N.(2001)。The World of the Policy Analyst: Rationality, Values and Politics。Washington, D.C.:CQ Press。  new window
8.Hoppe, R.(2010)。The Governance of Problems: Puzzling, Powering, Participation。Bristol:Policy Press。  new window
9.Weimer, D. L.、Vining, A. R.(2005)。Policy Analysis: Concepts and Practice。New Jersey:Pearson Prentice Hall。  new window
10.Stone, Deborah A.(2012)。Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making。W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.。  new window
11.Bachrach, Peter、Baratz, Morton S.(1970)。Power and Poverty: Theory and Practice。New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
12.Patton, C. V.、Sawicki, D. S.(1993)。Basic methods of policy analysis and planning。Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall。  new window
13.行政院經濟建設委員會(2008)。台灣發展觀光賭場之策略規劃。臺北:行政院經濟建設委員會。  延伸查詢new window
14.Stone, D. A.、朱道凱(2007)。政策弔詭:政治決策的藝術。臺北市:群學。  延伸查詢new window
15.Mitroff, Ian I.(1974)。The Subjective Side of Science: A Philosophical Inquiry into the Psychology of the Apollo Moon Scientists。New York:American Elsevier。  new window
16.Morrison, V.(2013)。Wicked Problems and Public Policy。Montréal, Québec:National Collaborating Centre for Healthy Public Policy。  new window
17.Nimmo, D.(1974)。Popular Images of Politics。Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall。  new window
18.Raiffa, Howard(1968)。Decision Analysis: Introductory Lectures on Choices under Uncertainty。Addison-Wesley。  new window
19.Kirk, Jerome、Miller, Marc L.(1986)。Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research。Sage Publications。  new window
20.丘昌泰(2010)。公共政策:基礎篇。台北:巨流圖書公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.Cobb, R. W.、Elder, C. D.(1983)。Participation in American Politics: The Dynamics of Agenda Building。Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press。  new window
22.Dunn, William N.(2012)。Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction。Pearson Education, Inc.。  new window
23.Simon, Herbert A.(1983)。Reason in Human Affairs。Stanford:Stanford University Press。  new window
24.Marcuse, Herbert(1991)。One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society。Routledge。  new window
25.Dery, David(1984)。Problem Definition in Policy Analysis。Lawrence, Kansas:University Press of Kansas。  new window
26.Edelman, Murray(1988)。Constructing the Political Spectacle。Chicago, Illinois:University of Chicago Press。  new window
27.丘昌泰(1995)。公共政策:當代政策科學理論之研究。臺北市:巨流圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
28.吳定(2003)。公共政策。台北:國立空中大學。  延伸查詢new window
29.Jun, Jong S.(1994)。Philosophy of Administration。Seoul:Daeyoung Moonhwa International。  new window
30.Stone, Deborah A.(1997)。Policy paradox: The art of political decision making。New York:W. W. Norton & Company。  new window
31.Gerring, John(2007)。Case Study Research: Principles and Practices。Cambridge University Press。  new window
32.Lukes, Steven(2005)。Power: A Radical View。Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
33.Strauss, Anselm L.、Corbin, Juliet M.(1990)。Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedure and techniques。Sage。  new window
其他
1.立法院(2013)。立法院第8屆第3會期第13次會議議案關係文書,http://lis.ly.gov.tw/lgcgi/lgmeetimage?cfc7cfccceccc8cdc5cecec8d2cecac9, 2015/04/02。  延伸查詢new window
2.曾鴻儒(20121208)。馬祖博弈 懷德︰拚四年後營運。  延伸查詢new window
3.連江縣選舉委員會(2012)。公告連江縣地方性公民投票案第1案公民投票結果,http://www.lcec.gov.tw/files/15-1022-19650,c4211-1.php, 2014/06/18。  延伸查詢new window
4.Horn, R. E.,Weber, R. P.(2007)。New Tools for Resolving Wicked Problems: Mess Mapping and Resolution Mapping Processes,http://www.strategykinetics.com/New_Tools_For_Resolving_Wicked_Problems.pdf, 2015/12/14。  new window
圖書論文
1.Zeckhauser, Richard、Schaefer, E.(1968)。Public Policy and Normative Economic Theory。The Study of Policy Formation。New York:The Free Press。  new window
2.楊孝濚(1989)。內容分析法。社會及行為科學研究法。臺北市:東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.Conklin, J.(2006)。Wicked Problems and Social Complexity。Dialogue Mapping: Building Shared Understanding of Wicked Problems。Hoboken, NJ:Wiley。  new window
4.Webber, M. M.(1978)。A Difference Paradigm for Planning。Planning Theory in the 1980s: A Search for Future Directions。New Brunswick, NJ:Rutgers University。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE