臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：大學影片鑑賞教學模式之發展與效果--以女性主義及生命教育為影片議題
書刊名：教育實踐與研究
作者：楊馥如
作者(外文)：Yang, Fu-ju
出版日期：2016
卷期：29:2
頁次：頁173-207
主題關鍵詞：行動研究；影片鑑賞；藝術鑑賞；鑑賞教學；Action research；Appreciation teaching；Art appreciation；Film appreciation
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:47
  • 點閱點閱:27
影片是當前大學生最常接觸的媒體，但目前影片鑑賞教學的研究仍為不足。研究者將藝術品的藝術鑑賞方法融入影片鑑賞特質，且兼顧學習者的感受與詮釋，建構大學中的影片鑑賞教學模式，希望為日後影片鑑賞教學實務與研究提供發展方向，也作為改進鑑賞相關教學之參考。本研究採行動研究方法，進行研究資料蒐集與分析。首先透過文獻探討建構影片鑑賞教學之模式，之後實施於兩屆新生的「視覺傳播概論」課程中，第一、二年班級都採用四部影片，各歷時十四週，採用觀察、訪談、文件分析、問卷等方式蒐集資料。研究結果顯示影片鑑賞教學的賞析細目需要融入影片特色而加以調整，可增列學生（觀者）感受、見解或經驗的省思。問卷資料與質性調查結果顯示學生能瞭解與分析影片的形式、技法、意涵等；藉由影片的反思，促成想法甚至行為的改變。教師可融入議題，設計相關問題讓學生思考；引導性的討論比開放性討論更有效率；且良好設計之學習單、報告可用來檢驗學生的學習成果。
Film is a medium to which contemporary university students have the most exposure. However, little research has been conducted on teaching film appreciation. In this study, art appreciation methods are adapted for film appreciation in the attempt to establish a new teaching model for film appreciation in Taiwanese universities that enables students to express personal responses. This approach opens up new possibilities for future teaching practice and research while serving as a reference for improving film appreciation education. This study employs an action research method for data collection and analysis. A model for teaching film appreciation was established based on literature review and implemented in a freshman course titled “Introduction to Visual Communication” for two consecutive years. Four films were used over 14 weeks in both years the course was offered, and data was collected through observation, interviews, document analysis (worksheets, feedback forms, reflection notes), and questionnaires. Results show that the implementation of teaching film appreciation must be adjusted in accordance with the characteristics of films studied by addressing student (viewer) reaction, personal views and experience. Students were able to understand and analyze film formats, techniques and meaning. Their self-reflection encouraged changes in their thinking and sometimes even behavior. Guided discussions were found to be more effective than free discussion. Well-designed worksheets and both oral and written reports were useful for evaluating learning outcomes.
期刊論文
1.鄒濬智(20080100)。如何在通識課程中妥善運用影視教材？--從「電影與人生百態」課程的設計理念談起。研究與動態，17，161-176。  延伸查詢new window
2.宋秀娟、林友棻(20090400)。電影音樂融入通識教育課程之探討--以大葉大學及建國科技大學為例。臺南科技大學通識教育學刊，8，217-236。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.王千倖(20120600)。「學習者主導」影片教學模式應用於師資生「生命教育」課程之初探。教育實踐與研究，25(1)，163-188。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Bo, B.(2008)。The differences between novels and films: enhance literature teaching by using films。U.S.-China Education Re^vie^w，5(7)，58-61。  new window
5.Prater, M.(2002)。Art criticism : Modifying the formalist approach。Art Education，55(2)，12-17。  new window
6.Aguirre, I.(2004)。Beyond the understanding of visual culture: A pragmatist approach to aesthetic education。International Journal of Art & Design Education，23(3)，256-269。  new window
7.陳育淳(20061000)。性別議題融入藝術教育之統整課程行動研究實例。師大學報. 教育類，51(2)，91-119。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.路況(20041200)。假如教室像電影院--德勒茲電影符號學。電影欣賞，23(1)=121，39-44。  延伸查詢new window
9.Taunton, M.(1983)。Questioning strategies to encourage young children to talk about art。Art Education，36(4)，40-43。  new window
10.Weerts, S.(2005)。Use of films to teach critical thinking。Journal of Nutrition Education & Behavior，37(2)，100-101。  new window
11.白娟翠(2005)。大學藝術系學生對流行視覺影像解讀之初探。視聽教育雙月刊，279，34-45。  延伸查詢new window
12.江惠蓮(19940400)。如何用電影來教學:以「清秀佳人」為例。英語教學，18(4)=72，55-69。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.宋邦珍(2002)。電影教學運用於通識課程：以「羅生門」為例。輔英通識教育年刊，1，141-149。  延伸查詢new window
14.徐敏雄(2013)。社區大學MV流行熱舞蹈融人式課程實踐經驗之個案研究。藝術教育研究，25，1-31。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.張淑雯(2007)。上課了，一起看電影：談電影融入生命教育課程。教師之友，48(4)，81-88。  延伸查詢new window
16.黃傳永(2011)。從符號互動論談電影教學在生命教育的應用。諮商與輔導，301，6-9。  延伸查詢new window
17.楊紋紋(20021200)。「蟲蟲危機」--我把卡通電影帶入教學現場。實中學刊，14，左176-187。  延伸查詢new window
18.楊馥如(2014)。藝術批評方法應用於動畫賞析教學之研究。藝術學報，94，271-296。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.歐姿妤、黃貞觀(2011)。以「不願面對的真相」影片教學探究專科學生對現存環境污染之觀點。新生學報，8，51-64。  延伸查詢new window
20.蔡宗和(2006)。以劇情片做為教學工具之意涵。視聽教育雙月刊，284，30-38。  延伸查詢new window
21.Briam, C.(2010)。"Outsourced": Using a comedy film to teach intercultural communication。Business Communication Quarterly，73(4)，383-398。  new window
22.Considine, D. M.、Baker, F.(2006)。Focus on film: Learning through the movies。Middle Ground，10(2)，12-15。  new window
23.Goldberg, B.(2005)。Art of the narrative: Interpreting visual stories。Art Education，58(2)，5-32。  new window
24.Knight, L.(2010)。Why a child needs a critical eye, and why the art classroom is central in developing it。International Journal of Art & Design Education，29(3)，236-243。  new window
25.Parkes, G.(2009)。Thinking images: Doing philosophy in film and video。Educational Perspectives，42(1/2)，36-46。  new window
26.Neuhaus, J.(2010)。"Shake this square world and blast off for kicksville": Teaching history with post-wwII prescriptive classroom films。History Teacher，44(1)，35-50。  new window
27.Sturm, J. L.(2012)。Using film in the L2 Classroom: A graduate course in film pedagogy。Foreign Language Annals，45(2)，246-259。  new window
28.郭禎祥(19990800)。描繪新世紀藝術教育藍圖。美育雙月刊，110，1-9。  延伸查詢new window
29.楊馥如(20091000)。國一階段生命教育多媒體遊戲學習教材研發與評鑑研究。藝術學報，85，479-503。new window  延伸查詢new window
30.楊馥如(20100400)。死亡教育議題融入藝術課程之行動研究。課程與教學季刊，13(2)，99-126。new window  延伸查詢new window
31.Raney, Karen(1999)。Visual Literacy and the Art Curriculum。Journal of Art and Design education，18(1)，41-47。  new window
32.Stoddard, J. D.、Marcus, A. S.(2010)。More than 'Showing What Happened': Exploring the potential of teaching history with film。High School Journal，93(2)，83-90。  new window
33.Roell, C.(2010)。Intercultural training with films。English Teaching Forum，48(2)，2-8。  new window
會議論文
1.Efland, A.(2002)。Emerging visions of art education。The meeting of International Society for Education through Art Congress。New York, NY。  new window
2.Yang, F. J.(2012)。Applying art criticism methods to the teaching of advertising interpretation。The meeting of the International Association of Empirical Aesthetics, Taipei。  new window
學位論文
1.陳伯拯(2005)。以符號學觀點分析動畫角色圖像的象徵性(碩士論文)。中原大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.Beach, G. M.(2007)。An examination of factors contributing to critical thinking and student interest in an on-line college-level art criticism course(博士論文)。University of North Texas，Denton, Texas。  new window
3.Chuang, C. P.(2003)。The effect of varied types of computer-assisted collaborative learning and prior knowledge on elementary students' learning achievements of art appreciation in Taiwan(博士論文)。The Pennsylvania State University，Old Main, Pennsylvania。  new window
4.Goodman, M. J.(1983)。An examination of an analogic-metaphoric approach to museum education and art appreciation(碩士論文)。University of Massachusetts Amherst，Amherst, Massachusetts。  new window
5.Tseng, C. T. B.(1989)。A study of art criticism instruction: Its historical development, theoretical rationale and content for elementary children(碩士論文)。Michigan State University，East Lansing, Michigan。  new window
圖書
1.Eisner, E. W.(1972)。Education artistic vision。New York：Macmillan Publishing。  new window
2.洪賢智(2002)。廣播電視廣告製作與創意。台北：五南書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.Parsons, Michael J.(1987)。How We Understand Art。Cambridge University Press。  new window
4.Addison, N.(2000)。Critical and Contextual Studies。New York：Routledge Falmer。  new window
5.劉立行(1997)。電影理論與批評。臺北：五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Kiefer, B. Z.(1995)。The potential of picture books: From visual literacy to aesthetic understanding。Columbus, OH：Merrill。  new window
7.Feldman, E. B.(1971)。Varieties of visual experience。Englewood Cliffs, N.J.：Prentic-Hall, Inc。  new window
8.Efland, A.、Freedman, K.、Stuhr, P.(1996)。Postmodern art education: An approach to curriculum。National Art Education Association。  new window
9.Bordwell, D.、Thompson, K.、曾偉禎(2013)。電影藝術：形式與風格。台北：麥格羅希爾。  延伸查詢new window
10.Freiberg, H. J.、Driscoll, A.(1992)。Universal teaching strategies. Needham Heights。MA：Allyn & Bacon。  new window
11.Giannetti, L. D.、焦雄屏(2005)。認識電影。台北：遠流。  延伸查詢new window
12.Mercado, G.、楊智捷(2012)。鏡頭之後：電影攝影的張力、敘事與創意。新北：大家。  延伸查詢new window
13.Landau, N.、吳莉君(2014)。好電影的法則。台北：原點。  延伸查詢new window
14.Parkinson, D.、陳雅雲、吳玉(2013)。改變電影的一百個觀念。台北：城邦。  延伸查詢new window
15.崔光宙、方志華(1992)。美感判斷發展研究。臺北：師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
16.Oja, S. N.、Smulyan, L.(1989)。Collaborative action research: A developmental approach。New York：The Falmer Press。  new window
17.王秀雄(1998)。觀賞、認知、解釋與評價：美術鑑賞教育的學理與實務。國立歷史博物館。  延伸查詢new window
18.Taylor, R.(1986)。Educating for art: Critical response and development。Longman。  new window
19.蔡清田(2000)。教育行動研究。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
20.Jameson, Fredric、唐小兵(2001)。後現代主義與文化理論。合志文化。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1307（臺灣：1298，外國：9） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1827278 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67642996
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上