:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:照顧男子氣概與男性公務人員育嬰留職經驗
書刊名:女學學誌:婦女與性別研究
作者:林東龍劉蕙雯
作者(外文):Lin, Dong-longLiu, Hui-wen
出版日期:2016
卷期:39
頁次:頁59-109
主題關鍵詞:育嬰假照顧男子氣概父職角色性別平等父職培養男性公務人員Parental leaveCaring masculinityFatherhoodGender equityFostering paternityMale civil servant
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:42
  • 點閱點閱:29
台灣性別工作平等法規未限定育嬰假僅能由夫妻其中一方申請,但男女申請育嬰留職人數差異極大。過去文獻指出,此根源於父職角色仍受文化和性別機制形塑。由於「男子氣概」是規範男性在各種場合展現合宜行為的重要準則,如何協助男性突破傳統男子氣概形塑的父職角色框架,提高其申請育嬰假的意願,為本研究關注焦點。因此,本研究以男子氣概為視角,分析育嬰留職男性的父職經驗,瞭解其男子氣概內涵和男子氣概與父職角色的連結關係。 本研究共訪談 10名高雄市政府各單位曾申請育嬰留職、且已回到職場的男性公務人員,並分析訪談文本。本研究發現有三:一、育嬰留職男性的男子氣概,是一種「照顧」男子氣概,並可分為「全力照顧型」和「兼顧工作型」兩種父職角色類型;二、職業保障和男女薪資平等,是實踐「照顧」男子氣概的社會基礎;三、當男性申請育嬰留職照顧孩子時,有助於減輕女性產後負荷,使其順利復原。因此,性別平等和父職培養是一體兩面的工作,均有助於落實男性申請育嬰留職停薪。 本研究建議有三:一、正向探究和倡導「照顧」男子氣概;二、持續改革人力市場,扭轉職場性別不平等;三、提供男性有薪父職假,鼓勵夫妻共同照顧,降低女性照顧負荷。
In Taiwan, the Act of Gender Equality in Employment allows a parent of either sex to apply for parental leave; however, the parental leave numbers differ significantly between males and females. According to the literature, the problem is that fatherhood attributes are still shaped by cultural and gender institutions. Because masculinity is the main standard proscribing male behaviors in any setting, this study has focused on how to assist males in breaking through the fatherhood framework as constricted by traditional notions of masculinity. Therefore, this study adopted a masculinity perspective to explore the experience of parental leave of male civil servants, to understand the meaning of masculinity, and to determine the relationship between masculinity and fatherhood. Ten in-depth interviews with male civil servants employed by Kaohsiung City Government who had applied for parental leave were conducted, and data analysis adopted a thematic approach. There were three major findings. Firstly, the masculinity of a male who applies for parental leave is called “caring masculinity”, and that masculinity is connected to “full-time fatherhood” and “balancing family and work fatherhood”. Secondly, both work protection and gender equity in salary are the social infrastructure that makes “caring masculinity” practicable. Thirdly, any male applying for parental leave contributes to decreasing the postnatal burden and facilitating female recovery. In other words, gender equity and fostering paternity are two sides to one coin, and both are conducive to men applying for parental leave without salary. This study makes three suggestions: firstly, a positive approach to exploring and advocating “caring masculinity” should be adopted. Secondly, reform of the labor market and reversal of gender inequity in the workplace should be continued. Thirdly, paid paternity leave would be effective in encouraging couples to care for children collectively and thus decrease the care burden for women.
期刊論文
1.Hammer, J. H.、Good, G. E.(2010)。Positive psychology: An empirical examination of beneficial aspects of endorsement of masculine norms。Psychology of Men and Masculinity,11(4),303-318。  new window
2.O'Neil, J. M.(2008)。Summarizing 25 years of research on men's gender role conflict using the gender role conflict scale: New research paradigms and clinical implications。The Counseling Psychologist,36(3),358-445。  new window
3.Lam, C. B.、McBride-Chang, C. A.(2007)。Resilience in young adulthood: The moderating influences of gender-related personality traits and coping flexibility。Sex Roles,56(3/4),159-172。  new window
4.Brandth, B.、Kvande, E.(1998)。Masculinity and child care: The reconstruction of fathering。The Sociological Review,46(2),293-313。  new window
5.劉梅君(20021000)。兩性工作平等法中「育嬰津貼」的定位及立法意義淺析。萬國法律,125,2-9。  延伸查詢new window
6.陳宜倩(20150600)。邁向一個積極對男性倡議的女性主義取徑?:以臺灣「性別工作平等法」育嬰假之理論與實務為例。女學學誌,36,1-47。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.李庭欣、王舒芸(20131200)。「善爸」甘休?「育爸」不能?與照顧若即若離的育嬰假爸爸。臺大社會工作學刊,28,93-135。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Ruhm, C. J.(2000)。Parental Leave and Child Health。Journal of Health Economics,19(6),931-960。  new window
9.林東龍(20141200)。從男子氣概分析男性口腔癌存活者的韌性形成過程。臺大社會工作學刊,30,139-185。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.陳芝瑜、潘湘如、張正和、杜明勳(20111200)。產後憂鬱症。家庭醫學與基層醫療,26(12),497-501。  延伸查詢new window
11.賀姝霞(20131200)。產後憂鬱症。護理雜誌,60(6),22-26。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Almqvist, A. L.(2008)。Why most Swedish fathers and few French fathers use paid parental leave: An exploratory qualitative study of parents。Fathering: A Journal of Theory, Research, and Practice about Men as Fathers,6(2),192-200。  new window
13.Abril, P.、Romero, A.(2008)。Including men into work-life balance: Fostering caring masculinities。Qualitative Methods in Psychology Newsletter,5,11-15。  new window
14.Anderson, E.(2008)。Inclusive masculinity in a fraternal setting。Men and Masculinities,10(5),604-620。  new window
15.Anderson, E.(2005)。Orthodox and inclusive masculinity: Competing masculinities among heterosexual men in a feminized terrain。Sociological Perspectives,48(3),337-355。  new window
16.Francis, B.、Skelton, C.(2001)。Men teachers and the construction of heterosexual masculinity in the classroom。Sex Education: Sexuality, Society and Learning,1(1),9-21。  new window
17.Cashmore, E.、Cleland, J.(2012)。Fans, homophobia and masculinities in association football: Evidence of a more inclusive environment。The British Journal of Sociology,63(2),370-387。  new window
18.Lamb, M. E.(2000)。The history of research on father involvement: An overview。Marriage and Family Review,29(2/3),23-42。  new window
19.Tharinger, D. J.(2008)。Maintaining the hegemonic masculinity through selective attachment, homophobia, and gay-baiting in schools: Challenges to intervention。School Psychology Review,37(2),221-228。  new window
20.Tanaka, S.(2005)。Parental Leave and Child Health Across OECD Countries。The Economic Journal,115(501),F7-F28。  new window
21.Bruning, G.、Plantenga, J.(1999)。Parental Leave and Equal Opportunities: Experiences in Eight European Countries。Journal of European Social Policy,9(3),195-209。  new window
22.Kamerman, S. B.(1991)。Child care policies and programs: An international overview。Journal of Social Issues,47(2),179-196。  new window
23.Connell, Raewyn W.、Messerschmidt, James W.(2005)。Hegemonic Masculinity: Rethinking the Concept。Gender and Society,19(6),829-859。  new window
研究報告
1.行政院性別平等會(2015)。重要性別統計資料庫:每人每月薪資。  延伸查詢new window
2.銓敘部(2013)。性別統計分析:102年公務人員申請育嬰留職停薪及回職復薪性別比率。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.許婷雯(2006)。我國育嬰假對於母職制度及女性就業處境之影響(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.田聖芳(2006)。台灣婦女產後照護之變遷--以北部地區為例(博士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.方婷玉(2010)。我國育嬰留職停薪津貼政策之探討:以台北縣市女性申請者為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.阮語豔(2007)。中部地區孕產婦對產後照顧(坐月子中心)需求之探討--以台中巿為例(碩士論文)。中國醫藥大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.洪雪英(2010)。育嬰留職停薪教師之心路歷程(碩士論文)。國立臺東大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.陳姵璇(2012)。影響申請育嬰留職停薪者重返原職場之相關因素探討--以女性醫療從業人員為例(碩士論文)。元智大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Connell, R. W.(2005)。Masculinities。University of California Press。  new window
2.Anderson, E.(2012)。Inclusive masculinity: The changing nature of masculinities。London:Routledge。  new window
3.Ezzy, D.(2002)。Qualitative analysis。London:Routledge。  new window
4.Morgan, D. H. J.(1992)。Discovering men: Critical studies on men and masculinities。London:Routledge。  new window
5.Slayton, G. W.、錢基蓮(2013)。我是好爸爸。台北:遠見天下文化。  延伸查詢new window
6.王舒芸(2003)。新手爸爸難為?。遠流出版事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
7.Messner, M. A.(1992)。Power at Play: Sports and the Problem of Masculinity。Boston:Beacon Press。  new window
8.王行(1998)。解放男人--男性的自覺與成長。探索文化。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.行政院勞動部(2015)。育嬰留職停薪就業關懷調查(103年),http://statdb.raol.gov.tw/htrnl/svy03/0323analyze.pdf。  延伸查詢new window
2.高雄市政府(2012)。高雄市政府第三階段推動性別主流化實施計畫,http://www.tbkc.gov.tw/Files/about/O6 05/1.高雄市政府第三階段推動性別主流化實施計畫.pdf。  延伸查詢new window
3.Ray, R.,Gornick, J. C.,Schmitt, J.(2008)。Parental leave policies in 21 countries,http://www.lisdatacenter.org/wp-content/uploads/parent-leavereport1.pdf。  new window
4.Moss, P.(2012)。International review of leave policies and related research 2012,http://www.leavenetwork.org/fileadmin/Leavenetwork/Annual_reviews/2012_annual_review.pdf。  new window
圖書論文
1.唐文慧(2012)。父職角色與照顧工作。性別向度與臺灣社會。台北:巨流。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.黃淑玲(2012)。男子性與男子氣概。性別向度與臺灣社會。臺北:巨流。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Sabo, D.、Gordon, D.(1995)。Rethinking men's health and illness。Men's health and illness: Gender, power and the body。London, England:Sage。  new window
4.王大維、郭麗安(2012)。在言談中做男人?運用論述心理學方法分析男性氣概建構之初探研究。陽剛氣質:國外論述與台灣經驗。高雄:巨流。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.黃囇莉(2012)。性別歧視的多重樣貌。性別向度與台灣社會。台北:巨流。  延伸查詢new window
6.郭道遠(2012)。「化」與「話」:男性彩妝師的職場經驗探究。陽剛氣質:國外論述與台灣經驗。高雄:巨流。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE