:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:我國積欠工資墊償基金新制之政策形成研究:多元流觀點
書刊名:中華行政學報
作者:黎秀梅石振國 引用關係
作者(外文):Li, Hsiu-meiShih, Chen-kuo
出版日期:2018
卷期:22
頁次:頁19-38
主題關鍵詞:議程設定多元流政策窗勞動基準法積欠工資墊償基金新制Multiple streams modelAgenda settingPolicy windowLabor Standards ActNew policy of the arrear wage payment fund
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:280
  • 點閱點閱:8
2015年2月《勞動基準法》第28條首次修正公布,擴大積欠工資墊償基金墊償範圍,並於同年10月提升該基金之墊款債權受償順位,這些重大變革,為我國積欠工資墊償基金制度開啟新的一頁。本研究以多元流觀點為基礎,採文獻分析法及深度訪談法,探討我國積欠工資墊償基金新制政策形成過程的影響因素。研究發現該政策形成過程中,華隆工會發起的罷工事件為問題流最先發展的焦點事件;其中政策流與政治流之形成因素是相互交錯形成,並非獨立發展;而且政策流及政治流之形成無明顯先後順序。從問題流形成開始,到政治流之國內氣氛的營造、公眾接受度的引導等,媒體在其中始終持續影響作用。以上各流之主要影響因素分別為:一、問題流部分:為勞工退休準備金提撥之不足。二、政治流部分:為國內氣氛、民意、政黨活動、選舉及朝野的共識升高修法議題能見度。三、政策流部分:為網路科技的進步、技術的可行性與公眾的接受度提高。另外,在整個《勞動基準法》第28條的修正通過的版本,主要為政策企業家勞動部長之政策選擇偏好所致。
In Feb 4, 2015, the first amendment to Article 28 of the Labor Standards Act was promulgated. This amendment drastically increased the insurance coverage of the Arrear Wage Payment Fund. With this amendment, workers would be given a higher priority to receive the remaining amounts owed to them starting from Oct, 6 of the same year. 2015 is the year where the largest change to the Arrear Wage Payment Fund has been made since implementation of the Fund. Based on multiple streams perspective and using document analysis and in-depth interview, this study explored factors affecting the formation of the new policy of the Arrear Wage Payment Fund. Results showed that in the policy formation process, the strike staged by Hualong Worker's Union was the focus event that first developed in the problem stream. The policy stream and the political stream consisted of factors that were intertwined that did not emerge independently. Besides, there was no significant order in the formation of the policy stream and the political stream. From the problem stream to the political stream (e.g. swing of national mood and guiding public acceptance), media all played an important role. The major factors in each stream were as follows: (1) Problem stream: The Labor Pension Reserve Fund was not sufficiently appropriated; (2) Political stream: national mood, public opinion, political party activities, election, and high consensus on amendment between the ruling and opposition parties; (3) Policy stream: advancement in Internet technology, technical feasibility, and increased public acceptance. In addition, the amendment to Article 28 of the Labor Standards Act was mainly a result of the policy choice of the policy entrepreneur, Minister of Labor. Finally, this study also proposed suggestions regarding the new policy of the Arrear Wage Payment Fund.
期刊論文
1.王惠玲(19970500)。積欠工資墊償基金制度--國勝公司積欠工資事件案例探討。月旦法學,24,60-67。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.林水波(20110700)。視框反省與政策機會窗。政策研究學報,11,1-26。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.余致力(20000900)。民意與公共政策:表達方式的釐清與因果關係的探究。中國行政評論,9(4),81-110。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.廖俊松、周俊妹、邱靜儀(19990300)。立法決策機會因素的研究。中國行政評論,8(2),75-107。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.林永裕(20080500)。韓國「工資求償保證基金」簡介--兼論與我國積欠工資墊償基金之比較。臺灣勞工季刊,13,99-104。  延伸查詢new window
6.徐國淦(20150300)。提升工資債權、保障勞工權益:論勞動基準法修訂。臺灣勞工季刊,41,40-45。  延伸查詢new window
7.張世賢(20141200)。政策企業家之探討。中國行政評論,20(特刊),1-18。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.黃德北(2013)。從歷史結構面看關廠失業工人抗爭事件。司法改革雜誌,96,40-43。  延伸查詢new window
9.黃耀滄(20120900)。美國因勞動關係所生之債權受清償優先性相關規定初步研析。臺灣勞工季刊,31,114-120。  延伸查詢new window
10.鄭少凡(2012)。攸關勞工「棺材本」臺灣勞退舊制何去何從?。看,122,34-38。  延伸查詢new window
11.Winkel, Goerg、Leipold, Sina(2016)。Demolishing Dikes: Multiple Streams and Policy Discourse Analysis。Policy Studies Journal,44(1),8-129。  new window
12.Cohen, Michael D.、March, James G.、Olsen, Johan P.(1972)。A garbage can model of organizational choice。Administrative Science Quarterly,17(1),1-25。  new window
學位論文
1.姜瑞麟(2003)。我國積欠工資墊償制度之研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.曹佩吉(2014)。公民媒體與傳統媒體影響之解析(碩士論文)。銘傳大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.王雅玲(2003)。我國行政中立法制定之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺北大學,三峽。  延伸查詢new window
4.許弘毅(2013)。我國證券交易所得稅之政策形成--多源流程模式的分析視角(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
5.林昌勳(2004)。我國勞工退休金改制過程之政治經濟分析(1984-2000)(碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
6.李蕙安(2011)。日本工資保障制度之研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
7.林慶和(2015)。勞工債權優先受償保障之探討(碩士論文)。國立中正大學,民雄。  延伸查詢new window
8.林曉雯(2010)。我國家庭暴力防治政策之研究--以台北市為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
9.柳琬玲(2009)。個別勞工利益與工會集體行動的辯證:以華隆頭份廠的個案為例(碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
10.陳威華(2014)。從政策利害關係人與政策移植觀點探討無障礙環境建構過程中使用者面臨之問題--以臺東縣校園為例(碩士論文)。國立臺東大學。  延伸查詢new window
11.陳美女(2007)。我國勞工退休金新制之研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
12.彭雨筑(2011)。論員工薪資債權於破產法上之優先受償順位(碩士論文)。國立中央大學,桃園。  延伸查詢new window
13.程韻舫(2005)。台灣第三部門政策倡導之研究--以國民年金為例(碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
14.蕭瓊玉(2016)。農保與國民年金保險脫勾政策制定過程之研究-多元流程觀點分析(碩士論文)。國立臺北大學,新北市。  延伸查詢new window
15.饒芷禎(2012)。政策之窗的啟合與西拉雅族正名之研究(碩士論文)。國立中正大學,民雄。  延伸查詢new window
16.余芝瑩(2010)。內政部入出國及移民署成立之研究-政策窗的觀點(碩士論文)。國立臺北大學,台北。  延伸查詢new window
17.張硯凱(2010)。中小學教師專業發展評鑑政策形成之研究:多元流程模式分析(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Heymann, Philip B.(2008)。Living the Policy Choice。Oxford:Oxford University Press。  new window
2.Gupta, Dipak K.(2001)。Analyzing Public Policy: Concepts, Tools, and Techniques。Washington, D.C.:Congressional Quarterly Inc.。  new window
3.Cobb, Roger W.、Elder, C. D.(1972)。Participation in American Politics: The Dynamic of Agenda-building。Boston:Allyn and Bacon。  new window
4.Kingdon, John W.(1995)。Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies。New York, NY:Harper Collins College Publishers。  new window
5.Lester, James P.、Stewart, Joseph Jr.、陳恆鈞(2001)。公共政策:演進研究途徑。臺北:學富文化。  延伸查詢new window
6.Birkland, Thomas A.(2001)。An Introduction to the Policy Process: Theories, Concepts, and Models of Public Policy Making。New York:M.E. Sharpe。  new window
7.魯炳炎(2016)。公共政策與民主治理:苗栗大埔徵地案的多元流分析。臺北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
8.Baumgartner, Frank R.、Jones, Bryan D.(1993)。Agendas and instability in American politics。Chicago, IL:The University of Chicago Press。  new window
9.張世賢(2015)。政策論證。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
10.勞動部勞工保險局(2016)。業務專輯。臺北:中華民國勞動部勞工保險局。  延伸查詢new window
11.丘昌泰(20130000)。公共政策. 基礎篇。巨流。new window  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.勞動部勞工保險局(2017)。105年度積欠工資墊償基金業務報告,臺北:中華民國勞動部勞工保險局。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Rogers, E. M.、Dearing, J. M.(1987)。Agenda-Setting Research: Where Has It Been ? Where Is It Going ?。Communication Yearbook。  new window
2.Davies, J. C.(1974)。How Does the Agenda Get Set?。The Governance of Common Property Resources。Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE