資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(18.117.77.76)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
Comparing Semi-Presidentialism in the ROC and the Russian Federation
書刊名:
政治學報
作者:
wu,yu-shan
出版日期:
1998
卷期:
30
頁次:
頁123-186
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
4
) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:
4
共同引用:
168
點閱:29
This paper takes an institutional approach to compare the constitutional reforms in the Republic of China and the Russian Federation. It first develops a triangular perspective to analyze various government forms, and comes up with the conclusion that semi-presidentialism is prone to conflict between the president and the parliament over control of government, and that a semi-presidential system with a dominant president may provide presidential power as strong as under a presidential system. It then depicts the development of the constitutional order in the Russian Federation and the ROC, demonstrating that there are striking similarities between the two cases: Leninist past, democratic transition, assertive parliament, direct election of the president, and substantial presidential powers. This brings about semi-presidentialism and its inherent conflict: the 1993 October putsch in Russia, and the parliamentary refusal to recognize the premier in Taiwan in 1996-97. Similar desire to keep firm presidential control over government promopted Boris Yeltsin and Lee Teng-hui to amend the constitution, and brought about a semi-presidential system dominated by the president. However, similar institutional arrangements do not guarantee the ROC president can exercise the same power, for besides the Russian model there are the French Fifth Republic model and the Weimar Republic model that lead to different outcomes. Taiwan’s constitutional future thus remains uncertain. Institutional comparison between East Asia and Eastern Europe is rare in the field of comparative politics. The few works done are concentrated in comparing economic reforms, political decline, democratizaion, and consolidation of democracy in the two areas. As the third-wave democracies in East Asia and Eastern Europe have gradually matured, it becomes meaningful to study how their nascent democratic institutions function, and to make comparisons. This paper sets out to examine the analytical frameworks in the field, and comp up with a triangular perspective to analyze the constitutional order of the Republic of China (ROC) after the 1997 amendments, and the 1993 constitutional system of the Russian Federation. The two cases are chosen for they both belong to the category of “semi-presidentialism,” a constitutional order that goes between the British-style “parliamentary” system and the American-style “presidentialism,” and has been popular among the “third-wave democracies” when they chose their constitutional system. A comparative study of the Taiwanese and Russian cases may shed light on the interaction of political institution and the functioning of nascent democracies.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
畢英賢(19940300)。俄羅斯的新國會與新政府。問題與研究,33(3),1-10。
延伸查詢
2.
許湘濤(19961200)。俄羅斯的政治發展--一九九○至一九九六。問題與研究,35(12),29-58。
延伸查詢
3.
Slay, Ben(1994)。Rapid versus Gradual Economic Transition。RFE/RL Research Report,3(31),31-42。
4.
Horowitz, Donald L.(1990)。Comparing Democratic Systems。Journal of Democracy,1(4),73-79。
5.
吳玉山(19921200)。The collapse of the soviet Union--A Crises and Sequences Approach。政治科學論叢,4,179-223。
6.
Crawford, Beverly、Lijphart, Arend(1995)。Explaining Political and Economic Change in Post-Communist Eastern Europe。Comparative Political Studies,28(2),171-199。
7.
Duverger, Maurice(1980)。A New Political System Model: Semi-Presidential Government。European Journal of Political Research,8(2),165-187。
8.
Easter, Gerald M.(1997)。Preference for presidentialism: Postcommunist regime change in Russia and the NIS。World Politics,49(2),184-211。
9.
吳東野(19960800)。「半總統制」政府體系的理論與實際。問題與研究,35(8),37-49。
延伸查詢
10.
Wu, Yu Shan(1989)。Marketization of Politics: The Taiwan Experience。Asian Survey,29(4),382-400。
11.
吳玉山(19971200)。歐洲後共產社會的政治制度變遷:以俄羅斯聯邦為例。美歐季刊,12(4)=132,89-145+Ⅳ-Ⅴ。
延伸查詢
12.
周陽山(19960800)。總統制、議會制、半總統制與政治穩定。問題與研究,35(8),50-61。
延伸查詢
13.
O'Neil, Patrick H.(1996)。Revolution from Within: Institutional Analysis, Transitions form Authoritarianism, and the Case of Hungary。World Politics,48(4),579-603。
14.
Orttung, Robert W.(1996)。Duma Elections Bolster Leftist Opposition。Transition,2(4)。
15.
Rutland, Peter(1996)。Russia: The Purge of the Generals。OMRI Analytical Brief,1(201)。
16.
Brudny, Yitzhak M.(1997)。In Pursuit of the Russian Presidency: Why and How Yeltsin Won the 1996 Presidential Election?。Communist and Post-Communist Studies,30(3),255-275。
17.
(1998)。When Boris Banged the Table。The Economist。
18.
Lyle, Robert(1998)。Russia: Camdessus To Brief Board On Talks With Chernomyrdin。RFE/ RL,8。
19.
Zhigalkin, Yuri、Frost, Matthew(19980828)。Russia: Currency Crisis Endangers Reform Process。RFE/RL,8。
會議論文
1.
吳玉山(1994)。Economic Reform under Different Political Context: Poland and the PRC。Annual meeting of the International Studies Association。Washington, D.C.。
2.
Rockman, Bert A.(1997)。Separation? Fusion? Or Hybridization? The Menu of Constitutional Choice。Workshop on Institutional Choice。Taipei。
3.
Veser, Ernst(1997)。Semipresidentialism-Duverger's Concept: A New Political System Model。Taipei。
4.
Bahro, H. H.(1997)。Virtues and Vices of Semi-Presidential Government。Constitutional Choice Round Table,(會議日期: 1997/05/31)。Taipei。
5.
林繼文(1998)。半總統制下的三角政治均衡。「政治制度:理論與現實」學術研討會。臺北:中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所。
延伸查詢
6.
吳玉山(1993)。Nationalism, Democratization, and Economic Reform。0。
7.
吳玉山(1998)。Moving towards the Center: Taiwan's Public Opinion and Mainland Policy in Shift。Vancouver。
8.
Achen, Christopher H.、徐永明、Kuo, Su-Feng(1997)。The Impact of the Straits Crisis on Taiwan's Presidential Election: China's Coercion Backfires。Washington, DC。
9.
Geddes, Barbara(1993)。Institutional Choice in Post-Communist Eastern Europe。1993 annual meeting of the American Political Science Association。Washington, DC。
10.
McFaul, M.(1995)。Prospects for Democratic Consolidation in Russia。International conference on Consolidating the Third Wave Democracies: Trends and Challenges。Taipei。
11.
呂亞力(19970823)。The Transformation of the Role of the President in Taiwan's Constitutional Evolution。Institutional Choice Workshop,Chinese Association of Political Science 。Taipei。
研究報告
1.
吳玉山(1997)。俄羅斯經濟改革之研究:1992-1994。行政院國家科學委員會。
延伸查詢
圖書
1.
Hastrup, Kirsten(1992)。Introduction。Other Histories。London, UK:New York, NY:Routledge。
2.
Tien, H. M.(1989)。The Great Transition: Politic and Social Change in Republic of China。Stanford:Hoover Institute Press。
3.
Stark, David、Nee, Victor(1989)。Remaking the Economic Institutions of Socialism: China and Eastern Europe。Stanford, California:Stanford University Press。
4.
Diamond, Larry、Plattner, Marc F.、Chu, Yun-han、Tien, Hung-mao(1997)。Consolidating the Third Wave Democracies: Trends and Challenges。The Johns Hopkins University Press。
5.
Shugart, Matthew S.、Carey, John M.(1992)。Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamic。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。
6.
Walder, Andrew G.(1995)。The Waning of the Communist State: Economic Origins of Political Decline in China and Hungary。Berkeley, CA:University of California Press。
7.
Wu, Yu-Shan(1994)。Comparative Economic Transformations--Mainland China, Hungary, the Soviet Union, and Taiwan。Stanford, California:Stanford University Press。
8.
Pei, Minxin(1994)。From Reform to Revolution: The Demise of Communism in China and the Soviet Union。Cambridge, Massachusetts:Harvard University Press。
9.
Friedrich, Carl J.、Brzezinski, Zbigniew K.(1963)。Totalitarian Dictatorship and Autocracy。New York:Praeger。
10.
郭正亮(1998)。民進黨轉型之痛。臺北:遠見天下文化出版股份有限公司。
延伸查詢
11.
Przeworski, Adam(1991)。Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America。Cambridge University Press。
12.
吳玉山(19950000)。共產世界的變遷:四個共黨政權的比較。臺北:東大。
延伸查詢
13.
吳玉山(19960000)。遠離社會主義:中國大陸、蘇聯和波蘭的經濟轉型。臺北:正中。
延伸查詢
14.
吳玉山(1997)。抗衡或扈從:兩岸關係新詮--從前蘇聯看臺灣與中國大陸間的關係。臺北:正中書局。
延伸查詢
15.
(1998)。The Republic of China 1998 Yearbook。The Republic of China 1998 Yearbook。Taipei。
16.
Tong, Yanqi(1997)。Transitions from State Socialism: Economic and Political Change in China and Hungary。Lanham, Maryland:Rowman and Littlefield。
17.
Sakwa, Richard(1996)。Russian Politics and Society。Routledge。
18.
Yeltsin, Boris(1995)。總統筆記。總統筆記。Beijing, PRC。
延伸查詢
19.
Hough, Jerry F.、Davidheiser, Evelyn、Lehmann, Susan Goodrich(1996)。The 1996 Russian Presidential Election。Washington, DC:The Brookings Institution Press。
其他
1.
CNN(1998)。Russian Government, Opposition Sign Deal Aimed at Taming Crisis,0。
2.
CNN(1998)。Communists Say They Will Block Confirmation of Russian Premier,0。
3.
CNN(1998)。Chernomyrdin Loses again in Russian,0。
4.
CNN(1998)。In Compromise, Yeltsin Nominates Primakov,0。
5.
CNN(1998)。Primakov Confirmed as Russian Prime Minister: Economy Awaits Action,0。
圖書論文
1.
Huntington, Samuel P.(1993)。Democracy's Third Wave。The Global Resurgence of Democracy。Baltimore, MD:The Johns Hopkins University Press。
2.
Linz, Juan J.(1994)。Presidential or Parliamentary Democracy: Does It Make a Differnce?。The Failure of Presidential Democracy: Comparative Perspective。Baltimore:John Hopkins University Press。
3.
Blondel, Jean(1992)。Dual Leadership in the Contemporary World。Parliamentary Versus Presidential Government。Oxford University Press。
4.
Suleiman, Ezra N.(1994)。Presidentialism and Political Stability in France。The Failure of Presidential Democracy: Comparative Perspectives。Baltimore, MD:John Hopkins University Press。
5.
Wiarda, Howard J.(1985)。Comparative Politics Past and Present。New Directions in Comparative Politics。Boulder, CO:Westview。
6.
Malle, Silvana(1994)。Privatization in Russia: Options and Transaction Costs。The Post-communist Economic Transformation。Boulder, Colorado:Westview。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
半總統制下憲政運作類型的再思考--從換軌制、擺盪制到羽翼式
2.
半總統制總統化和議會化的權力平衡、路徑依賴與憲政運作
3.
中共意識型態的演進與現況
4.
從比較共產主義看中共百年
5.
中國國家資本主義下的政商權力網絡:以國資委和國開行的「產融聯盟」為例
6.
總統和國會的權力平衡與憲政衝突:以總統國會制國家祕魯、俄羅斯、喬治亞和葡萄牙為例
7.
戰略三角理論在「爭霸」過程中的應用與修正:以冷戰時期美蘇中與未來美中臺關係為例
8.
總統的政策權與決策機制:半總統制的跨國分析
9.
論中共政權與私營中小企業主的關係:最具市場競爭力企業的個案分析
10.
臺灣憲法制度下半總統制的二元行政權論
11.
菁英輪廓與黨國體制的存續:中共與國民黨的比較
12.
多種類型的威權主義:中國政體類型的探討
13.
從中國大陸物權立法看中共意識形態之轉變
14.
半總統制下的國會監督--從法制面比較臺灣與法國國會的監督能量
15.
Comparing Taiwan and the CEE Trio: The Impact of Social and Institutional Factors on Democracy
1.
政府存續性之研究 ─以戰後日本內閣更迭為例
2.
具台灣特色的總統制理論與實際之研究─以李登輝(1991-2000)、陳水扁、馬英九、蔡英文(2016-2018)四任總統職權行使狀況之分析
3.
中共意識形態的政權建構:經濟基礎與專政理論之探討
4.
政治甄補與地方治理:金門縣的個案分析
5.
胡錦濤時期中共國家形象建構─建構主義觀點
6.
我國半總統制的形成與少數政府憲政困境—歷史制度主義的觀點
7.
從民主轉型到民主鞏固:蒙古與台灣之比較分析
8.
半總統制下不同政府型態之成因─台灣、蒙古、波蘭及其他後列寧民主國家
9.
兩岸統合可能模式的探討:歐盟模式與不均等聯邦制對兩岸適用之比較
10.
中國大陸中央與地方關係之研究:鄧小平時期廣東個案之分析
11.
「中國模式」:後極權資本主義發展國家模式之建構
12.
中共對臺政策變遷之研究(1990-2012.3)
13.
中國的邊疆與安全:中國大戰略與新疆地緣政治
14.
台灣七次修憲過程中的媒體角色(1991-2005) ─《自由時報》與《聯合報》的新聞與言論分析
15.
中國大陸與印度金融政治之比較:以銀行部門的自由化為例(1990-2008)
1.
中山思想與當代政治
2.
四個寄希望:解構中共對臺政策
3.
鬧劇或悲劇?:論Maurice Meisner眼中的中國
4.
威瑪憲政變奏曲 : 半總統制憲法的生命史
5.
中共黨國邊界的設定與延伸 : 歷史制度論的觀點
6.
蘇俄新聞傳播史論
7.
爭辯中的中國社會組織研究 : 「國家-社會」關係的視角
8.
半總統制的理論與實際
9.
正義與福利國家概論
10.
馬克思的經濟哲學:中共的社會主義市場經濟
11.
政教的分立與制衡:從聖經看政教關係
12.
臺灣公營事業民營化 : 經濟迷思的批判
13.
中華民國的憲政工程 : 以雙首長制為中心的探討
14.
俄羅斯轉型1992-1999 : 一個政治經濟學的分析
15.
中國 : 向鄧後時代轉折
無相關著作
無相關點閱
QR Code