:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:從移動的空間到轉變的地景--對於賽夏社會變動性與穩定性的另類思考
作者:胡家瑜 引用關係
作者(外文):Hu, Chia-yu
書刊名:空間與文化場域 : 空間之意象、實踐與社會的生產;黃應貴 (主編)
頁次:335-362
出版日期:2009
出版項:臺北:漢學研究中心
主題關鍵詞:生活世界土牛線社會行動動態穩定微型空間Life worldOxen lineSocial practicesDynamic stabilityMicro space
學門:區域研究及地理
資料類型:專書論文
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:54
本文試圖從空間和地景的角度,探討聚落遷移和環境景觀的變動,如何在集體記憶中表現,以及如何在具體社會行動中回應。分佈在新竹和苗栗交界區的賽夏族,因為遷移和跨界互動影響,造成生活世界快速而巨大的變化。根據史料記載,賽夏聚落的分佈區域,過去曾長期夾處在不斷推進的漢番交界區。賽夏各姓氏的口語傳說,也經常從不同角度強調過去移動的路線和遷移歷史。但是,這一個人口數量極少的小族群,相對而言,卻在變動的生活領域中,建構和維持了相當強烈的集體意識和行動力。最近數十年間,雖然賽夏聚落地點的移動並不大,但生活領域內的環境景觀,卻正面臨另一波變化與衝擊。自 2000 年起,由於臺灣休閒風潮的興起和觀光產業發展政策的提出,使得原本山水秀麗的新竹和苗栗山區,突然轉變為熱門的觀光景點;偏遠的賽夏山區生活世界,開始朝著遊客浪漫想像的「花園山城」方向發展。如果空間和地景是行動者感知和建構生活經驗的基本舞臺,那麼聚落不斷的遷徙與地景的大幅變動,也將對地方社會的性質造成一些影響。本文透過賽夏的例子,希望能夠進一步探討空間與地景的動態意義,並思考社會建構過程中不斷交錯運作的變動和穩定力量。
Focusing on space and landscape, this paper aims to explore how the migration and dynamic spatial changes are represented in collective memories and responded to in social practices. As a small indigenous group in the hinterland of northwestern Taiwan, the Saisiyat 賽夏 had been moving along the shifting Chinese-Aboriginal borderlines from the 18th century to 20th century. In the oral narratives of Saisiyat clans, migrating and encountering others are constantly recited stories.
Other than the movement of settlements, the transformation of landscape has acted as the most influential force to change the Saisiyat life world since the 1990s. Due to the picturesque mountainous scenery of the Saisiyat territory, this area has become a very popular resort and leisure area in Taiwan. Within this area, increasing fancy guest houses, garden cafés, and other tourist facilities are established. The landscape of the indigenous dwelling places has been transformed into tourist attractions.
It is generally agreed that spatial factors objectify the temporal processes and construct a stage for human actors to perceive and shape living experiences. Thus, migration and transformation could be dangerous forces which cause the loss of linkages with past social relations and collective memories. From the case of Saisiyat, this paper diachronically analyzes the social mobility and stability mediated under the transformation of the spatial-temporal framework.
期刊論文
1.Tilley, Christopher(2002)。Introduction: Identity, Place, Landscape and Heritage。Journal of Material Culture,11(12)。  new window
2.西田又二(1896)。新竹縣南庄地方林況。臺灣總督府民政局殖產部報文,1(2)。  延伸查詢new window
3.Gell, Alfred(1985)。How to Read a Map: Remarks on the Practical Logic of Navigation。Man,20(2),271-277。  new window
4.Cosgrove, Denis E.(2006)。Modernity, Community and the Landscape Idea。Journal of Material Culture,11(12),49-66。  new window
5.Harrison, Simon(1999)。Identity as a Scarce Resource。Social Anthropology,7,239-251。  new window
6.Lawrence, Denise L.、Low, Setha M.(1990)。The Built Environment and Spatial Form。Annual Review of Anthropology,19,453-505。  new window
7.施添福(19910600)。紅線與藍線:清乾隆中葉臺灣番界圖。臺灣史田野研究通訊,19,46-50。  延伸查詢new window
8.鄭依億(19891000)。血緣、地緣與儀式: 向天湖賽夏族三儀式之探討。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,67,109-142。  延伸查詢new window
9.衛惠林(19561200)。賽夏族的氏族組織與地域社會。臺灣文獻,7(3/4),1-6。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.胡家瑜、林欣宜(20031100)。南庄地區開發與賽夏族群邊界問題的再檢視。臺大文史哲學報,59,177-214。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.施添福(19901200)。清代臺灣竹塹地區的土牛溝和區域發展:一個歷史地理學的研究。臺灣風物,40(4),1-68。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.胡家瑜(20001200)。器物、視覺溝通與社會記憶--賽夏族儀式器物的初步分析。國立臺灣大學考古人類學刊,55,113-141。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.陳運棟(19870000)。黃祈英事蹟探討。臺灣史研究暨史料發掘研討會。高雄:中華民國臺灣史蹟研究中心。79-104。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.Hu, Chia-yu(2006)。Embodied Memories and Enacted Ritual Materials-Possessing the Past in Making and Remaking Saisiyat Identity in Taiwan(博士論文)。University College London,London。  new window
2.林欣宜(1998)。樟腦產業下的地方社會與國家--以南庄地區為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳淑萍(1998)。南賽夏族的領域歸屬意識(碩士論文)。國立師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.潘秋榮(1998)。賽夏族祈天祭之研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學,台北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.小島由道、中央研究院民族學研究所(1998)。台灣總督府臨時台灣舊慣調查會番族慣習調查報告書(第三卷):賽夏族。臺北:中央研究院民族學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
2.柳本通義(1897)。柳本技師前往新竹、臺中兩縣轄內出差覆命書。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳朝龍、林文龍(1999)。新竹縣采訪冊。南投:臺灣省文獻委員會。  延伸查詢new window
4.(1997)。淡新檔案。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
5.臺北帝國大學理農學部農業(1933)。サイセット族姓の分布に關する調查綴。臺北:臺北帝國大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.衛惠林(1965)。臺灣省通志稿。臺中:臺灣省文獻委員會。  延伸查詢new window
7.Tilley, Christopher Y.(1994)。A Phenomenology of Landscape。Oxford:Berg。  new window
8.山內朔郎(1932)。サイセット族の經濟生活特にその農業。臺北:臺北帝國大學。  延伸查詢new window
9.蕭瑞雲(1896)。屯番魚鱗冊。  延伸查詢new window
10.竹越與三郎(1997)。臺灣統治志。臺北:南天書局。  延伸查詢new window
11.胡台麗(1995)。賽夏矮人祭歌舞祭儀的「疊影」現象。  延伸查詢new window
12.吳學明(2000)。金廣福大隘研究。新竹:新竹縣立文化中心。  延伸查詢new window
13.Cosgrove, Denis E.。Social Formation and Symbolic Landscape。Totowa, N. J.:Barnes and Noble。  new window
14.Casey, Edward S.(1993)。Getting Back into Place: Toward a Renewed Understanding of the Place-world。Bloomington:Indiana University Press。  new window
15.Mackay, George L.、Macdonald, J. A.(1972)。From Far Formosa。Taipei:Cheng Wen Publishing Company。  new window
16.Lambek, Michael(2002)。The Weight of the Past: Living with History in Mahajanga, Madagascar。New York:Macmillan。  new window
17.Anita, Jacobson-Widding(1991)。Body and Space: Symbolic Models of Unity and Division in African Cosmology and Experience。Uppsala:Upsaliensis Academiae。  new window
18.Bax, Bonham W.(1875)。The Eastern seas: Being a narrative of the voyage of H.M.S. "Dwarf" in China, Japan, and Formosa。London:John Murray。  new window
19.臺灣總督府警察本署(1989)。理蕃誌稿。東京:青史社。  延伸查詢new window
20.Stewart, Pamela J.、Strathern, Andrew(2003)。Landscape, Memory, and History: Anthropological Perspectives。Pluto Press。  new window
21.Merleau-Ponty, Maurice、Smith, Colin(1962)。Phenomenology of Perception。London:Routledge & Kegan Paul。  new window
22.移川子之藏、宮本延人、馬淵東一、台北帝國大學土俗人種學研究室(1935)。台灣高砂族系統所屬の研究。東京:刀江書院。  延伸查詢new window
23.Bourdieu, Pierre、Nice, Richard(1977)。Outline of a Theory of Practice。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
24.Basso, Keith H.(1996)。Wisdom Sits in Places: Landscape and Language among the Western Apache。Albuquerque:University of New Mexico Press。  new window
25.Hillier, Bill、Hanson, Julienne(1984)。The Social Logic of Space。Cambridge University Press。  new window
26.伊能嘉矩、楊南郡(1996)。台灣踏查日記。臺北市:遠流。  延伸查詢new window
27.江日昇(1960)。臺灣外記。臺灣銀行經濟研究室。  延伸查詢new window
28.謝世忠(20020000)。臺灣原住民影像民族史--賽夏族。臺北:南天書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.Hoskins, Janet(1993)。The Play of Time: Kodi Perspectives on Calendars, History, and Exchange。University of California Press。  new window
30.簡鴻模(20070000)。矮靈、龍神與基督:賽夏族當代宗教研究。南投:臺北:國史館臺灣文獻館:行政院原住民族委員會。new window  延伸查詢new window
31.黃叔璥、臺灣銀行經濟研究室(1957)。臺海使槎錄。臺灣銀行經濟研究室。  延伸查詢new window
32.伊能嘉矩(1904)。臺灣蕃政志。臺灣總督府民政部殖產局。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.熟蕃ト合蕃。臺灣地理資料:新竹、苗栗、臺中、彰化、嘉義、臺南、鳳山、恆春。  延伸查詢new window
2.林修澈(2006)。明治時代賽夏頭目列傳。賽夏學概論。苗栗:苗栗縣文化局。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃煉石、伊能嘉矩。奉查南庄開闢緣由序。臺灣地理資料:新竹、苗栗、臺中、彰化、嘉義、臺南、鳳山、恆春。  延伸查詢new window
4.Bender, Barbara(2002)。Landscape and Politics。The Material Culture Reader。Berg。  new window
5.Fox, James(1997)。Genealogy ana Topogeny: Towards an Ethnography of Rotinese Ritual Place Names。The Poetic Power of Place: Comparative Perspectives on Austronesian Ideas of Locality。Australian National University。  new window
6.Tilley, Christopher(2004)。From Body to Place to Landscape: A Phenomenological Perspective。The Materiality of Stone: Explorations in Landscape Phenomenology。Oxford:New York:Berg:Berg。  new window
7.Morphy, Howard(1993)。Colonialism, History and the Construction of Place: The Politics of Landscape in Northern Australia。Landscape: Politics and Perspectives。Oxford:Berg。  new window
8.Bender, Barbara(2006)。Place and Landscape。Handbook of Material Culture。London:Sage。  new window
9.胡家瑜(2004)。賽夏儀式食物與Tatinii(先靈)記憶:從文化意象和感官經驗的關連談起。物與物質文化。臺北:中央研究院民族學研究所。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.黃應貴(1995)。導論:空間、力與社會。空間、力與社會。台北:中央研究院民族學研究所。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Guo, Pei-yi(2003)。"Island Builders": Landscape and Historicity among the Langalanga, Solomon Islands。Landscape, Memory and History: Anthropological Perspectives。Pluto Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE