:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:儀式、記憶與政治行動:排灣望嘉文化遺產化的協商與認同
作者:郭玉敏
作者(外文):Yu-Min Kuo
校院名稱:國立臺灣大學
系所名稱:人類學研究所
指導教授:胡家瑜
童元昭
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2019
主題關鍵詞:排灣文化遺產化文化復振社會記憶地景Maljeveq
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:5
本研究探討異質社群構成的排灣族部落,如何在文化遺產化潮流及國家力量下,以既有的文化邏輯加以銜接,並轉換為社會內部文化實踐的資源與動能,進而展現其當代的身分認同並且累積內部政治能量。
本論文以位於屏東縣來義鄉的排灣族Paumaumaq群望嘉及其系統相關部落為主要研究場域,從近幾年雙面石雕祖先柱登錄國家有形文化資產國寶以及Maljeveq刺球儀式復振等過程為例,探討在地社群在對遇國家文化與族群政策時,其傳統的文化語彙、政治修辭與社會規範如何被挪用以創造行動空間,並在文化、象徵與政治資源間相互轉換、累積,展現其主體認同。
本論文除了銜接1950年代以來望嘉部落的排灣與箕模社群文化關係研究,也從臺灣原住民族部落在地文化實踐的民族誌,回應當代論述中從原住民離散經驗出發,將文化遺產及博物館場域視為文化抵抗及後殖民時代身分認同策略的討論;從望嘉部落社群如何銜接國家的族群治理政策及文化遺產化潮流為例,試討論後殖民情境下排灣地方社群的「原民性」與「在地性」意涵。
望嘉部落作為異質社群共同所構成的地方社會,巧妙運用了中心型社會的特質,以家、土地、祖靈及傳統儀式等排灣傳統文化語彙與邏輯,建立社群內部的認同,也以此將外來的國家及機構力量再脈絡化。在地社會文化實踐的傾向,使其在面對當代複雜的政治競爭與基督宗教在地化時,得以重新獲得能量。本研究也從儀式與地景變遷的角度,重新思考文化遺產及社會記憶之間的關係,以及排灣社會組織與文化邏輯的當代性。
This research aims to explore how a local multi-cultural community constructed its identity and accumulated inner political energy under the nation’s heritagization policy and how it mobilized existing cultural logic and social memory mechanism to transform the national policy as resource and agency on cultural practice.
This thesis is based on the ethnographic fieldwork at the indigenous Paiwan tribe, Vungalid, and its related villages which belong to Paumaumaq of Paiwan indigenous group in Laiyi Township of Pingtung County, Taiwan. It discusses how the local community creates space to act through appropriating their cultural idiom, political rhetoric and social norms to connect with national cultural policy and resource through two cases of heritagization in recent years: the double-sided ancestral post as the national treasure of Taiwan and the revitalization of Maljeveq, a ceremony of spearing rattan ball.
The significance of this study is firstly linking up a research gap on Paiwan-Chimo’s culture and ethnic relations of Vungalid since the 1950s. This ethnography of local cultural practice in a Taiwan’s indigenous society starts from indigenous experience to reply modern Western mainstream theory focusing on cultural heritage and museums as cultural resistance and identity in the post-colonial era. Moreover, this study discusses how a local community reacts to nation’s ethnic governance and the heritagization trend and has further discussion on the meaning of indigeneity and locality in the context of globalization and post-colonization.
The Vungalid tribe, a Paiwan local society constituted by heterogeneous communities of different origins, tactfully used its character of centralized society with some Paiwan’s cultural concepts: umaq(house), kadjunangan(territory), vuvu (ancesor) and rituals, to re-contextualize the power of the nation and its agency. This process has permitted local society regaining power when it faces modern complex political competitions and the localization of Christianity faith. To sum up, this case study not only reminds us to rethink the interaction between the cultural heritage and the social memory of the local community from the angle of ceremony, landscape and transformation of material culture, but also presents the contemporary characteristics of Paiwan.
壹、中文文獻
小島由道(臺灣總督府臨時臺灣舊慣調查會),2003a[1920],《番族慣習調查報告書第五卷:排灣族第一冊》,黃文新譯,蔣斌主編,臺北:中央研究院民族學研究所。
小島由道(臺灣總督府臨時臺灣舊慣調查會),2003b[1920],《番族慣習調查報告書第五卷:排灣族第四冊》,黃文新譯,蔣斌主編,臺北:中央研究院民族學研究所。
小島由道(臺灣總督府臨時臺灣舊慣調查會),2004[1920],番族慣習調查報告書第五卷:排灣族第三冊,黃文新譯,蔣斌主編,臺北:中央研究院民族學研究所。
中村孝志,1994,〈荷蘭時代的臺灣番社戶口表〉,吳密察、許賢瑤譯,《臺灣風物》,44(1):197-234。
石磊,1971,《筏灣:一個排灣族部落的民族學田野調查報告》,臺北:中央研究院民族學研究所。
包惠玲,2014,〈排灣族maljeveq (五年祭) 持續因素之探討—以patjaljinuk為例〉,《Maljeveq:2013台東土坂學術研討會紀事》,鄭漢文(編),臺東:東臺灣研究會,頁170-195。
李亦園,1982[1956],〈來義鄉排灣族中箕模人的探究〉,《臺灣土著民族的社會與文化》,臺北:聯經,77-118頁。
汪明輝、潘英海、鄭安晞,2009,《臺灣原住民族傳統聚落(含古道)委託研究報告建置計畫案浸水營古道與聚落研究報告書複查版》,屏東:行政院原住民族委員會文化園區管理局。
巫化.巴阿立佑司,2010,《神靈之路:排灣人祭儀經語(kai)之研究》,國立台東大學南島文化研究所碩士論文。
松崗格,2018[2012],《「蕃地」統治與「山地」行政:臺灣原住民族社會的地方化》,臺北:國立臺灣大學。
松澤員子,1986,〈東部排灣族之家族與親族—以ta-djaran(一條路)之概念為中心〉,黃應貴(編) ,《臺灣土著社會文化研究論文集》,臺北:聯經,頁445-478。
邱新雲,2010,〈東排灣族女巫師養成研究:以土坂村為例〉,胡台麗、劉璧榛(主編),《臺灣原住民巫師與儀式展演》,臺北:中央研究院民族學研究所,頁69-134。
邱馨慧,2001,《家、物與階序:以一個排灣社會為例》,國立臺灣大學人類學研究所碩士論文。
林徐達、梁永安譯,2017,《復返:21世紀成為原住民》,苗栗:桂冠。譯自James Clifford. Returns : becoming indigenous in the twenty-first century. 2013.
胡台麗,2010,〈排灣古樓女巫師唱經的當代展演〉,胡台麗、劉璧榛(主編),《臺灣原住民巫師與儀式展演》,臺北:中央研究院民族學研究所,頁23-68。
胡台麗,2011,《排灣文化的詮釋》,臺北:聯經。
胡台麗,2013,《讓靈魂回家(DVD)》,臺北:同喜文化出版工作室。
胡台麗,2016,〈傳承的挑戰:排灣古樓巫師傳統的衰微與復振〉,《民俗曲藝》,192:11-46。
胡家瑜,2011,〈非物質文化遺產與臺灣原住民儀式—對於遺產政治和文化傳承的一些反思〉,廖迪生(主編),《刊於非物質文化遺產與東亞地方社會》,香港:香港科技大學華南研究中心、香港文化博物館,頁201-225。
胡家瑜,2015,〈從凝視到行動:宮川次郎的「臺灣原始藝術」收藏〉,《文物、造型與臺灣原住民藝術:臺大人類學博物館宮川次郎藏品圖錄》,臺北:臺大出版中心,頁2-25。
胡家瑜,2015,〈當代情境下臺灣原住民文化遺產的實踐─對於文化傳承與地方動能的一些思考〉,「2015年南島民族國際會議:空間治理與文化資產」(10月29-30日),臺北:原住民族委員會。
馬淵東一,2014[1954],《臺灣原住民族移動與分布》,楊南郡(譯註),臺北:原住民族委員會、南天書局有限公司。
宮本延人,2005[1934],〈臺灣排灣族五年祭見聞記〉,《臺灣百年曙光 : 學術開創時代調查實錄》,楊南郡(譯註),頁272-295。臺北:南天。
康培德,2005,《臺灣原住民史政策篇(一):荷西明鄭時期》,南投:國史館臺灣文獻館。
許功明、柯惠譯,1994,《排灣族古樓村的祭儀與文化》,臺北:稻鄉。
鳥居龍藏,2012,《探險臺灣 : 鳥居龍藏的臺灣人類學之旅》,楊南郡(譯註),臺北:遠流。
陳奇祿,1961,《臺灣排灣群諸族木雕標本圖錄》,臺北:南天。
張正衡,2017,〈國寶結拜的一些詮釋:物質文化、文化遺產與博物館〉,芭樂人類學網頁,https://guavanthropology.tw/article/6578。
張金生,2005,〈排灣族箕模(Cimo)人溯源之研究〉,《民族學研究所資料彙編》,19:149-226。
黃叔璥,1995[1736],〈臺海使槎錄卷七〉,高賢治主編,《臺灣方志集成‧淸代篇‧第一輯》,33:143-160。
黃智慧,2012,〈「多元文化」理念的脆弱性:莫拉克災後重建政策思維、法令與組織型態〉, 潘英海(主編) ,《再現南臺平埔族群文化學術研討會論文集》,臺北:國立臺灣博物館,頁49-72。
黃應貴,1995,〈導論:空間、力與社會〉,黃應貴(主編),《空間、力與社會》,臺北:中央研究院民族學研究所,頁1-37。
黃應貴,1999,〈導論:時間、歷史與記憶〉,黃應貴(主編),《時間、歷史與記憶》,頁1-29。
童春發、洪湘雲,2017,《排灣族PADAIN部落歷史研究》,南投、臺北、新北:國史館臺灣文獻館、國史館、原住民委員會。
森丑之助,2012,《生蕃行腳 : 森丑之助的臺灣探險》,楊南郡(譯註),臺北:遠流。
葉高華,2017,〈從山地到山腳:排灣族與魯凱族的社會網絡與集體遷村〉,《於臺灣史研究》,24(1):125-170。
葉神保,2014,《日本時期排灣族「南蕃事件」之研究》,國立政治大學民族學系博士論文。
蔡光慧,1998,《排灣原住民部落社會的建立與族群關係(1630-1894)》,國立臺灣師範大學歷史研究所碩士論文。
蔡光慧,2001,〈大武山原始叢林裡的尋夢者:排灣原住民的開拓史觀〉,《原住民教育季刊》,22:107-122。
趙秀英、廖秋吉、鍾興華,2013,《排灣族tjuvecekadan(老七佳)部落》,屏東:行政院原住民族委員會文化園區管理局。
霍爾(Hall, Stuart)、陳光興,1998,《文化硏究 : 霍爾訪談錄》,唐維敏(編譯),臺北:元尊。
臺北帝國大學土俗‧人種學研究室,2011a[1935],《臺灣原住民族系統所屬之研究:本文篇》,楊南郡(譯註),臺北:行政院原住民族委員會、南天書局。
臺北帝國大學土俗‧人種學研究室,2011b[1935],《臺灣原住民族系統所屬之研究:資料篇》,楊南郡(譯註),臺北:行政院原住民族委員會、南天書局。
臺灣總督府警務局理蕃課,2012[1931],《高砂族調查書-蕃社概況》,周惠民(主編),中央研究院民族學研究所(編譯),臺北:中央研究院民族學研究所。
臺灣總督府警務局理蕃課,2016[1932-1943 ],《理蕃之友》,臺北:原住民族委員會。
蔣梓驊譯,2003[1980],《實踐感》,南京:譯林。譯自Pierre Bourdieu. Le sens pratique. 1980.
蔣斌,1999,〈墓葬與襲名〉,黃應貴(主編) ,《時間、歷史與記憶》,臺北:中央研究院民族學研究所,頁381-421。
蔣斌,2014,〈排灣族五年祭ljeveljeveqan意義的初步分析〉,鄭漢文(主編),《Maljeveq:2013台東土坂學術研討會紀事》,臺東:東臺灣研究會,頁40-80。
蔣斌、李靜怡,1995,〈北部排灣族家屋的空間結構與意義〉,黃應貴(主編),《空間、力與社會》,臺北:中央研究院民族學研究所,頁167-212。
衛惠林,1960,〈排灣族的宗族組織與階級制度〉,《中央研究院民族學研究所集刊》,9:71-108。
顏廷伃、許勝發,2013,《望嘉舊社人頭骨架遺址搶救調查計畫成果報告書》,社團法人臺灣打里摺文化協會,屏東縣政府。
顏廷伃、徐明福、許勝發,2015,《屏東縣望嘉舊社遺址現況調查研究保存維護與活化計畫成果報告書》,社團法人打里摺文化協會,屏東縣政府。
譚昌國,1992,《家、階層與人的觀念:以東部排灣族台坂村為例的研究》,國立臺灣大學人類學研究所碩士論文。
譚昌國,2004,〈祖靈屋與頭目家階層地位:以東排灣土坂村Patjaljinuk家為例〉,黃應貴(主編),《物與物質文化》,臺北:中央研究院民族學研究所,頁111-169。
貳、英文文獻
Antweiler, Christoph. 2015. “Ethnicity from an anthropological perspective”. In Ethnicity as a Political Resource: Conceptualizations across Disciplines, Regions, and Periods. University of Cologne Forumed, 25-38.
Appadurai, Arjun. 1981. “The Past as a Scarce Resource”. Man (N.S.) 16(2) :201-219.
Appadurai, Arjun. 1986. “Introduction: Commodities and the Politics of Value.” In The Social Life of Things—Commidities in Cultural Perspective, ed. Arjun Appadurai. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press, 3-63.
Appadurai, Arjun. 2008. “The Globalization of Archaeology.” In The Heritage Reader, eds. Graham Fairclough et al. London, New York : Routledge, 209-218.
Bacigalupo, Ana Mariella. 2010. The Life, Death, and Rebirth of a Mapuche Shaman: Remembering, Disremembering, and the Willful Transformation of Memory. Journal of Anthropological Research 66(1):97-119.
Bender, Barbara. 2002. “Time and Landscape”. Current Anthropology 43, No. S4, (August/ October 2002), S103-S112.
Bloch, Maurice. 1977. “The Past and the Present in the Present.” Man (N.S.) 12(2): 278-292.
Bloch, Maurice. 1992. “Internal and External Memory: Different Ways of Being in History”. The Edward Westermarck Memorial Lecture, Suomen Antropologi 1/92:3-15.
Bloch, Maurice. 1995. “People into Places: Zafimaniry Concepts of Clarity.” In The Anthropology of Landscape: Perspectives on Place and Space, eds. Eric Hirsch and Michael O’Hanlon. New York: Oxford University Press, 63-77.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carsten, Janet. 1996. The Politics of Forgetting: Migration, Kinship and Memory on the Periphery of the Southeast Asia State. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 1: 317-35.
Clifford, James. 1997. Routes : travel and translation in the late twentieth century. Cambridge, Mass : Harvard University Press.
Comaroff, John & Jean Comaroff. 2009. Ethnicity, Inc. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Cole, J. 1998. “The Uses of Defeat: Memory and the Political Morality in East Madagascar.” In Memory and the Postcolony: African Anthropology and the Critique of Power, ed. R. Werbner. London: Zed Books, 105-125.
Connerton, Paul. 1989. How Societies Remember. Cambridge UK & New York: Cambridge University Press.
Connerton, Paul. 2006. “Cultural Memory.” In Handbook of Material Culture, eds. Christorpher Tilley, Webb Keane, Susanne Küchler, Michael Rowlands and Patricia Spyer. London: Sage Publications, 315-324.
Eller, Jack David. 2007. Introducing Anthropology of Religion. New York: Routledge.
Fabian, Johannes. 2007. Momory Against Culture: Arguments and Reminders. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
Fox, James J. 1996. “Introduction.” In Origins, Ancestry and Alliance: Explorations in Austronesian Ethnography, eds. James J. Fox and Clifford Sather. Canberra: Australian National University, 1-17.
Graham, Brian. 2002. “Heritage As Knowledge: Capital or Culture?” Urban Studies 39 (5/6):1003-1017.
Halbwachs, Maurice. 1992. On Collective Memory. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Harrison, Rodney. 2008. “The Politics of the Past: Conflict in the Use of Heritage in the Morden World.” In The Heritage Reader, ed. Rodney Harrison. London: Routledge, 178-208.
Harrison, Simon. 2000. “From Prestige Goods to Legacies: Property and the Objectification of Culture in Melanesia.” Comparative Studies in Societies and History 42(3):662-679.
Harvey, David C. 2007. “Heritage Pasts and Heritage Presents: Temporality, Meaning and the Scope of Heritage Studies.” In Cultural Heritage: Critical Concepts in Media and Cultural Studies Vol I, ed. Laurajane Smith. London & New York: Routledge, 25-44.
Harvey, David C. 2008. “The History of Heritage”. In The Ashgate Research Companion to Heritage and Identity, eds. Brain Graham and Peter Howard Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Ltd, 19-36.
Helms, Mary W. 1993. Craft and the Kingly Ideal: Art, Trade, and Power. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Herzfeld, Michael. 1982. “When Exceptions Define the Rules: Greek Baptismal Names and the Negotiation of Identity.” In Journal of Anthropological Research 38(3):288-302.
Hirsch, Eric. 1995. “Landscape: Between Place and Space.” In The Anthropology of Landscape, eds. Hirsch, Eric & O’Hanlon, Michael.New York: Oxford University Press. 1-30.
Hoskins, Janet. 1993. The Play of Time : Kodi Perspectives on Calendars, History, and Exchange. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Hoskins, Janet. 1998. Biographical Objects: How Things Tell the Stories of People’s Lives. London: Routledge.
Hoskins, Janet. 2006. “Agency, Biography and Objects.” In Handbook of Material Culture, ed. Christopher Y. Tilley. London: Sage Publications. 74-84.
Hu, Chia-Yu. 2017. “From Making Heritage to Reviving Culture: Two Cases of Indigenous National Treasures in Taiwan.” Paper presented in the Conference on Heritage Making in Asia: Conservation in Action. Organized by South China Research Center, the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.
Keesing, R. 1982. Kwaio Religion: The Living and the Dead in a Soloman Island Society. New York: Columbia University Press.
Ku, Kun-Hui. 2008. “Ethnographic Studies of Voting Among the Austronesian Paiwan-The Role of Paiwan Chiefs in the Contemporary State System of Taiwan.” Pacific Affairs 81(3):383-406.
Ku, Kun-Hui. 2016. “Naming Relationship and Constructing Hierarchy: Names, Values, and Hierarchy among the Austronesian Paiwan, Taiwan.” Pacific Studies 39 (1-2):174-200.
Ku, Kun-Hui. 2019. “Reconsidering Hierarchy and Egalitarianism in Austronesian Taiwan.” Anthropological Forum. DOI: 10.1080/00664677.2019.1626217.
Küchler, Susanne. 1993. “Landscape as Memory: The Mapping of Process and its Representation in a Melanesian Society.” In Landscape: Politics and Perspectives. ed. Barbara Bender. Providence : Berg. 85-106.
Küchler, Susanne. 2002. Malanggan : art, memory and sacrifice. Oxford; New York : Berg.
Miller, Daniel. 2010. Stuff. Cambridge:Plity Press.
Morphy, Howard. 1995. “Landscape and the Reproduction of the Ancestral Past.” In The Anthropology of Landscape, eds. Eric Hirsch and Michael O’Hanlon. New York: Oxford University Press, 184-209.
Nora, Pierre. 1989. “Between Memory and History: Les Lieux de Mémoire.” Representations No. 26, Special Issue: Memory and Counter-Memory Spring :7-24.
Rowlands, Michael. 2007. “Entangled Memories and Parallel Heritages in Mali.” In Reclaiming Heritage: Alternative Imaginaries of Memory in West Africa, eds. Michael Rowlands &Ferdinand De Jong. Walnut Creek, Calif. : Left Coast Press, 127-147.
Rowlands, Michael & De Jong, Ferdinand. 2007. “Reconsidering Heritage and Memory.” In Reclaiming Heritage: Alternative Imaginaries of Memory in West Africa, eds. Michael Rowlands &Ferdinand De Jong. Walnut Creek, Calif : Left Coast Press, 13-29.
Tilley, Christopher Y. 1994. A Phenomenology of Landscape. Oxford: Berg.
Tilley, Christopher Y. 2006. “Objectification.” In Handbook of Material Culture, ed. Christopher Y. Tilley. London: Sage Publications, 60-73.
Thomas, Nicholas. 1991. Entangled Objects: Exchange, Material Culture, and Colonialism In the Pacific. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Tung, Yuan-chao. 2016. “Returning to/ Reconnecting with the Source: Reorienting Ethnographic Museums in Taiwan.” Presented at Transpacific Taiwan: An International Symposium, 14 November, Watson Institute, Brown University.
Urry, John. 2007. “How Societies Remember the Past.” In Cultural Heritage: Critical Concepts in Media and Cultural Studies Vol II. ed. Laurajane Smith. London & New York: Routledge, 188-205.
Vermander, Benoit. 2017. “Rituals as Local Knowledge: Millet and the Symbolic Subsistence of Taiwan’s Aboriginal Populations.” In Religion in Taiwan and China: Locality and Transmission, eds. Hsun Chang & Benjamin Penny. Taipei: Institute of Ethnology, 253-291.
Weiner, Annette B. 1985. “Inalienable Wealth.” American Ethnologist 12(2): 210-227.
Winter, Tim. 2007. “Landscape in the Living Memory:New Year Festivities at Angkor, Cambodia.” In Heritage, Memory and the Politics of Identity: New Perspectives on the Cultural Landscape, eds. Niamh Moore and Yvonne Whelan. Aldershot, England ; Burlington, VT : Ashgate, 133-147.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE