臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：後結構藝術表達之哲學圖表的美育運用--依據德勒茲的差異與重複理論
作者：謝攸青 引用關係
作者(外文)：Hsieh, Yu-Ching
校院名稱：國立臺灣師範大學
系所名稱：美術學系
指導教授：趙惠玲
學位類別：博士
出版日期：2019
主題關鍵詞：差異與重複；德勒茲；藝術教育；美感；圖表；表達；現實化；超越；聯覺；第三方我；difference and repetition；Deleuze；art education；aesthetic；diagram；expression；actualisation；trascendence；synesthesia；the third party on me
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:5
本研究基於德勒茲的「差異」與「重複」的理論，建構出後結構藝術表達的哲學圖表以為美育應用。希望強調出藝術必須是基於生命實質內在性意義，其符號的外在表達才能有價值；關心當人作為藝術表達的主體，必須有主體「超越運動」的學習作用，如此才是物質意義昇華為藝術的根本。而這種「運動」能使藝術表達因為主體突破困境的解決問題，而迴響生命現實的共鳴，因而產生一種藝術的力量。因此，這個力量並非憑空的添加之補充物，而是關係著後結構的動性事實如何透過直接藝術語彙表達的議題，即「現實化」的議題。
再者，本研究關注德勒茲觀點中所牽涉到本體論如何掌握差異事物的理想本質之議題，研究者將由此推論當藝術教育上強調尊重差異的原則時，事實上如何堅持與追求生命世界事物理想本質之普同性價值亦是一個相對重要的課題。
主要透過德勒茲《差異與重複》一書之文本研究，本研究將差異與重複理論具體化出三個探索其內涵意義的主軸：「現實化」、「第三方我聯覺與意志」，以及「差異理型的哲學辨證行動」，發現這整個理論系統乃藝術品質追求的核心理論。並且，結合德勒茲另兩部著作《法蘭西斯‧培根：感覺的邏輯》與《普魯斯特與符號》，研究發現此一理論系統在這些文本間的高度一致性，而且，後兩本著作更有助於彰顯差異與重複理論中關於「超越運動」與「藝術表達」兩大概念當中原本隱含之意義可以更清楚地被了解。
總之，本研究結構出藝術符號表達的哲學圖表，可做為判定藝術品質與價值的指導方針。它可做為藝術學習上與問題解決之基本研究工具，以幫助人們辨明AI科技時代藝術定義擴張後美感與創造力意義混淆的亂象，了解藝術符號的表達如何作用而幻化成為不同於物質符號的意義。總結而言，本研究的表達也正像一個基於哲學的藝術圖表之展現，提出關於藝術教育之建議。
藝術的創造價值在於是否能反應出問題需要，並有助於問題解決功用的建議之創造。本研究除了建構了美育應用上的哲學圖表，也具體就一個藝術課程實例分析。最後，本論文建議美育應重視此研究所建構的藝術表達之核心意涵，應培養基於發展人文教育所應重視的各種人才，以下乃五項具體的建議：一、應檢視並重視人類文明中值得珍視與發展的藝術理想的本質行為。二、應重視歷史中各種被關注的藝術議題之詮釋與應用方向。三、應重視人文價值本體論的辨證與差異理型的核心意涵。四、主體超越之生命內在性才是物質能昇華為藝術的根本。五、應重視主體「第三方我」聯覺感受力與持續深化學習的意義。
This essay, which is based on Deleuze’s theory of “difference” and “repetition” establishes the philosophy diagram of post-structural art expression for art education. This essay will emphasize that the value of art needs the immanent meaning of life inside when art is expressed by signs outward; and pay more attention to that when human beings should be seen as the subject of art expression and that the learning function of “transcendent exercise” by subject is the core value of how material can become art. This “athlete” can make art expression have kind of a force which comes from how the subject breaks through the difficulty and problem solving, and resonates life immanence. Therefore, the force isn’t an additional supplementary, it is the issue of “actualisation ” related to how the dynamic real will be expressed through the direct language of art.
Moreover, the essay will raise the issue to Deleuze’s aspects of how to catch the ideal essence of difference, which is involved ontology. From the results of the issue, the research will affirm that when respecting the difference of students is an emphasized principle in art education, how to resist and pursue the ideal essence of the universality in life is also a significant issue respectively.
Through the research on the text of "Difference and Repetition" mainly, this essay has incarnated the theory of “difference” and “repetition” into three topics for discussing its significance: “actualisation”, “the synesthesia of the third party on me and the will”, and “the philosophical dialectics of different Idea”, and finds that the whole theory system is the core theory for pursuing the quality of art. In addition, combining Deleuze’s other two books— "Francis Bacon: The Logic of Sensation", and "Proust and Signs", this essay finds the system of theory is highly consistent with each other between these texts. Furthermore, the latter two books are helpful for making the aspects of both “transcendent exercise” and “art expression” more explicit for understanding, which are implicit in the theory of “difference” and “repetition”.
Eventually, the essay constructs the philosophy diagram of art expression to be the orientation for judging the quality or value of art. This can be used as a researching tool for art learning and problem solving to help people distinguish the aesthetic and creative meanings when the definition of art is magnifying its extent and so confusing during the AI ages. Also, it can clarify how art signs operate and become different from material signs. All in all, the expression of this research is like performing an art diagram based on philosophy to give suggestions for art education.
The creative value of art lies in whether it can correspond to the needs of problem and contribute the creation to suggest for problem solving. In addition to constructing the philosophy diagram for the application in art education, this essay also analyzes an example of an art curriculum. Consequently, the essay advises that art education should seriously concern the core significance of art expression according to this study, and attach the great importance to humanistic education for cultivating various talents. Thus, the following are five recommendations: First, we should inspect what is the ideal essential conducts of art in human civilization and then attach importance to cherishing and developing them. Second, we should pay attention to the orientation associated with how the issues of art in history are interpreted and used. Third, we should pay attention to the vital meaning related to the dialectics of the ontology and Ideas of difference for concerning humanistic value. Fourth, immanence of life coming from the subject's transcendence is the fundamental factors that material can be sublimated into art. Fifth, we should concern how the sensation of the subject functioned by “the third party on me”, and how learning can continue to be deepened.
中文文獻
周雪君（2016年12月19日）。宮崎駿狠批AI製作動畫：我覺得這是對生命的侮辱。The News Lens關鍵評論。取自https://hk.thenewslens.com/article/57160
陳榮華（2011）。高達美詮釋學：《真理與方法》導讀。台北市：三民。
陳瑞文（2009）。以問題性為核心的美學經驗：德勒茲的圖表思想。現代美術學報，第17期，11-43。
萬胥亭（2009）。德勒茲、巴洛克、全球化。台北市：唐山。〔Wan, H.-T. （2009）. Deleuze baroque globalization. Taipei, Taiwan: Tonsan.〕
楊宏琪（2015）。德勒茲「無器官 （身） 體」流變課程。（未出版之博士論文）國立臺北教育大學，台北市。
楊凱麟（2003）。德勒茲「思想-影像」或「思想=影像」之條件及問題性。臺大文史哲學報，59，337-367。
楊凱麟（2014）。起源與重複：德勒茲哲學的差異問題性。政治大學哲學學報，31，107-140。
劉文潭（1991）。現代美學。台北市：臺灣商務印書館。
劉育忠（2009）。後結構主義與當代教育學探索：回到世界性真實。台北市：巨流。
劉育忠（2010）。教育學的再想像：德勒茲思想與教育哲學。台北市：巨流圖書有限公司。
謝攸青（2006）。後現代藝術教育：理論建構與實例設計。嘉義市：濤石。
謝攸青（2013）。藝術教學中高達美詮釋學與批判理論之整合應用—以孟克《青春期》為例。屏東教育大學學報 人文社會類，40，31-60。
謝攸青（2015）。藝術的創造思維與超越：德勒茲的「差異」理論之啟示。現代美術學報，29，191-219。
謝攸青（2016）。詩性的藝術創造與學習--「第三方我」生命直覺之探索。中正教育研究，15（1），137-179。
謝攸青（2017）。德勒茲藝術符號的問題解決與創造表達。廖瑞章（主持人），2017 視覺藝術新視野學術研討會發表之論文。國立嘉義大學。
謝攸青（2018）。德勒茲後結構主義美學的教育啟示。朱啟華（主持人），臺灣教育哲學學會106學年度下學期中區討論會發表之講稿。國立中正大學。
羅貴祥 （1997）。德勒茲。台北市：三民。
蘇子中（2011）。事關緊要的身體：表演者如何替自己打造一個擴張的身體？ Bodies that matter: How does a performer make himself/herself a dilated body?。淡江評論， 42（1），103-126。
龔卓軍（2006）。身體感與時間性: 以梅洛龐蒂解讀柏格森為線索。思與言: 人文與社會科學雜誌, 44（1）, 49-100.
龔卓軍（譯）（2007）。眼與心：身體現象大師梅洛龐蒂的最後書寫。（原作者：Maurice Merleau-Ponty）。台北市：典藏藝術家庭。


西文文獻
Badiou, A. (2000). Of life as a name of being, or, Deleuze’s vitalist ontology. Pli: The Warwick Journal of Philosophy, 10, 191-199.
Beighton, C. (2015). Deleuze and lifelong learning: Creativity, events and ethics. Palgrave Macmillan.
Best, S., & Kellner, D. (1991). Postmodern theory: Critical interrogations. New York: Guilford Press.
Bogue, R. (2003). Deleuze on music, painting, and the arts. London: Routledge.
Bryant, L. R. (2008). Difference and givenness: Deleuze's transcendental empiricism and the ontology of immanence. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Cantinho, B. (2013). Choreographing thought: Ｍovement as an image of thought, seen through the Deleuzian pure optical and sound image. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Edinburgh). Retrieved from: https://www.era.lib.ed.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1842/8979/Cantinho2013.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y
Carlin, M., & Wallin, J. (Eds.). (2014). Deleuze and Guattari, politics and education: For a People-Yet-to-Come. NY: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Colebrook, C. (2002). Gilles Deleuze. London and New York: Routledge.
Colebrook, C. (2010). Deleuze and the meaning of life. London and New York: Continuum.
Cole, D. R. (2011). Educational life-forms. Rotterdam : SensePublishers. Retrieved from: https://www.sensepublishers.com/media/337-educational-life-forms.pdf
Delanda, M. (2012). Deleuze, mathematics, and realist ontology. In Daniel W. Smith & Henry Somers-Hall (Eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Deleuze. (pp. 220). Cambridge University Press.
Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota
Press. (Original work published 1980)
Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and repetition. (P. Patton, Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press. (Original work published 1968)
Deleuze, G. (2000). Proust & signs. (R. Howard, Trans.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 1964)
Deleuze, G. (2001). Pure immanence: A life (A. Boyman, Trans.). New York, NY: Zone Books. (Original work published 1995)
Deleuze, G. (2003). Francis Bacon: The logic of sensation. (D. W. Smith, Trans.). London, UK: Continuum. (Original work published 1981)
Derrida, J. (1973). Speech and phenomena, and other essays on Husserl’s theory of signs. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Drohan, C. M. (2007). Toward a material concept of the sign: The semiotics of Gilles Deleuze
(Unpublished Ph.D. thesis). European Graduate School, Geneva.
Duffy, S. B. (2006). The mathematics of Deleuze's differential logic and metaphysics. In S. Duffy (Ed.), Virtual mathematics: The logic of difference (pp. 118-144) Manchester, UK: Clinamen Press.
Duffy, S. B. (2013). Deleuze and the history of mathematics: In defense of the “new”. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Ferrari, S. (2011). Gombrich, art and psychoanalysis. Journal of art historiography, 5. Retrieved from https://arthistoriography.files.wordpress.com/2011/12/ferrari.pdf
Gadamer, H. G. (1986). The relevance of the beautiful and other essays. (N. Walker Trans.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1977)
Gadamer, H. G. (1989). Truth and method (J. Weinsheimer, & D. G. Marshall, Trans.). New York, NY: Seabury Press. (Original work published 1960)
Globus, G.(2007). Mind, matter, and monad. Mind and Matter, 5(2), 201-214.
Gray, C., & Malins, J. (2004). Visualizing research: A guide to the research process in art and design. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
Harris, D. E. (2013). Applying theory to practice: Putting Deleuze to work. International Journal of Sociology of Education, 2(2), 142-166.
jagodzinski, j. (2005). Virtual reality's differential perception: On the significance of Deleuze (and Lacan) for the future of visual art education in a machinic age. Visual Arts Research, 3, (1), 129-177.
jagodzinski, j. (2014). When Deleuze and Lacan {finally} meet: The singularity (life) of art in [art] education. Synnyt/Origins: Finnish Studies in Art Education Special Issue, 2, 77-98. Retrieved from https://wiki.aalto.fi/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=97623342
Jay, M. (1993). Downcast eyes: The denigration of vision in twentieth-century French thought. Berkeley: University of California.
Kesson, K. R. (1999). Toward a curriculum of mythopoetic meaning. In
J. G. Henderson & K. R. Kesson (Eds.), Understanding democratic curriculum leadership (pp. 84-105). New York, NY: Teachers College.
Macleod, K., & Holdridge, L. (2006). Thinking through art: Reflections on art as research. London, UK: Routledge.
Marshall, J. (2007). Image as insight: Visual image in practice-based research. Studies in Art Education, 49(1), 23-41.
Mazzei, L. A., & McCoy, K. (2010). Thinking with Deleuze in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23(5), 503-509.
Milovanovic, D. (2013). Quantum holographic critical criminology. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Criminology, 5(2): 1-29.
Nakagomi, T. (2004). Quantum monadology: A consistent world model for consciousness and physics. BioSystems, 69, 27-38.
Nakagomi, T. (2006). Picture of the world as a quantum monadistic system. NeuroQuantology, 4(3), 241-248.
Ramachandran, V. S. (2003). The emerging mind: The Reith lectures 2003. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/reith2003/
Roy, K. (2003). Teachers in nomadic spaces: Deleuze and curriculum. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
Semetsky, I. (2003). The problematics of human subjectivity: Gilles Deleuze and the Deweyan legacy. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 22 (3/4), 211-225.
Semetsky, I. (2006). Deleuze, education and becoming. Rotterdam : Sense Publishers.
Somers-Hall, H. (2013). Deleuze's Difference and Repetition: An Edinburgh philosophical guide. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Stephen, K. (1922). The misuse of mind: A study of Bergson's attack on intellectualism. London, UK: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co.
Sullivan, G. (2005). Art practice as research: Inquiry in the visual arts. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Wendt, A. (2010). Flatland: Quantum mind and the international system of hologram. In M. Albert, L. Cederman and A. Wendt (Eds.), New systems theories of world politics. (pp. 279-310). London, UK: Palgrave.
Zizek, S. (1989, Nov 5). The interpassive subject [Online forum comment].
Retrieved from http://www.lacan.com/zizek-pompidou.htm
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：819（臺灣：749，外國：70） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1311662 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67118722
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上