:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣社區照顧的實施與衝擊--福利多元主義的觀點
書刊名:臺大社會工作學刊
作者:黃源協 引用關係
作者(外文):Hwang, Yuan-shie
出版日期:2001
卷期:5
頁次:頁53+55-101
主題關鍵詞:社區照顧福利多元主義民營化志願部門非正式部門Community careWelfare pluralismPrivatizationVoluntary sectorInformal sector
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(18) 博士論文(5) 專書(2) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:18
  • 共同引用共同引用:316
  • 點閱點閱:329
本文旨在藉由福利多元主義的觀點,檢視台灣社區照顧發展脈絡中,政府、商業、志願與非正式部門所扮演的角色,並進一步藉以分析起步中的台灣社區照顧,在福利分工趨勢下所面臨的衝擊,及其在邁向福利多元主義所可能面對的難題與挑戰。研究發現,就人口與社經脈絡的發展言,台灣已逐漸面臨到高齡化社會的老年照護問題,但傳統提供照護的非正式系統也正面臨著轉型,使得正式部門不得不重視趨於嚴重的老人照護問題。在受到福利多元主義的影響下,社區照顧已經成為政府因應的重要策略之一。社區照顧福利供給的四個部門-政府、商業、志願和非正式部門,在老人長期照護的服務輸送脈絡裡,也因而處於一個轉型的年代。對政府部門言,其角色已漸從有限的直接提供者,轉為補助者、購買者、規範者、監督者和某些服務的供給者。為健全社區照顧的發展,明確制訂政策和實務導引,並扮演好財務提供、規範和監督的角色,是政府所應有的作為。商業部門作為照護提供的一份子,如何確保並提升服務品質,以及提供家庭照顧勞務的穩定性,為其所需肩負的社會責任。對志願部門言,隨著契約委託而來的服務範疇與規模的擴展,如何要處理契約與其傳統性格間的兩難,以及如何以「責信」作為服務提供的導引和基礎,將是福利多元主義目標能否真正實現的關鍵因素。對非正式部門言,社區照顧提供支持、補充並強化了傳統家庭照顧的功能,但其理想能否實現且延續,則需端視服務使用者對付費與不付費間的拔河,以及充權能力的養成。
This paper aims to review roles of state, commercial, voluntary and informal sectors in the context of community care development by using the approach of welfare pluralism. Further, this paper also wants to look into the challenge and dilemma of community care on the way toward welfare pluralism in Taiwan. The demographic and socio-economic trends suggest that it has become more difficult to expect that family should continue functioning as main provider of caring for the elderly, therefore, caring issue has been and will be a matter of great concern for society. Under the influence of welfare pluralism, community care has become one of main strategies of coping the problem. In the context of community care provision, the four parts including state, commercial, voluntary and informal sectors are now in a period of transition. For the state sector, its role is shifting from provider of limited and fragmented services to subsidizer, regulator, monitor and provider in some fields. For commercial sector, as an element of providing care, its responsibility is to improve and guarantee service quality and accountability, and provide a stable source of foreign carers. For voluntary sector, the introduction of contracting out social services has resulted in extension of welfare service's category and scale. The problems needing to be tackled are the dilemma between traditional mission and contract requirements. In addition, whether voluntary organizations can view and take the 'accountability' as their guideline or basis in providing services is a necessary condition for carrying out the ideas of welfare plural-ism. For informal sector, provision of community care provides supporting, supplementing and strengthening family's function in caring elderly people. However, whether the idea can be carried out or not is dependent on a tug of war between the government capability and family's willingness on paying for services.
期刊論文
1.Stoker, G.(1987)。Decentralisation and Local Government。Social Policy and Administration,21(2),157-170。  new window
2.林維言(20001200)。從「加強老人安養服務方案」的執行談長期照護制度之建構。社區發展季刊,92,6-18。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.吳淑瓊、朱昭美(19950800)。民眾對老人長期照護安排之態度:1994臺灣地區社會意向調查之發現。中華公共衛生雜誌,14(4),369-382。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.林秀純、徐亞瑛、姚開屏、吳淑瓊(19990200)。臺灣北部地區失能老人家庭照顧品質及相關因素之探討。護理研究,7(1),15-28。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.吳淑瓊、林惠生(1999)。臺灣功能障礙老人家庭照護者的全國概況剖析。中華公共衛生雜誌,18(1),44-53。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.謝美娥(19970900)。從失能老人社區照顧的需求初探服務網絡之建立。國立政治大學社會學報,27,47-88。  延伸查詢new window
7.Johnson, Norman(1989)。The Privatization of Welfare State。Social Policy and Administration,23(1),17-30。  new window
8.徐震(19910600)。臺灣社會轉型中社區發展的新模式與新作法。社會福利,94,11-18。  延伸查詢new window
9.李美玉(19980900)。臺灣省輔導未立案老人照顧養護機構之問題、對策與未來。社區發展季刊,83,255-262。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.劉邦富、黃松林、劉阿琴(19960400)。臺灣省已未立案老人養護機構探討。社會發展研究學刊,2,19-68。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.劉佳安、吳淑瓊(19991200)。社區老人對居家護理之認識及其影響因子。中華公共衛生雜誌,18(6),445-452。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.呂寶靜(19970900)。臺灣地區老人日間照護方案功能之初探:從老人使用者及其家屬的觀點出發。國立政治大學社會學報,27,89-120。  延伸查詢new window
13.賴惠玲、吳淑瓊、江東亮(19960300)。城鄉及兩代間對護理之家看法的前驅性研究。護理雜誌,43(1),55-63。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.吳淑瓊、江東亮(19950600)。臺灣地區長期照護的問題與對策。中華公共衛生雜誌,14(3),246-255。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.徐慧娟、吳淑瓊(19980800)。提供社區式家庭支持方案能否減少機構式長期照護服務之使用意願?。中華公共衛生雜誌,17(4),326-336。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.嚴毋過、吳淑瓊、許菁菁、陳寶輝(19960600)。臺北市公私立醫院非急性長期住院病人的盛行率、長期照護需要與長期照護態度。護理研究,4(2),151-160。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.台北市政府社會局(1995)。「台灣社區府顱研討會」會議手冊暨論文集。台灣社區府顱研討會。台北:台北市政府社會局。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.楊堂、黃源協(1999)。推動「社會褔利社區化」之研究--以彰化縣鹿港鎮為例。台北:內政部。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳淑瓊、王正、呂寶靜、莊坤洋、張媚、戴玉慈(2001)。建構長期照護體系先導計畫。內政部。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Choi, Y. C.(1999)。The Dynamics of Public Service Contracting--The British Experience。Bristol:The Policy Press。  new window
2.DHSS(1978)。Collaboration in Community Care--A discussion Document。London:HMSO。  new window
3.Johnson, N.(1987)。The Welfare State in Transition。Wheatsheaf Books。  new window
4.Rao, N.(1996)。Towards welfare pluralism: Public services in a time of change。Dartmouth Publishing Company。  new window
5.Johnson, N.(1999)。Mixed Economy of Welfare--A Comparative Perspective。London:Prentice Hall Europe。  new window
6.中華民國公共衛生學會(2001)。居家服務支援中心參訪報告。台北:中華民國公共衛生學會。  延伸查詢new window
7.內政部統計處(2000)。中華民國八十九年老人狀況調查報告。台北:內政部。  延伸查詢new window
8.行政院社會福利推動小組長期照護專案小組(2001)。長期照護管理示範中心參訪報告。台北:行政院社會福利推動小組長期照護專案小組。  延伸查詢new window
9.Johnson, N.(1992)。Reconstructing the Welfare State--A Decade of Change 1980-1990。London:Harvest Wheatsheaf。  new window
10.MoH(1963)。Heaith & Welfare--The Development of Community Care。London:HMSO。  new window
11.呂寶靜(20010000)。老人照顧:老人、家庭、正式服務。臺北:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.黃源協(20000000)。社區照顧:臺灣與英國經驗的檢視。臺北:揚智文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Department of Health(1989)。Caring for people: Community care in the next decade and beyond。HMSO。  new window
14.Means, R.、Smith, R.(1998)。Community Care: Policy and Practice。Macmillan。  new window
15.Lovell, T.、Cordeaux, C.(1999)。Social Policy for Health and Social Care。London:Hodder & Soughton。  new window
其他
1.行政院主計處(2001)。民國八十九年戶口及住宅普查初步報告,http://www.dgbasey.gov.tw。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Walker, A.(1983)。A Caring Community。The Future of the Welfare State: Remaking Social Policy。London:Heinemann Educational Books。  new window
2.Deakin, N.(2001)。Public Policy, Social Policy and Voluntary Organisation。Voluntary Organisations and Social Policy in Britain。Basingstoke:Palgrave。  new window
3.Le Grand, J.、Robbinson, R.(1984)。Privitisation and the Welfare State: An Introduction。Privitisation and the Welfare State。London:Unwin Hyman。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE