臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：母親參與親子遊戲訓練團體對國小被同儕拒絕兒童親子關係、社交地位及學校行為改變之研究
書刊名：諮商輔導文粹
作者：洪淑雅／卓紋君 引用關係
作者(外文)：Hung, Shu-ya／Cho, Wen-chun
出版日期：2001
卷期：6
頁次：頁23-58
主題關鍵詞：親子遊戲訓練團體；親子遊戲治療；被同儕拒絕兒童；親子關係；社交地位；Filial therapy group；Filial therapy；Peer-rejected children；Parent-child relationship；Social status
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(6) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:37
  • 點閱點閱:76
本研究旨在探討親子遊戲訓練團體對親子關係和被同儕拒絕兒童之社交地位的影響，並探究被同儕拒絕兒童在生活及學習行為上的改變情形。本研究以國小四、五年級在班級中被同儕拒絕的兒童及其家長(母親)為對象，參與十週的親子遊戲訓練團體，且於第三次團體結束後，讓成員在家中與被同儕拒絕兒童進行每週一次、每次三十分鐘、共計七次的家中遊戲單元。研究結果發現: 一、 在親子關係方面 「親子關係滿意程度量表」結果顯示，親子遊戲訓練團體顯著改善成員與其子女(被同儕拒絕兒童)的親子關係。訪談結果亦顯示親子遊戲訓練團體使成員增加與其子女互動的頻率，且互動方式由負向轉為正向，對孩子有較多包含和接納;六位被同儕拒絕兒童在參與團體後對母親的情感也都有正向成長的趨勢。 二、 在社交地位方面 由社交測量前、後測的資料顯示，親子遊戲訓練團體無法有效改善被同儕拒絕兒童的社交地位。但仔細研究，這六位被同儕拒絕兒童比較不會再被同儕列為拒絕的第一人選。 三、 在生活及學習行為方面 從同儕、導師、母親、及被同儕拒絕兒童本身的訪談內容皆表示，親子遊戲訓練團體結束後，這六位被同儕拒絕兒童在學校及日常生活中的行為有某種程度的改變。 根據上述研究結果，研究者進一步提出對於未來研究及實務工作的建議。由於研究設計有其限制，故結果的推論需謹慎。
The purpose of this study are to discuss and explore the influence of the filial therapy group does to the parent-child relationship and the social status of peer-rejected children, and to investigate the changes in life and school social behavior of peer-rejected children. The subjects of the study include 4th or 5th grade elementary peer-rejected children and their mothers. We educated these mothers with filial therapy training in a ten-weeks group, and had the members proceed play sessions for 30 minutes, once a week, totally 7 times with their peer-rejected children at home after the third group session. The findings of the study are as follows. I. With Respect to the Parent-child Relationship; The outcome show that the filial therapy group has significantly enhanced the parent-child relationship between the members and their children. The interview result also indicates that the filial therapy group increases the interactive frequency between the members and their children, and changes their interactive pattern from the negative to the positive direction, with more tolerance and acceptance toward the children. Moreover, after the group training the emotion to their mothers of the six peer-rejected children appears the tendency of positive growing. II. With Respect to the Social Status: The data before and after the socioeconomic survey reveal that the filial therapy group do not significantly improve the social status of peer-rejected children, but at least the six peer-rejected children are not listed as the first choices of rejected persons by their peers. III. With Respect to Life and School Behavior: The content of interviews of the peers, teachers, mothers, and peer-rejected children themselves shows that the behaviors of the six peer-rejected children at school and at home have improved to some extent after the end of the filial therapy group training. According to the result, suggestions concerning the future study and the actual counseling are provided.
期刊論文
1.Hartup, W. W.(1996)。The Company they Keep: Friendships and Their Developmental Significance。Child Development，67(1)，1-13。  new window
2.Parker, J.G.、Asher, S.R.(1987)。Peer relations and later personal adjustment: Are low-acceptd children at risk?。Psychological Bulletin，102(3)，357-389。  new window
3.洪儷瑜、涂春仁(19960100)。Coie & Dodge社會計量地位分類公式之修正。測驗年刊，43，103-114。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Connolly, G. M.、Casswell, S.、Zhang, J. F.、Silva, P. A.(1994)。Alcohol in the mass media and drinking by adolescent: a longitudinal study。Addiction，89(10)，1255-1263。  new window
5.Athanasiou, M.、Gunning, M.(1999)。Filial therapy: Effects on two children's behavior and mothers' stress。Psychological Reports，84(2)，587-590。  new window
6.Chau, I. Y. F.、Landreth, G. L.(1997)。Filial therapy with Chinese parents: Effects on parental empathic interactions, parental acceptance of child and parental stress。International Journal of Play Therapy，6(2)，75-92。  new window
7.Johnson, Laura、Bruhn, Rick、Winek, Jon、Krepps, Jeff、Wiley, Kelly(1999)。The Use of Child-centered Play Therapy and Filial Therapy with Head Start Families: A Brief Report。Journal of Marital and Family Therapy，25(2)，169-176。  new window
8.Parker, J. G.、Asher, S. R.(1993)。Friendship and friendship quality in middle childhood: Links with peer group acceptance and feelings of loneliness and social dissatisfaction。Developmental Psychology，29(4)，611-621。  new window
9.Gresham, F. M.、Nagle, R. J.(1980)。Social skills training with children: Responsiveness to modeling and coaching as a function of peer orientation。Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology，48(6)，718-729。  new window
學位論文
1.徐慶娟(1996)。兒童同儕地位之家庭因素研究(碩士論文)。文化大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.林佩琪(2000)。社會技巧訓練對國小「退縮--被拒絕」兒童之社會技巧、同儕接納與社會自尊影響之實驗研究(碩士論文)。國立東華大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.魏渭堂(1999)。親子遊戲治療團體方案設計與效果之分析研究(博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.蔡麗芳(1992)。社交技巧訓練策略對國小兒童社交技巧、問題行為及同儕接納之影響效果實驗研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.黃信仁(1985)。社會技巧訓練對國小兒童社會關係之影響(碩士論文)。中國文化大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.郭孝貞(1988)。父母婚姻關係、親子關係與其幼兒社會行為之相關研究--以托兒所幼兒為調査對象(碩士論文)。私立中國文化大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.吳百能(1988)。遊戲治療對增進孤立兒童社會關係效果之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.VanFleet, R.(1994)。Filial Therapy: Strengthening Parent-Child Relationships Through Play。Sarasota, FL：Professional Resource Press。  new window
2.Landreth, Garry L.、高淑貞(1994)。遊戲治療：建立關係的藝術。臺北市：桂冠。  延伸查詢new window
3.林清山(1992)。心理與教育統計學。東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
4.Patton, Michael Quinn、吳芝儀、李奉儒(1995)。質的評鑑與研究。桂冠圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.吳新華(1996)。親子關係與適應問題，台北市：五南圖書出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.涂春仁(1998)。社交測量3.0，台北市：暢達資訊（股）公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.高淑貞(1996)。親子關係潤滑劑--親子遊戲治療簡介。  延伸查詢new window
4.郭靜晃，吳幸玲，Newman, R. M.，Newman, P. R.(1993)。兒童發展：心理社會理論與實務，臺北：揚智文化。  延伸查詢new window
5.Asher, S. R., & Wheeler, V. A.(1985)。Children’s loneliness: A comparison of rejected and neglected peer status。  new window
6.Bierman, K. L. & Furman, W.(1984)。The effects of social skill training and peer involvement on the social adjustment of pre-adolescents。  new window
7.Bierman, K. L., Miller, C. L., & Stabb, S. D.(1987)。Improving the social behavior and peer acceptance of rejected boys: Effects of social skill training with instructions and prohibitions。  new window
8.Bratton, S. C.(1994)。Filial therapy with single parents (DAI-A 54/08)，Denton, TX。  new window
9.Bratton, S., & Landreth, G.(1995)。Filial therapy with single parents: Effects on parental acceptance, empathy, and stress。  new window
10.Coie, J. D., & Krehbiel, G.(1984)。Effects of academic tutoring on the social status of low- achieving ,socially rejected children。  new window
11.Costas, M., Landreth, G.(1999)。Filial therapy with nonoffending parents of children who have been sexually abused。  new window
12.Dekovic’ , M., & Janssens, J. M. A. M.(1992)。Parents, child-rearing style and child’s sociometric status。  new window
13.Franz, D. Z., & Gross, A. M.(1996)。Parental correlates of socially neglected, rejected, and average children。  new window
14.Ginsberg, B. G.(1989)。Training parents as therapeutic agents with foster/adoptive children using the filial approach，New York：John Wiley & Sons, Inc。  new window
15.Ginsberg, B. G., Stutman, S. S., Hummel, J.(1978)。Group filial therapy。  new window
16.Glazer, H. R., Kottman, T.(1994)。Filial therapy: Rebuilding the relationship between parents and children of divorce。  new window
17.Guemey, B.(1982)。Filial therapy: description and rationale，Illinois：Charles C Thomas-Publisher。  new window
18.Guerney, L.(1997)。Filial therapy，New York：John Wiley & Sons, Inc。  new window
19.Guerney, L., & Guerney, B.(1989)。Child relationship enhancement: Family therapy and parent education (Special issue: Person-centered approaches with families)。  new window
20.Guerney, L. F., & Welsh, A. D.(1993)。Two by two: A filial therapy case study，Northvale, N. J.：Jason Aronson Inc。  new window
21.Havighurst, R. J.(1972)。Developmental tasks and education，New York：Mckay。  new window
22.Johnson, L.(1995)。Filial therapy: A bridge between individual child therapy and family therapy。  new window
23.Ladd, G. W.(1981)。Effectiveness of a social learning method for enhancing children’s social interaction and peer acceptance。  new window
24.Ladd, G. W., & Le Sieur, K. D.(1995)。Parents and children’s peer relationships，Mahwah, N. J.：Lawrence Erlbaum Associaties。  new window
25.Lahti, S. L.(1992)。An ethnographic study of the filial therapy process (DAI-A 53/08)，Denton, TX。  new window
26.Lobaugh, F. A.(1992)。Filial therapy with incarcerated parents (DAI-B 53/04)，Denton, TX。  new window
27.MacDonald, K., & Parke, R.(1984)。Bridging the gap: Parent-child play interaction and peer interactive competence。  new window
28.MacDonald, K.(1987)。Parent-child physical play with rejected, neglected, and popular boys。  new window
29.Oden, S., & Asher, S. R.(1977)。Coaching children in social skills for friendship-making。  new window
30.Putallaz, M.(1987)。Maternal behavior and sociometric status。  new window
31.Putallaz, M. & Heflin, A. H.(1990)。Parent-child interaction，New York：Cambridge University Press。  new window
32.Sywulak, A.(1977)。The effect of filial therapy on parental acceptance and child adjustment。  new window
33.Vosk, B. Forehand, R. Parker, J. B. & Richard, K.(1982)。A multimethod comparison of popular and unpopular children。  new window
圖書論文
1.Kupersmidt, J. B.、Coie, J. D.、Dodge, K. A.(1990)。The role of poor relationships in the development of disorder。Peer rejection in childhood。New York：Cambridge University Press。  new window
2.Parker, J. G.、Rubin, K. H.、Price, J. M.、DeRojsier, M. E.(1995)。Peer relationships, child development and adjustment: A developmental psychopathology。Developmental psychotherapy。New York：Wiley。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：317（臺灣：312，外國：5） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1430120 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67223601
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上