The present paper consists of five sections. Section I reviews the main content and purpose of the paper. Sections II-IV discuss these three debates on Wang Yangming’s “four sentences doctrine” (Si-Ju-Jiao) following the historical order. Section V discloses the similarities and differences among these three debates and analyzes their hermeneutic significance. It is pointed that there were some changes in rhetoric and “bed-rock faith” used and presupposed by each partner in these three debates, which reflected the tendency of thought in later Ming Dynasty and contextuality, respectively. The dimensions involved in the debates, such as sage authority orientation, scripture orientation, praxis orientation and experience orientation, were in the discursive state. The three debates also reflected a kind of reciprocity between the Confucian community and the sacred text.