:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:佛教量論的宗教意義
書刊名:揭諦
作者:何建興 引用關係
作者(外文):Ho, Chien-hsing
出版日期:2002
卷期:4
頁次:頁35-60
主題關鍵詞:陳那法稱解脫佛教量論DignagaDharmakirtiLiberationBuddhist pramana theory
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:83
  • 點閱點閱:30
     陳那、法稱等印度大乘佛教中、後期思想家嘗就知覺理論、邏輯及語言哲學等領域著書立論, 建立了佛教自身的量論體系,並批判印度教量論學者的相關理論。問題是,量論所探討的主要是世俗知識,這同解脫這一印度宗教家共同的終極關懷又有什麼關連呢 ? 本文嘗試探討此一問題。文中先論述印度量論的起源,並討論佛教量論的主要見地。其次就佛教量論學者以「佛陀為量」一觀點進行探討,梳理出此觀點所隱藏的意含。最後,作者自佛教知覺理論、邏輯及語言哲學等視野抽絲剝繭,以證成「量論研究可作為宗教實踐的初階」一主張。
     Dignaga and Dharmakirti are the establishers of the Buddhist pramana theory, which includes theory of knowledge, logic and philosophy of language. They propounded the theory while leveling criticisms against the rival theories of Hinduism. The problem is that as a pramana theory mainly concerns worldly knowledge, one wonders how the theory is pertinent to nirvana or liberation as the object of ultimate care for Indian Buddhists. This paper is intended to investigate into this issue. It discusses the implications of the Buddhist claim that the Buddha is a pramana-bhuta, one who is the personification of the means of knowledge. Towards the end of the paper, the author seeks to show that a study of the theory does pave the way to higher religious practice.
期刊論文
1.Dummett, Michael A. E.(1996)。Matilal's Mission: A Memorial Address。Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences: Journal of the Inter-University Centre for Humanities and Social Sciences,3(2),16-17。  new window
2.Phillips, Stephen H.(1996)。Counter Matilal's Bias: The Philosophically Repectable in Indian Spiritual Thought。Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences: Journal of the Inter-University Centre for Humanities and Social Sciences,3(2),174-178。  new window
圖書
1.服部正明(1968)。Dignāga, On Perception。Dignāga, On Perception。Cambridge, Mass.。  new window
2.Mohanty, J. N.(1992)。Reason and Tradition in Indian Thought。Reason and Tradition in Indian Thought。New York。  new window
3.釋法稱。釋量論。  延伸查詢new window
4.Dreyfus, Georges(1997)。Recognizing Reality: Dharmakirti's Philosophy and Its Tibetan Interpretations。SUNY。  new window
5.Rahhakrishnan, Sarvepalli、Moore, Charles A.(1957)。A Source Book in Indian Philosophy。Princeton, N.J.。  new window
6.霍韜晦(1986)。絕對與圓融--佛教思想論集。臺北:東大圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
7.Matilal, Bimal Krishna(1986)。Perception: An Essay on Classical Indian Theories of Knowledge。Oxford:Clarendon Press。  new window
8.吳汝鈞(1992)。佛教的概念與方法。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Hattori, Masaaki(1997)。The Buddihist Theory Concerning the Truth and Falsity of Cognition。Relativism, Suffering, and Beyond: Essays in Memory of Bimal K. Matilal。New York。  new window
10.Warder, Anthony Kennedy(1991)。Indian Buddhism。Indian Buddhism。Delhi。  new window
11.Jha, Ganganatha(1984)。The Nyaya-Sutras of Gautama (Vol. 1)。The Nyaya-Sutras of Gautama (Vol. 1)。New Delhi。  new window
12.Herzberger, R.、Herzberger, Hans G.(1997)。Two Truths, or One?。Relativism, Suffering, and Beyond: Essays in Memory of Bimal K. Matilal。New York。  new window
13.(1992)。Nyaayabindu。Nyaayabindu。New Delhi。  new window
14.Kajiyama, Yuichi(1989)。Y. Kajiyama: Studies in Buddhist Philosophy。Y. Kajiyama: Studies in Buddhist Philosophy。kyoto。  new window
15.Stcherbatsky, Theodore(1962)。Buddhist Logic (Vol. 1)。Buddhist Logic (Vol. 1)。New York。  new window
16.Swaamii Dwaarikaadaas `Saastrii(1997)。The Tattvasa^ngraha (Vol. 2)。The Tattvasa^ngraha (Vol. 2)。Varanasi。  new window
其他
1.因明正理門論。  延伸查詢new window
2.蓮華戒菩薩造(1973)。廣釋菩提心論,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
3.寂護。攝真實論。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE