Criminal reports indicate that burglary is one of the most unpleasant crimes we are facing in today’s society. For the general public, they are afraid of being the victims of the burglary crimes, but also are worry about the exposure of liability risks. Therefore, the burglary prevention policy is one of the most significant public policy issues that Police Department has to cope with. The research problem is: Will the citizen-oriented or elite-oriented policy formulation influence the performance of burglary prevention? The purpose of this study is to explore the policy formulation process model of burglary prevention from the perspective of comparative research. Data collected for analysis in this study comes from two kinds of sources: literature review and qualitative interviews with 2 high-ranking officers, 15 patrol officers and 13 residents in two large law enforcement branches under the jurisdiction of the Police Department. Of various research findings in the study, this study particularly showed that the extent and scope of interaction between community residents and law enforcement branches determines the performance of burglary prevention policy, i.e., those who patrol officers are collaborating closely with citizens and community leaders, and usually successfully demonstrate satisfactory performance of burglary prevention policy. Through a Neighborhood Watch organization, neighbors agree to keep an eye on each other's property and to report suspicious activities to the Police. This research concludes that the burglary prevention policy-formulation model should be citizen-oriented and bottom-up-perspective, and emphasizing the first-line crime-control implementer’s experiences and the voices coming from community, and encouraging the residents to participate the Neighborhood Watch program. The author, lastly, concludes that formulating a citizen-oriented policy-making model is the most effective alternative to prevent the burglary crimes.