:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:給付標準的設定會引導民眾對社區式服務的利用嗎?--以居家服務為例
書刊名:臺灣公共衛生雜誌
作者:曾淑芬莊坤洋陳正芬 引用關係葉乃禎吳淑瓊
作者(外文):Tzeng, Su-fenChuang, Kun-yangChen, Chen-fenYeh, Nai-chenWu, Swu-chung
出版日期:2004
卷期:23:3
頁次:頁221-234
主題關鍵詞:給付標準服務利用居家服務Reimbursement levelUtilizationHome care services
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:6
  • 共同引用共同引用:117
  • 點閱點閱:144
     目標:為了解社區失能者在不同的居家服務給付方案下,個案實際使用服務的情形與差異性,以及影響服務使用的相關因素。方法:本研究選取六家受臺北市政府委託辦理居家服務之機構,並以該六家機構所收案並提供服務的對象為研究樣本,樣本資料係來自服務提供機構的個案記錄等相關資料,收集自89年1月至90年3月期間,各單位新開個案一個月內使用居家服務之相關資料,進行分析,總計取得樣本數為454人,經刪除資料不適用個案後,得有效樣本數為440人。結果:(1)將近三分之二的個案其一個月服務使用時數都集中於16小時(63.4%),其中一般戶月服務使用時數為16小時之比例更高達86.1%,而低收入戶在該項的比率則僅有13.8%。(2)低收入戶個案的月使用時數超過16小時以上者佔70%,且使用的最高時數為96小時(佔13.8%),而非低收入戶月服務使用時數超過16小時以上者僅佔7.8%。(3)邏吉斯複迴歸分析結果,在控制相關因素之後,低收入戶高時數服務使用(大於16小時)的可能性比非低收入戶多58倍(危險勝算比為57.8),完全依賴個案的高時數服務使用可能性則比輕度依賴者高出6倍(危險勝算比約為5.9)。而個案年齡則與月服務使用時數成正比,未婚者比已婚或同居者有較多的機會使用高時數服務(危險勝算比則為2.8),家庭照顧資源越少者其使用高時數服務的可能性越高。結論:由於政府給付上限設定的不同,使低收入戶與非低收入戶兩類不同身分類別的個案,在居家服務的使用也有明顯的差異,顯示政府給付標準的設定對民眾服務的使用有極大的主導作用,因此,未來在進行長期照護保險的規劃時,有關支付制度的設計,應同時考量民眾的付費能力與實際的照顧需要,以避免服務利用多集中於低收入戶的現象,並能更適當合理的運用照護資源。
     Objectives: To investigate the use of home care services and the possible effects of reimbursement levels and other factors associated with the use of services. Methods: Six home care services providers, all under contractual agreement with the City of Taipei to provide services, were selected. Data (n=454), in the form of documents and clients records, was collected from the providers from January 2000 to March 2001. After the elimination of inappropriate data, the final number included for analysis was 440. Results: (1) About 63.4% of the cases used 16 hours of services a month. Among the 16-hour users, 13.8% were from low-income households. (2) Among the low-income users, 70% used more than 16 hours per month. Some (13.8%) used as many as 96 hours a month. For cases not in the low-income group, only 7.8% used more than 16 hours. (3) Logistic regression showed that, after controlling for other variables, the low-income (OR=50.8), severely disabled (OR=7.6), and the unmarried (OR=15.9) were more likely than their counterparts to use more than 16 hours of services per month. Furthermore, being younger, and having more family care resources were associated with using fewer hours. Conclusions: Level of reimbursement has significant impacts on the use of services, as indicated by the wide disparity in services hours used between low-income users and others. In planning for long-term care insurance, in order to avoid the skewing of needs for the use of services towards the low-income group, the design of reimbursement schemes should take into account both the ability to pay and also their level.
期刊論文
1.陳武雄(19960600)。我國老人福利政策的現行措施與未來展望。社區發展季刊,74,頁5-14。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Houde, S. C.(1998)。Predictors of Elders' and Family Caregivers' Use of Formal Home Service。Research in Nursing & Health,21,533-543。  new window
3.Keysor, Julie J.、Desai, Tejas、Mutran, Elizabeth J.(1999)。Elders' Preferences for Care Setting in Short and Long Term Disability Scenarios。Gerontologist,39(3),334-344。  new window
4.Thorslund, M.、Norström, T.、Wernberg, K.(1991)。The Utilization of Home Help in Sweden: A Multivariate Analysis。Gerontologist,31(1),116-119。  new window
5.Liu, K.、Manton, K. G.、Aragon, C.(2000)。Changes in Home Care Use by Disabled Elderly Persons: 1982-1994。The Journals of Gerontology:Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences,55(4),S245-S253。  new window
6.王增勇(19971200)。殘補式或普及式福利?--臺北市居家照顧政策的抉擇。社區發展季刊,80,213-232。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.吳淑瓊、陳正芬(20001200)。長期照護資源的過去、現在、與未來。社區發展季刊,92,19-31。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.蔡啟源(20001000)。老人居家服務之探討。社區發展季刊,91,252-268。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.簡乃卉、徐亞瑛(20000800)。住院失能老人之家庭照顧者出院需求的探討。護理研究,8(4),410-422。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Shah, S.、Vanclay, F.、Cooper, B.(1989)。Improving the sensitivity of the barthel index for stroke rehabilitation。Journal of Clinical Epidemiology,42(8),703-709。  new window
11.施教裕、賴建仲(19980900)。老人居家服務現況及整合之探討。社區發展季刊,83,74-91。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.李怡娟(19970400)。城鄉社區老人使用居家護理服務情形及其預測因子之探討。護理研究,5(2),127-136。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.徐慧娟、吳淑瓊(19980800)。提供社區式家庭支持方案能否減少機構式長期照護服務之使用意願?。中華公共衛生雜誌,17(4),326-336。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Phillips, V. L.(1995)。Community Care for Severely Disabled People on Low Incomes。British Medical Journal,311,1121-1123。  new window
15.Tennsted, S. L.、Sullivan, L. M.、Mckinlay, J. B.、Agostino, R. B.(1990)。How Important is Functional Status as a Predictor of Service Use by Older People?。J Aging Health,2,439-461。  new window
16.Torrez, D. J.、Estes, C.、Linkens, K.(1998)。The Impact of a Decade of Policy on Home Health Care Utilization。Home Health Care Serv Q,16,35-56。  new window
17.McCall, N.、Komisar, H. L.、Petersons, A.、Moore, S.(2001)。Medicare Home Health Before and After the BBA。Health Aff,20,189-198。  new window
18.Herlitz, C.(1997)。Distribution of Informal and Formal Home Help for Elderly People in Sweden。Gerontologist,37,117-124。  new window
19.Weiner, J. M.、Tily, J.、Alencxih, L. M. B.(2002)。Home and Community-Based Services in Seven States。Health Care Financing Review,23,89-114。  new window
20.Logan, J.、Spitze, G.(1994)。Informational Support and the Use of Formal Services by Older Americans。J Gerontol,49,25-34。  new window
21.Kivela, S. L.、Pahkala, K.、Tervo, R. R.(1986)。Factors Explaining the Referral of the Elderly to Home Nursing or Home Help。Health Policy,6,73-85。  new window
22.Miller, N. A.、Harrington, C.、Ramsland, S.、Goldstein, E.(2002)。State Policy Choices and Medicaid Long-Term Care Expenditures。Res Aging,24,413-444。  new window
23.Miller, N. A.、Harrington, C.、Goldstein, E.(2002)。Access to Community-Based Long-Term Care: Medicaid's Role。J Aging Health,14,138-159。  new window
24.McCall, N.、Peterson, A.、Moore, S.、Korb, J.(2003)。Utilization of Home Services Before and After the Balanced Budget Act of 1997: What Were the Initial Effects?。Health Services Research,38,85-106。  new window
25.Stoller, E. P.、Cutler, S. J.(1993)。Predictor of Use of Paid Help Among Older People Living in the Community。Gerontorogist,33,31-40。  new window
研究報告
1.吳淑瓊、呂寶靜、盧瑞芬、國立臺灣大學公共衛生學研究所[執行](1998)。配合我國社會福利制度之長期照護政策研究。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.吳怡真(2001)。家庭照顧者之支持性服務需求(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳亮汝(2002)。社區居家身心功能障礙者居家支持服務使用分析(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.曾桂琴(2002)。運用衛生服務利用行為模式探討影響主要照顧者對長期照護服務利用及滿意度之相關因素(碩士論文)。台北醫學院。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.OECD(1996)。Caring for Frail Elderly People: Policies in Evolution。Paris:Organization for Economic Cooperation Development。  new window
2.McDowell, Ian(2006)。Measuring health: A guide to rating scales and questionnaires。New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
3.行政院衛生署(1999)。老人長期照護三年計畫執行成果。老人長期照護三年計畫執行成果。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
4.Fillenbaum, G. G.(1998)。Multidimensional Functional Assessment of Older Adults: The Duke Older American Resources and Services Procedure。Multidimensional Functional Assessment of Older Adults: The Duke Older American Resources and Services Procedure。Hillsdale, NJ。  new window
5.吳淑瓊、蕭玉煌、劉玉蘭(2001)。考察英國、德國及瑞典長期照護制度報告書。考察英國、德國及瑞典長期照護制度報告書。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.內政部統計處(2002)。86-89年老人福利服務成果,沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE