我國家庭暴力防治法自1998年通過至今，實務上發現法官甚少裁定轉介審前鑑定而致使加害人甚少有危險評估及接受處遇計畫，使家暴法未能落實加害人之輔導治療，而被害人也未能有依據危險評估之嚴密安全計畫。本試辦方案以行動研究之方法，重新調整保護令聲請流程，就目前從報案、施測致命危險評估量表（DA）及受暴嚴重度量表（CTS）、改新式簡易鑑定、法官依據簡易鑑定之危險分級裁定保護令之輔導治療、警察及社工員依據危險分級作危險管理、及後續之保護令輔導治療人員之訓練與實施等提出一完整之改善方案，並於2005年在嘉義縣市、基隆市、及宜蘭縣試辦之。實施後發現本方案有以下之優點：能促進各體系之溝通、大幅提高法官裁定加害人處遇計畫之比率，並加速保護令之核發、及警察對於家暴案件之兩造查訪有清楚之方向及做法、社工員對於中高之危險分級之被害人會給予較多之關懷與查訪、及參與輔導之加害人亦較能有機會在輔導治療中學習再犯預防及自我控制之觀念。而本方案也發現確實有聲請保護令之異常個案，如有濫用（如被害者有惡意）或誤用（被害者有精神異常等）保護令之虞者，其約各占4.8%及1.1%。

The Domestic Violence Prevention Law was enacted in Taiwan in 1998. However, it was found that the judges rarely ordered or transferred the abusers for pre-sentence assessment, and it caused that very few abusers had been sentenced to clinical treatment in protection order, which jeopardized the original purpose of this law to prevent relapse in the future. This experimental project adopted action research as the methodology and tried to ameliorate the whole procedure. It included the following elements： police officer assisting the victim to fill risk assessment scale while report the case, new telephone-contact brief assessment by clinician, clinicians writing the report and treatment suggestion for judge, the judge ordering the treatment by referring to the brief assessment report, supervising contacts of various density made by the police officers and social workers, supervisor training enough treatment practitioners for providing treatment, and holding network meeting every two months. The advantages of this project could be concluded as the following： better communication among related practitioners, more abusers sentenced to treatment by judges, more supervising contacts made by police officers and social workers, more abusers participating in treatment to learn relapse prevention and self control. The project also identified abnormal domestic abuse reporting cases, such as 8% of victims maliciously abusing this law and 1.1% of victims making faulty reporting because of suffering from serious mental illness.