:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:建構自行車使用者休閒涉入對休閒效益之影響
書刊名:運動與遊憩研究
作者:林樹旺
作者(外文):Lin, Shu-wang
出版日期:2008
卷期:2:3
頁次:頁130-149
主題關鍵詞:自行車使用者休閒涉入休閒效益結構方程模式Bicycle usersLeisure involvementLeisure benefitsSEM
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(15) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:15
  • 共同引用共同引用:193
  • 點閱點閱:135
本研究旨在建構休閒涉入對休閒效益的因果模式,以自行車的使用者共計489名,作爲本研究的對象,本研究採用問卷調查法,抽樣係以便利取樣的方式蒐集研究樣本,依研究目的及驗證假設,本研究以LISREL 8.72版統計軟體進行資料分析,透過結構方程模式的統計技術,進一步獲得其因果意涵。研究結果發現,本研究模式整體適配度良好(χ2 =836.11, df=306, χ2/df=2.73, GFI=0.90, SRMR=0.04, RMSEA=0.057, NNFI=0.99, CFI=0.99, PNFI=0.73, PGFI=0.73, CN=245.58),顯示本假設模式,可以進一步解釋自行車使用者休閒涉入對休閒效益的因果關係,從自行車使用者的休閒涉入對休閒效益具有顯著的影響可以得知,休閒涉入對休閒效益所扮演的角色值得正視。
The Objective of this research is to construct a cause-effect model of leisure involvement on leisure benefits. This study conducts a questionnaire survey and 489 bicycle users are interviewed by convenience sampling. Moreover, this study employs LISREL 8.72 statistical program to run SEM analysis for testing research hypothesis and achieving research objective of this study. Bases on the research output, the Goodness of model fit is good (χ2=836.11, df=306, χ2/df=2.73, GFI=0.90, SRMR=0.04, RMSEA=0.057, NNFI=0.99, CFI=0.99, PNFI=0.73, PGFI=0.73, CN=245.58). The research results show that this research model can be used to explain the causal effect relationship between leisure involvement and leisure benefits of bicycle users. Based on the positive impact of leisure involvement on leisure benefits, the key role of leisure involvement on leisure benefits should be considered for leisure planning and management.
期刊論文
1.Driver, B. L.(1997)。The defining moment of benefits。Parks and Recreation,32(12),38-41。  new window
2.蔡瑋娟、黃孟立、陳聰獻(20061200)。泳渡日月潭參與者休閒需求之研究。運動休閒餐旅研究,1(4),24-42。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.林樹旺(20051200)。登山自行車參與者活動參與涉入程度與流暢體驗之相關研究。生物與休閒事業研究,3(2),153-164。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Iwasaki, Y.(2003)。The impact of leisure coping beliefs and strategies on adaptive outcome。Leisure Studies,22(2),93-108。  new window
5.Havitz, Mark E.、Dimanche, Frederic(1997)。Leisure involvement revisited: Conceptual conundrums and measurement advances。Journal of Leisure Research,29(3),245-278。  new window
6.張良漢(20061200)。建構登山健行者活動涉入與地方依戀影響模式。體育學報,39(4),163-177。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.張良漢、吳崇旗、王偉琴(20061200)。登山健行經驗對活動參與之研究。大專體育學刊,8(4),37-49。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Kyle, G. T.、Graefe, A.、Manning, R.、Bacon, J.(2004)。Effect of activity involvement and place attachment on recreationists' perceptions of setting density。Journal of Leisure Research,36(2),209-231。  new window
9.Kyle, G.、Chick, G.(2002)。The Social Nature of Leisure Involvement。Journal of Leisure Research,34(4),426-448。  new window
10.Wiley, C. G. E.、Shaw, S. M.、Havitz, M. E.(2000)。Men's and women's involvement in sports: An examination of the gendered aspects of leisure involvement。Leisure Sciences,22(1),19-31。  new window
11.Havitz, M. E.、Dimanche, F.(1990)。Propositions for guiding the empirical testing of the involvement construct in recreational and tourist contexts。Leisure Sciences,12(2),179-196。  new window
12.Tinsley, Howard E. A.、Tinsley, Diane J.(1986)。A theory of the attributes, benefits, and causes of leisure experience。Leisure Sciences,8(1),1-45。  new window
13.Anderson, James C.、Gerbing, David W.(1988)。Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach。Psychological Bulletin,103(3),411-423。  new window
14.Iwasaki, Y.、Mannell, R. C.、Smale, B. J. A.、Butcher, J.(2002)。A short-term longitudinal analysis of leisure coping used by police and emergency response service workers。Journal of Leisure Research,34(3),311-339。  new window
15.McIntyre, Norman、Pigram, John J.(1992)。Recreation specialization reexamined: The case of vehicle-based campers。Leisure Sciences,14(1),3-15。  new window
16.Kyle, G. T.、Graefe, A. R.、Manning, R.、Bacon, J.(2003)。An examination of the relationship between leisure activity involvement and place attachment among hikers along the Appalachian Trail。Journal of Leisure Research,35(3),249-273。  new window
17.高俊雄(19950300)。休閒利益三因素模式。戶外遊憩研究,8(1),15-28。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.Iwasaki, Y.(2001)。Testing and optimal matching hypothesis of stress, coping and health: Leisure and general coping。Society and Leisure,24,163-203。  new window
會議論文
1.Cavin, J. K.、Cavin, D. A.、Kyle, G.、Hammitt, W. E.、Absher, J.(2004)。Examining the structure of the leisure involvement/place bonding relationship in three Sumter national forest camping areas。The 2004 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium。USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech.。281-288。  new window
學位論文
1.姚代平(2005)。以休閒為動機之業餘戲劇參與者之態度、涉入與休閒效益之探討--以台北地區的大學戲劇社員為例(碩士論文)。大葉大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.洪煌佳(2002)。突破休閒活動之休閒效益研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.林欣慧(2002)。解說成效對休閒效益體驗之影響研究--以登山健行為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳中雲(2001)。國小教師休閒參與、休閒效益與工作滿意之關係研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Seiger, L. H.、Hesson, J.(1994)。Walking For Fitness。Kerper Boulevard, Dubuque:Wm. C. Brown Publishers。  new window
2.內政部(2001)。中華民國八十九年社會發展趨勢調查報告。台北:行政院主計處。  延伸查詢new window
3.Bentler, P. M.、Wu, E. J. C.(1993)。EQS/Windows use's guide。Los Angeles:BMDP Statistical Software。  new window
4.Sherif, M.、Cantril, H.(1947)。The Psychology of Ego-Involvement: Social Attitudes and Identifications。New York:John Wiley and Sons。  new window
5.邱皓政(2002)。量化研究統計分析:SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析。臺北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
6.行政院主計處(1992)。台灣地區國民休閒生活調查報告。台北:行政院主計處。  延伸查詢new window
7.黃芳銘(2004)。社會科學統計方法學:結構方程模式。臺北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
8.黃芳銘(2002)。結構方程模式--理論與應用。臺北市:五南。  延伸查詢new window
9.Kline, Rex B.(1998)。Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling。Guilford Press。  new window
10.Byrne, B. M.(1989)。A primer of LISREL: basic applications and programming for confirmatory factor analytic models。New York:Springer-Verlag。  new window
其他
1.行政院主計處(1995)。台灣地區國民休閒生活調查報告,台北市:行政院主計處。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.王俊明(2000)。問卷量表的編製與分析方法。體育測驗與評鑑。臺北:中華民國體育學會。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE