:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:個人背景特性、婚前關係發展與婚姻調適狀況的關係:以家庭建立期之夫妻為例
書刊名:人類發展與家庭學報
作者:陳靜宜
作者(外文):Chen, Ching-yi
出版日期:2006
卷期:8
頁次:頁45-68
主題關鍵詞:家庭建立期個人背景特性婚姻調適婚前關係發展類型婚前教育Back ground factorMarital adjustmentPremarital education
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(4) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:303
  • 點閱點閱:62
家庭建立期是經營健康家庭的起跑點,此一階段的的婚姻調適需求、困難點以及調適策略的運用,究竟受到哪些個人背景特性影響?婚前交往類型和婚後調適是否有關係?研究者希望藉此深入瞭解能有助於婚姻教育方案的設計與推動。本研究以多變項變異數分析考驗及典型相關考驗進行分析,資料來源採用行政院國家科學委員會補助研究計畫「婚前關係與婚後適應:一個長期性的研究」(NSC91-2413-H-128-001-SSS)針對分布在台灣北、中、南及東部的四十九對夫妻所蒐集到的有關雙方婚前關係發展及婚後適應歷程的資料。 研究結果發現:1.夫妻之結婚年齡大小與否對於婚姻調適困難沒有顯著差異。2.夫妻是否有宗教信仰對於婚姻調適策略沒有顯著差異。妻子比丈夫更傾向採用個人外消極的婚姻調適策略。3.有子女的夫妻比沒有子女的夫妻更傾向採用個人內消極的婚姻調適策略。4.訂婚達13-18個月的夫妻,各項婚姻調適需要皆最高;婚前發展呈「細水長流型」的夫妻「與原生家庭適應需要」最高,尤以男性為甚。5.婚姻交往關係呈「有驚無險型」的夫妻最常採取個人內、外消極的調適策略,其中妻子傾向採取個人內消極的策略,而丈夫多採取個人外消極的調適策略。6.夫妻間調適困難越高者,越傾向使用個人外消極的婚姻調適策略。研究者並根據研究結果提供四點建議,以協助婚前教育方案與婚姻教育工作之參考。
The purpose of this study focuses on the relations among the back ground factors and marital adjustments of couples who belong to the 1st stage of family life. The study sample adopted from NSC91 -2413-H-128-001-SSS and consisted of 49 couples, who have married for three years. A questionnaire was adopted and administered for this study in order to gather the study data. The tools are ”Marital Adjustment Scale”. This study uses statistical methods of Descriptive statistics, MANOVA, Canonical Correlation. The major findings are presented as follows: 1. The sex and marital adjustment strategies of newlywed couples has obvious relationship. Wives prefer to use ”extra-personal passive” strategies. 2. Those newlywed couples who have kids prefer to use ”intra-personal passive” strategies. 3. Those newlywed couples who had engaged for 13-18 months have more needs of marital adjustment. 4. Those newlywed couples who had dated for a long time before they got married need more adjustments of their original family. 5. Those newlywed couples who had troublesome relationship before they got married prefer to use negative marital adjustment strategies. The husbands tend to use ”intra-personal passive” strategies. And the wives tend to use ”extra-personal passive” strategies. This study also provides several recommendations for the premarital education programs, marital education programs of couples who belong to the 1st stage of family life and future research.
期刊論文
1.Cohan, C. L.、Bradbury, T. N.(1997)。Negative life events, marital interaction, and the longitudinal course of newlywed marriage。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,73(1),114-128。  new window
2.Quinn, W. H.、Odell, M.(1998)。Predictors of marital adjustment during the first two years。Marriage and Family Review,27(1/2),113-130。  new window
3.張思嘉(19990600)。從系統觀點看婚姻適應的研究。應用心理研究,2,111-123。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.張思嘉(20090900)。婚前關係與婚後適應:一個長期性的研究。中華心理學刊,51(3),319-339。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.張思嘉(20011200)。婚姻早期的適應過程--新婚夫妻之質性研究。本土心理學研究,16,91-133。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.利翠珊(19950800)。夫妻互動歷程之探討:以臺北地區年輕夫妻為例的一項初探性研究。本土心理學研究,4,260-321。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Bowman, M. L.(1990)。Coping efforts and marital satisfaction: Measuring marital coping and its correlates。Journal of marriage and the Family,52(2),463-474。  new window
8.Larson, J. H.、Holman, T. B.。Premarital Predictors of Marital Quality and Stability: An Applied Literature Review。Family Relations,43,228-237。  new window
9.Wamboldt, F. S.、Reiss, D.。Defining a Family Heritage and a New Relationship Identity: Two Central Tasks in the Making of a Marriage。Family Process,28,317-335。  new window
10.Lee, L. J.(1995)。Age and sex differences in marital coping behavior。The Journal of National Chengchi University,70,117-134。  new window
研究報告
1.Vital Statistics of the United States(1989)。Housefolds, Families, Marital Status and Living Arrangements: March 1989。Washington, DC:Government Printing Office。  new window
學位論文
1.徐玉青(2002)。訂婚情侶衝突因應、調適歷程之研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.林佳玲(2000)。夫妻依附風格、衝突因應策略與婚姻滿意度之相關研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳靜宜(2001)。新婚調適歷程研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.洪雅真(2000)。夫妻性別角色、權力與衝突之研究(碩士論文)。國立嘉義師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
5.謝銀沙(1992)。已婚婦女個人特質、婚姻溝通與婚姻調適相關之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.楊淑君(2004)。新婚階段個人角色轉換之經驗與調適(碩士論文)。國立台北師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
7.蔡詩薏(2001)。家庭生命週期、性別角色態度、自我開放程度與夫妻婚姻滿意度及其差異之研究(碩士論文)。國立成功大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.林亞寧(2003)。婚夫妻婚姻信念、衝突因應策略與婚姻調適之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
9.馮耀廣(2004)。都市住民家庭倫理與社區價值---以台北市萬華區為例(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
10.陳珮庭(2004)。她為什麼還沒嫁?~台灣當代熟齡女性未婚現象探究(碩士論文)。世新大學。  延伸查詢new window
11.楊琳(1998)。已婚職業婦女個人特質與婚姻調適.婚姻滿意之質性研究(碩士論文)。中國文化大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.周麗端、吳明燁、唐先梅、李淑娟(1999)。婚姻與家人關係。臺北市:國立空中大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃富順、陳如山、黃慈(1996)。成人發展與適應。國立空中大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Adams, B. N.(1995)。The Family: A Sociological interpretation。New York, NY:Harcourt Brace & Company。  new window
4.蔡文輝(1984)。社會學理論。臺北:三民。  延伸查詢new window
5.Goldenberg, Irene、Goldenberg, Herbert(1991)。Family therapy: An overview。Pacific Grove, Calif:Brooks/Cole Publishing Company。  new window
6.胡幼慧(1995)。三代同堂:迷思與陷阱。巨流。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Bernard, J.(1982)。The future of marriage。New Haven:Yale University Press。  new window
8.Burns, R. B.(1984)。The self concept in theory, measurement, development, and behavior.。New York:Longman。  new window
9.Duvall, E. M.(1977)。Family Development。Philadelphia:Lippincott。  new window
10.Rice, F. P.(1990)。Intimate Relationships, Marriage, and the Family。Mountain View, CA:Mayfield Publishing。  new window
11.Williamson, D. S.(1991)。The intimacy paradox: Authority in the family system。New York:Guilford Press。  new window
其他
1.內政部統計處(2004)。民國九十二、九十三年臺閩地區各縣市人口結婚和離婚對數統計資料。  延伸查詢new window
2.Ross, M.,Holmberg, D.(1990)。Recounting the past: Gender differences in there call of events in the history of a close relationship,J. M. Olson & M. P.。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE