臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：促進知識整合的網路學習環境量表發展
書刊名：科學教育學刊
作者：林建良 引用關係／黃台珠／吳裕益 引用關係
作者(外文)：Lin, Chien-liang／Huang, Tai-chu／Wu, Yuh-yih
出版日期：2008
卷期：16:6
頁次：頁605-626
主題關鍵詞：知識整合；問卷發展；網路學習；學習環境量表；Knowledge integration；Learning environment instrument；Scale development；Web-based learning
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:67
  • 點閱點閱:61
本研究為促進專題學習中的知識整合編製一個網路學習環境量表，量表的構念 分成易取、互動、反應、結構及整合五個分量表，用以評鑑網路學習環境的設計。研 究者請兩位數位學習及一位課程教學專長的大學教授進行該量表初稿的審議，以增加 量表的專家效度。由於當前大專進行網路學習的學生樣本不易取得，本研究立意選取 研究者運用專題學習策略教授的大專生進行施測。預試施測的回收有效樣本為187 份， 經項目分析保留網路學習環境量表共39 題。正式施測的回收有效樣本為176 份，運用 結構方程模式以題目分群方式進行驗證性因素分析檢驗該量表的構念效度。結果發現 測量模式與觀察資料適配度大致良好。該量表整體信度為 .962，各分量表的信度 （Cronbach’s alpha 值）介於 .769 至 .901 之間。另外，網路學習環境量表設計有開放 式問題，藉以蒐集學習者對網路學習環境的感知。經文本分析結果發現，學習者對網 路學習環境使用原因及優缺點的感知，會考量易取、互動及整合的特性。本研究發展 的網路學習環境量表具有良好的信效度，配合開放式問題文本分析結果的檢驗，確實 可作為評鑑網路學習環境的工具。
The purpose of this study was to develop a web based learning environment instrument using insights gained from project based learning and knowledge integration. The instrument contained five subscales: access, interaction, response, structure and integration and was used to evaluate the design of the web based learning environment to promote the knowledge integration of project based learning. In order to enhance the validity of this instrument, two e-learning experts and one course instruction expert were invited to review the instrument. Due to the limitations of web based courses at the college level, data were gathered from college students in a project based course taught by one of the authors with project based learning. The initial number of subjects for the pre-test was 187, and the final version of the instrument contained 39 items. The number of subjects in the post test was 176; using the confirmatory factor analysis to establish construct validity of the instrument with the structured equation model using the item parcels method. By utilizing confirmatory factor analysis to examine the measurement model, goodness of fit was confirmed to be reliable. The Cronbach’s alpha reliability for the entire instrument was .962 and the Cronbach’s alpha reliability for each of the 5 subscales ranged from .769 to .901. We also designed five open-ended questions for the instrument to collect the subjects’ awareness and preferences of the web based project learning environment. The results of content analysis found that; the accessibility, interaction and integration characteristics were the main concerns of the learners in using a web course. Findings of this study confirmed the validity and reliability of the web based learning environment instrument. Thus, showing that it is a useful instrument to evaluate web based learning environments.
期刊論文
1.徐敏珠、楊建民(20060600)。我國高等教育之數位學習發展策略分析。教育學刊，26，191-214。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Jung, I.(2001)。Building a Theoretical Framework of Web-based Instruction in the Context of Distance Education。British Journal of Educational Technology，32(5)，525-534。  new window
3.Van Merrienboer, J. J. G.、Kirschner, P. A.、Kester, L.(2003)。Taking the load off a learner's mind: Instructional design for complex learning。Educational Psychologist，38，5-13。  new window
4.Davis, E. A.、Linn, M. C.(2000)。Scaffolding students' knowledge integration: Prompts for reflection in KIE。International Journal of Science Education，22(8)，819-837。  new window
5.Sigel, I.(1978)。Constructivism and teacher education。Elementary School Journal，78，333-338。  new window
6.葉玉珠(20051000)。影響國小學童科技創意發展的因素之量表發展。師大學報. 科學教育類，50(2)，29-54。  延伸查詢new window
7.李建億(20060200)。網際網路專題學習互動歷程之研究。科學教育學刊，14(1)，101-120。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Marx, R. W.、Blumenfeld, P. C.、Krajcik, J. S.、Soloway, E.(1997)。Enacting project-based science。The Elementary School Journal，97(4)，341-358。  new window
9.李建億、黃瑋苹(20040400)。網路專題學習活動中多元智慧對學習成果影響之研究。師大學報. 科學教育類，49(1)，65-80。  延伸查詢new window
10.徐新逸(20010700)。如何利用網路幫助孩子成為研究高手--網路專題式學習與教學創新。臺灣教育，607，25-34。  延伸查詢new window
11.岳修平、鐘婉莉(20051200)。專題式學習小組網路溝通互動之研究。教育學刊，25，1-23。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.徐新逸(20031200)。數位學習課程發展模式初探。教育研究，116，15-30。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Grant, Michael M.、Branch, Robert Maribe(2005)。Project-Based Learning in a middle school: Tracing abilities through the artifacts of learning。Journal of Research on Technology in Education，38(1)，65-98。  new window
14.Kaiser, Henry F.(1974)。An index of factorial simplicity。Psychometrika，39(1)，31-36。  new window
15.Bandalos, Deborah L.(2002)。The effects of item parceling on goodness-of-fit and parameter estimate bias in structural equation modeling。Structural Equation Modeling，9(1)，78-102。  new window
16.Huang, J. C.、Newell, S.(2003)。Knowledge Integration Processes and Dynamics within the Context of Cross-Functional Projects。International Journal of Project Management，21(3)，167-176。  new window
17.Bagozzi, Richard P.、Yi, Youjae(1988)。On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models。Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science，16(1)，74-94。  new window
18.Henson, R. K.(2001)。Understanding internal consistency reliability estimates: A conceptual primer on coefficient alpha。Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development，34，177-189。  new window
19.Owston, R. D.(2000)。Evaluating Web-based Learning Environments: Strategies and Insights。Cyberpsychology & Behavior，3，79-87。  new window
20.Maor, D.、Fraser, B. J.(1996)。Use of Classroom Environment Perceptions in Evaluating Inquiry-based Computer Assisted Learning。International Journal of Science Education，18，401-421。  new window
21.Pearson, J.、Trinidad, S.(2005)。OLES: An Instrument for Refining the Design of E-learning Environments。Journal of Computer Assisted Learning，21，396-404。  new window
22.Tanaka, J. S.(1987)。"How Big Is Big Enough?": Sample Size and Goodness of Fit in Structural Equation Models with Latent Variables。Child Development，58，134-146。  new window
23.Tobin, K. G.(1998)。Qualitative Perceptions of Learning Environments on the World Wide Web。Learning Environment Research: An International Journal，1(1)，139-162。  new window
24.Teh, G. P. L.、Fraser, B. J.(1994)。An Evaluation of Computer Assisted Learning in Geography in Singapore。Australian Journal of Educational Technology，10(1)，55-68。  new window
25.Blumenfeld, P. C.、Tal, T.、Krajcik, J. S.(2006)。Urban Schools' Teachers Enacting Project-based Science。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，43(7)，722-745。  new window
26.Chiarelli, S.、Whipp, J. L.(2004)。Self-regulation in a Web-based Course: A Case Study。Education Technology Research and Development，52(4)，5-22。  new window
27.Yildirim, S.、Ozcelik, E.(2005)。Factors Influencing the Use of Cognitive Tools in Web-based Learning Environements: A Case Study。The Quarterly Review of Distance Education，6(4)，295-308。  new window
會議論文
1.吳為聖、張惠博、陳錦章(2004)。網路學習環境對科學教學與學習之影響：高中師生的觀點。中華民國第十九屆科學教育學術研討會。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.Huang, T. C.、Wu, Y. Y.、Lin, C. L.(2007)。The Development and Validation of Web Project Based Learning Environment Instrument (WPBLEI)。0。  new window
3.Fisher, D.、Fraser, B.、Jegede, O.(1998)。Development, Validation and Use of a Learning Environment Instrument for University Distance Education Settings。0。  new window
學位論文
1.Talsma, V.(2004)。Student Scientific Understandings in a Ninth Grade Project-based Science Classroom: A River Runs through It，Ann Arbor, MI。  new window
圖書
1.Czerniak, C. M.、Krajcik, J. S.、Berger, C. F.(2003)。Teaching Science in Elementary and Middle School Classrooms: A Project-based Approach。New York, NY。  new window
2.Linn, M. C.、Hsi, S.(2000)。Computers, teachers, peers: Science learning partners。Mahwah, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
3.黃芳銘(2004)。結構方程式模式理論與應用。五南。  延伸查詢new window
4.Davis, E. A.、Bell, P.、Linn, M. C.(2004)。Internet Environments for Science Education。Internet Environments for Science Education。Hillsdale, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.。  new window
5.陳英豪、吳裕益(1998)。測驗與評量。測驗與評量。高雄市：高雄復文圖書出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.Hatcher, L.(1994)。A step-by-step approach to use the SAS system for factor analysis and structural equation modeling。SAS Institute。  new window
7.Hair, J. F.、Anderson, R. E.、Tatham, R. L.、Black, W. C.(1995)。Multivariate data analysis with readings。Upper Saddler River, NJ：Prentice-Hall。  new window
8.余民寧(2006)。潛在變項模式：SIMPLIS的應用。高等教育。  延伸查詢new window
9.吳明隆、涂金堂(2005)。SPSS與統計應用分析實務。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
10.Lave, Jean、Wenger, Etienne(1991)。Situated learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation。Cambridge University Press。  new window
11.邱皓政(2006)。量化研究與計量分析：SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析。五南。  延伸查詢new window
12.Bandura, Albert(1986)。Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory。Prentice-Hall, Inc.。  new window
13.Clark, D.(2004)。Hands-on Investigation in Internet Environments: Teaching Thermal Equilibrium。Internet Environments for Science Education。Hillsdale, NJ。  new window
14.Sörbom, D.、Jöreskog, K. C.(1984)。LISREL VI: Analysis of Linear Structural Relationships by the Method of Maximum Likelihood, Instrumental Variables, and Least Squares Methods。LISREL VI: Analysis of Linear Structural Relationships by the Method of Maximum Likelihood, Instrumental Variables, and Least Squares Methods。Mooresville, IN。  new window
圖書論文
1.Linn, M. C.(1998)。The impact of technology on science instruction: Historical trends and current opportunities。International handbook of science education。Dordrecht：Kluwer Academic Publishers。  new window
2.Chang, V.、Fisher, D. L.(2001)。A new learning instrument to evaluate online learning in higher education。New horizons in university teaching and learning。Curtin University of Technology。  new window
3.Bandalos, D. L.、Finney, S. J.(2001)。Item parceling issues in structural equation modeling。New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling。Lawrence Erlbanm Association。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：890（臺灣：880，外國：10） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1725833 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67537367
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上