臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：國小六年級學生在社會性科學議題教學中之論證能力研究--不同學業成就學生間之比較
書刊名：科學教育學刊
作者：林樹聲 引用關係／黃柏鴻
作者(外文)：Lin, Shu-sheng／Huang, Po-hung
出版日期：2009
卷期：17:2
頁次：頁111-133
主題關鍵詞：論證；社會性科學議題；國小學生；學業成就；Argumentation；Socioscientific issues；Elementary school students；Academic achievement
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(18) 博士論文(6) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:15
  • 共同引用共同引用:15
  • 點閱點閱:258
期刊論文
1.Schommer-Aikins, M.、Hutter, R.(2002)。Epistemological Beliefs and Thinking about Everyday Controversial Issues。The Journal of Psychology，136(1)，5-20。  new window
2.Zohar, A.、Nemet, F.(2002)。Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，39(1)，35-62。  new window
3.Zohar, A.、Dori, Y. J.(2003)。Higher Order Thinking Skills and Low-achieving Students: Are They Mutually Exclusive?。The Journal of the Learning Sciences，12(2)，145-181。  new window
4.Sadler, Troy D.(2004)。Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，41(5)，513-536。  new window
5.Sadler, T. D.、Zeidler, D. L.(2005)。The Significance of Content Knowledge for Informal Reasoning Regarding Socioscientific Issues: Applying Genetics Knowledge to Genetic Engineering Issues。Science Education，89(1)，71-93。  new window
6.Driver, R.、Newton, P.、Osborne, J.(2000)。Establishing the Norms of Scientific Argumentation in Classroom。Science Education，84，287-312。  new window
7.Sadler, T. D.、Fowler, S. R.(2006)。A threshold model of content knowledge transfer for socioscientific argumentation。Science Education，90(6)，986-1004。  new window
8.Rivard, L. P.(2004)。Are language-based activities in science effective for all students, including low achievers?。Science Education，88(3)，420-442。  new window
9.Sandoval, W. A.、Millwood, K. A.(2005)。The quality of students' use of evidence in written scientific explanations。Cognition and Instruction，23(1)，23-55。  new window
10.Kuhn, D.(1993)。Science as argument: Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking。Science Education，77(3)，319-337。  new window
11.蔡俊彥、黃台珠、楊錦潭(20080400)。國小學童網路論證能力及科學概念學習之研究。科學教育學刊，16(2)，171-192。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P.、Rodríguez, A. B.、Duschl, R. A.(2000)。"Doing the lesson" or "doing science": Argument in high school genetics。Science Education，84(6)，757-792。  new window
13.Zeidler, D. L.、Sadler, T. D.、Simmons, M. L.、Howes, E. V.(2005)。Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education。Science Education，89(3)，357-377。  new window
14.Kuhn, D.(1992)。Thinking as argument。Harvard Educational Review，62(2)，155-179。  new window
15.林燕文、洪振方(20070300)。對話論證的探究中學童論述策略對促進科學概念理解之研究。屏東教育大學學報，26，285-324。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.黃柏鴻、林樹聲(20070900)。論證教學相關實證性研究之回顧與省思。科學教育月刊，302，5-20。  延伸查詢new window
17.蔡俊彥、黃臺珠(2008)。學童論證能力及科學本質觀之研究。屏東教育大學學報－理工類，28，85-116。  延伸查詢new window
18.Aikenhead, G. S.(2005)。Science-based Occupations and the Science Curriculum: Concepts of Evidence。Science Education，89，242-275。  new window
19.Anderson, R. C.、Chinn, C.、Chang, J.、Waggoner, M.、Yi, H.(1997)。On the Logical Integrity of Children's Arguments。Cognition and Instruction，15(2)，135-167。  new window
20.Braund, M.、Lubben, F.、Scholtz, Z.、Sadeck, M.、Hodges, M.(2007)。Comparing the Effect of Scientific and Socio-scientific Argumentation Tasks: Lessons from South Africa。School Science Review，324，67-76。  new window
21.Chambliss, M.、Murphy, P. K.(2002)。Fourth and Fifth Graders Representing the Argument Structure in Written Texts。Discourse Processes，34，91-115。  new window
22.Jeong, A.、Lee, J. M.(2008)。The Effects of Active Versus Reflective Learning Style on the Processes of Critical Discourse in Computer-supported Collaborative Argumentation。British Journal of Educational Technology，39(4)，651-665。  new window
23.Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P.(2002)。Knowledge Producers or Knowledge Consumers? Argumentation and Decision Making about Environmental Management。International Journal of Science Education，24(11)，1171-1190。  new window
24.Kolsto, S. D.(2006)。Patterns in Students' Argumentation Confronted with a Risk-focused Socioscientific Issue。International Journal of Science Education，28(14)，1689-1716。  new window
25.Kortland, K.(1996)。An STS Case Study about Students' Decision Making on the Waste Issue。Science Education，80(6)，673-689。  new window
26.Lao, J.、Kuhn, D.(2002)。Cognitive Engagement and Attitude Development。Cognitive Development，17(2)，1203-1217。  new window
27.Mason, L.、Scirica, F.(2006)。Prediction of Students' Argumentation Skills about Controversial Topics by Epistemological Understanding。Learning and Instruction，16(5)，492-509。  new window
28.Means, M. L.、Voss, J. F.(1996)。Who Reasons Well? Two Studies of Informal Reasoning among Children of Different Grade, Ability, and Knowledge Levels。Cognition and Instruction，14(2)，139-178。  new window
29.Naylor, S.、Keogh, B.、Downing, B.(2007)。Argumentation and Primary Science。Research in Science Education，37，17-39。  new window
30.Osborne, J.、Erduran, S.、Simon, S.(2004)。Enhancing the Quality of Argument in School Science。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，41(10)，994-1020。  new window
31.Patronis, T.、Potari, D.、Spiliotopoulou, D.(1999)。Students' Argumentation in Decisionmaking on a Socio-scientific Issue: Implication for Teaching。International Journal of Science Education，21(7)，745-754。  new window
32.Sadler, T. D.、Donnelly, L. A.(2006)。Socioscientific Argumentation: The Effects of Content Knowledge and Morality。International Journal Science Education，28(12)，1463-1488。  new window
33.Scholtz, Z.、Braund, M.、Hodges, M.、Koopman, R.、Lubben, F.(2008)。South Aferican Teachers' Ability to Argue: The Emergence of Inclusive Argumentation。International Journal of Educational Development，28，21-34。  new window
34.Simonneaux, L.(2001)。Role-play or Debate to Promote Students' Argumentation and Justification on an Issue in Animal Transgenesis。International Journal of Science Education，23(9)，903-927。  new window
35.Stanovich, K. E.、West, R. F.(1998)。Individual Differences in Rational Differences in Rational Thought。Journal of Experimental Psychology，127，161-188。  new window
36.Taber, K. S.、Cooke, V. M.、de Trafford, T.、Lowe, T. J.、Millins, S.、Quail, T.(2006)。Learning to Teach about Ideas and Evidence in Science: Experiences of Teachers in Training。School Science Review，87(321)，63-73。  new window
37.von Aufschnaiter, Erduran, S.、Osborne, J.、Simon, S.(2008)。Arguing to Learn and Learning to Argue: Case Studies of How Students' Argumentation Relates to Their Scientific Knowledge。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，45，101-131。  new window
38.Voss, J. F.、Means, M. L.(1991)。Learning to Reason Via Instruction in Argumentation。Learning and Instruction，1，337-350。  new window
39.Voss, J. F.、van Dyke, J. A.(2001)。Argumentation in Psychology: Background Comments。Discourse Processes，32(2/ 3)，89-111。  new window
40.Wu, Y. T.、Tsai, C. C.(2007)。High School Students' Informal Reasoning on a Socio-scientific Issue: Qualitative and Quantitative Analyses。International Journal of Science Education，29(9)，1163-1187。  new window
41.Yerrick, R. K.(2000)。Lower Track Science Students' Argumentation and Open Inquiry Instruction。Journal of Research in Science Education，37(8)，807-838。  new window
會議論文
1.李佳生、林樹聲(2008)。探究國小高年級學生科學論證之表現與問題。  延伸查詢new window
2.蔡金宗、林樹聲(2008)。國小六年級學生對湖山水庫議題之論證研究。第二十四屆科學教育學術研討會。彰化市：國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.林樹聲(2008)。應用社會性科學議題教學模組的設計與實踐促進科學教師專業成長及學生論證能力之研究。嘉義縣。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Wray, D.、Lewis, M.(1997)。Extending Literacy: Children Reading and Writing Non-fiction。London：Routledge。  new window
2.Kuhn, Deanna(1991)。The skills of argument。Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.Toulmin, Stephen Edelston(1958)。The Uses of Argument。Cambridge University Press。  new window
4.Alexander, R.(2006)。Towards Dialogic Teaching: Rethinking Classroom Talk。Towards Dialogic Teaching: Rethinking Classroom Talk。New York, NY。  new window
5.Freeley, A. J.、Steinberg, D. L.(2005)。Argumentation and Debate。Argumentation and Debate。Belmont, CA。  new window
6.Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P.、Erduran, S.(2008)。Argumentation in Science Education: An Overview。Argumentation in Science Education。UK。  new window
7.Simonneaux, L.(2008)。Argumentation in Socioscientific Contexts。Argumentation in Science Education: Perspectives form Classroombased Research。Springer。  new window
8.Stanovich, K. E.(1999)。Who is Rational? Studies in Individual Differences in Reasoning。Who is Rational? Studies in Individual Differences in Reasoning。Mahwah, NJ。  new window
圖書論文
1.Zeidler, D. L.、Osborne, J.、Erduran, S.、Simon, S.、Monk, M.(2003)。The Role of Argument during Discourse about Socioscientific Issues。The Role of Moral Reasoning on Socioscientific Issues and Discourse in Science Education。Dordrecht：Kluwer Academic Publishers。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：851（臺灣：846，外國：5） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1695817 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67503815
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上