臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：國小學童網路論證能力及科學概念學習之研究
書刊名：科學教育學刊
作者：蔡俊彥 引用關係／黃台珠／楊錦潭
作者(外文)：Tsai, Chun-yen／Huang, Tai-chu／Yang, Jin-tan
出版日期：2008
卷期：16:2
頁次：頁171-192
主題關鍵詞：Toulmin論證模式；迷思概念；網路論證；Toulmin argument pattern；Misconception；Web argumentation
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(3) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:322
  • 點閱點閱:175
期刊論文
1.Simon, S.、Osborne, J.、Erduran, S.(2004)。TAPping into Argumentation: Developments in the Application of Toulmin's Argument Pattern for Studying Science Discourse。Science Education，88(6)，915-933。  new window
2.Zohar, A.、Nemet, F.(2002)。Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，39(1)，35-62。  new window
3.Joiner, R.、Jones, S.(2003)。The Effects of Communication Medium on Argumentation and the Development of Critical Thinking。International Journal of Educational Research，39，861-871。  new window
4.Osborne, J.、Erduran, S.、Simon, S.(2004)。Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，41(10)，994-1020。  new window
5.Bell, P.、Linn, M. C.(2000)。Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: Designing for learning from the web with KIE。International Journal of Science Education，22(8)，797-817。  new window
6.Erduran, S.、Osborne, J.、Simon, S.(2006)。Learning to Teach Argumentation: Research and Development in the Science Classroom。International Journal of Science Education，28(2/3)，235-260。  new window
7.Sandoval, W. A.、Millwood, K. A.(2005)。The quality of students' use of evidence in written scientific explanations。Cognition and Instruction，23(1)，23-55。  new window
8.張靜儀、李采褱(20040300)。國小中、高年級學童光迷思概念與相關因素探究。屏東師院學報，20，315-354。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Sampson, V. D.、Clark, D. B.(2007)。Personally-seeded Discussions to Scaffold Online Argumentation。International Journal of Science Education，29(3)，253-277。  new window
10.Driver, R.、Newton, P.、Osborne, J.(2000)。Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms。Science Education，84(3)，287-312。  new window
11.Duschl, R. A.、Osborne, J.(2002)。Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education。Studies in Science Education，38(1)，39-72。  new window
12.Lawson, A. E.(2003)。The nature and development of hypothetico‐predictive argumentation with implications for science teaching。International Journal of Science Education，25(11)，1387-1408。  new window
13.Nussbaum, E. M.、Sinatra, G. M.(2003)。Argument and conceptual engagement。Contemporary Educational Psychology，28(3)，384-395。  new window
14.Means, L. M.、Voss, J. F.(1996)。Who Reasons Well? Two Studies of Informal Reasoning among Children of Different Grade, Ability, and Knowledge Levels。Cognition and Instruction，14(2)，139-178。  new window
15.Maloney, J.、Simon, S.(2006)。Mapping Children's Discussions of Evidence in Science to Assess Collaboration and Argumentation。International Journal of Science Education，28(15)，1817-1841。  new window
16.Neuman, Y.、Weinstock, M.、Tabak, I.(2004)。Missing the Point or Missing the Norms? Epistemological Norms as Predictors of Students' Ability to Identify Fallacious Arguments。Contemporary Educational Psychology，29(1)，77-94。  new window
17.Dyke, A. J. V.、Voss, J. F.、Van Dyke, J. A.(2001)。Argumentation in Psychology: Background Comments。Discourse Processes，32(2/ 3)，89-111。  new window
18.Weems, L.、Brem, S. K.、Russell, J.(2001)。Science on the Web: Student Evaluations of Scientific Arguments。Discourse Processes，32(2/ 3)，191-213。  new window
19.Nussbaum, M. E.(2002)。Scaffolding Argumentation in the Social Studies Classroom。Social Studies，93(3)，79-84。  new window
會議論文
1.Sampson, V. D.、Clark, D. B.(2005)。Analyzing the Quality of Argumentation Supported by Personally-seeded Discussions。2005 Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Learning 2005: The Next 10 Years!。  new window
2.王再盛、蔡俊彥(2004)。問題解決為基礎之多媒體討論互動系統研究。0。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃台珠、蔡俊彥、楊錦潭(2007)。符合Toulmin論證模式之系統發展研究。0。  延伸查詢new window
4.楊錦潭、江南輝(2003)。超媒體教材導引模式對學習迷失之影響－以高市高職生對半導體學習單元為例。0。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.張淑女(2004)。從認識論的觀點探究大學生論證思考之能力與模式(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.洪振方(1994)。從孔恩異例的認知與論證探討科學知識的重建(博士論文)。國立師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.丁信中(2004)。青年學生於理論競爭論證過程中對其支持理論侷限的覺察，0。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Wray, D.、Lewis, M.(1997)。Extending Literacy: Children Reading and Writing Non-fiction。London：Routledge。  new window
2.Cohen, J.(1988)。Statistical power and analysis for the behavioral sciences。Hillsdale, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
3.鄭昭明(2004)。認知心理學：理論與實踐。桂冠。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Toulmin, Stephen Edelston(1958)。The Uses of Argument。Cambridge University Press。  new window
5.Kuhn, Thomas Samuel(1970)。The Structure of Scientific Revolutions。University of Chicago Press。  new window
6.(2007)。學習、發展和發現的神經心理學基礎：科學和數學教學的啟示。學習、發展和發現的神經心理學基礎：科學和數學教學的啟示。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
7.Lakatos, I.(1970)。Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmers。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
8.Kuhn, D.(1991)。The Skills of Arguments。The Skills of Arguments。Cambridge, UK。  new window
圖書論文
1.Linn, M. C.(1998)。The impact of technology on science instruction: Historical trends and current opportunities。International handbook of science education。Dordrecht：Kluwer Academic Publishers。  new window
2.Nersessian, Nancy J.(1992)。How Do Scientists Think? Capturing the Dynamics of Conceptual Change in Science。Cognitive Models of Science。Minneapolis：University of Minnesota Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1038（臺灣：1031，外國：7） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1725833 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67536431
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上