:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:資深科學教師實踐論證言談之個案研究
書刊名:通識教育與跨域研究
作者:林樹聲 引用關係
作者(外文):Lin, Shu-sheng
出版日期:2014
卷期:14
頁次:頁73-103
主題關鍵詞:個案研究國小資深教師論證言談論證教學Case studyOne veteran elementary teachersArgumentative talksArgumentation instruction
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:29
  • 點閱點閱:35
期刊論文
1.Howes, E. V.、Lim, M.、Campos, J.(2009)。Journeys into inquiry-based elementary science: Literacy practices, questioning, and empirical study。Science Education,93(2),189-217。  new window
2.McNeill, K. L.、Pimentel, D. S.(2010)。Scientific discourse in three urban classrooms:The role of the teacher in engaging high school students in argumentation。Science Education,94(2),203-229。  new window
3.Clark, D. B.、Sampson, V.(2008)。Assessing dialogic argumentation in online environments to relate structure, grounds, and conceptual quality。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,45(3),293-321。  new window
4.Falk, A.、Brodsky, L.(2013)。Scientific argumentation as a foundation for the design of inquiry-based instruction: Collaborative explorations。The Journal of Mathematics and Science,13,27-55。  new window
5.Lee, O.(1997)。Scientifically literacy for all: What is it, and how can we achieve it?。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,34(3),219-222。  new window
6.Osborne, J.(2010)。Arguing to learn in science: The role of collaborative, critical discourse。Science,328(5977),463-466。  new window
7.Baviskar, S. N.、Hartle, R. T.、Whitney, T.(2009)。Essential criteria to characterize constructivist teaching: Derived from a review of the literature and applied to five constructivist-teaching method。International Journal of Science Education,31(4),541-550。  new window
8.Beyer, C. J.、Delgado, C. D.、Davi, E. A.、Krajcik, J.(2009)。Investigating teachers' learning supports in high school biology curricular programs to inform the design educative curriculum materials。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,46(9),977-998。  new window
9.Braund, M.、Scholtz, Z.、Sadeck, M.、Koopman, R.(2013)。First steps in teaching argumentation: A South African study。International Journal of Educational Development,33(2),175-184。  new window
10.Bulunnz, M.、Jarrett, O.、Hansen, L. M.(2012)。Level of inquiry as motivator in an inquiry methods course for preservice elementary teachers。School Science and Mathematics,112(6),330-339。  new window
11.Coenders, F.、Terlouw, C.、Dikjstra, S.、Pieters, J.(2010)。The effects of the design and development of a chemistry curriculum reform on teachers professional growth-A case study。Journal of Science Teacher Education,21(5),535-557。  new window
12.Hackling, M.、Smith, P.、Murcia, K.(2010)。Talking science: Developing a discourse of inquiry。Teaching Science,56(1),17-22。  new window
13.Kuhn, D.(2010)。Teaching and learning science as argument。Science Education,94(5),810-824。  new window
14.Lin, Shu-sheng、Mintzes, Joel J.(20101200)。Learning Argumentation Skills through Instruction in Socioscientific Issues: The Effect of Ability Level。International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,8(6),993-1017。  new window
15.Lin, S.(2010)。Science and non-science major undergraduate students’ critical thinking and argumentation performance in the context of reading a science news report。International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education。  new window
16.Martin, A. M.、Hand, B.(2009)。Factors affecting the implementation of argument in the elementary science classroom: A longitudinal study。Research in Science Education,39,17-38。  new window
17.Mercer, N.(2010)。The analysis of classroom talk: Methods and methodologies。British Journal of Educational Psychology,80(1),1-14。  new window
18.Murphy, C.、Neil, P.、Beggs, J.(2007)。Trimary science teacher confidence revisited: ten years on。Educational Researcher,49(4),415-430。  new window
19.Reis, P.、Galvao, C.(2009)。Teaching controversial socioscientific issues in biology and geology classes: A case study。Electronic Journal of Science Education,13(1),1-24。  new window
20.Scholtz, Z.、Braund, M.、Hodges, M.、Koopman, R.、Lubben, F.(2008)。South Aferican teachers' ability to argue: The emergence of inclusive argumentation。International Journal of Educational Development,28(1),21-34。  new window
21.Scott, P.(1998)。Teacher talk and meaning making in science classroom: A Vygotskian analysis and review。Studies in Science Education,32,45-80。  new window
22.Viiri, J.、Saari, H.(2006)。Teacher talk patterns in science lessons: Use in teacher education。Journal of Science Teacher Education,17(4),347-365。  new window
23.Sadler, Troy D.(2004)。Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,41(5),513-536。  new window
24.Scott, P. H.、Mortimer, E. F.、Aguiar, O. G.(2006)。The tension between authoritative and dialogic discourse: A fundamental characteristic of meaning making interactions in high school science lessons。Science Education,90(4),605-631。  new window
25.Osborne, J.、Erduran, S.、Simon, S.(2004)。Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,41(10),994-1020。  new window
26.Erduran, S.、Osborne, J.、Simon, S.(2006)。Learning to Teach Argumentation: Research and Development in the Science Classroom。International Journal of Science Education,28(2/3),235-260。  new window
27.蘇衍丞、林樹聲(20120800)。在社會性科學議題情境下應用鷹架教學提升國小六年級學生論證能力。科學教育學刊,20(4),343-366。new window  延伸查詢new window
28.林樹聲、黃柏鴻(20090400)。國小六年級學生在社會性科學議題教學中之論證能力研究--不同學業成就學生間之比較。科學教育學刊,17(2),111-133。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.Dawson, V. M.、Venville, G.(2010)。Teaching strategies for developing students' argumentation skills about socioscientific issues in high school genetics。Research in Science Education,40,133-148。  new window
圖書
1.教育部(20030115)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要總綱。台北市:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
2.Mehan, Hugh(1979)。Learning Lessons。Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press。  new window
3.Lemke, Jay L.(1990)。Talking science: Language, learning, and values。Ablex。  new window
4.Vygotsky, Lev Semenovich、Cole, Michael、John-Steiner,‎ Vera、Scribner, Sylvia、Souberman, Ellen(1978)。Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes。Harvard University Press。  new window
5.Toulmin, Stephen Edelston(1958)。The Uses of Argument。Cambridge University Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Cazden, C. B.、Beck, S. W.(2003)。Classroom discourse。Handbook of discourse processes。Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum。  new window
2.Zeidler, D. L.、Osborne, J.、Erduran, S.、Simon, S.、Monk, M.(2003)。The Role of Argument during Discourse about Socioscientific Issues。The Role of Moral Reasoning on Socioscientific Issues and Discourse in Science Education。Dordrecht:Kluwer Academic Publishers。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE