:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:新婚夫妻的婚姻適應:概念測量與模式檢驗
書刊名:中華心理學刊
作者:張思嘉 引用關係周玉慧 引用關係黃宗堅
作者(外文):Chang, Szu-chiaJou, Yuh-hueyHuang, Tsung-chain
出版日期:2008
卷期:50:4
頁次:頁425-446
主題關鍵詞:婚姻態度量表婚姻適應新婚夫妻適應問題量表適應策略量表Adjustment problem scaleAdjustment strategy scaleMarital adjustmentMarital attitude scaleNewlyweds
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(15) 博士論文(4) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:13
  • 共同引用共同引用:503
  • 點閱點閱:150
本研究旨在探討新婚夫妻的婚姻適應,以過去質性研究的發現為基礎,研究者將新婚夫妻的婚姻適應分為四個部分來說明:包括婚姻適應的內涵及向度、影響婚姻適應的脈絡因素、婚姻適應策略及婚姻適應模式等。研究者編製了「適應問題」、「婚姻態度」及「適應策略」等三個量表,並對所提出的理論模式進行檢驗。以大台北地區288對(n=576)結婚五年內的新婚夫妻為施測樣本,經過驗證性因素分析及內部一致性信度檢定的結果,各量表的因素結構與原先提出之架構大致符合。在假設考驗方面,研究結果顯示:在「夫妻與原生家庭」方面的適應,妻子感受到的需要度與困難度均高於夫。「夫妻間」適應的困難度亦為妻高於夫,丈夫只有在「家庭與工作間」適應的需要度高於妻子。在本身的婚姻態度上,以雙方「原生家庭規則的差異」對新婚期間各層面適應的影響最大,「父系制度」及「傳統性別角色」則對妻子婚後的適應有較多的影響。夫妻間態度的差異與夫妻在「夫妻與原生家庭」適應的困難度及妻子在「家庭與工作間」適應的需要度有關。在適應策略的應用上,夫比妻更常使用「個人內積極」及「個人內消極」的方式,妻則比夫更常使用「個人外消極」的策略來處理適應問題。最後,不論是丈夫或妻子的適應模式均具有良好的適配度。綜合夫妻的分析結果我們發現,雖然積極的適應策略與較高的婚姻品質有關,在適應上遇有困難的丈夫或妻子卻愈傾向採取消極的策略來因應新婚期間的適應問題,也因此導致較低的婚姻品質。本研究支持了上述三個量表的可用性,未來可以針對上述的研究成果,修正量表及理論架構,使其更臻完善。
This study tests a theoretical model of newlyweds' marital adjustment proposed by the author based on qualitative data collected in Taiwan. Three measures which included dimensions of marital adjustment, attitude toward marriage, and strategies for dealing with adjustment problem were developed. Two hundred and eighty eight newly married couples (n=576) filled out a questionnaire which contained the measures mentioned above and questions to gather demographic and background information. Results of factor analysis verified the proposed measurement models and high reliabilities were reported for most of the measures. Overall, wives perceived more adjustment difficulties than husbands. Adjustment problems for wives were found to mostly be concerned with their relationships with in-laws and with their spouse. On the other hand, husbands perceived more need balancing their work and family. Both husbands' and wives' level of adjustment difficulties were predicted by their own attitude and the discrepancy between their attitudes toward marriage. Particularly, wives' adjustment difficulties were predicted by their attitude toward patriarchal family system and sex role. There were also differences in terms of the strategies that husbands and wives used in dealing with adjustment problems. Husbands adopted more intrapersonal-positive (accommodation) and intrapersonal-negative (avoidance) coping strategies while wives used more extrapersonal-negative (aggressive) strategies when faced with adjustment problems. Finally, results of SEM show that although positive coping strategies were found to relate to high marital quality, newlywed husbands and wives tend to use more negative coping strategies when they had more adjustment difficulties. As a consequence, such adjustment pattern would lead to low marital quality. The findings of the present study are expected to lead to the revision of the proposed model and to shed some light on the cultural characteristics that shape marital adjustment processes in Taiwan.
期刊論文
1.Ridley, C. A.、Wilhelm, M. S.、Surra, C. A.(2001)。Married couples' conflict responses and marital quality。Journal of Social and Personal Relationships,18(4),517-534。  new window
2.Yi, Chin-Chun、Chien, Wen-Yin(2006)。Does Conjugal Disparity Affect Marital Relations? A Comparative Study of Taiwan, Shanghai and Hong Kong。Current Sociology,54(2),229-255。  new window
3.Bradbury, T. N.、Fincham, F. D.、Beach, S. R. H.(2000)。Research on the nature and determinants of marital satisfaction: A decade in review。Journal of Marriage and the Family,62,964-980。  new window
4.Huston, T. L.、Caughlin, J. P.、Houts, R. M.、Smith, S. E.、George, L. J.(2001)。The Connubial Crucible: Newlywed Years as Predictors of Marital Delight, Distress, and Divorce。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,80(2),237-252。  new window
5.Harris, V. W.、Schramm, D. G.、Marshall, J. P.、Lee, T. R.(2005)。After "I do": The newlywed transition。Marriage and Family Review,38(1),45-67。  new window
6.Gottman, J. M.(1993)。The roles of conflict engagement, escalation, and avoidance in marital interaction: A longitudinal view of five types of couples。Journal of Counseling and Clinical Psychology,61,6-15。  new window
7.Gottman, J. M.、Coan, J.、Carrere, S.、Swanson, C.(1998)。Predicting marital happiness and stability from newlywed interactions。Journal of Marriage and Family,60(1),5-22。  new window
8.沈瓊桃(20020900)。多面向婚姻滿意量表之編製。中華心理衛生學刊,15(3),67-100。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.莊耀嘉(19991200)。家庭中人際互動結構與運作模式。本土心理學研究,12,3-46。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.張思嘉(19990600)。從系統觀點看婚姻適應的研究。應用心理研究,2,111-123。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Sabatelli, R. M.(1988)。Measurement Issues in Marital Research: A Review and Critique of Contemporary Survey Instruments。Journal of Marriage and the Family,50,891-915。  new window
12.Norton, R.(1983)。Measuring marital quality: A critical look at the dependent variable。Journal of Marriage and the Family,45(1),141-151。  new window
13.Glenn, N. D.(1990)。Quantitative research on marital quality in the 1980s : A critical review。Journal of Marriage and the Family,52,818-831。  new window
14.張思嘉(19971000)。Marriage as Environment: Toward a Model of Processes of Adaptation in Marriage。世新大學學報,7,219-250。  new window
15.Sharpley, C. F.、Cross, D. G.(1982)。A psychometric evaluation of the Spanier Dyadic Adjustment Scale。Journal of Marriage and the Family,44(3),739-741。  new window
16.張思嘉(20060800)。家庭與婚姻:臺灣心理學研究的現況與趨勢。本土心理學研究,26,3-34。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.伊慶春(19910700)。臺北地區婚姻調適的一些初步研究發現。國家科學委員會研究彙刊.人文及社會科學,1(2),151-173。  延伸查詢new window
18.黃囇莉(20010600)。身心違常--女性自我在父權結構網中的「迷」途。本土心理學研究,15,3-62。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.利翠珊、蕭英玲(20080400)。華人婚姻品質的維繫:衝突與忍讓的中介效果。本土心理學研究,29,77-116。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.伊慶春、楊文山、蔡瑤玲(19921200)。夫妻衝突處理模式的影響因素:丈夫、妻子、和夫妻配對樣本的比較。中國社會學刊,16,25-54。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.黃宗堅、葉光輝、謝雨生(20040600)。夫妻關係中權力與情感的運作模式:以衝突因應策略為例。本土心理學研究,21,3-48。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.Spanier, Graham B.(1976)。Measuring Dyadic Adjustment: New Scales for Assessing the Quality of Marriage and Similar Dyads。Journal of Marriage and the Family,38(1),15-28。  new window
23.楊國樞(19971200)。心理學研究的本土契合性及其相關問題。本土心理學研究,8,75-120。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.張思嘉(20011200)。婚姻早期的適應過程--新婚夫妻之質性研究。本土心理學研究,16,91-133。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.劉惠琴(19990600)。從辯證的歷程觀點看夫妻衝突。本土心理學研究,11,153-202。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.高旭繁、陸洛(20060400)。夫妻傳統性/現代性的契合與婚姻適應之關聯。本土心理學研究,25,47-100。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.利翠珊(19950800)。夫妻互動歷程之探討:以臺北地區年輕夫妻為例的一項初探性研究。本土心理學研究,4,260-321。new window  延伸查詢new window
28.李良哲(19961200)。大臺北地區已婚者婚姻衝突因應行為之年齡與性別差異研究。教育與心理研究,19,169-195。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.李良哲(19990600)。維繫婚姻關係重要因素的成人期差異初探。教育與心理研究,22(上),145-160。new window  延伸查詢new window
30.Fincham, F. D.、Bradbury, T. N.(1987)。The Assessment of Marital Quality: A Reevaluation。Journal of Marriage and the Family,49,797-809。  new window
31.Spanier, G. B.(1988)。Assessing the Strengths of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale。Journal of Family Psychology,2,92-94。  new window
32.Kazak, A. E.、Jarmas, A.、Snitzer, B. M.(1988)。The Assessment of Dyadic Adjustment Scale。Journal of Family Psychology,2,82-91。  new window
33.Spanier, G. B.、Cole, C. L.(1976)。Toward Clarification and Investigation of Maritl Adjustment。International Journal of Sociology of the Family,6,121-146。  new window
34.Eddy, J. M.、Heyman, R. E.、Weiss, R.(1991)。An Empirical Evaluation of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale: Exploring the Differences between Marital "Satisfaction" and "Adjustment"。Behavioral Assessment,13,199-220。  new window
35.Busby, D. M.、Christensen, C.、Crane, D. R.、Larson, J. H.(1995)。A Revision of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale for Distressed and Nondistressed Couples: Construct Hierarchy and Multidimensional Scales。Journal of Marital & Family Therapy,21,289-308。  new window
36.Locke, H. J.、Wallace, K. M.(1959)。Short Marital Adjustment and Prediction Tests: Their Reliability and Validity。Marriage and Family Living,21,251-255。  new window
37.Kitamura, T.、Watanable, M.、Aoki, M.、Fujino, M.、Ura, C.、Fujihara, S.(1995)。Factorial Structure and Correlates of Marital Adjustment in a Japanese Population: A Community Study。Journal of Community psychology,23,117-126。  new window
38.Spanier, G. B.、Thompson, L.(1982)。A Confirmatory Analysis of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale。Journal of the Marriage and the Family,44,731-738。  new window
39.Shek, D. T. L.(1995)。The Chinese Version of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale: Does Language Make a Difference?。Journal of Clinical psychology,51,802-810。  new window
40.Krokoff, L.(1989)。Predictive Validation of a Ttelephone Version of the Locke-Wallace Marital Adjustment Test。Journal of Marriage and the Family,51,767-775。  new window
41.Freeston, M.、Plechaty, M.(1997)。Reconsideration of the Locke-Wallace Marital Adjustment Test: Is it Still Relevant for the 1990s'?。Psychological Reports,81,419-434。  new window
會議論文
1.周玉慧、張思嘉(2002)。家人關係中社會支持獲取策略之運用及其影響。家庭系統量化實徵研究學術研討會。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.蕭英玲、曾秀雲(2005)。臺北市新婚夫妻的衝突反應。2005台灣社會學年會學術研討會,國立台北大學舉辦 。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.楊淑君(2004)。新婚階段個人角色轉換之經驗與調適(碩士論文)。國立台北師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳靜宜(2001)。新婚調適歷程研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.林亞寧(2003)。新婚夫妻婚姻信念、衝突因應策略與婚姻調適之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.吳秀敏(2004)。小家庭新婚妻子角色轉換之心路歷程(碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學,嘉義。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.內政部統計處(2006)。內政部統計通報。台北:內政部。  延伸查詢new window
2.Raush, H. L.、Barry, W. A.、Hertel, R. K.、Swain, M. A.(1974)。Communication, conflict and marriage。San Francisco:Jossey-Bass。  new window
3.黃芳銘(2004)。社會科學統計方法學:結構方程模式。臺北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.胡幼慧(1995)。三代同堂:迷思與陷阱。巨流。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.邱皓政(2003)。結構方程模式--LISREL的理論、技術與應用。雙葉書廊。  延伸查詢new window
6.Locke, H. J.(1951)。Predicting Adjustment in Marriage: A Comparison of a Divorced and Happy Married Group。Predicting Adjustment in Marriage: A Comparison of a Divorced and Happy Married Group。New York, NY。  new window
7.Burgess, E. W.、Wallin, P.(1953)。Enganement and Marriage。Enganement and Marriage。Philadelphia, PA。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE