臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：巢狀探究教學對國二學生覺知教師溝通行為改變之探討
書刊名：課程與教學
作者：蔡執仲／段曉林 引用關係／靳知勤 引用關係
作者(外文)：Tsai, Chih-chung／Tuan, Hsiao-lin／Chin, Chi-chin
出版日期：2009
卷期：12:3
頁次：頁129-152
主題關鍵詞：探究教學；探究學習；溝通行為；巢狀探究教學；Inquiry teaching；Inquiry learning；Communication behavior；Nested inquiry-based instruction
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:58
  • 點閱點閱:87
本研究主要在探討國二「自然與生活科技領域」課室中實施「巢狀探究教學模式」後，學生對師生互動知覺上的改變與對社會心理層面的影響。研究採雙組前後測設計，以五班實驗組（155人）與五班對照組（140人）共295人為研究樣本；其中實驗組實施探究教學；對照組則進行以教科書教學；資料收集方面採用「教師溝通行為量表(TCBQ)，並以T檢定進行分析。實驗組在「挑戰性問題」、「鼓勵與稱讚」、「非語言支持」、「掌控與管理」等向度有顯著的成長(p<.05)，並對社會心理層面的產生影響“其中「挑戰性問題」提升「個人發展」層面；「鼓勵與稱讚」與「非語言支持」提升「關係」層面，而「掌控與管理．則提升「系統維持與改變」層面。
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of inquiry-based instruction on 8(superscript th) graders' perceptions of their teachers' communication behavior in the physical science classes. A total of 295 8th graders participated in the study. The experimental group included five classes (n=155) who were taught with three units of nested-based inquiry instruction for three months. In the control group, teachers used the textbook to teach five classes of students (n=140). The "Teacher Communication Behavior Questionnaire" was implemented in both groups before the study and again three months later to collect students' perceptions about the climate of classroom environments. Results showed, the nested-based inquiry instruction could significantly increase students' perceptions of teachers' communication behaviors (p<.001). However, the nested-based inquiry instruction showed significantly higher gain scores (p<.001) than textbook-based instruction, especially in the scales of "Challenging Questioning (CQ),", "Encouragement and Praise (EP), "Non-verbal Supportive (NVS)," and "Controlling and Management (CM)." However, the scales of "Understanding and Friendly (UF)" showed no difference. Four scales dominated students' perceptions of the classroom climate about inquiry-based instruction; these were EP, CM, HQ, and NVS (explained the variances over 5%). Among four scales, the HQ scale related to the Personal Development Dimension; EP and NVS scales related the Relationship Dimension and CM scale related the System Management and Change Dimension. Finally, it was found that personal development, relationships, and system management and change of the psychosocial factors have been improved by nested inquiry-based instruction.
期刊論文
1.Chinn, C. A.、Malhotra, B. A.(2002)。Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks。Science Education，86(2)，175-218。  new window
2.Polman, J. L.、Pea, R. D.(2001)。Transformative Communication as a Cultural Tool for Guiding-inquiry Science。Science Education，85(3)，223-238。  new window
3.She, H. C.、Fisher, D.(2002)。Teacher communication behavior and its association with students' cognitive and attitudinal outcomes in science in Taiwan。Journal of Research in science Teaching，39(1)，63-78。  new window
4.Lampert, M.(1990)。When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing and teaching。American Education Research Journal，27，29-63。  new window
5.Sandoval, William A.、Reiser, Brian J.(2004)。Explanation-driven inquiry: Integrating conceptual and epistemic scaffolds for scientific inquiry。Science Education，88(3)，345-372。  new window
6.游淑媚、林淑芳(20050900)。國小學生的生物腐化想法與科學教室環境知覺關係之研究。科學教育學刊，13(3)，241-262。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Rogoff, Barbara(1994)。Developing understanding of the idea of communities of learners。Mind, Culture & Activity，1(4)，209-229。  new window
8.Marx, R. W.、Blumenfeld, P. C.、Krajcik, J. S.、Blunk, M.、Crawford, B.、Kelly, B.、Meyer, K. M.(1994)。Enacting project-based science: Experiences of four middle grade teachers。Elementary School Journal，94(5)，517-538。  new window
9.蔡執仲、段曉林、靳知勤(20070400)。巢狀探究教學模式對國二學生理化學習動機影響之探討。科學教育學刊，15(2)，119-144。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Tyack, D.、Tobin, W.(1994)。The "Grammar" of Schooling: Why Has It Been so Hard to Change?。American Educational Research Journal，31(3)，453-479。  new window
11.Staer, H.、Goodrum, D.、Hackling, M.(1998)。High School Laboratory Work in Western Australia: Openness to Inquiry。Research in Science Education，28(2)，219-228。  new window
12.White, B. Y.、Frederiksen, J. R.(1998)。Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students。Cognition and Instruction，16(1)，3-118。  new window
13.Crawford, B. A.、Krajcik, J. S.、Marx, R. W.(1999)。Elements of a community of learners in a middle school science classroom。Science Education，83(6)，701-723。  new window
14.Magnusson, S. J.、Palincsar, A. S.(1995)。The learning environment as a site of science education reform。Theory Into Practice，34(1)，43-50。  new window
15.黃臺珠、Aldridge, Jill M.、Fraser, Barry(19981200)。臺灣和西澳科學教室環境的跨國研究：結合質性與量的研究方法。科學教育學刊，6(4)，343-362。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.李旻憲、張俊彥(2004)。地球科學教室學習環境問卷之研發與初探。科學教育學刊，12，421-443。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.Achtenhagen, F.(2001)。Criteria for the Development of Complex Teaching-leaning Environments。Instructional Science，29，361-380。  new window
18.Anderson, A.、Hamilton, R. J.、Hattie, J.(2004)。Classroom Climate and Motivated Behavior in Secondary Schools。Learning Environments Research，7，211-225。  new window
19.Dart, B.、Burnett, P.、Boulton-Lewis, G.、Campbell, J.、Smith, D.、McCrindle, A.(1999)。Classroom Learning Environments and Students' Approaches to Learning。Learning Environments Research，2，137-156。  new window
20.Dorman, J. P.(2003)。Cross-national Validation of the What Is Happening in This Class? (WIHIC) Questionnaire Using Confirmatory Factor Analysis。Learning Environments Research，6，231-245。  new window
21.Ford, M. J.、Wargo, B. M.(2007)。Routines, Roles, and Responsibilities for Aligning Scientific and Classroom Practices。Science Education，91，133-157。  new window
22.Herron, M. D.(1971)。The Nature of Science Enquiry。School Review，79，171-212。  new window
23.Kass, A.、Burke, R.、Blevis, E.、Williamson, M.(1993)。Constructing Learning Environments for Complex Social Skills。The Journal of the Learning Sciences，3(4)，387-427。  new window
24.Lidar, M.、Lundqvist, E.、Östman, L.(2006)。Teaching and Learning in the Science Classroom: The Interplay between Teachers' Epistemological Move and Students' Practical Epistemology。Science Education，90，148-163。  new window
25.Martin-Hansen, L.(2002)。Defining Inquiry。The Science Teacher，69(2)，34-37。  new window
26.Sandoval, W. A.(2005)。Understanding Students' Practical Epistemologies and Their Influence on Learning through Inquiry。Science Education，89，634-656。  new window
27.Savinainen, A.、Scott, P.、Viiri, J.(2005)。Using a Bridging Representation and Social Interactions to Foster Conceptual Change: Designing and Evaluating an Instructional Sequence for Newton's Third Law。Science Education，89，175-195。  new window
28.She, H. C.、Fisher, D. L.(2000)。The Development of a Questionnaire to Describe Science Teacher Communication Behavior in Taiwan and Australia。Science Education，84(6)，706-726。  new window
29.Tyson, L. M.、Venville, G. J.、Harrison, A. G.、Treagust, D. F.(1997)。A Multidimensional Framework for Interpreting Conceptual Change Events in the Classroom。Science Education，81，387-404。  new window
30.Watson, J. R.、Swain, F. R. L.、McRobbie, C.(2004)。Students' Discussions in Practical Scientific Inquiries。International Journal of Science Education，26，25-45。  new window
31.Walberg, H. J.(1991)。Improving School Science in Advanced and Developing Countries。Review of Educational Research，61(1)，25-69。  new window
32.Yerrick, R.、Pedersen, J.、Arnason, J.(1998)。"We're Just Spectator": An Interaction of Science Epistemologies and Teaching。Science Education，82，619-648。  new window
圖書
1.Moos, R. H.(1979)。Evaluating Educational Environments: Procedures, Measures, Findings, and Policy Implications。San Francisco, CA：Jossey-Bass。  new window
2.Cohen, J.(1988)。Statistical power and analysis for the behavioral sciences。Hillsdale, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
3.Roth, Wolff-Michael(1995)。Authentic School Science: Knowing and Learning in Open-Inquiry Science Laboratories。Authentic School Science: Knowing and Learning in Open-Inquiry Science Laboratories。Dordrecht。  new window
4.Lemke, Jay L.(1990)。Talking science: Language, learning, and values。Ablex。  new window
5.Moos, R. H.(1974)。The social Climate Scales: An overview。Palo Alto, CA：Consulting Psychologists Pres。  new window
6.Wubbels, Theo、Levy, Jack(1993)。Do You Know what You Look Like? Interpersonal Relationships in Education。London：Falmer Press。  new window
7.Vygotsky, Lev Semenovich、Cole, Michael、John-Steiner,‎ Vera、Scribner, Sylvia、Souberman, Ellen(1978)。Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes。Harvard University Press。  new window
8.American Association for the Advancement of Science(1993)。Benchmarks for science literacy。Oxford University Press。  new window
9.邱皓政(2007)。量化統計與分析。量化統計與分析。臺北巿。  延伸查詢new window
10.Solomon, J.(1989)。The Social Construction of School Science。Doing Science。London, UK。  new window
11.Walberg, H. J.(1981)。A Psychological Theory of Educational Productivity。Psychology and Education: The State of the Union。Berkeley, CA。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：772（臺灣：768，外國：4） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1641614 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67434488
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上