臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：從學校本位評量省思臺灣擴大免試入學方案
書刊名：教育科學研究期刊
作者：宋曜廷 引用關係／周業太／吳佩璵／林秀珊／曾芬蘭
作者(外文)：Sung, Yao-ting／Chou, Yeh-tai／Wu, Pei-yu／Lin, Hsiu-shan／Tseng, Feng-lan
出版日期：2010
卷期：55:2
頁次：頁73-113
主題關鍵詞：入學考試；學校本位評量；擴大高中職及五專免試入學實施方案；Entrance examination；School-based assessment；The program of extended open admission to senior high school, senior vocational school, and five-year junior college
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(9) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(2)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:7
  • 共同引用共同引用:30
  • 點閱點閱:150
摘要： 教育部推動的擴大高中職及五專免試入學實施方案，在作法與理念上和澳洲與香港所執行的學校本位評量有雷同之處。兩者都是以學生為學習主體、提供其適性與優質之教育機會；同樣需仰賴教師之專業素養，以提高教學與學習品質；此外，皆採計在校成績作為入學申請依據，弱化高風險測驗之角色。因此，國外所執行利用學校本位評量作為入學與考試制度的變革方案之利弊得失，可以作為臺灣的改革參考。本研究目的在於融合校本評量之施行理念與作法，歸納出教育主管機關之政策規劃、教師之信念與專業、社會之態度與支持，以及執行期程和程序等四個可能影響校本評量實施成效之因素，針對現行免試入學方案提出具體建議，期能作為該方案全面實施前，相關政策調整之參考依據。
Abstract： The program of extended open admission to senior high school, senior vocational school, and five-year junior college, promoted by the Ministry of Education, is similar to school-based assessment implemented in Australia and Hong Kong. The learners of both programs are students, and the two programs share the same goal of providing adaptive and high quality educational opportunities. Both programs count on teachers’ professional capability to enhance teaching and learning quality. Moreover, they both adopt the GPA as the main application source in order to weaken the role of high-stake exams. Therefore, the experience of employing school-based assessment in other countries can serve as references for the educational reform in Taiwan. The goal of this study is to integrate four concepts of implementation of school-based assessment: policy planning of education authorities, teacher’s beliefs and profession, attitudes and support of the society, and processes/procedures, in order to make a suggestion to the current open admission program and to serve as a reference for modification before the program is implemented.
期刊論文
1.Curnming, J. J.、Maxwell, G. S.(2004)。Assessment in Australian Schools: Current Practice and Trends。Assessment in Education，11(1)，89-108。  new window
2.Yung, B. H. W.(2001)。Three Views of Fairness in a School-based Assessment Scheme of Practical Work in Biology。International Journal of Science Education，23(10)，985-1005。  new window
3.張善培(20011200)。School-based Assessment in Public Examinations: Identifying the Concerns of Teachers。Education Journal，29(2)，105-123。new window  new window
4.Cohen, D. K.、Spillane, J. P.(1992)。Policy and practice: The relations between governance and instruction。Review of Research in Education，18(1)，3-49。  new window
5.Stillman, G.(2001)。The impact of school-based assessment on the implementation of a modeling/applications-based curriculum: An Australian example。Teaching Mathematics and its Applications，20(3)，101-108。  new window
6.Yip, D. Y.、Cheung, D.(2005)。Teachers' concerns on school-based assessment of practical work。Journal of Biological Education，39(4)，156-162。  new window
7.Yung, B. H. W.(2001)。Examiner, policeman or students' companion: Teachers' perceptions of their role in an assessment reform。Educational Review，53(3)，251-260。  new window
8.宋曜廷、許福元、曾芬蘭、蔣莉蘋、孫維民(20071200)。國民中學學生基本學力測驗的回顧與展望。教育研究與發展期刊，3(4)，29-50。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.林永豐(20070600)。我國後期中等教育分流模式之探討。當代教育研究，15(2)，1-33。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Davison, C.(2007)。Views from the chalkface: English language school-based assessment in Hong Kong。Language Assessment Quarterly，4(1)，37-68。  new window
11.李然堯(20061200)。我國後期中等教育分流機制與生涯輔導之檢討。中等教育，57(6)，4-22。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Madaus, G. F.(1988)。The distortion of teaching and testing: High-stakes testing and instruction。Peabody Journal of Education，65(3)，29-46。  new window
13.譚彩鳳(2009)。引進校本評核提升學習水平的迷思：教師信念剖析。教育研究與發展期刊，5（2），175-206。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Barnes, M., Clarke, D.,、Stephens, M.(2000)。Assessment: The engine of systemic curricular reform?。Journal of Curriculum Studies，32(5)，623-650。  new window
15.Cheung, D.,、Yip, D. Y.(2004)。How science teachers’ concerns about school-based assessment of practical work vary in time: The Hong Kong experience。Research in Science and Technological Education，22(2)，153-169。  new window
16.Darling-Hammond, L.,、McCloskey, L.(2008)。Assessment for learning around the world: What would it mean to be internationally competitive?。Phi Delta Kappan，90(4)，263-272。  new window
17.Darling-Hammond, L.,、Wise, A. E.(1985)。Beyond standardization: State standards and school improvement。The Elementary School Journal，85(3)，315-336。  new window
18.Dori, Y. J.(2003)。From nationwide standardized testing to school-based alternative embedded assessment in Israel: Students’ performance in the matriculation 2000 project。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，40(1)，34-52。  new window
19.Gilman, D. A.,、Reynolds, L. A.(1991)。The side effects of statewide testing。Contemporary Education，62(4)，272-278。  new window
20.Jones, K.,、Whitford, B. L.(1997)。Kentucky’s conflicting reform principles: High-stakes school accountability and student performance assessment。Phi Delta Kappan，79(4)，276-281。  new window
21.Roderick, M.,、Engel, M.(2001)。The grasshopper and the ant: Motivational responses of low-achieving students to high-stakes testing。Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis，23，197-227。  new window
22.Vogler, K. E.(2002)。The impact of high-stakes, state-mandated student performance assessment on teachers’ instructional practices.。Education，123(1)，39-55。  new window
23.Yung, B. H. W.(2002)。Same assessment, different practice: Professional consciousness as a determinant of teachers’ practice in a school-based assessment scheme.。Assessment in Education，9(1)，97-117。  new window
會議論文
1.譚光鼎、莊勝義、魯先華、康瀚文、陳怡璇(2007)。臺灣高級中學多元入學政策之檢討。公義社會與教育行政革新國際學術研討會，國立臺灣師範大學教育學系舉辦 。臺北市。27-64。  延伸查詢new window
2.Pitman, J.(1985)。Criteria-based assessment: The Queensland experience.。Oxford.。  new window
3.Shepard, L. A.(1989)。Inflated test score gains: Is it old norms or teaching the test? Effects of testing project.。San Francisco, CA.。  new window
研究報告
1.Luke, A., Weir, K.,、Woods, A.(2008)。Development of a set of principles to guide a P-12 syllabus framework。  new window
2.Mercurio, A.(2008)。Re-imagining school-based assessment at the upper secondary education level。  new window
3.Qualifications and Curriculum Authority(2007)。Report on trial of models of moderation within assessing pupils’ progress 2007/8.。London。  new window
4.Queensland Studies Authority(2007)。Teacher guildlines-food webs。  new window
5.Queensland Studies Authority(2010)。School-based assessment-The Queensland system。  new window
6.South Australian Certificate of Education Review(2006)。Success for all: Ministerial review of senior secondary education in South Australia: SACE review, final report。Adelaide, South Australia。  new window
圖書
1.黃政傑(1994)。我國公元兩千年高級中等教育改革方向之研究。臺北市：國立教育資料館。  延伸查詢new window
2.Board of Studies(1998)。A review of the HSC assessment program。Sydney, Australia。  new window
3.教育部(2007)。高中及高職多元入學方案。臺北市：教育部。  延伸查詢new window
4.謝文全(2001)。中等教育--理論與實際。臺北：五南。  延伸查詢new window
5.宋曜廷(2008)。十二年國民基本教育規劃：國中基測轉型規劃研究。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
6.鍾宜興(2004)。各國中等教育。高雄市。  延伸查詢new window
7.Clarke, E.(1987)。Assessment in Queensland schools: Two decades of change 1964-1983。Queensland, Australia。  new window
8.Jones, M. G., Jones, B. D.,、Hargrove, T.(2003)。The unintended consequences of high-stakes testing。Lanham, MD。  new window
9.Madaus, G. F.(1988)。The influences of testing on the curriculum。Critical issues in curriculum: Eighty-seventh yearbook of the national society for the study of education。Chicago, IL。  new window
10.Queensland Board of Secondary School Studies(1978)。A review of school-based assessment in Queensland secondary schools。Queensland, Australia。  new window
11.Queensland Department of Education(1970)。Public examinations for Queensland secondary school studies。Queensland, Australia。  new window
12.Stake, R.(1991)。Advance in program evaluation: Using assessment policy to reform education。Greenwich, CT。  new window
13.Stanley, G., MacCann, R., Gardner, J., Reynolds, L.,、Wild, I.(2009)。Review of teacher assessment: Evidence of what works best and issues for development。England。  new window
其他
1.香港教育統籌委員會(2006)。教育改革進展報告（四），香港：政府物流服務署。  延伸查詢new window
2.香港考試及評核局(2010)。香港中學文憑考試－2012 中國語文校本評核教師手冊。  延伸查詢new window
3.香港考試評核局(2013)。香港中學文憑考試，http://www.hkeaa.edu.hk/DocLibrary/Media/Leaflets/HKDSE_pamphlet_Chi_2013.pdf。  延伸查詢new window
4.教育部(2009)。擴大高中職及五專免試入學實施方案，臺北市：教育部。  延伸查詢new window
5.香港考試及評核局(2006)。香港中學會考中國語文科及英國語文科校本評核家長簡介。  延伸查詢new window
6.香港考試及評核局(2007)。中國語文教育學習領域課程及評估指引。  延伸查詢new window
7.香港考試及評核局(2010)。校本評核簡介A發展過程。  延伸查詢new window
8.香港考試及評核局(2010)。香港中學文憑考試校本評核簡介。  延伸查詢new window
9.香港考試及評核局(2010)。香港中學文憑考試－數學校本評核教師手冊（試行版）。  延伸查詢new window
10.香港考試及評核局(2010)。校本評核簡介 B 現行概況。  延伸查詢new window
11.香港考試及評核局(2010)。香港中學文憑校本評核常見問題－有關延遲推行校本評核科目的安排。  延伸查詢new window
12.Australia Government(2010)。Diagram of education system。  new window
13.Queensland Studies Authority(2010)。Guide to making judgments.。  new window
14.University of Southern Queensland(2010)。Learning and teaching support。  new window
15.Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority(2001)。Statistical moderation of VCE coursework。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：468（臺灣：466，外國：2） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1695817 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67508105
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上