臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：警察、檢察官、法官對社工認知之探討：以家庭暴力與性侵害案件處理為例
書刊名：臺大社會工作學刊
作者：王珮玲 引用關係
作者(外文)：Wang, Pei-ling
出版日期：2010
卷期：21
頁次：頁1-53
主題關鍵詞：家庭暴力；性侵害；社會工作；警察；司法系統；Domestic violence；Sexual assault；Social work；Policeman；Judicial system
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(8) 博士論文(3) 專書(2) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:8
  • 共同引用共同引用:81
  • 點閱點閱:110
因應性侵害犯罪防治法及家庭暴力防治法等保護令法令之立法施行，在維護被害人權益的訴求下，社工人員的工作場域必須擴大至警察、檢察及法院系統中。本研究旨在瞭解警察、檢察官及法官與社工接觸的經驗，探討該三類人員對社工專業能力與表現的的認知情形，以及對社工參與案件處理之功能看法及其相關因素。本研究以問卷調查方式詢問承辦家庭暴力及性侵害案件之法官、檢察官及警察，結果發現三體系人員因角色不同、與社工存在不同的關係；對於社工功能的看法，檢察官有顯著較高的評價。社工進入司法系統，所發揮的功能以提升被害人服務品質有最高的評價，其次為提升案件處理品質、最後則是促進司法人員處理案件動力。另亦發現社工司法倡導滲透、改變司法體系文化效果部分已逐漸發酵；而社工是否「好用」，是影響社工功能被肯定的最重要因素。最後根據研究結果，提出深化跨領域知識的建構、建構社工與司法之合作模式、強化社工司法倡導能量、司法體系跨大建置對被害人之服務機制及未來研究方向等五項建議。
In the past decade, the Sexual Assault Prevention Act and Domestic Violence Prevention Act have been implemented in Taiwan. According to these laws, social workers have to enter the police departments, prosecutors' office and courts to advocate for their clients. Therefore, social workers have more interactions with police officers, prosecutors and judges. This paper aimed to examine the three professionals' interactive experiences with social workers, and explore the impacts of social worker's legal advocacy. This study collected opinion from judges, prosecutors and police officers who were in charge of domestic violence and sex assault cases. Results from this study suggest that police officers have great understanding about the role of social workers, and more likely to make requests to social worker's assistance, compared with prosecutors and judges. However, results also suggest that police officers feel more frustrated from cooperation with social workers. Moreover, the results indicate that the relationships with social workers are different among the judge, prosecutors and police officers. Social workers have imbued and change the culture of these three systems gradually. In addition, police officers, prosecutors and judges perceive that providing service for victims in the justice system is the social welfare agency's responsibility, rather than theirs. The regression analysis results indicate that the social worker's professional ability is the most important factor associated with these three professionals' opinions on the impacts of social worker's advocacy. Finally, this study proposes five suggestions for practice fields service programs and future studies.
期刊論文
1.張錦麗(20041200)。法院「家庭暴力事件聯合服務處」方案的倡導歷程分析。朝陽人文社會學刊，2(2)，103-148。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Bell, M. E.、Goodman, L. A.(2001)。Supporting battered women involved with the court system: An evaluation of a law school-based advocacy intervention。Violence Against Women，7(12)，1377-1404。  new window
3.Robinson, A. L.(2006)。Reducing repeat victimization among high-risk victims of domestic violence: The benefits of a coordinated community response in Cardiff, UK.。Violence Against Women，12(8)，761-788。  new window
4.Burgess, A. W.、Holmstrom, L. L.(1974)。Rape trauma syndrome。American Journal of Psychiatry，131(9)，981-986。  new window
5.Bronstein, L. R.(2003)。A model for interdisciplinary collaboration。Social Work，48(3)，297-306。  new window
6.Homant, R. J.、Kennedy, D. B.(1985)。Police perceptions of spouse abuse: A comparison of male and female officers。Journal of Criminal Justice，13(1)，29-47。  new window
7.王燦槐(2005)。〈性侵害防治中心在司法流程中的角色－減少性侵害被害人減少重複陳述作業之評析〉。亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊，1(1)，111-136。  延伸查詢new window
8.Bennett, L.、Goodman, L.、Dutton, M. A.(1999)。System obstacles to the criminal prosecution of a battering partner。Journal of Interpersonal Violence，14(7)，761-772。  new window
9.劉淑瓊(20070200)。教恐龍跳芭蕾？--論兒童保護服務之網絡協同合作。兒童及少年福利期刊，11，49-76。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.嚴祥鸞(20061200)。誰可以決定「誰專業／非專業」。應用心理研究，32，69-74。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Robinson, A. L.、Chandek, M. S.(2000)。The domestic violence arrest decision: Examining demographic, attitudinal, and situational variables。Crime & Delinquency，46(1)，78-37。  new window
12.Mignon, S. I.、Holmes, W. M.(1995)。Police response to mandatory arrest laws。Crime and Delinquency，41(4)，420-430。  new window
13.Roberts, A. R.、Brownell, P.(1999)。A Century of Forensic Social Work: Bridging the Past to the Present。Social Work，44(4)，359-369。  new window
14.Berg-Weger, M.、Schneider, F. D.(1998)。Interdisciplinary collaboration in social work education。Journal of Social Work Education，34(1)，97-107。  new window
15.Bronstein, L. R.(2002)。Index of interdiciplinary collaboration。Social Work Research，26(2)，113-126。  new window
16.Campbell, R.,、Raja, S.(2005)。The sexual assault and secondary victimization of female veterans: Help seeking experiences in military and civilian social systems。Psychology of Women Quarterly，29，97-106。  new window
17.Edleson, J. L.(1993)。Advocacy services for battered women。Violence Update，4(4)，1-10。  new window
18.Fast, J. D.(2003)。An in-law comes to stay: Examination of interdiciplinary conflict in a school-based health center。Social Work，48(1)，45-50。  new window
19.Ferraro, K. J.(1989)。Policing woman battering。Social Problems，36(1)，61-74。  new window
20.Ford, D. A.(2003)。Coercing victim participation in domestic violence prosecutions。Journal of Interpersonal Violence，18(6)，669-684。  new window
21.Hart, B.(1993)。Battered women and the criminal justice system。American Behavioral Scientist，36，624-638。  new window
22.Loseck, D. R.(1991)。Changing the boundaries of crime: The battered women's social movement and the definition of wife abuse as criminal activity. Crimi-violence。Crime and Criminal Justice International，1，148-204。  new window
23.Weisz, A. N.(1999)。Legal advocacy for domestic violence survivors: The power of an informative relationship。Families in Society，80(2)，138-147。  new window
24.Zweig, J. M.,、Burt, M. R.(2003)。Effects of interactions among community agencies on legal system responses to domestic violence and sexual assault in STOP-funded communities。Criminal Justice Policy Review，14(2)，249-272。  new window
25.Zweig, J. M.,、Burt, M. R.(2006)。Predicting case outcomes and women's perceptions of the legal system's response to domestic violence and sexual assault。Criminal Justice Policy Review，17(2)，202-233。  new window
26.Berg-Weger, M.、Schneider, F. D.(1998)。Interdisciplinary collaboration in social work education。Journal of Social Work Education，34，97-107。  new window
27.Bronstein, L. R.(2002)。Index of interdiciplinary collaboration。Social Work Research，26(2)，113-126。  new window
28.Campbell, R.(2006)。Rape survivors' experiences with the legal and medical systemsDo rape victim advocates make a difference?。Violence Against Women，12(1)，30-45。  new window
29.Campbell, R.、Raja, S.(2005)。The sexual assault and secondary victimization of female veterans: Help seeking experiences in military and civilian social system。Psychology of Women Quarterly，29，97-106。  new window
30.Edleson, J. L.(1993)。Advocacy services for battered women。Violence Update，4(4)，1-10。  new window
31.Fast, J. D.(2003)。An in-law comes to stay: Examination of interdiciplinary conflict in a school-based health center。Social Work，48(1)，45-50。  new window
32.Ferraro, K. J.(1989)。Policing woman battering。Social Problems，36(1)，61-74。  new window
33.Ford, D. A.(2003)。Coercing victim participation in domestic violence prosecutions。Journal of Interpersonal Violence，18(6)，669-684。  new window
34.Hart, B.(1993)。Battered women and the criminal justice system。American Behavioral Scientist，36，624-638。  new window
35.Loseck, D. R.(1991)。Changing the boundaries of crime: The battered women's social movement and the definition of wife abuse as criminal activity。Criminal Justice Review，16(2)，249-262。  new window
36.Lynch, R. S.、Mitchell, J.(1995)。Justice system advocacy: A must for NASW and the social work community。Social Work，40(1)，9-12。  new window
37.Madden, R. G.、Wayne, R. H.(2003)。Social work and the law: A therapeutic jurisprudence perspective。Social Work，48(3)，338-347。  new window
38.Schmitt, F. E.、Martin, P. Y.(1999)。Unobtrusive mobilization by an institutionalized rape crisis center: All we do comes from victims。Gender & Society，13(3)，364-384。  new window
39.Sudderth, L. K.(2006)。An uneasy alliance: Law enforcement and domestic violence victim advocates in a rural area。Feminist Criminology，1(4)，329-353。  new window
40.Wang, P. L.(2003)。Police adopting a pro-arrest policing in response to domestic violence。Crime and Criminal Justice International，1，148-204。  new window
41.Weisz, A. N.(1999)。Legal advocacy for domestic violence survivors: The power of an informative relationship。Families in Society，80(2)，138-147。  new window
42.Zweig, J. M.、Burt, M. R.(2003)。Effects of interactions among community agencies on legal system responses to domestic violence and sexual assault in STOP-funded communities。Criminal Justice Policy Review，14(2)，249-272。  new window
43.Zweig, J. M.、Burt, M. R.(2006)。Predicting case outcomes and women's perceptions of the legal system's response to domestic violence and sexual assault。Criminal Justice Policy Review，17(2)，202-233。  new window
會議論文
1.姚淑文(2003)。地方法院法官與書記官訪談整理。台北。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.王珮玲、沈慶鴻(2008)。駐地方法院家庭暴力事件服務方案評估研究。  延伸查詢new window
2.現代婦女基金會(2003)。《九十二年推動性侵害案件減少被害人重複陳述作業方案成效評估報告》。  延伸查詢new window
3.現代婦女基金會(2003)。九十二年推動性侵害案件減少被害人重複陳述作業方案成效評估報告。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.杜瑛秋(2004)。婚暴社工員陪同出庭過程的專業角色與功能之探討(碩士論文)。輔仁大學，新北市。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃心怡(2004)。法官對婚姻暴力態度之研究--以北台灣法官為例(碩士論文)。國立臺北大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Buzawa, E. S.、Buzawa, CARL G.(2003)。Domestic Violence: The Criminal Justice Response。Thousand Oaks, CA：Sage。  new window
2.Pence, E. L.(2001)。Advocacy on behalf of battered women。Sourcebook on violence against women。Thousand Oaks, CA：Sage。  new window
3.Ptacek, J.(1999)。Battered women in the court room: The power of judicial responses。Boston: MA:：Northeastern University Press。  new window
4.Hoyle, C.(1998)。Negotiating domestic violence: Police, criminal justice and victims。Oxford：Oxford University Press。  new window
5.Allison, J. A.、Wrightsman, L. S.(1993)。Rape: The misunderstood crime。Newbury Park, CA：Sage Publications。  new window
6.Barker, Robert L.(2003)。The Social Work Dictionary。Washington, D.C.：National Association of Social Workers Press (NASW)。  new window
7.Edwards, S. S. M.(1989)。Policing 'Domestic' Violence: Women, the Law and the State。London：Sage Publications。  new window
8.黃富源(20000000)。警察與女性被害人：警察系統回應的被害者學觀察。臺北：新迪文化有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Walker, L. E.(1979)。The battered women。New York：Harper & Row Publishers。  new window
10.柯麗評、王珮玲、張錦麗(2005)。家庭暴力：理論政策與實務。巨流。  延伸查詢new window
11.姜琴音(2001)。〈熟悉法庭工作模式及調查訪視報告的重點之分享〉。司法社工專業訓練工作坊學員手冊。台北。  延伸查詢new window
12.秦紀樁(2001)。〈熟悉法庭工作模式及調查訪視報告的重點之分享〉。司法社工專業訓練工作坊學員手冊。台北。  延伸查詢new window
13.Buzawa, E. S.,、Buzawa, C. G.(2003)。Domestic violence: The criminal justice response。Thousand Oaks, CA。  new window
14.Campbell, R.,、Martin, P. Y.(2001)。Services for sexual assault surviors: The role of rape crisis centers。Sourcebook on violence against women。Thousand Oaks, CA。  new window
15.Cohen, D.(2001)。Reflections on advocacy。Advocacy for social justice : A global action and reflection guide。Bloomfield, CT。  new window
16.Parker, S. G.(2001)。Establishing victim services within a law enforcement agency: The Austin experience。Washington, DC。  new window
17.姜琴音(2001)。熟悉法庭工作模式及調查訪視報告的重點之分享。法社工專業訓練工作坊學員手冊。台北。  延伸查詢new window
18.秦紀樁(2001)。熟悉法庭工作模式及調查訪視報告的重點之分享。司法社工專業訓練工作坊學員手冊。台北。  延伸查詢new window
19.Campbell, R.、Martin, P. Y.(2001)。Services for sexual assault surviors: The role of rape crisis centers。Sourcebook on violence against women。Thousand Oaks, CA。  new window
20.Cohen, D.(2001)。Reflections on advocacy。Advocacy for social justice : A global action and reflection guide。Bloomfield, CT。  new window
其他
1.內政部(2009)。家庭暴力案件統計，http://dspc.moi.gov.tw/public/Attachment/9299342771.xls， 20090520。  延伸查詢new window
2.苗栗地方法院檢察署(2009)。犯罪被害人保護服務處，http://www.mlc.moj.gov.tw/mp014.html， 20090301。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Cahn, N. R.、Lerman, L. G.(1991)。Prosecuting woman abuse。Woman battering: Policy responses。Cincinnati, OH：Anderson。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：342（臺灣：338，外國：4） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1348743 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67155861
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上