:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:學校評鑑人員認證途徑之研究
書刊名:教育研究與發展期刊
作者:曾淑惠 引用關係
作者(外文):Tseng, Shu-hui
出版日期:2011
卷期:7:3
頁次:頁1-35
主題關鍵詞:學校評鑑評鑑人員認證爭議認證途徑School evaluationEvaluatorApproaches of certification
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:21
  • 點閱點閱:36
本研究旨在探究當前各級學校校務評鑑人員認證的可行途徑。採專家訪談法,以半結構式訪談大綱共計訪談19位教育評鑑關係人,並以分析軟體Atlas.ti 5.2版進行訪談資料分析。其次以問卷調查寄發各級學校教師2525位並回收共1860位對認證途徑各項議題的看法,問卷有效回收率73.3%。研究結果包括八成七的教師贊成需有評鑑人員認證制度,然而對於評鑑人員認證仍有部份不一致的意見值得留意。同時教育評鑑關係人對評鑑人員認證可行途徑的重要意見包括:通過認證的等級、認證制度的設計、參加認證者的資格條件、認證應優先處理的事項、證照的更換、負責認證的業務單位、以及撤銷證照的條件,中等以下與專科以上學校教師的意見間多數並無差異。最後根據研究結果提出四項具體建議以供參考。
The purpose of this study was to explore various approaches to the certification of evaluators of educational institutes. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with nineteen individuals involved in educational evaluation. The content of the interviews was coded by Atlas.ti version 5.2. In accordance with the issues identified in the preliminary stages of the study, questionnaires were distributed among 2525 educators to gather opinions regarding the certification of evaluators of educational institutes. A total of 1860 questionnaires were collected, for an effective return rate of 73.3%. The findings showed that eighty seven percent of educators agreed with the certification of evaluators. The important issues suggested by educators regarding the certification of evaluators included a system for ranking certificates, denomination of the certification process, conditions for the authentication of qualifications, the priority of items, conditions for the replacement of certificates, the establishment of an administration unit, and conditions for the cancellation of certificates. Opinions did not vary among teachers in primary or secondary schools, or among faculty members in colleges or university. Finally, four suggestions were proposed.
期刊論文
1.吳清山(20100300)。落實評鑑委員研習課程 提升評鑑品質與效能。評鑑雙月刊,24,9-14。  延伸查詢new window
2.曾憲政、陳善德(20080500)。評鑑委員培訓是優質評鑑的關鍵。評鑑雙月刊,13,42-44。  延伸查詢new window
3.Smith, M. F.(1999)。Should AEA begin a process for restricting membership in the profession of evaluation。American Journal of Evaluation,20(3),521-531。  new window
4.顏善邦(20100500)。美國HLC機構(校務)評鑑及其評鑑倫理。評鑑雙月刊,25,9-12。  延伸查詢new window
5.Altschuld, J. W.(1999)。The case for a voluntary system for credentialing evaluators。American Journal of Evaluation,20(3),507-517。  new window
6.Worthen, B. R.(1994)。Is evaluation a mature profession that warrants the preparation of evaluation professionals?。New Directions for Program Evaluation,62,3-15。  new window
7.黃嘉莉(20060300)。1990年代後臺灣教師證照制度發展之分析。教育研究與發展期刊,2(1),63-91。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.賴志峰(20020900)。教育評鑑邁向專業化之途徑--評鑑人員證照制度。教育資料與研究,48,100-107。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.曾淑惠、阮淑萍(2010)。加拿大評鑑人員認證制度。評鑑雙月刊,27,42-46。  延伸查詢new window
10.鄺海音(2008)。評鑑中心將建立評鑑委員認證制度。評鑑雙月刊,11,43。  延伸查詢new window
11.宋冠瑩(2006)。建立教育機構評鑑人員專業證照制度。商業職業教育,101,43-47。  延伸查詢new window
12.Altschuld, J. W.(1999)。Certification of evaluators- Highlights for a report submitted to board of directions of the American Evaluation Association。American Journal of Evaluation,20(3),481-493。  new window
13.Bickman, L.(1997)。Education evaluation? Where do we go from here。Evaluation practice,18,1-16。  new window
14.LaVelle, J. M.、Donaldson, S. I.(2010)。University-based evaluation training programs in the United States 1980-2008: An empirical examination。American Journal of Evaluation,31(1),9-23。  new window
會議論文
1.潘慧玲(2004)。邁向下一代的教育機構評鑑:回顧與前瞻。「教育機構評鑑回顧與展望」學術研討會,國立臺灣師範大學教育研究中心 。臺北市:臺灣師範大學教育研究中心。11-23。  延伸查詢new window
2.曾淑惠(2009)。教育評鑑人員認證制度可行做法與相關議題分析。臺北, 臺灣。311-324。  延伸查詢new window
3.Worhten, B. R.(1972)。Certification for educational evaluators: Problems and potential。Chicago, IL.。  new window
4.McDavid, J.、Kuji-Shikatani, K.、Dumaine, F.、Dandurand, Y.(2010)。Credentialing professional evaluators in Canada。the meeting of Feature Panel at 2010 Annual CES Conference。Victoria, BC。  new window
學位論文
1.徐慧嬛(2007)。我國教育機構評鑑人員證照制度建構之研究。臺北市立教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.曾淑惠、張嘉育(2008)。建置職業訓練師師資培訓之研發。桃園。  延伸查詢new window
2.Cleary, H.(1995)。The credentialing of health evaluators: An historical account 1970-1990。New York, NY。  new window
3.盧增緒(1995)。論教育機構評鑑觀念之形成。教育機構評鑑。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.中華工程教育學會認證委員會(2005)。認證執行委員會認證團主席及認證委員選任資格細則,http://www.ieet.org.tw/download/eea/2006/認證委員選任資格細則_2006.pdf, 20081102。  延伸查詢new window
2.行政院勞工委員會中部辦公室(2010)。技術士技能檢定及發證辦法,http://www.labor.gov.tw/management/sitemap_upload_file/G1_378_.pdf, 20101018。  延伸查詢new window
3.考選部(2006)。專門職業及技術人員高等考試法醫師考試規則,http://wwwc.moex.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=12410&ctNode=1368, 20101018。  延伸查詢new window
4.George Washington University(2009)。Certificate in evaluation practice,http://tei.gwu.edu/certificate_in_evaluation_practice.cfm, 20091008。  new window
圖書論文
1.Worthen, B. R.(2003)。How can we call evaluation a profession if we are no qualification for practice?。International handbook of educational evaluation。Kluwer Academic Publishers。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE