臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：美國最高法院與就業上年齡歧視之禁止
書刊名：歐美研究
作者：焦興鎧
作者(外文)：Chiao, Cing-kae
出版日期：2011
卷期：41:3
頁次：頁679-762
主題關鍵詞：就業上年齡歧視；一九六七年就業年齡歧視法；一九六四年民權法第七章；平等就業機會委員會；美國最高法院；Age discrimination in employment；Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967；Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964；Equal Employment Opportunity Commission；United States Supreme Court
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:41
  • 點閱點閱:93
本文之目的，是要對美國自一九六七年起所建構禁止就業上年齡歧視之法制，做一簡要之說明，並對該國聯邦最高法院過去四十多年所做之三十則相關判決，以三個階段為期做一全面之檢視，藉以評析其已解決之爭議，並找出未來仍可努力之空間，以供我國未來在處理相關問題時參考攻錯之用。全文主要內容共分五大部分：第一部分說明一九六七年就業年齡歧視法之制定背景、立法經過、重要條款與嗣後之修正及執行機構等。第二部分探討自聯邦最高法院在一九七六年做出第一則判決後，至一九八五年為止，在十一則判決中所處理之相關爭議。第三部分檢視一九八九年至一九九八年這段期間之另十一則判決。第四部分則是延續前二部分之作法，討論該院自二○○○年至二○○八年所做成之八則判決。第五部分試圖對該院在這些判決中所能發揮之作用，做一綜合性之評析，並提出美國在這方面之經驗可供我國攻錯援引之處。
The purpose of this article is to provide a brief account of the le-gal regime governing the prohibition of age discrimination in em-ployment in the Untied States. It examines in three stages in the de-velopment of that legal regime, taking account of thirty related deci-sions rendered by the U.S. Supreme Court over the past forty years, assessing the controversies resolved and issues as yet unresolved. The paper is divided into five sections. Section One discusses the back-ground information, legislative history, important provisions, subse-quent amendments, and the enforcement mechanism of the Age Dis-crimination in Employment Act (ADEA) of 1967. Section Two exam-ines twelve cases ruled on by the Supreme Court from 1976 to 1985 to discuss the controversies it settled. Section Three evaluates twelve cases from 1989 to 1998. Section Four looks into eight cases rendered by the Court from 2000 to 2008. Section Five makes a general as-sessment of the impact of these decisions on the development of the American legal regime. Finally, the paper evaluates whether the American experience in this field can provide any guidance for Tai-wan given its recent efforts to establish a similar legal system to com-bat age discrimination in employment.
期刊論文
1.焦興鎧(20090400)。論美國推動積極行動方案以消弭就業歧視問題之努力。長庚人文社會學報，2(1)，53-99。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Lacy, D. Aaron(2005)。You Are Not Quite As Old As You Think: Making the Case For Reverse Age Discrimination under The ADEA。Berkeley journal of employment and labor law，26，363。  new window
3.焦興鎧(20090300)。美國就業上性傾向歧視爭議之探討。歐美研究，39(1)，29-77。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.焦興鎧(20061100)。工作場所基因測試在美國所引起之就業歧視爭議。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，35(6)，169-239。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.焦興鎧(20080600)。國際勞動基準之最新發展趨勢--以國際勞工組織之近期努力為例。中華國際法與超國界法評論，4(1)，1-49。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.焦興鎧(20071200)。工作平等國際勞動基準之建構。中華國際法與超國界法評論，3(2)，367-417。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.焦興鎧(20020300)。我國就業歧視評議制度之現況及實施檢討評析。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，31(2)，131-195。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.焦興鎧(2008)。就業上年齡歧視所引起的爭議。勞動關係，1，42-48。  延伸查詢new window
9.Estlund, C.(2002)。The Supreme Court's labor and employment cases of the 2001-2002 term。Labor Lawyer，18(2)，291-335。  new window
10.Abbene, M. L.(1986)。1985-1986 Annual survey of labor relations and employment discrimination law: Federal retirement provision does not establish mandatory retirement age for nonfederal employees: Johnson v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore。Boston College Law Review，28(1)，202-209。  new window
11.Arrington, P. L.(2005)。Not always protected: Reverse age discrimi-nation and the Supreme Court's Decision in General Dynamics Land Systems, Inc. v. Cline。UMKC Law Review，73(3)，543-580。  new window
12.Fairman, C. M.(2002)。Heightened pleading。Texas Law Review，81(2)，551-625。  new window
13.Fairman, C. M.(2003)。The myth of notice pleading。Arizona Law Review，45(4)，987-1065。  new window
14.Fentonmiller, K. R.(1998)。The continuing validity of disparate impact analysis for federalsector age discrimination claims。American University Law Review，47(5)，1071-1129。  new window
15.Finkelstein, M. G.(1989)。Minimum physical standards--Safeguarding the rights of protective service workers under the Age Discrimina-tion in Employment Act。Fordham Law Review，57，1053-1091。  new window
16.Befort, S. F.(2004)。The labor and employment law decisions of the Supreme Court's 2003-04 term。Labor Lawyer，20(2)，177-224。  new window
17.Bellace, J. R.(1993)。The Supreme Court's 1992-1993 term: A review of labor and employment law cases。Labor Lawyer，9(4)，603-628。  new window
18.Bethel, T. A.(1991)。Recent Supreme Court employment law decisions, 1990-91。University of Dayton Law Review，17(1)，33-78。  new window
19.Bethel, T. A.、Lamber, J. C.(1991)。Labor and employment discrimination cases in the Supreme Court 1989 term。University of San Francisco Law Review，25(2)，325-358。  new window
20.Bitter, A. N.(2007)。Smith v. City of Jackson: Solving an age-old problem?。Catholic University Law Review，56，647-682。  new window
21.Gold, M. E.(2004)。Disparate impact under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967。Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labor Law，25(1)，1-86。  new window
22.Brant, J. C.(1998)。Seminole tribe, flores and state employees: Reflec-tions on a new relationship。Employee Rights and Employment Policy，2，175-239。  new window
23.Gottesman, M. H.(1997)。Labor employment and benefit decisions of the Supreme Court's 1995-96 term。Labor Lawyer，12(3)，325- 369。  new window
24.Grant, E.(1996)。A revolutionary view of the seventh amendment and the just compensation clause。Northwestern University Law Review，91(1)，144-241。  new window
25.Brudney, J. J.(2000)。The changing complexion of workplace law: Labor and employment decisions of the Supreme Court's 1999-2000 term。Labor Lawyer，16(2)，151-200。  new window
26.Green, L.(1998)。Mandatory arbitration of statutory employment disputes: A public policy issue in need of a legislative solution。Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy，12(1)，173-226。  new window
27.Gregory, D. L.(2008)。Sprint/United Mgmt. Co. v. Mendelsohn and case-by-case adjudication of “me too” evidence of discrimination。Northwestern University Law Review Colloquy，102，382-386。  new window
28.Gruendel, S. E.(1998)。1995-96 Annual survey of labor and employment law: Rejecting the Requirement that ADEA plaintiffs demonstrate replacement from outside protected class: O'Connor v. Consolidated Coin Caterers Corp。Boston College Law Review，38(2)，381-392。  new window
29.Hans, R. G.(1987)。Waiver under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act: Putting the Fair Labor Standards Act criteria to rest。George Washington Law Review，55(2)，382-408。  new window
30.Calamita, N. J.(1993)。The Older Worker's Benefit Protection Act of 1990: The end of ratification and tender back in ADEA waiver cases。Boston University Law Review，73(4)，639-672。  new window
31.Champion, W. T. Jr.(1984)。The age/experience dilemma and the ADEA。Thurgood Marshall Law Review，9(1/2)，51-64。  new window
32.Charland, J. E.(1988)。Willfulness, good faith, and the quagmire of liquidated damages under the Age Discrimination in Employ-ment Act。Journal of Corporation Law，13(2)，573-619。  new window
33.Harkins, C. J.(1986)。Civil rights--Age discrimination: Employers may not extend to their employee's employment privileges which are denied to any employees on the basis of age。Journal of Air Law and Commerce，51(3)，705-734。  new window
34.Harris, D. G.(1997)。Employment law: O'Connor v. Consolidated Coin Caterers Corp.--Eliminating the replacement outside the protected class element in ADEA hiring and replacement cases。Oklahoma Law Review，50(2)，283-301。  new window
35.Johnson, J. J.(2009)。Reasonable factor other than age: The emerging spector of ageist stereotypes。Seattle University Law Review，33(1)，49-91。  new window
36.Howard, W. M.(1994)。Artibrating employment discrimination claims: Do you really have to? Do you really want to?。Drake Law Review，43(2)，255-290。  new window
37.Henkel, J. W.(1997)。The Age Discrimination in Employment Act: Disparate impact analysis and the availability of liquidated damages after Hazen Paper Co. v. Biggins。Syracuse Law Review，47(4)，1183-1228。  new window
38.Henkel, J. W.(2000)。Waiver of claims under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act after Oubre v. Entergy Operations, Inc.。Wake Forest Law Review，35(2)，395-424。  new window
39.Huska, J.(2005)。The death of reverse discrimination as a possible cause of action under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act: General Dynamic Land Systems v. Cline。Duquesne Business Law Journal，7，191-205。  new window
40.Comment.(1979)。O'Neil v. Baine: Application of middle-level scrutiny to old-age classifications。University of Pennsylvania Law Review，127(3)，798-816。  new window
41.Cunicelli, L. M.(1992)。Gregory v. Ashcroft: Setting the stage to over-rule Garcia in the context of mandatory retirement of state judges。Widener Journal Public Law，2(1)，139-197。  new window
42.DiSante, M. D.(1987)。Age Discrimination in Employment Act--Judicial interpretation of the bona fide occupational qualification ex-emption。Journal of Air Law and Commerce，52，773-795。  new window
43.Duston, R. L.(1991)。Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.: A major step forward for alternative dispute resolution, or a meaningless decision。Labor Lawyer，7(4)，823-848。  new window
44.Ennis, R. L.(2005)。General Dynamics Land Systems, Inc. v. Cline: Shrinking the realm of possibility for reverse age discrimination suits。University of Richmond Law Review，39(2)，753-769。  new window
45.Kuhl, A. F.(1986)。Remedies under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act。Labor Lawyer，2(2)，229-250。  new window
46.Norton, G. P.(1987)。EEOC's rights to a jury trial and liquidated damages in actions under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act: A dissenting view。Labor Lawyer，3(4)，819-851。  new window
47.Jordan, M. R.(1998)。Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA)--Older Workers Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA)--Ratification--Tender Back--The Supreme Court of the United States held that an employee's ADEA claim is not barred when a waiver thereof does not comply with the sp。Duquesne Law Review，37(1)，157-172。  new window
48.Laaveg, T.(2001)。Constitutional Law--State sovereign immunity。North Dakota Law Review，77(3)，491-524。  new window
49.Rubenstein, M. H.(2008)。The significance of Sprint--United Management Company v. Mendelsohn: A reply to Professors Gregory and Secunda。Northwestern University Law Review Colloquy，102，387-390。  new window
50.Ruddock, D. L.(1992)。Gregory v. Ashcroft: The plain statement rule and judicial supervision of State-Federal relations。North Carolina Law Review，70(5)，1563-1591。  new window
51.Palumbo, V. D.(1984)。National League of Cities v. Usery to EEOC v. Wyoming: Evolution of a balancing approach to tenth amendment analysis。Duke Law Journal，3，601-620。  new window
52.Landers, S. M.(1992)。1990-91 Annual survey of labor and employment law: Clarifying the Timing Requirements for Federal Employees' Age Discrimination Claims: Stevens v. Department of the Treasury。Boston College Law Review，33(2)，396-410。  new window
53.Moberly, M. D.(1994)。Reconsidering the discriminatory motive requirement in ADEA disparate treatment cases。New Mexico Law Review，24(1)，89-124。  new window
54.Niles, D. A.(1992)。The Older Workers Benefit Protection Act: Painting age-discrimination law with a watery brush。Buffalo Law Review，40(3)，869-915。  new window
55.Peterson, P. G.(1996)。Will America grow up before it grows old?。The Atlantic Monthly，277(5)，55-86。  new window
56.Pomfret, M. D.(1991)。All Betts are off: How employers should view the Older Workers' Benefit Protection Act。Journal of Legislation，18(1)，87-104。  new window
57.Pontz, E. H.(1995)。What a difference ADEA makes: Why disparate impact theory should not apply to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act。North Carolina Law Review，74(1)，267-323。  new window
58.Krop, P. S.(1982)。Age discrimination and the disparate impact doctrine。Stanford Law Review，34(4)，837-855。  new window
59.LaPointe, M. K.、Fogarty, J. G. Jr.(2004)。A “means to an end”: The Cline Court's pragmatic refusal to allow reverse discrimination under the ADEA。Labor Law Journal，52(2)，85-98。  new window
60.(2000)。Leading cases--Constitutional law--Constitutional structure--State sovereign immunity--Congress's power to enact enforcement legislation under section 5 of the fourteenth amendment。Harvard Law Review，114，179-189。  new window
61.Stewart, M. A. H.(1994)。1992-93 Annual survey of labor and employment law: Status of Paid Union-Organizers as “Employees” under the National Labor Relations Act: Sunland Construction Co. and Town & Country Electric。Boston College Law Review，35(2)，524-532。  new window
62.(1995)。Leading cases--Internal revenue code--Inclusion of damages under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act。Harvard Law Review，109，319-329。  new window
63.Livingston, B. D.(1992)。Gregory v. Ashcroft: The Supreme Court announces a new rule of statutory construction in deference to constitutionally recognized principles of federalism。Saint Louis University Public Law Review，11(1)，243-262。  new window
64.Ryman, B. L.(2003)。Lame duck precedent: A comment on the summary judgment framework for disparate treatment cases after Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.。University of Cincinnati Law Review，71(2)，669-693。  new window
65.Sandifer, T. M.(1996)。No exclusion for ADEA claims under I.R.C. § 104 (a) (e): An analysis of Commissioner v. Schleier。Mercer Law Review，47(2)，637-644。  new window
66.Saunders, J.(1996)。Age discrimination: Disparate impact under the ADEA after Hazen Paper Co. v. Biggins: Arguments in favor。University of Detroit Mercy Law Review，73(3)，591-611。  new window
67.Schaub, K.(1998)。The “substantially younger” requirement in O'Connor v. Consolidated Coin Caterers Corp.: Will ADEA plaintiffs lose again?。Hofstra Labor & Employment Law Journal，16(1)，225-257。  new window
68.Sweeney, B.(1996)。“Downsizing”the Age Discrimination in Employment Act: The availability of disparate impact liability。Villanova Law Review，41(5)，1527-1577。  new window
69.Schmidt, J. G. Jr.(1993)。The tenth amendment: A “new” limitation on congressional commerce power。Rutgers Law Review，45(2)，417-474。  new window
70.Schooler, L. M.(2009)。Labor and employment law update。Texas Tech Law Review，41(3)，1097-1140。  new window
71.Schott, M. J.(1986)。Civil rights--A company's policy requiring the retirement of certain employees under the age of seventy for reasons allegedly attributable to public safety must satisfy the two-prong test established in Tamiami before it can qualify as a bona fide occupat。Drake Law Review，36(1)，213-235。  new window
72.Luce, G. O.(2004)。Why disparate impact claims should not be allowed under the federal employment provisions of the ADEA。Northwestern University Law Review，99(1)，437-494。  new window
73.Marion, J. H.(1986)。Legal and equitable remedies under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act。Maryland Law Review，45(2)，298-351。  new window
74.McFadden, T. S.(2000)。The new age of the eleventh amendment: A survey of the Supreme Court's eleventh amendment jurisprudence and a review of Kimel v. Florida Board of Regents。Journal of College and University Law，27，519-564。  new window
75.Mitchell, P. A.(1993)。Hazen Paper Co. v. Biggins: Extending the disparate impact doctrine to ADEA claims。Gonzaga Law Review，29(3)，675-697。  new window
76.Preheim, E. J.(1995)。Discrimination, deceit, and legal decoys: The diversion of after-acquired evidence and the focus restored by Mckennon v. Nashville Banner Publishing Company。Indiana Law Journal，71(1)，235-269。  new window
77.Querry, T. J.(1996)。A rose by any other name no longer smells as sweet: Disparate treatment discrimination and the age proxy doctrine after Hazen Paper Co. v. Biggins。Cornell Law Review，81(2)，530-581。  new window
78.Radetic, E. P.(1992)。Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corporation: The Supreme Court endorses mandatory arbitration of ADEA claims。Saint Louis University Law Journal，36(3)，741-768。  new window
79.Roseman, E.(2006)。A phoenix from the ashes? Heightened pleading requirements in disparate impact cases。Seton Hall Law Review，36(3)，1043-1073。  new window
80.Rubenstein, M. H.(2008)。Sprint/United Mgmt. Co. v. Mendelsohn: The Supreme Court appears to have punted on the admissibly of “me too” evidence of discrimination. But did it?。Northwestern University Law Review Colloquy，102，264-275。  new window
81.Thelen, T. A.(1985)。Liquidated damages and statute of limitations under the “willful” Standards of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Age Discrimination in Employment Act: Repercussions of Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Thurston。Washburn Law Journal，24(3)，516-545。  new window
82.Thompson, C. F. Jr.(2001)。Juries will decide more discrimination cases: An examination of Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.。Vermont Law Review，26(1)，1-42。  new window
83.Surprise, C.(1990)。Civil procedures--Authority of federal district authority notice to potential plaintiffs in ADEA actions--Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. Sperling, 110 S. Ct. 484 (1989)。Suffolk University Law Review，24(1)，205-212。  new window
84.Tompkins, D. E.(1996)。The taxation of ADEA settlements and the lack of personal injury in age discrimination claims: Commissioner v. Schleier。Missouri Law Review，61(2)，507-521。  new window
85.Turek, D. J.(2001)。Affirming ambiguity: Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. and the burden-shifting framework of disparate treatment cases。Marquette Law Review，85(1)，283-316。  new window
86.Turner, R.(1989)。Release and waiver of Age Discrimination in Employment Act rights and claims。Labor Lawyer，5(4)，739-786。  new window
87.Urban, C. R.(1990)。Section 4 (f) (2) of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act: No justification for cost justification? Public Employees Retirement System v. Betts。Indiana Law Review，24(1)，161-196。  new window
88.Secunda, P. M.(2008)。The many Mendelsohn “me too” missteps: An alliterative response to Professor Rubinstein。Northwestern University Law Review Colloquy，102，374-381。  new window
89.Shanor, C. A.(2008)。Employment case from the 2007-2008 Supreme Court term。Labor Lawyer，24(2)，147-173。  new window
90.Shanor, C. A.、Marcosson, S. A.(1990)。Battleground for a divided court: Employment discrimination in the Supreme Court, 1988-89。Labor Lawyer，6(1)，1988-89。  new window
91.Silverstein, E.(2001)。From statute to contract: The law of employ-ment relationship reconsidered。Hofstra Labor & Employment Law Journal，18(2)，479-527。  new window
92.Spero, D. J.(2005)。Smith v. City of Jackson: Does it really open new opportunities for ADEA plaintiffs to recover under a disparate impact theory?。University of Memphis Law Review，36(1)，183-216。  new window
93.Steiner, J. R.(1995)。Age classifications and the fourteenth amendment: Is the Murgia standard too old to stand?。Seton Hall Constitutional Law Journal，6(1)，263-294。  new window
94.Sturgeon, J.(2007)。Smith v. City of Jackson: Setting an unreasonable standard。Duke Law Journal，56(5)，1377-1402。  new window
95.Strickler, G. M. Jr.(1990)。Martin v. Wilks。Tulane Law Review，64(6)，1557-1607。  new window
96.Suane,V. J. Jr.(2006)。Age and race: The court's search for equality through the ADEA: Smith v. City of Jackson, Miss., 544 U.S. 228, 125 S. Ct. 1536 (2005)。Southern University Law Review，33(2)，399-419。  new window
97.Sullivan, G.、Kaikati, J.、Virgo, J.、Carr, T. R.、Virgo, K.(1998)。Supreme Court resolves major age discrimination controversy: Ratification and tender back impermissible under OWBPA。Labor Law Journal，49(3)，879-887。  new window
98.Watson, C. E.(1991)。The pension game: Age- and gender-based inequities in the retirement system。Labor Lawyer，7(1)，159-220。  new window
99.Welch, B. M.(1990)。Mandatory retirement of appointed state judges: Balancing state and federal interests。Valparaiso University Law Review，25(1)，125-155。  new window
100.Whitford, C. L.(1995)。While the United States Supreme Court waves goodbye to the after-acquired evidence doctrine, it may allow the employer to held a card up its sleeve in McKennon v. Nashville Banner Publishing Co., 115 S Ct. 879 (1995)。Nebraska Law Review，72(2)，374-409。  new window
101.Willbrand, D. J.(1996)。Better late than never? The function and rule of after-acquired evidence in employment discrimination litigation。University of Cincinnati Law Review，64(2)，617-703。  new window
102.Wortche, A. A.(1986)。Defining willfulness under the ADEA: Trans World Airlines v. Thurston, 105 S. Ct. 613 (1995)。Marquette Law Review，69(3)，451-461。  new window
圖書
1.Lindemann, Barbara、Grossman, Paul(1996)。Employment Discrimination Law。Washington, DC：Bureau of National Affairs。  new window
2.Ross, Susan D.、Pineler, Isabelle K.、Ellis, Deborah A.、Moss, Kary L.(1993)。The Rights of Women, The Basic ACLU Guide to Women's Rights。The Rights of Women, The Basic ACLU Guide to Women's Rights。Carbondale, IL：Southern Illinois University Press。  new window
3.International Labour Office(2007)。Equality at work, tackling the challenges。Geneva, Switzerland。  new window
4.Gregory, R. F.(2001)。Age discrimination in the American workplace。New Brunswick, NJ。  new window
5.Lindemann, B.、Kadue, D. D.(2003)。Age discrimination in employment law。Washington, DC。  new window
6.Twomey, D. P.(2010)。Labor & employment law。Cincinnati, OH。  new window
7.U.S. Department of Commerce(1996)。Statistical abstract of the United States 1996。Washington, DC。  new window
8.U.S. Department of Labor(1965)。The older American workers--Age discrimination in employment, report of the secretary of labor to congress under § 715 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964。Washington, DC。  new window
9.焦興鎧(1995)。美國聯邦最高法院與就業歧視問題。勞工法與勞工權利之保障--美國勞工法論文集(一)。台北。  延伸查詢new window
10.焦興鎧(1997)。懷孕歧視在美國之最新發展趨勢。勞工法與勞工權利之保障--美國勞工法論文集(二)。台北。  延伸查詢new window
11.焦興鎧(1997)。美國兩性工作平等制度之研究。勞工法制之最新發展趨勢--美國勞工法論文集(二)。台北。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Chiao, C. K.(2008)。Employment discrimination in Taiwan。New development in employment discrimination law。New York。  new window
13.Friedman, L. M.(2003)。Age discrimination law: Some remarks on the American experience。Age as an equality issue。Portland, OR。  new window
其他
1.Keselenko, J. A.(2008)。The impact of 2008 Supreme Court employment cases: A subtle and sometimes surprising year for employment decision (ASPATORE, 2008 WL 5689284)，http://international.westlaw.com/print/printstream.， 20101020。  new window
2.Schrader, W. A.(2008)。The impact of 2008 Supreme Court employment law cases: A look at 2008 and beyond (ASPATORE, 2008 WL 5689283)，http://international.westlaw.com/result/default.wl?cfid=1&mt=LawSchool&origin=。  new window
3.U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission(2010)。Age Discrimination in Employment Act (includes concurrent charges with title VII, ADA and EPA) FY1997-FY 2010，http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/statistics/enforcement/adea.cfm， 20101020。  new window
圖書論文
1.焦興鎧(2000)。美國平等就業機會委員會機能之研究。勞工法論叢。台北：元照出版公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.焦興鎧(2007)。美國最高法院與身心障礙者就業歧視爭議之解決：2002年庭期三則判決之評析。美國最高法院重要判決之研究：2002-2003。臺北：中央研究院歐美研究所。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：399（臺灣：393，外國：6） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1641614 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67442350
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上