臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：網路潛水者的公民參與實踐之探索：以「野草莓運動」為例
書刊名：新聞學研究
作者：李明穎 引用關係
作者(外文)：Lee, Ming-ying
出版日期：2012
卷期：112
頁次：頁77-116
主題關鍵詞：公民參與；社會運動；野草莓運動；網路；潛水者；Civic participation；Internet；Lurkers；Social movements；Wild strawberry movement
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(11) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:11
  • 共同引用共同引用:135
  • 點閱點閱:141
網路是社會運動行動者的資源動員的新利器，但參與落差會限制網路社會運動的潛能。本研究從網路潛水者的角度切入，以「野草莓運動」為個案，藉由深度訪談與次級資料分析，勾勒出潛水者參與社會運動的樣貌，思索其實踐公民參與的潛能或限制。本研究發現，社會運動行動者誇大了網路工具理性，而忽略潛水者對運動的疏離感。潛水者拒絕被歸屬於特定族群，更不想因為現身而被標籤化，伴隨網路技術而來的失望，深化他們對運動的他者心態。
The Internet is a new tool for resource mobilization for social activists. However, digital divide may restrict the power of social movements on the Internet. The aim of this study is to map the participation of lurkers in social movements and analyze the potentials and restrictions of their civic participation by using the “Wild Strawberries Movement” in 2008, which opened a new leaf of social movement in Taiwan, as a case study. Through secondary data analysis and in-depth interviews, this study argues that the social activists exaggerated the instrument reasons of the Internet. However, the apathy of lurkers toward social movements was neglected. Internet technology did not liberate the lurkers’ cognition. Solidarity between activists and lurkers was also split. The lurkers thus refused to belong to any specific group with consensus. Moreover, they had no intention of physically participating in organized protests. They were afraid of being labeled, which affected their willingness to participate. After being disappointed, the lurkers’ sensation of “others” was reinforced.
期刊論文
1.Jennings. M. K.、Zeitner. V(2003)。Internet use and civic engagement: A longitudinal analysis。Public Opinion Quarterly，67，331-334。  new window
2.Freeman, Jo(1973)。The Origins of the Women's Liberation Movement。American Journal of Sociology，78，792-811。  new window
3.蔡鴻濱(20060700)。網路社會運動之語藝分析：以苦勞網中「香港反WTO」事件為例。傳播與管理研究，6(1)，1-48。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Burnett, G.(2000)。Information exchange in virtual communities: a typology。Information Research，5(4)。  new window
5.林鶴玲、鄭陸霖(20010600)。臺灣社會運動網路經驗：一個探索性的分析。臺灣社會學刊，25，111-156。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Shah, D. V.、McLeod, J. M.、Yoon, S.(2001)。Communication, context and community: An exploration of print, broadcast, and Internet influences。Communication Research，28(4)，464-506。  new window
7.Rogers, Everett M.(2001)。The Digital Divide。Convergence，7(4)，96-111。  new window
8.von Krogh, G.、Spaeth, S.、Lakhani, K. R.(2003)。Community, joining, and specialization in open source software innovation: a case study。Research Policy，32(7)，1217-1241。  new window
9.Correll, Shelley(1995)。The Ethnography of an Electronic Bar: The Lesbian Café。Journal of Contemporary Ethnography，24(3)，270-298。  new window
10.Lindlof, Thomas R.、Shatzer, Milton J.(1998)。Media Ethnography in Virtual Space: Strategies, Limits, and Possibilities。Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media，42(2)，170-189。  new window
11.Benford, Robert D.、Snow, David A.(2000)。Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment。Annual Review of Sociology，26(1)，611-639。  new window
12.張卿卿(20060100)。網路的功與過：網路使用與政治參與及社會資產關係的探討。新聞學研究，86，45-90。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Muller, E. N.、Opp, K-D.(1986)。Rational choice and rebellious action。American Political Science Reviewm，80，471-488。  new window
14.Myers, D. J.(1994)。Communication technology and social movement: contributions of computer networks to activism。Social Science Computer Review，12(2)，256-260。  new window
15.Oliver, P.(1984)。If you don't do it, nobody else will: Active and token contribution to local collective action。American Sociological Review，49，601-610。  new window
16.Preece, J.、Nonnecke, B.、Andrews, D.(2004)。The tope five reasons for lurking: Improving community experiences for everyone。Computers in Human Behavior，20，201-223。  new window
17.何東洪(2009)。我的台北「野草莓」雜記。思想，11，119-132。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.李郁薇、陳斐卿、江火明(2006)。社群觀點的網路潛水現象：認同與協商的構程。全球華人計算機教育應用學報，4(1)，1-9。  延伸查詢new window
19.許容顏(2009)。開放社運的想像。思想，12，295-302。  延伸查詢new window
20.謝昇佑(2009)。偶然還是必然？野草莓學運的結構限制與機運。思想，12，281-302。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.Delli Carpini, M.(2000)。Gen.com: Youth, civic engagement, and the new information environment。Journal of Communication，17，341-349。  new window
22.Diani, M.(2000)。Social movement networks virtual and real. Information。Communication and Society，5(3)，386-401。  new window
會議論文
1.Zhang, W.、Storck, J.(2001)。Peripheral Members in Online Communities。Boston, MA。  new window
2.李明穎(2008)。網路潛水之民主意涵探討。新竹。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.李郁薇(2005)。網路學習社群中的潛水現象：一種被忽略的充分參與(碩士論文)。國立中央大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.Nonnecke, B.(2000)。Lurking in Email-based Discussion Lists(博士論文)。South Bank University，London。  new window
圖書
1.Grossman, Lawrence K.(1995)。The electronic republic: Reshaping democracy in the information age。Viking Penguin。  new window
2.Hirschman, A. O.(1982)。Shifting Involvements: Private Interest and Public Action。Oxford：Basil Blackwell。  new window
3.Melucci, Alberto(1996)。Challenging Codes: Collective Actions in the Information Age。Cambridge University Press。  new window
4.Turner, Ralph H.、Killian, Lewis M.(1987)。Collective Behavior。Englewood Cliffs, NJ：Prentice-Hall College。  new window
5.Kling, R.(1996)。Computerization and controversy: value conflicts and social choices。San Diego, CA：Morgan Kaufmann Publishers。  new window
6.Warkentin, C.(2001)。Reshaping World Politics: NGOs, the Internet, and Global Civil Society。Lanham, MD：Rowman ＆ Littlefield。  new window
7.Budge, Ian(1996)。The New Challenge of Direct Democracy。Cambridge, UK：Cambridge University Press。  new window
8.Smith, Marc A.、Kollock, Peter(1999)。Communities in cyber-space。London：Routledge。  new window
9.Epstein, Barbara(1991)。Political Protest and Cultural Revolution: Nonviolent Direct Action in the 1970s and 1980s。University of California Press。  new window
10.Downing, J. D. H.、Ford, T. V.、Gil, G.、Stein, L.(2001)。Radical Media: Rebellious communication and social movements。Thousand Oaks, California：Sage。  new window
11.Olson, Mancur(1965)。The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups。New York：Mcgraw-Hill College。  new window
12.Castells, Manuel(1997)。The Power of Identity。Blackwell。  new window
13.Della Porta, Donatella、Diani, Mario(1999)。Social Movements: An Introduction。Oxford：Blackwell。  new window
14.蕭新煌、顧忠華(2010)。臺灣社會運動再出發。巨流。  延伸查詢new window
15.何明修(2005)。社會運動概論。臺北：三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
16.McAdam, Doug(1982)。Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930-1970。University of Chicago Press。  new window
17.吳筱玫(20030000)。網路傳播概論。臺北：智勝文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.Verba, Sidney、Schlozman, Kay Lehman、Brady, Henry E.(1995)。Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics。Harvard University Press。  new window
19.Norris, Pippa、Bennett, W. L.、Entman, R. M.(2001)。Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide。Cambridge University Press。  new window
20.Putnam, Robert D.(2000)。Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community。Simon & Schuster。  new window
21.Norris, Pippa(2002)。Democratic Phoenix: Reinventing Political Activism。Cambridge University Press。  new window
22.Nip, J. Y. M.(2004)。The queer sisters and its electronic bulletin board: A study of the Internet for social movement mobilization。Cyberprotest: New, media, citizens and social movements。London, UK：Routledge。  new window
23.Nonnecke, B.、Preece, J.(2001)。Why lurhers lurk Paper presented at the Americas Conference on Information Systems。Boston, MA。  new window
24.Passey, F.(2003)。Social networks matter. But how?。Social movements and networks: Relational approaches to collective action \\ Diani, M. ; McAdam, D. (Eds.)。Oxford, UK。  new window
25.Friedman, D.、McAdam, D.(1992)。Collective identity and Activism: Networks, choice and the life of a social movement。Frontiers in Social Movement Theory \\ Morris, A. D. ; Muller, C. M. (Eds.)。New Heaven, CT。  new window
26.Kollock, P.、Smith, M.(1996)。Managing the virtual commons: Cooperation and conflict in computer communities。Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social, and cross-cultural perspectives \\ Herring, S. (Ed.)。Amsterdam, N1。  new window
27.McAdam, D.、Paulsen, R.(1997)。Specifying the relationship between social ties and activism。Social movements: Reading on their emergence, mobilization, and dynamics \\ McAdam, D. ; Snow, D. A. (Eds.)。Los Angeles, CA。  new window
28.McLeod, D. M.、Hertog, J. K.(1999)。Social control and the mass media's role in the regulation of protest groups: The communicative acts perspective。Mass media, social control and social change \\ Demers, D. ; Viswanath, K. (Eds.)。Ames, IA。  new window
29.Mele, C.(1999)。Cyberspace disadvantages communities: The Internet as a tool for collective action。Communities in cyberspace \\ Smith, M. A. ; Kolloclcs, P. (Eds.)。London, UK。  new window
30.Melucci, A.(1995)。The process of collective identity。Social movement and culture \\ Johnston, H. ; Klandermans, B. (Eds.)。Minneapolis, MN。  new window
31.Salter, L.(2003)。Democracy, new social movement, and the Internet: A Habermasian analysis。Cyberactivism: online activism in theory and practice \\ McCaughey, M. ; Ayers, M. D. (Eds.)。London, UK。  new window
32.van de Donk, W.、Loader, B. D.、Nixon, P. G.、Rucht, D. Eds..(2004)。Cyberprotest: New media, citizens and social movements。London, UK。  new window
其他
1.Smith, M.(1992)。Voices from the WELL: The Logic of the Virtual Commons，http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/soc/csoc/paoers/voices/Voices.htm.， 2013/01/10。  new window
2.Nieleson, J.(2006)。Participation inequality: Encouraging more users to contribute。  new window
3.中央社(2008)。野草莓靜坐一個月 明起漸退場。  延伸查詢new window
4.江偉華(2011)。廣場。  延伸查詢new window
5.周祝瑛(2008)。向奮起的宅男宅女致敬。  延伸查詢new window
6.陳順孝(2008)。網路作爲社會運動基礎建設：以野草莓運動為例，台北。  延伸查詢new window
7.徐佩君，陳怡靜(2008)。「集遊法」改報備 野草莓決撤離。  延伸查詢new window
8.曾巧儀(2008)。當科技的工具力量被過度詮釋。  延伸查詢new window
9.黃哲斌，何榮幸，高有智，郭石城(2008)。按Enter我抗議網路社運我來了。  延伸查詢new window
10.孫窮理(2008)。自由廣場再集結學生決議不申請集會遊行。  延伸查詢new window
11.楊宗興(2011)。紀錄片《廣場》重現野草莓學運。  延伸查詢new window
12.陶儀芬(2008)。珍惜學運民主資產。  延伸查詢new window
13.Katz, J.(1998)。Luring the lurkers，http://slashdot.org/features/98/12/28/1745252.shtml， 2009/06/14。  new window
14.Spaeth, S.，Haefliger, S.，von Krogh, G.，Renzl, B.(2008)。Communal resources in open source software development。  new window
圖書論文
1.吳國光(2003)。資訊傳播、公共空間與集體行動：試論互聯網對中國民主化的政治作用。兩岸社會運動分析。臺北市：新自然主義。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.范雲(20030000)。連結運動者與變動的政治機會結構 : 八○年代到九○年代台灣民主轉型過程中社會運動參與者的個案研究。兩岸社會運動分析。臺北：新自然主義。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：677（臺灣：664，外國：13） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1520404 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67329458
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上