:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣國家愛滋教育之國族身體形構與情感政治:以世界愛滋病日為線索
書刊名:文化研究
作者:黃道明 引用關係陳柏旭
作者(外文):Huang, Hans Tao-mingChen, Po-his
出版日期:2013
卷期:15
頁次:頁9-42
主題關鍵詞:愛滋國家教育性熱帶導向身體情感AIDSNational pedagogySexual tropicsOrientationBodyEmotions
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:166
  • 點閱點閱:487
本文以1990年代以降世界愛滋病日的官方民間宣導活動為場域,審視了台灣的國家愛滋教育論述,企圖分析其所形構的國族身體與時空,並探究其中的情感政治。在後解嚴時期的地緣政治脈絡裡,我標誌了國家愛滋教育的正規「性導向」,顯示愛滋防治教育在將國族身體導向單偶伴侶的理想的同時,也同時導引此正規身體遠離布滿病體的危險「性熱帶區」。我進一步顯示,全球在地化的物件諸如愛滋被單和愛滋水燈,是如何被在國家愛滋教育裡被大幅地傷感濫情化,而當關懷愛滋的紅絲帶形變為象徵接納感染者的人性圈圈時,我則揭示這個愛的氛圍其實是一個當下台灣政體威權性管制下的憂鬱狀態產物。最後,本文提出了一個關於感染者哀悼的記憶政治,來詰問這樣一個將感染者軀體與愛滋歷史性排除於未來的國族想像。
By way of looking at some key moments of the World AIDS Day campaigns conducted by the government and NGOs since the 1990s, this essay maps out the terrain of Taiwan’s national AIDS pedagogy, attempting to examine the production of the national body, time-space, and the politics of emotion therein. Situating the official AIDS policy within the context of the post-martial law geopolitics, I mark out the ‘sexual orientation’ of national AIDS pedagogy as one that orientates the national body towards the monogamous ideal while steering it away from the diseased sexual tropics. Further, I look into the affective directive of such orientation organised under the rhetoric of love by showing how glocalised objects such as the quilt and the waterlily lantern come to be massively sentimentalised. With the Red Ribbon morphed into the circle of humanity that claims, as a gesture of social inclusion, to safeguard people living With AIDS/HIV, I elucidate how this affective climate of compassion is nothing but a product of a melancholic state that fosters intense sexual moralism. Finally, this essay offers a politics of mourning and remembrance as enacted by people living with HIV/AIDS themselves, in order to contest the national imagination that forecloses the historicity of the AIDS body from its futurity.
期刊論文
1.行政院衛生署(1991)。別以為下一個不會是你!。衛生報導,2(1),8。  延伸查詢new window
2.周曉白(2004)。起訴轟趴同志只為殺雞儆猴?。權雜誌,15,4-5。  延伸查詢new window
3.林宜慧(2004)。同志Home Party事件追蹤報導。權雜誌,16,24-28。  延伸查詢new window
4.Ahmed, Sara(2006)。Orientation: Toward a Queer Phenomenology。GLQ,12(4),543-574。  new window
5.Corber, Robert J.(2003)。Nationalising the Gay Body: AIDS and the Sentimental Pedagogy in Philadelphia。American Literary History,15(1),107-133。  new window
6.Irvine, Janice M.(2007)。Transient Feelings: Sex Panics and Politics of Emotion。GLQ,14(1),1-40。  new window
7.Khanna, Ranjana(2008)。Indignity。Positions: east asia cultures critique,16(1),39-77。  new window
8.Mcdowell, Linda(2009)。Book Review: Sara Ahmed, Queer Phenomenology: Orientations, Objects, Others。Sexualities,12(3),405-406。  new window
9.丁乃非(1995)。是防治條例,還是罪犯懲罰條例?。婦女新知,163,2-3。  延伸查詢new window
10.Ding, Naifei(2010)。Imagined Concubinage。Positions: east asia cultures critique,18(2),321-349。  new window
11.Ding, Naifei(2007)。Wife-in-Monogamy and 'the Exaltation of Concubines'。Interventions: International Journal of Postcolonial Studies,9(2),219-237。  new window
12.何春蕤(20050900)。從反對人口販賣到全面社會規訓:臺灣兒少NGO的牧世大業。臺灣社會研究,59,1-42。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.Chang, Jerry Yung-Ching(2010)。Affective Ruptures, Queer (Op) positionalities: Sex and Intimacy in Contemporary Taiwanese Literary Representations on Ecstasy(碩士論文)。National Central University。  new window
2.Hung, Chiming Leonard(2007)。Gay Rave Culture and HIV Prevention: A Subcultural Intervention in Public Policy(碩士論文)。National Central University。  new window
圖書
1.行政院衛生署(1993)。愛滋病與性傳染疾病的防治與認識。台北:行政院衛生署。  延伸查詢new window
2.晏涵文(2003)。對抗愛滋,從你我做起:愛滋防治教育手冊。台北:杏陵醫學基金會。  延伸查詢new window
3.喀飛(2009)。糾葛愛滋污名的男同志轟趴風潮。酷兒新聲。中壢:中央大學性別研究室。  延伸查詢new window
4.廖娟秀(1995)。愛之生死:韓森的愛滋歲月。台北:大村文化出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.Ahmed, Sara(2006)。Queer Phenomenology: Orientations, Objects, Others。Durham, NC:Duke University Press。  new window
6.Dean, Tim(2009)。Unlimited Intimacies。Chicago:University of Chicago Press。  new window
7.Haver, William(1996)。The Body of This Death: Historicity and Sociality in the Time of AIDS。Stanford, CA:Stanford University Press。  new window
8.黃道明(2011)。Queer Politics and Sexual Modernity in Taiwan。Hong Kong:University of Hong Kong Press。  new window
9.Patton, Cindy(1995)。Performativity and Spatial Distinction: the End of AIDS Epidemiology。Performativity and Performance。New York:Routledge。  new window
10.Patton, Cindy(2002)。Globalising AIDS。Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press。  new window
11.Shilt, Randy(1988)。And the Band Plays On: People, Politics and the AIDS Epidemic。New York:Viking。  new window
12.Sturken, Marita(1997)。Tangled Memories: The Vietnam War, the AIDS Epidemic, and the Politics of Remembering。University of California Press。  new window
13.Yingling, Thomas E.(1997)。AIDS and the National Body。Durham:Duke University Press。  new window
14.Crimp, Douglas(2002)。Melancholia and Moralism: Essays on AIDS and Queer Politics。Cambridge, MA:The MIT Press。  new window
15.Watney, Simon(1997)。Policing Desire: Pornography, AIDS and the Media。Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press。  new window
16.Ahmed, Sara(2004)。The Cultural Politics of Emotion。Routledge。  new window
17.Edelman, Lee(2004)。No Future: Queer Theory and the Death Drive。Durham:Duke University Press。  new window
18.Agamben, Giorgio、Heller-Roazen, Daniel(1998)。Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life。Stanford, Calif:Stanford University Press。  new window
19.Patton, Cindy(1996)。Fatal Advice: How Safe Sex Education Went Wrong。Durham, NC:Duke University Press。  new window
20.陳光興(20060000)。去帝國:亞洲作為方法。臺北:行人出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.溫貴香(19961201)。放水燈祈福,愛滋病有淚漣漣。  延伸查詢new window
2.行政院衛生署(19941205)。家中有愛,愛滋不在:想想親愛的家人,遠離愛滋陷阱。  延伸查詢new window
3.白錫鑑(20091024)。兒轟趴染愛滋 母追出帶頭「惡魔」。  延伸查詢new window
4.宋豪麟,黃雅詩(20031208)。呂秀蓮:愛滋是天譴⋯中共不負責。  延伸查詢new window
5.李樹人(20041201)。曝光太沉重?農安街轟趴同志自殺。  延伸查詢new window
6.呂秉原(19961130)。愛滋被單心情 I:愛的學習過程。  延伸查詢new window
7.張博雅(19911105)。對抗愛滋:告全國公開信。  延伸查詢new window
8.陳惠惠(20061201)。世界愛滋日 獻上紅色祝福。  延伸查詢new window
9.楊政郡(20091027)。同志性交 散布愛滋未遂起訴。  延伸查詢new window
10.楊政郡(20091027)。法律觀點/未遂?既遂? 端看結果。  延伸查詢new window
11.楊政郡(20091027)。醫界看法/各染愛滋性交 恐致抗藥性。  延伸查詢new window
12.郭錦萍(19911218)。強制篩檢愛滋病毒,鎖住特定對象。  延伸查詢new window
13.人類免疫缺乏病毒傳染防治及感染者權益保障條例,http://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=L0050004, 2013/02/18。  延伸查詢new window
14.(2010)。後天免疫缺乏症候群防治條例,http://www.tdes.chc.edu.tw/guidance/p_11/law-3.htm, 2010/06/01。  new window
15.(2006)。台灣滋愛、愛之手護行動,http://www.wretch.cc/blog/tepu/5964835, 2010/05/28。  延伸查詢new window
16.TVBS News(2003)。愛滋天譴論 呂秀蓮:出自一片好意,http://www.tvbs.com.tw/news/news_list.asp?no=eveno20031209120509, 2010/05/15。  new window
17.王信雄(2003)。政府宣示以三心二意給予愛滋者有尊嚴的生活空間,http://www.24drs.com/special_report/content_relate_article.asp?no=1497&sec=dail&sp=5, 2010/05/14。  延伸查詢new window
18.台灣人權報(2003)。呂秀蓮斥愛滋是天譴 引起社團抗議,http://enews.url.com.tw/enews/23905, 2010/05/15。  延伸查詢new window
19.民視(2004)。愛滋男同志 查無散播故意不起訴,http://gsrat.net/news/newsclipDetail.php?pageNum_RecClipData=1&&ncdata_id=321, 2010/05/15。  延伸查詢new window
20.行政院衛生署疾病管制局(2009)。守護自己,遠離愛滋海報,http://health99.doh.gov.tw/educzone/edu_detail.aspx?catid=30353, 2012/04/09。  延伸查詢new window
21.行政院衛生署疾病管制局(2010)。台灣愛滋病政策與法令及流行病學介紹,http://www.klchb.gov.tw/filesPath/news/20100406112438%E6%84%9B%E6%BB%8B%E6%94%BF%E7%AD%96%E6%B5%81%E7%97%85%E6%B3%95%E4%BB%A4-20100322.ppt, 2013/02/18。  new window
22.希望工作坊(2006)。愛滋線上放水燈,http://www.aids.org.tw/card/, 2010/09/02。  延伸查詢new window
23.希望工作坊(2011)。大事紀,http://www.aids.org.tw/index.php/about/2012-02-12-10-23-49, 2013/02/18。  new window
24.林俊言(2001)。何謂偵查不公開,http://www.tahr.org.tw/node/138, 2013/02/18。  延伸查詢new window
25.愛滋感染者權益促進會(2004)。針對13名參加home party 感染者將遭起訴一案,http://intermargins.net/Headline/2004/hopa040117c.htm, 2010/05/20。  延伸查詢new window
26.韓森(1997)。愛滋鬥士田啟元,http://www.praatw.org/right_2_cont.asp?id=52, 2010/05/30。  new window
圖書論文
1.黃道明(2012)。國家道德主權與卑污芻狗:《韓森的愛滋歲月》裡的結社、哀悼與匿名政治。愛滋治理與在地行動。中壢:中央大學性/別研究室。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃道明(2012)。紅絲帶主流化:台灣愛滋NGO防治文化與性治理。愛滋治理與在地行動。中壢:中央大學性別研究室。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE