臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：臺灣家庭暴力防治服務方案的實施與轉變之探討
書刊名：臺大社會工作學刊
作者：游美貴 引用關係
作者(外文)：Yu, Mei-kuei
出版日期：2014
卷期：29
頁次：頁53-96
主題關鍵詞：協同合作；服務方案；家庭暴力防治；Collaboration；Service program；Domestic violence prevention
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(12) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:10
  • 共同引用共同引用:81
  • 點閱點閱:160
本研究目的在探討臺灣在 2007至 2011年間，22個地方政府辦理家庭暴力防治相關服務方案之實施與轉變情形，並依據研究結果提出增進台灣在家庭暴力防治服務方案之建議。研究資料分成三個階段蒐集：第一階段，主要蒐集相關文獻資料，彙整出 2007至 2011年間的家庭暴力防治服務方案，以作為第二階段地方政府焦點座談依據。第二階段，進行 22縣市的實地焦點座談，瞭解地方政府在家庭暴力防治服務方案實施與轉變的情形。第三階段，將初步研究結果，請中央及地方政府代表實施焦點團體，以確定研究的準確性。 研究發現主要有，服務方案所服務對象多元且延伸服務場域、法定項目均有辦理、服務方案聚焦於三級防治處遇、服務方案仍以社政單位為推行主力、成效評估是服務方案推廣的關鍵、服務方案缺乏立基實證研究的建構等等。研究建議為，鼓勵在地特性的服務方案、定期檢視和瞭解服務方案的辦理情形、增加預防性服務方案、促進服務方案辦理採多元面向、促進立基實證研究的服務方案發展等等。
This study examines the effectiveness of domestic violence prevention-related service programs in 22 local governments. Based on those results, the growth and decline of domestic violence prevention-related service programs in 22 local governments are categorized. Recommendations are also made on how to enhance the quality of domestic violence prevention-related service programs in Taiwan. While lasting for ten months (i.e. March to December 2011), this study consists of three stages. In stage 1, domestic violence prevention-related service programs from 2007-2011 in 22 local governments are reviewed. In stage 2, small group forums are held in 22 local governments to exchange opinions with NGOs and governmental agencies on how to more effectively implement the service programs in each local government, determine the availability of resources to these local governments, and examine the difficulties of local governments in implementing such programs. In stage 3, a focus group is conducted in which local government representatives discuss the primary evaluation results of stages 1 and 2. Analysis results indicate that domestic violence prevention-related service programs have evolved from victim assistance to a correction service of perpetrators. The programs have also evolved from social case work to group work and community work. Additionally, for instance, the muti-agency service programs have been extended from social service organizations to prisons. Moreover, the services offered previously only to individual victims have been extended to others, including children and other important family members. Results of this study provide recommendations and a valuable reference for governmental policy planners.
期刊論文
1.游美貴(20081200)。臺灣地區受虐婦女庇護服務轉型之研究。臺大社會工作學刊，18，143-190。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Buchbinder, E.、Eisikovits, Z.(2008)。Collaborative Discourse: The Case of Police and Social Work Relationships in Intimate Violence Intervention in Israel。Journal of Social Service Research，34(4)，1-13。  new window
3.Robinson, A. L.(2006)。Reducing repeat victimization among high-risk victims of domestic violence: The benefits of a coordinated community response in Cardiff, UK.。Violence Against Women，12(8)，761-788。  new window
4.游美貴(20101200)。臺北市婚姻暴力被害人垂直整合服務方案實施之研究。臺大社會工作學刊，22，53-108。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.林明禛(20130600)。社會資源的盤整與運用探析：從某縣市社會行政部門的考察。東吳社會工作學報，25，71-93。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Akoensi, T.、Koehler, J. A.、Lösel, F. A.、Humphreys, D. K.(2012)。Domestic violence perpetrator programs in Europe, Part II: A systematic review of the state of evidence。International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. Advance。  new window
7.Allen, N.(2006)。An examination of the effectiveness of domestic violence coordinating councils。Women Against Violence，12(1)，46-67。  new window
8.Baker, C. K.、Cook, S. L.、Norris, F. H.(2003)。Domestic violence and housing problems: A contextual analysis of women's help-seeking, received informal support, and formal system response。Violence Against Women，9(7)，754-783。  new window
9.Burton, M.(2006)。Judicial monitoring of compliance: Introducing ‘Problem Solving’ approaches to domestic violence courts in England and Wales。International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family，20，366-378。  new window
10.Chartas, N. D.、Culbreth, J. R.(2001)。Counselor treatment of coexisting domestic violence and substance abuse: A qualitative study。Journal of Addictions & Offender Counseling，22，2-11。  new window
11.Day, A.、Chung, D.、O’Leary, P.(2009)。Programs for men who perpetrate domestic violence: An examination of the issues underlying the effectiveness of intervention programs。Journal of Family Violence，24，203-212。  new window
12.Gilligan, J.、Lee, B.(2005)。The resolve to stop the violence project: Reducing violence in the community through a jail-based initiative。Journal of Public Health，27(2)，143-148。  new window
13.Johnson, J. E.、Brunell, L.(2006)。The emergence of contrasting domestic violence regimes in postcommunist Europe。Policy & Politics，34，578-598。  new window
14.Lindhorst, T.、Padgett, J. D.(2005)。Disjunctures for women and frontline workers: Implementation of the family violence option。Social Service Review，79(3)，405-429。  new window
15.Macy, R. J.、Giattina, M.、Parish, S.、Crosby, C.(2010)。Domestic violence and sexual assault services: Historical concerns and contemporary challenges。Journal of Interpersonal Violence，25，3-32。  new window
16.Macy, R. J.、Goodbourn, M.(2012)。Promoting successful collaborations between domestic violence and substance abuse treatment service sectors: A review of the literature。Trauma Violence Abuse，13，234-251。  new window
17.Madoc-Jones, I.(2005)。Domestic violence and crime and disorder reduction partnerships。Probation Journal，52(2)，192-194。  new window
18.Menard, A.(2001)。Domestic violence and housing: Key policy and program challenges。Violence Against Women，7(6)，707-720。  new window
19.Nixon, J.、Humphreys, C.(2010)。Marshalling the evidence: Using intersectionality in the domestic violence frame。Social Politics，17(2)，137-158。  new window
20.Potito, C.、Day, A.、Carson, E.、O'Leary, P.(2009)。Domestic violence and child protection: Partnerships and collaboration。Australian Social Work，62(3)，369-387。  new window
21.Roggeband, C.(2012)。Shifting policy responses to domestic violence in the Netherlands and Spain (1980-2009)。Violence Against Women，18(7)，784-806。  new window
22.Tatum, D.(2000)。Why the label child abuse puts children who witness domestic violence at risk。Trauma, Violence and Abuse，1(3)，288-290。  new window
23.Vinton, L.(2003)。A model collaborative project toward making domestic violence centers elder ready。Violence Against Women，9(12)，1504-1513。  new window
24.Webb, E.、Shankleman, J.、Evans, M. R.、Brooks, R.(2001)。The health of children in refuges for women victims of domestic violence: Cross sectional descriptive survey。British Medical Journal，23，210-213。  new window
25.Wendt, S.(2010)。Building and sustaining local co-ordination: An Australian rural community responds to domestic and family violence。British Journal of Social Work，40，44-62。  new window
26.丁雁琪(20061200)。反婚姻暴力的在地行動與全球聯結。應用心理研究，32，81-100。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.宋麗玉(20081200)。增強權能策略與方法：臺灣本土經驗之探索。社會政策與社會工作學刊，12(2)，123-194。new window  延伸查詢new window
28.汪淑媛(20060600)。家暴婦女庇護中心工作者情緒張力與因應策略。社會政策與社會工作學刊，10(1)，189-226。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.劉淑瓊(20081200)。推倒「柏林圍牆」--論家庭暴力防治之網絡治理課題。東吳社會工作學報，19，1-35。new window  延伸查詢new window
30.Coker, D.(2004)。Race, poverty, and crime-centered response to domestic violence: A comment on Linda Mills’s Insult to injury rethinking our responses to intimate abuse。Violence Against Women，10(11)，1331-1353。  new window
研究報告
1.劉淑瓊、王珮玲(2011)。家庭暴力安全防護網成效評估計畫。  延伸查詢new window
2.游美貴(2011)。「全國家庭暴力及性侵害個案管理服務模式評估」計畫。  延伸查詢new window
3.鄭麗珍、游美貴(2010)。補助各直轄市、縣(市)政府增聘家庭暴力及性侵害防治社工人力執行成效評估。  延伸查詢new window
4.劉淑瓊(2010)。責任通報制度對我國家庭暴力防治工作推動之評估研究。  延伸查詢new window
5.王珮玲、沈慶鴻(2008)。駐地方法院家庭暴力事件服務方案評估研究。  延伸查詢new window
6.簡春安、常宏文(2002)。家庭暴力被害人保護方案之初探研究。  延伸查詢new window
7.潘淑滿、游美貴(2012)。親密關係暴力問題之研究 (計畫編號：PG10005-0292)。內政部。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.謝秀芬(2010)。社會個案工作：理論技巧。臺北：雙業書廊。  延伸查詢new window
2.Morris, K.(2008)。Social work and multi-agency working: Making a difference。Bristol：The Policy。  new window
3.Women’s Resource Center of Northern Michigan(2004)。WRC(Women’s Resource Center) Domestic abuse handbook。US：Petoskey, MI：Women’s Resource Center of Northern Michigan。  new window
4.潘淑滿(2000)。社會個案工作。臺北：五南：心理。  延伸查詢new window
5.Hague, G.、Malos, E.(1998)。Domestic violence: Action for change。Cheltenham：New Clarion。  new window
6.潘淑滿(2003)。質性研究：理論與應用。臺北市：心理出版社股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
7.Marshall, Catherine、Rossman, Gretchen B.(2011)。Designing qualitative research。Sage Publication。  new window
8.Quinney, Anne(2006)。Collaborative Social Work Practice。Learning Matters Ltd.。  new window
9.柯麗評、王珮玲、張錦麗(2005)。家庭暴力：理論政策與實務。巨流。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.內政部家庭暴力防治委員會(2013)。受暴婦女庇護安置機構設置參考標準，http://dspc.moi.gov.tw/ct.asp?xltem=2023&ctNode=462&mp=1， 2013/02/27。  延伸查詢new window
2.內政部家庭暴力及性侵害防治委員會(2007)。法院家庭暴力事件服務處緣起與簡介，http://dspc.moi.gov.tw/content.asp?CuItem=2033。  延伸查詢new window
3.內政部家庭暴力及性侵害防治委員會(2012)。統計資料，http://dspc.moi.gov.tw/lp.asp?CtNode=776&CtUnit=79&BaseDSD=7&mp=1。  延伸查詢new window
4.Family Justice Center Alliance(2012)。Family justice centers，http://www.familyjusticecenter.org/home.html。  new window
5.Mullender, A.，Hague, G.(2000)。Reducing domestic violence... What works? Women survivors’ views. Crime Reduction Research Series，http://webdoc.sub.gwdg.de/ebook/serien/n/CRRS/4-9.pdf。  new window
圖書論文
1.Dobash, R. E.、Dobash, R. P.(2000)。The politics and policies of responding to violence against women。Home truths about domestic violence: Feminist influences on policy and practice-A reader。London：Routledge。  new window
2.Hughes, N.、Prior, D.(2008)。Delivering youth justice through partnership working。Social work and multi-agency working: Making a difference。Bristol：The Policy。  new window
3.Jordan, L.(2008)。Accessing and using multi-agency services: The experience of families。Social work and multi-agency working: Making a difference。Bristol：The Policy。  new window
4.Wilkinson, S.(2004)。Focus group research。Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice。London：Sage。  new window
5.Kamberelis, G.、Dimitriadis, G.(2005)。Fous groups: Strategic articulations pedagogy, politics, and inquiry。The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research。Thousand Oaks, CA：Sage。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：840（臺灣：811，外國：29） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1451226 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67260364
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上