:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:紐西蘭育兒就業家庭稅額抵減政策經驗之探討
書刊名:東吳社會工作學報
作者:顏淑韻鄭清霞 引用關係
作者(外文):Yen, Shu-yunCheng, Ching-hsia
出版日期:2014
卷期:26
頁次:頁77-109
主題關鍵詞:育兒就業家庭稅額抵減工作誘因兒童貧窮Working for family tax creditWorking incentiveChildren poverty
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:50
  • 點閱點閱:81
紐西蘭政府為使低所得育兒家庭脫離貧窮及增加就業意願,近年施行「育兒就業家庭稅額抵減」政策。本文以文獻回顧方式,探討紐西蘭協助低所得育兒家庭之政策變遷,解析「育兒就業家庭稅額抵減」政策之正反面效果。研究發現兒童貧窮率下降與貧富差距縮短,皆反應出對政策施行成效,亦發現兼職人數增加及雙薪育兒家庭轉變為單薪之趨勢。台灣若推動「稅額扺減」相關政策,可以減緩育兒就業家庭貧窮為目標,將18歲以下受撫養孩童年齡與人數、家庭總收入作為申請條件,並參考「家庭最低收入保障稅額抵減」制度,以保障育兒就業家庭最低所得水準。最後建議加強單親就業輔導與公共托育機制,以減少單親家庭就業障礙。
In order to relieve the poverty of low-income families with dependent children and promote their working motivation, the New Zealand government has introduced the policy of ’Working for Families Tax Credits’ in recent years. This paper uses the method of literature review to explore the transformation of the social assistance policies for low-income families with dependent children, and also to understand both positive and negative effect of the policy of ’Working for Families Tax Credits’ in New Zealand. This study finds out that the child poverty rate and the gap of poverty was decreasing after government introduces the policy. Besides, the policy has increased the work incentives for the sole-parent households, but most of them are doing part time works. Furthermore, the policy also has opportunity for two-income household change to one-income household. If Taiwan plans to implement "Tax Credit policy, the following issues should be taken consideration: (1) To target the working families with dependent children as main purpose; (2) Referring to ’The Minimum Family Tax Credit’, to ensure the working families with dependent children to earn minimum annual income after tax.; (3) occupational consulting servieces and child care system for sole parent should be improving, makes sole parent are able to return full time work.
期刊論文
1.Palme, J.(2006)。Welfare States and Inequality: Institutional Designs and Distributive Outcomes。Research in Social Stratification and Mobility,24,387-403。  new window
2.Iceland, J.(200308)。Why poverty remains high: The role of income growth, economic inequality, and changes in family structure, 1949-1999。Demography,40(3),1949-1999。  new window
3.呂朝賢(20101200)。臺灣兒童貧窮:輪廓與成因。臺灣社會福利學刊,9(1),97-137。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.鄭清霞(20121200)。兒童經濟安全保障政策之探討。兒童及少年福利期刊,20,111-139。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Hertzman, C.、Siddiqi, A.、Hertzman, E.、Irwin, L. G.、Vaghri, Z.、Houweling, T. A.、Marmot, M.(2010)。Bucking the inequality gradient through early child development。British Medical Journal,340,468。  new window
6.孫健忠(20090300)。新政府「工作所得補助方案」的形成、執行與省思。社區發展季刊,124,49-57。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.呂朝賢(19990600)。社會救助問題:政策目的、貧窮的定義與測量。人文及社會科學集刊,11(2),233-263。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.邱貴玲(20060600)。從女性角度分析美國、法國、丹麥三種家庭政策發展模式。社區發展季刊,114,30-42。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Devaney, B. L.、Ellwood, M. R.、Love, J. M.(1997)。Programs that mitigate the effects of poverty on children。The Future of Children,7(2),88-112。  new window
會議論文
1.宋興洲、陳佳琪(201011)。從福利到工作福利-女性主義的批判。中國政治學會年會暨「能知的公民?民主的理想與實際」學術研討會。台北:中國政治學會。  延伸查詢new window
2.Minujin, A.、Delamonica, E.、Gonzalez, E.、Davidziuk, A. I.(2005)。Children living in poverty. A review of child poverty definitions, measurements and policies。Unicef conference children and poverty: Global context, local solutions New York Unicef。New School University。  new window
研究報告
1.呂朝賢、鄭清霞(2008)。台灣貧窮輪廓:趨勢與解釋。  延伸查詢new window
2.Tax Working Group(2010)。A tax system for New Zealand's future。  new window
學位論文
1.黃楷茗(2009)。我國工作所得補貼方案之最適社會權重模擬分析(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.江亮演(1990)。社會救助的理論與實務。台北:桂冠圖書。  延伸查詢new window
2.行政院(2009)。內政部對監察院糾正工作所得補助方案之檢討改進情形。台北:行政院。  延伸查詢new window
3.HM Treasury(1999)。Supporting children through the tax and benefit system。London:The Stationery Office。  new window
4.Inland Revenue Department, & Centre for Social Research and Evaluation(2007)。Receipt of the working for families package。Wellington:Inland Revenue Department。  new window
5.Johnson, N.(2005)。Working for families in New Zealand: Some early lessons。Fulbright New Zealand。  new window
6.New Zealand Council of Christian Social Services(2009)。Facts about poverty in 2009。Wellington:New Zealand Council of Christian Social Services。  new window
7.Nolan, P.(2002)。New Zealand's family assistance tax credits: Evolution and operation。Wellington:New Zealand Treasury。  new window
8.Perry, B.(2012)。Statistics NZ household economic survey (HES) 1982-2011。Wellington:Ministry of Social Development。  new window
9.Ridge, T.、Wright, S.(2008)。Understanding inequality, poverty and wealth: Policies and prospects。Bristol:Policy Press。  new window
10.St. John, S.、Wynd, D.(2008)。How social and income inequalities damage New Zealand children。Auckland:Child Poverty Action Group (Inc)。  new window
11.The Expert Advisory Group on Solutions to Child Poverty(2012)。Solutions to child poverty in New Zealand: Evidence for action。The Children's Commissioner。  new window
其他
1.內政部社會司(2009)。工作所得補助方案(核定本),http://www.ey.gov.tw/Upload/UserFiles/%E5%B7%A5%E4%BD%9C%E6%89%80%E5%BE%97%E8%A3%9C%E5%8A%A9%E6%96%B9%E6%A1%88%E4%BF%AE%E6%AD%A3%E6%A0%B8%E5%AE%9A%E6%9C%AC01(1).pdf, 2013/11/10。  new window
2.曾巨威(2008)。EITCVS. NIT,http://www.npf.org.tw/post/1/4301。  new window
3.Bellamy, P.(2011)。Household incomes, inequality and poverty,http://www.parliament.nz/en-nz/parl-support/research-papers/00PlibCIP181/household-incomes-inequality-and-poverty, 2013/02/12。  new window
4.Blome, A.(2011)。Work/care policies in European welfare states: Continuing variety or change towards a common model?,http://www.wzb.eu/sites/default/files/publikationen/discussionpapers/i11-401.pdf, 2013/03/11。  new window
5.Inland Revenue Department of New Zealand(2012)。Working for families tax credits registration pack,http://www.ird.govt.nz/resources/0/3/0305f4804d7bb5e088aeacae01f57bd1/ir200.pdf, 2013/01/05。  new window
6.Inland Revenue Department of New Zealand(2012)。Family tax credit,http://www.ird.govt.nz/wfftax-credits/entitlement/what-is-wfftc/ftc/, 2011/01/05。  new window
7.What are working for families tax credits?,http://www.ird.govt.nz/wff-tax-credits/entitlement/what-is-wfftc/, 2011/01/05。  new window
8.Knutson, D.(1998)。Welfare reform in New Zealand: Moving to a work-based welfare system,http://www.fulbright.org.nz/publications/1998-knutson/, 2013/03/21。  new window
9.(2010)。National benefit factsheets,https://www.msd.govt.nz/about-msd-and-our-work/publications-resources/statistics/benefit/2010-national-benefit-factsheets.html, 2013/05/01。  new window
10.Ministry of Social Development(2010)。Changing families’ financial support and incentives for working: The summary report of the evaluation of the working for families package,http://www.ird.govt.nz/resources/b/7/b7ce150043303191903cf75d5f60e4be/research-wfftc-report.pdf, 2013/05/01。  new window
11.Naschold, F.(2002)。Why inequality matters for poverty,http://www.odi.org.uk/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/3876.pdf, 2013/05/06。  new window
12.(2011)。OECD - Social policy division - Directorate of employment, labour and social affairs,http://www.oecd.org/social/family/database, 2013/05/15。  new window
13.OECD(2011)。Divided we stand: Why inequality keeps rising,http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264119536-en。  new window
14.Perry, B.(2014)。Household incomes in New Zealand: Trends in indicators of inequality and hardship 1982 to 2012 (Revised Tables and Figures 27 February 2014),Wellington。  new window
15.Whiteford, P.,Adema, W.(2007)。What works best in reducing child poverty: A benefit or work strategy?,http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/30/44/38227981.pdf, 2013/05/24。  new window
圖書論文
1.Morel, S.(2004)。Workfare and insertion: How the U.S. and French models of social assistance have been transformed。Welfare Reform: A Comparative Assessment of the French and U.S. Experiences。New Brunswick:London:Transaction Publishers:Transaction Publishers。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE