:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:從女性角度分析美國、法國、丹麥三種家庭政策發展模式
書刊名:社區發展季刊
作者:邱貴玲 引用關係
作者(外文):Chiu, Karleen
出版日期:2006
卷期:114
頁次:頁30-42
主題關鍵詞:家庭政策
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:30
  • 點閱點閱:52
本文以女性角度為出發點,探討女性的家庭角色定位,和社會地位界定,如何影響各國家庭政策的發展。本文舉出美國、法國、丹麥3個國家,代表3種不同的思考方式,及其所發展出來的不同的家庭政策模式。美國家庭政策以「女性傳統母職和照顧者」為主,著重在照顧低收入戶等特殊團體,就業婦女托育需求由家庭和自由市場機制來解決。法國以「促進婦女就業」為重點,強調女性就業的特殊需要,由雇主提供相關福利,配合國家托育制度,減輕婦女出外就業的障礙。丹麥則著重「婦女的公民權」,超越女性的傳統角色和就業身分,以公民福利為出發設計家庭政策,提供全民的福利,保障人民的生活福祉。未來台灣在制定家庭政策及討論家庭政策如何影響女性生活時,這3個模式可以提供作為參考的模式。
This paper examines three different models of family policy development in three western countries: United States, France, and Denmark. Using different approach to define women’s role in family, in work, in society, these three countries develop its own family policy system. American government portraits women from traditional family roles as caregiver and mother, therefore, American family policy emphasizes on supporting families in poverty and special needs. French family policy aims to increase women’s labor participation; therefore, the government mandates the employers to provide employees generous paid maternal leaves and job protection related benefits. To help French women balance family and work responsibilities, French government also provides national childcare system to empower French women to work outside of the family. Denmark goes beyond women’s roles in family and in work and sees women as citizens as general. Thus, Denmark has the most comprehensive and generous family policy to support women and every citizens with the basic needs including housing stipend, family allowance, and national child care system and so on. These three different models, never the less, present good examples for Taiwan in looking for the possible direction of future family policy development.
期刊論文
1.許雅惠(20020600)。性別、依賴、就業力--臺灣婦女的經濟弱勢與保障。臺大社會工作學刊,6,123+125-173。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Garfinkel, E.(2002)。The Roles of Child Suppor on Welfare Exits and Re-Entries。Journal of Policy Analysis and Management,21(4),557-576。  new window
會議論文
1.Kamerman, B.(2005)。Welfare States, Family Policies and Early Childhood Education, Care and Family Support。  new window
2.Stokes, W.(1998)。A Politics of Presence?117-136。  new window
研究報告
1.徐震、盧政春、李明政、趙碧華(1989)。我國社會救助體系整體規劃之研究。行政院研究發展考核委員會。  延伸查詢new window
2.Kamerman, S.(2004)。Social Policies, family types, and child outcomes in selected OECD countries。  new window
圖書
1.Siim, B.(2000)。Gender and Citizenship: Politics, Agency in France, Britain and Denmark。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
2.林萬億、李淑容、王永慈(1995)。我國社會救助政策之研究。臺北市:內政部。  延伸查詢new window
3.王麗蓉(1995)。婦女與社會政策。台北:巨流。  延伸查詢new window
4.孫健忠(2002)。我國社會救助制度實施與建構之研究。台北。  延伸查詢new window
5.劉毓秀(1997)。從父權到國家社會。女性、國家、照顧工作 \\ 劉毓秀(編)。台北。  延伸查詢new window
6.Charles, N.(2000)。Feminism, the State, and Social Policy。New York。  new window
7.Giddens, A.(1984)。The Construction of Society。London:Polity Press。  new window
8.Kamerman, S.、Kahn, A.(1998)。Family change and family policies in Great Britain, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States。New York。  new window
9.Kamerman, S.、Kahn, A.(1978)。Family Policy: government and families in fourteen countries。New York。  new window
10.Kamerman, S.、Kahn, A.(2004)。Beyond Child Poverty: The Social Exclusion of Children。New York。  new window
11.Zimmerman, S.(1995)。Understanding Family Policy。New York。  new window
其他
1.主計處(2005)。  延伸查詢new window
2.內政部統計處(2006)。  延伸查詢new window
3.CUSSW(2006)。The Clearinghouse on international developments in child, youth and family policy at Columbia University School of Social Work。  new window
4.(2005)。OECD Factbook。  new window
圖書論文
1.張晉芬(1995)。此恨綿綿,可有絕期?女性工作困境之分析。台灣婦女處境白皮書。台北:時報文化。  延伸查詢new window
2.傅立葉(1995)。建構女人的福利國。臺灣婦女處境白皮書:1995年。臺北:時報文化。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE