:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:埔里菩提長青村的經驗:與社會投資觀點的對話
書刊名:臺灣社會福利學刊
作者:黃彥宜 引用關係陳昭榮 引用關係
作者(外文):Huang, Yen-yiChen, Jun-rong
出版日期:2014
卷期:12:1
頁次:頁215-252
主題關鍵詞:社會投資長青村活躍老化健康老化921地震Social investmentBodhi Chang-Ching VillageActive agingHealthy agingThe 921 earthquake
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:6
  • 共同引用共同引用:111
  • 點閱點閱:104
本文主要探討長青村的運作,討論它因應大型災難而生的特殊運作經驗,並與社會投資觀點進行對話,以期在面臨未來新的風險時能為台灣老人照顧帶來的新的思考。研究方法採主題分析法,以個別訪談和團體討論為主,輔以參與觀察之資料。研究發現,長青村以非正式立案機構的實驗區之形式協助處於社會救助「邊緣」長者。其存在15年的事實真實地反應台灣底層社會邊緣人口的需求,也顯示台灣既有的長照機構法規在面對社會劇烈變遷所產生的新風險上之回應不足與造成的社會排除。長青村「老有所用」的運作方式,鼓勵長者健康老化和獨立生活。而從長者照顧衍生的生產性,其產值不應只是運用貨幣價值衡量,也須關照所創造的社會價值。長青村存在的意涵反應安養體制也須突破傳統保護和照顧的思維,提供創新措施、預防取向及友善與始能環境協助長者活躍老化。
Bodhi Chang-Ching Village was established in Puli in response to the emerging needs of older people following the 921 earthquake in 1999. The authors report an analysis of the village’s dialogue with the European Union regarding the development and reflective implications of social investment for long-term care services in Taiwan. A thematic analysis was employed to interpret data from individual interviews and group discussions. Fieldwork notes served as supplementary data for this analysis. Although Bodhi Chang-Ching Village is an unregistered association, it has taken care of its marginalized, elderly population for 15 years. The authors draw attention to the social exclusion of some older people and to their lack of access to care services, which has created a need for services that are better targeted to older people. Bodhi Chang-Ching Village actively mobilizes the productive potential of older people by encouraging healthy aging and independent living. The social value of senior citizens cannot be defined simply by how much money they earn. Instead, it should be stressed that older people have an important role to play in the society. Bodhi Chang-Ching Village exemplifies the benefits of fostering a change in both policies and attitudes to promote creative initiatives and build enabling environments that encourage active aging.
期刊論文
1.江大樹、王子華、潘中道、梁鎧麟(20100900)。從長期照顧到老有所用:菩提長青村創新治理模式分析。社區發展季刊,131,436-454。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.陳錦煌、翁文蒂(20040600)。推動社區照顧服務之探討--以重建區菩提長青村為例。社區發展季刊,106,200-208。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.江大樹、王子華、潘中道、梁鎧麟(20130600)。老有所用的理念與實踐:菩提長青村個案研究。國家與社會,14,55-118。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Jenson, Jane(2009)。Lost in Translation: The Social Investment Perspective and Gender Equality。Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society,16(4),446-483。  new window
5.Braun, Virginia、Clarke, Victoria(2006)。Using thematic analysis in psychology。Qualitative Research in Psychology,3(2),77-101。  new window
6.高淑清(20011200)。在美華人留學生太太的生活世界--詮釋與反思。本土心理學研究,16,225-285。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Chenail, R. J.(1995)。Presenting Qualitative Data。The Qualitative Report,2(3),1-9。  new window
8.Ngo, B. E.(2001)。When disasters and age collide: reviewing vulnerability of the elderly。Natural Hazards Review,2(2),80-89。  new window
會議論文
1.梁鎧麟、孫同文(2011)。非主流方法論與非主流老人福利議題:埔里鎮菩提長青村互助社區的Q方法論分析。2011年台灣公共行政與公共事務系所聯合會學術研討會--建國一百年公共事務的回顧與展望,TASPAA、台北市立教育大學社會暨公共事務學系主辦 (會議日期: 2011/05/27-29)。台北市立教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.江大樹、梁鍇麟(2009)。從長期照顧到老有所用:菩提長青村的創新治理模式分析。2009年台灣政治學會年會暨學術研討會--動盪年代中的政治學:理論與研討會,台灣政治學會(主辦) (會議日期: 2009/09/11-09/12)。  延伸查詢new window
3.梁鎧麟、許素英(2010)。社會企業的永續治理模式之研究--埔里鎮「菩提長青老人瓦助社區」個案研究。多元變遷中公共服務與治理之機會與挑戰研討會,台灣公共行政與公共事務系所聯合會(主辦) (會議日期: 2010/05/30)。  延伸查詢new window
4.Dc Dckcn, J.(2012)。Identifying the Skeleton of the Social Investment State: Defining and Measuring Patterns of Social Policy Change on the Basis of Expenditure Data。Stream 1 Social Innovation and Soda! Investment at the ESPANET 2012 Conference,(會議日期: 2012/09/06-09/08)。Edinburgh, Scotland。  new window
學位論文
1.許素英(2011)。非營利組織轉型社會企業之變遷衝擊分析--以菩提長青村為例(碩士論文)。國立暨南國際大學,埔里鎮。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳倩姿(2006)。「自養其身」老年社區之理念與實踐以埔里菩提長青村為個案(碩士論文)。南華大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.王子華(2009)。老有所用的社造理念與實踐過程--「菩提長青村」個案研究(碩士論文)。國立暨南國際大學,南投縣。  延伸查詢new window
4.林家瑜(2009)。從SallyHelgesen的「包容網」理論探討非營利組織女性領導人:以菩提長青村村長個案分析(碩士論文)。國立暨南國際大學,南投縣。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.呂建德、李淑容、王舒芸、陳昭榮(2013)。我國社會福利服務提供方式之研究。臺北:行政院研究發展考核委員會。  延伸查詢new window
2.European Commission(2013)。Long-term Care in Ageing Societies -Challenges and Policy Options。Brussels, Belgium:European Commission。  new window
3.European Federation of Public Service Unions。EPSU Working Document: Social Investment Package。Brussels, Belgium:European Federation of Public Service Unions。  new window
4.Haekkerap, K.(2012)。Speech at the Opening of Conference of the European Year of Active Ageing and Solidarity between Generations。Copenhagen。  new window
5.Morel, N.、Palicr, B.、Palme, J.(2011)。Towards a Social Investment Welfare State?。Bristol, England:Policy Press。  new window
6.Zaidi, A.、Gasior, K.、Hofmarcher, M. M.、Lelkes, O.、Marin, B.、Rodrigues, R.、Schmidt, A.、Vanhuysse, P.、Zolyomi, E.(2013)。Active Ageing index 2012: Concept, Methodology and Final Results。Vienna:European Centre。  new window
7.Zsambokv, M. L.、Femandez-Bilbao, A.、Smith, D.、Knight, J.、Allan, J.(2011)。Impacts of Climate Change on Disadvantaged UK Coastal Communities。York, England:Rowntree Foundation。  new window
其他
1.Moth, R.,Morton, D.(2009)。Social Work and Climate Change: A Call to Action,http://www.socialworkfuture.org/articles-and-analysis/articles/55-social-work-and-climate-change-a-call-to-action-richmoth-a-dan-morton, 2013/08/10。  new window
2.張君培(2007)。另一種老年生活:埔里菩提長青村,http://www.ptcf.org.tw/ptcf2/healthcity/epaper/hce13/1302.pdf, 2013/08/02。  延伸查詢new window
3.AGE(2013)。Social Investment Package AGE Report and Reaction,http://www.age-platforrn.eu/age-policy-work/ social-inclusion/lastest-iiews/1635-age-first-response-to-the-social-investment-package#sthash.68TSMqch.dpf, 2013/08/10。  new window
4.European Commission(2013)。Social Investment,http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catld=1044&langld:=en-General, 2013/08/08。  new window
5.Jurczak, K.(2013)。Panel 3: Social Security and Health, Open-ended Working Group on Ageing Fourth Working Session 12-15,http://social.un.org/agdng~working-group/docuroente/fourth/ presentation/KasiaJurczak.pdf., 2013/08/08。  new window
6.Vandenbroucke, F.,Hemerijck, A.,Palier, B.(2011)。The EU Needs a Social Investment Pact,http://www.ose.be/files/OpinionPaper5_Vandenbroucke-Hemerijk-Palier_2011.pdf, 2013/08/08。  new window
7.Colombo, F.,Llena-Nozal, A.,Mercier, J.,Tjadens, F.(2011)。Help Wanted? Providing and Paying for Long-term Care,www.oecd.org/health/longtermcare/lielpwaiiled, 2013/08/08。  new window
圖書論文
1.Joffc, H.(2011)。Thematic Analysis。Qualitative Research Methods in Menial Health and Psychotherapy: A Guide for Students and Practitioners。Sussex, England:John Wiley & Sons。  new window
2.Lindh, T.(2009)。The Future Needs for Social Investment in Ageing Populations: Sweden as a Pilot Case。What Future for Social Investment? Institute for Futures Studies Research Report。Digaloo:Stockholm institute for Futures Studies。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE