:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:邁向復元之路—優勢觀點社會工作處遇關係之內涵與歷程研究
作者:曾仁杰
作者(外文):Tseng, Jen-Chieh
校院名稱:國立暨南國際大學
系所名稱:社會政策與社會工作學系
指導教授:宋麗玉
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2014
主題關鍵詞:復元優勢觀點助人關係recoverystrengths perspectivehelping relationship
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:164
優勢觀點社會工作為了實踐復元的理念,除一反缺失或問題取向的思考習慣,在實際協助工作上,更進一步將案主視為指導者。然此種以案主為指導者的助人關係,讓長久以來以助人專家自許的社會工作者,不管在思想或作法上都產生很大的衝擊與挑戰。本研究主要目的是想了解優勢觀點處遇模式(簡稱優點模式)處遇關係的內涵、關係發展歷程以及實務作法,並進一步探討此種關係於台灣本土的適用性。
本研究以詮釋學方法論為基底,透過立意取樣,選取具有優點模式之成功經驗的社工員,以半結構訪談大綱進行深入訪談。本研究共訪問八位社工,皆具有至少二年以上優點模式實務經驗。從其經驗中,本研究歸納出此模式的專業關係是一種為了協助案主進入關愛自己、相信自己、開放自己與活出自己之復元境界的人際連結。作為一種專業的助人連結,此關係促進案主孕育希望、正向能量、練習自主與啟動復元的機會。在雙方結伴邁向復元的過程中,最關鍵的是社工「相信有」的信念,相信案主一定有優點、有可能、有方法,從相遇時就投入信念的力量,在經歷相識、相知、相伴、相助、想挺與相惜七階段,於此漸進歷程中分別投入關心、分享、陪伴、分工合作、成全與感恩的元素,讓案主的存有越發明顯與清晰可見,也使案主能夠帶著相信、勇氣、感恩與祝福,繼續復元的道路。從陌生到默契的過程中,雙方培養出優勢取向的復元夥伴關係。與其他關係不同的是,其不只以專業為背景,更是以復元為最終目的,進而與案主發展出平等互為主體、正面雙向、情感距離靠近、互動狀態穩定、權責共承共榮、在彼此心中具份量且界限清楚有彈性的關係特色。在發展夥伴關係的歷程中,社工使用「善誘利導」策略,投入相信、關心、分享等要素,點亮復元火花,成就復元之道。
優勢觀點兼善、圓融的論點,夥伴關係兼容並蓄的特性,專業友誼看似衝突實為動態之太極平衡,正好符合華人講求「中庸」的處事態度;而其既專業又友誼的特色,也頗能符合華人重情面、講人情的準親屬關係與差序格局之特色。此外,本研究也針對夥伴關係之專業定位、助人成效等議題進行討論並提出建議。
To achieve recovery, strengths-based social work practice focuses on reversing defect- or problem-oriented thinking habits, considering the client a guide in practical helping work. This type of helping relationship that considers clients as guides drastically affects and challenges the thoughts and practical behaviors of social workers, who have deemed themselves helping professionals. The primary objective of this study is elucidating the content, relationship development process, and practical methods of the strengths-based case management (SBCM) model to examine the suitability of this model for use in Taiwan.
Based on hermeneutics, this study used purposive sampling to select 8 social workers who had successfully used the SBCM model for at least 2 years, conducting in-depth interviews by using a semi-structured interview outline. This study summarized the participant experiences and determined that the professional relationship in the SBCM model can be viewed as an interpersonal connection there to help clients recover by loving themselves, believing in themselves, being open, and living their true lives. As a professional helping connection, the relationship used in this model prompts clients to develop hope and positive energy, practice self-independence, and activate opportunities for recovery. The most crucial element of the recovery process is the social workers strongly trusting in the strengths, possibilities, and solutions that the clients can develop. The social workers foster the power of belief when they first meet their clients. During the seven stages (meeting, acquaintance, getting to know, accompanying, helping, supporting, and cherishing each other), the social workers invested elements of belief, caring, sharing, accompanying , cooperation, assisting, and thankfulness to enhance and clarify the existences of the clients. Subsequently, the clients were able to continue on the road to recovery with belief, courage, thankfulness, and blessing. Evolving from strangers to well-known partners, the social workers and clients developed a strengths-based partnership. In contrast to other relationships, this partnership targeted recovery as the ultimate goal in addition to professional provisions. In this partnership, the social workers and clients developed a positive, bidirectional relationship in which their subjectivity was equally important and each was emotionally intimate, conducted stable interactions, shared responsibilities, regarded the other as important, and defined clear and flexible boundaries for the relationship. While developing a partnership, the social workers used inspiring and guiding strategies and input elements, such as believing, caring, and sharing and so on, to encourage and assist the clients toward recovery.
The strengths perspective emphasized arguments of universal benevolence and harmony, highlighting the compatibility between partners. Although a professional-based friendship appears contradictory, this relationship is actually a dynamic balance based on the concept of Taiji, conforming to the attitude discussed in the Doctrine of the Mean (Zhongyong), which is favored by Chinese people. This professional and friendly relationship matches the characteristics of the differential mode of association, emphasizing the affinity and feelings expressed in kinship-like relationships in Chinese society. Moreover, this study provided a discussion and suggestions regarding the professional orientation and helping effectiveness of the partnership
中文部分
王仕圖、吳慧敏(2003)。深度訪談與案例演練。載於齊力、林本炫主編,質性研究方法與資料分析(頁95-113)。嘉義:南華大學教研所。
李佩怡(2002)。助人者與癌症末期病人關係歷程之質性研究。臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系博士論文。new window
李增祿主編(1995)社會工作概論(增訂二版)。台北:巨流。
沈清松(1983)。詮釋學的變遷與發展。鵝湖,9,18-24。new window
余德慧(2001)。詮釋現象心理學。台北:心靈工坊。new window
宋麗玉譯(2003)基礎優點個案管理訓練手冊。內政部印製。
宋麗玉、施教裕、張錦麗(2004)。優點個案管理模式簡介與評估結果報告。九十三年推動受暴婦女優點個案管理模式處遇成果發表與研討會會議手冊。南投:台灣社會政策協會。
宋麗玉(2005)。精神障礙者之復健與復元—一個積極正向的觀點。中華心理衛生學刊,18(4),1-29。new window
宋麗玉、施教裕、張錦麗(2005)。九十四年「推動受暴婦女優點個案管理模式」方案報告。台北:內政部(未出版)。
宋麗玉等譯(2005)。基礎優點個案管理訓練手冊。內政部印製。
宋麗玉、施教裕、顏玉如、張錦麗(2006)。優點個案管理模式之介紹與運用於受暴婦女之評估結果。社區發展季刊,113,143-160。new window
宋麗玉、施教裕(2007)。復元優點模式在高風險家庭關懷及相關領域之運用。「社會福利發展:東、西方的經驗與對話」國際學術研討會。
宋麗玉、施教裕(2009)。優勢觀點:社會工作理論與實務。台北:洪葉。new window
林家興、王麗文(2003)。諮商與心理治療進階:心理分析取向的實務指南。台北:心理。new window
林冠馨(2007)。優勢觀點運用於高風險家庭青少年情緒及行為問題。暨南國際大學社會政策與社會工作學系碩士論文。
林勝義(2003)。學校社會工作服務。台北:學富。
范幸玲、卓紋君(2004)。一位受暴婦女的內在信念與生命轉換歷程:詮釋學的觀點。中華輔導學報,15,61-96。new window
范錡(1993)。哲學概論。台北:台灣商務。
施教裕、宋麗玉(2008)。高風險家庭兒少及家暴婦女的復元:優勢觀點社會工作處遇的理念模式、實務成果及推展議題。兒童及少年福利學刊,14,11-37。new window
施教裕(2009)。優點助人關係的內涵和操作,載於宋麗玉、施教裕,優勢觀點:社會工作理論與實務。台北:洪葉。new window
洪漢鼎(2001)。理解與解釋。中國:東方出版社。
胡幼慧(1996)。質性研究理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。台北:巨流。
徐宗國(1994)。紮根理論研究法:淵源、原則、技術與涵義。香港社會科學學報,4,194-221。new window
徐錦鋒、張宏哲、張振成、許臨高、莫藜藜、曾麗娟、黃韻如、顧美俐(2003)。社會個案工作—理論與實務。台北:五南。
徐震、林萬億(1983)。當代社會工作。台北:五南。
高淑清(2001)。在美華人留學生太太的生活世界:詮釋與反思。本土心理學研究,new window
16,225-285。
高淑清(2004)。父母親職經驗之現象詮釋:以家有青春期子女為例之初探。應用心理研究,24,117-145。new window
高淑清(2008)。質性研究的18堂課:首航初探之旅。高雄:麗文。
張瑜洳(2006)。中輟高危險群青少年之處遇研究-優點個案管理之運用。國立暨南
國際大學社會政策與社會工作研究所碩士論文。
張振成(2001)。台灣臨床社會工作者建立助人關係經驗之敘說分析。香港:香港中文大學社會工作課程哲學博士論文。
張振成(2003)。助人關係與中國文化。載於徐錦鋒等合著,社會個案工作:理論與實務,pp.156-158。台北:五南。
許素彬(2008)。家長與個管員夥伴關係對早期療育服務成效之影響研究。臺大社工學刊,17,43-92。new window
陳介英(2003)。深度訪談在經驗研究地位的反思。齊力、林本炫主編,質性研究方法與資料分析。嘉義:南華大學教育社會學研究所。
陳向明(2002)。社會科學質的研究。台北:五南。new window
葉明岱(2006)。驚濤駭浪的一家人-遭受兒童虐待與性侵害個案尋找自我的成長故事。新竹市政府家庭暴力暨性侵害防治中心參與優點個案管理模式案例報告。
童映雪(2006)。從心出發。社團法人彰化縣生命線協會參與優點個案管理模式案例分享。
畢恆達(1996)。詮釋學與質性研究。胡幼慧主編,質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。台北:巨流。
梁福鎮(2000)。詮釋學方法及其在教育研究上的應用。中正大學教育研究所主編,質的研究方法。高雄:麗文。
曾仁杰、王鈺菱(2010)。優勢助人觀點水平思考的實務運用—以高風險家庭酒癮父親的處遇為例。嘉南學報,36,422-434。new window
曾月娥(2006)。火金姑來照路。彰化縣政府家庭暴力及性侵害防治中心參與優點個案管理模式案例報告。
曾華源、胡慧嫈、李仰慈、郭世豐(2002)。社會工作專業價值與倫理概論。台北:洪葉。
曾華源、胡慧嫈、李仰慈、郭世豐(2006)。社會工作專業價值與倫理概論。台北:洪葉。
黃光國(2001)。社會科學的理路。台北:心理。
黃維憲、曾華源、王慧君(1985)社會個案工作。台北:五南。
黃維憲、曾華源、王慧君(1989)社會個案工作。台北:五南。
費孝通(1948)。鄉土中國。上海:觀察社。
萬育維譯(2006)。社會工作實務手冊。台北:洪葉。
楊深坑(1986)。教育學科學之詮釋學分析。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所集刊,28,33-73。
楊國樞(1992)。中國人的蛻變。台北:桂冠。new window
趙雨龍(2003)。充權的概念探索:青年工作為例,載於趙雨龍、黃昌榮、趙維生編著,充權—新社會工作視界。台北:五南。
管貴貞、連秀鸞(2005)。詮釋學方法在質性研究中之探討。輔導季刊,41(3),1-10。new window
廖榮利(1986)。社會個案工作。台北:幼獅。
潘淑滿(2000)。社會個案工作。台北:五南。
潘淑滿(2003)。質性研究:理論與應用。台北:心理。
鄭麗珍 (2003)。增強權能理論與倡導,載於宋麗玉、曾華源、施教裕、鄭麗珍編著,社會工作理論:處遇模式與案例分析,407-440。台北:洪葉。
賴維淑(2002)。晚期癌症病患對臨終事件之感想與身心、社會及靈性之需求。成大護理研究所碩士論文。
顏玉如(2004)。社會工作人員對優點個案管理模式之態度與執行現況深討-以婚姻
暴力處遇為例。國立暨南國際大學社會政策與社會工作研究所碩士論文。
簡春安、鄒平儀(2004)。社會工作研究法(修訂版)。台北:巨流。new window
嚴平譯(1992)。詮釋學。台北市:桂冠。

外文部分
Anderson, K. M. (1997).Uncovering survival abilities in children who have been sexually abused. Families in society, 78(6), 592-599.
Anthony, W. (1993). Recovery from Mental Illness: The guiding vision of the mental health service system in the 1990s. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 16(4), 11-23.
Ayland, L. & West, B.(2006). The good way model: A strrengths-based approach for working with young people, especially those with intellectual difficulties who have sexually abusive behavior. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 12(2), 189-201.
Baron-Epel, O., Drach-Zachavy, A., & Peleg, H. (2003). Health promotion partnerships in Israel: Motives, enhancing and inhibiting factors, and modes of structure. Health Promotion Internation, 18(1), 15-22.
Bartlett, H. M.(1958).Some Aspects of Social Casework in a Medical Setting: A Study in
the Field of Medical Social Work. National Association of Social Workers.
Bell, H. (2003). Strengths and secondary trauma in family violence work. National Association of Social Workers, 48(4), 513-522.
Biddle J. B.(1979). Role Theory: Concepts and Research. Krieger Pub Co.
Biestek, F. P. (1957). The casework relationship. Chicago: Loyola University Press.
Biestek, F. P.(1978)。社會個案工作的專業關係(王仁雄等譯)。台中:向上兒童福利基金會。(原著出版於1957)。
Bisman, C. (1994). Social Work Practice: Cases and Principles. California: Brooks/Cole.
Blanch, A., Fisher, D., Tucker, W., Walsh, D., & Chassman, J. (1993). Consumer practitioners and psychiatrists share insights about recovery and coping. Disability Studies Quarterly, 13(2), 17-20.
Blue-Banning, M. J., Turnbull, A. P., & Pereira, L. (2000). Group action planning as support strategy for Hispanic families: Parent and professional perspectives. Mental Retardation, 38(2), 262-275.
Borg, M. & Kristiansen, K. (2004) Recovery-oriented professionals: Helping relationships in mental health services. Journal of Mental Health, 13(5): 493-505.
Brammer, L.M.(1997). The helping relationship:Process and skill. New Jersey:Prentice-Hall.
Bruder, M. B. (2000). Family-centered early intervention: Clarifying our values for the new millennium. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 20, 105-115.
Brun, C. & Rapp, R. C.(2001). Strengths-based case management: Individuals’ perspectives on strengths and the case manager relationships. Social Work, 46(3), 278-288.
Chapin, R. K. (1995). Social policy development: The strengths perspective. Social Work, 40(4), 506-515.
Christ, G. & Blacker, S. (2006) The helping relationship: Beyond the best of intentions.Journal of Palliative Medicine, 9(1),182-182
Coleman, R. (2004). Recovery An Alien Concept. P&P 2nd Press.
Compton B. R. & Galaway B. (1994).Social work processes 5th. Cole Pub Co.
Compton, B. &Galaways, B. (2005).Social Work Processes, 6thedn. Homewood: Dorsey.
Cowger, C. D. (1994). Assessing client strengths: Clinical assessment for client empowerment. Social Work, 39(3), 262-268.
Cowger, C. D., & Snively, C.A. (2002). Assessing client strengths: Individual, family, and community empowerment. In D. Saleebey(ed), The strengths perspective in social work practice.(3th ed.)(p106-123). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Deegan, P. E. (1988). Recovery: The lived experience of rehabilitation. Psychosocial
Rehabilitation Journal, 11(4), 11-19.
Deegan, P. E.(1996). Recovery as a Journey of the Heart. Psychiatric Rehabilitation
Journal, 19(3), 91–97.
Deegan, P. E. (1988). Recovery: The lived experience of rehabilitation. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 11(4), 11-19.
DeJong, P., & Miller, S. D. (1995). How to interview for client strengths. Social Work, 40(6), 729-736.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln(Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research(2nd ed.)(pp.1-28). Thousand Oasks: Sage Publications.
Dunst, C. J. (2000). Revisiting “Rethinking early intervention.” Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 20, 95-104.
Early, T .J.,& GlenMaye, L. F. (2000). Valuing families: Social work practice with families from a strengths perspective. Social Work, 45(2), 118-131.
Epps, S., & Jackson, B. (2000). Empowered families, successful children. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Fast, B. & Chapin, R. (2000). Strengths-based care management for older adults. Health Professions Press.
Graybeal, C. (2001). Strengths-based social work assessment: Transforming the dominant paradigm. Family in Society, 82(3), 233-242.
Harding, C., Anthony, W., Chamberlin, J. & Farkas. (2001). The Recovery Vision: New paradigm, new questions, new answers. http://www.bu.edu/cpr/webcast
Hepworth, D.H., Rooney, R.R. & Larson, J.A. (2002). Direct Social Work Practice. California: Brooks/Cole.
Hollis, F. (1972).Casework: a Psychosocial Therapy (2nded.). New York: Random House.
Johnson, L. (1995). Social work practice: a generalist approach. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Kadushin, A. (1972).The social work interview. Columbia University Press.
Kavanagh, C. K. (2002). Good fences don’t necessarily make good therapist. Annals of the American Psychotherapy Association, 5, 34.
Keith-Lucas, A. (1986). Giving and taking help. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.
Kalkman M. (1967). Psychiatric Nursing. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Krill, D. F. (1978).Existential Social Work. Free Press.
Krill, D. F. (1986).Beat Worker: Humanizing Social Work and Psychotherapy Practice.Rowman & Littlefield.
Lambert, M. J. (1992). Psychotherapy outcome research: Implications for integrative and
eclectic therapists. In J. C. Norcross & M. R.Goldfried (Eds.), Handbook of
psychotherapy integration. New York, NY: Basic.
Lambert, M. J., & Bergin, A. E. (1994). The effectiveness of psychotherapy. In A. E. Bergin & S. L. Garfield (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavioral change: An empirical analysis (pp. 143-184). New York:John Wiley.
Lambert, M. J., & Cattani-Thompson, C. (1996).Current findings regarding the
effectiveness of counseling: Implications for practice.Journal of Counseling and Development, 74, 601-608.
Leete, E. (1989). How I perceive and manage my illness. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 15(2), 197-200.
Lee, J. A.B. (1994). The Empowerment Approach to Social Work Practice. New York: Columbia University Press.
Maidment, J. (2006). The quiet remedy: A dialogue on reshaping professional relationship. Family in Society, 87(1), 115-121.
McWilliam, R. A., Tocci, L., & Harbin, G. L. (1998). Family-centered services providers’ discourse and behavior. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 18(4), 206-221.
Moustaks, C. (1994). Phenomenological research method. CA: Stage.
Neuman, W. L. (2003). Social research: qualitative and quantitative approach(5th ed.). MA: Allyn and Bacon.
New Freedom Commission on Mental Health. (2003). Achieving Promise: Transforming Mental Health Care in America. Final Report. DHHS Pub.
Oko, J. (2006). Evaluating alternative approaches to social work: A critical review of strengths perspective. Families in Society, 87(4). 601-611.
Onken, S.J., Dumont, J.M., Ridgway, P., Dornan, D.H. & Ralph, R. (2002). Mental health recovery: What helps and what hindes?A National Research Project for the Development of Recovery Facilitating System Performance Indicators. National Technical Assistance Center for State Mental Health Planning Report.
Padgett, D. K. (1998). Qualitative methods in social work research: Challenges and rewards. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Patton, M. Q. (1995)。質的評鑑與研究(吳芝儀、李奉儒譯)。台北:桂冠。(原著出版於1990年)。
Palmer, E. P. (1969). Hermeneutics. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Perlman, H.H.(1979). Relationship:The heart of helping people. U.S.A.: The University of Chicago.
Petr, C.P.(1988). The Worker-client relationship:A general systems perspective. Social Casework,69(10),620-626.
Proctor,E.K.(1982). Defining the worker-client relationship. Social Work.27(5),430-435.
Ralph, R., Lambert, D. & Kidder, K.A. (2002). The Recovery Perspective and Evidence-based Practice for people with serious mental illness: A guideline development for the Behavioral Health Recovery Management project. http://bhrm.org/guidelines/mhguidelines.htm
Rapp, C. A. (1998). The strengths model: Case management with people suffering from severe mental illness. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rapp, C. & Goscha, R. (2002) Active Ingredients of Case Management (unpublished
documents). University of Kansas School of Social Welfare.
Rapp, C. A. &Goscha, R. J. (2012).The Strengths Model: A Recovery-Oriented Approach to Mental Health Services. New York: Oxford University Press.
Reid, W. J. (1996). Task-Centered social work. Social Work Treatment, 26, 617-640.
Ribner, D.S. & Knei-Paz, C. (2002). Client’s view of a successful helping relationship. Social Work, 47(4), 379-387.
Ridgway, P. (2001). ReStorying psychiatric disability: Learning from first person accounts of recovery. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 24(4), 335-343.
Russo, R. J. (1999). Applying a strengths-based practice approach in working with people with developmental disabilities and their families. Family in Society, 80(1), 25-33.
Riessman, C. K.(2003)。敘說分析(王勇智、鄧明宇譯)。台北:五南。(原著出版於1993)。
Saleebey, D. (1996). The strengths perspective in social work practice: Extensions and cautions. Social Work, 41(3), 296-305.
Saleebey, D. (1997). The strengths perspective in social work practice(3rd ed.). NY: Longman Publisher USA.
Schatz, M. S. & Flagler, M. N. (2004). Examining how professionals describe the strengths
perspective in their practice. The Journal of Baccalaureate Social Work, 9(2), 63-77.
Sheppard, M. (2001). The design and development of an instrument for assessing the quality of partnership between mother and social worker in child and family care. Child and Family Social Work, 6, 31-46.
Skimore, R. A. & Thackeray, M. G. (1994).Introduction to Social Work (6thed.). NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Stiker, H. J. (1999). A history of disability. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Stone, E., & Priestley, M. (1996). Parasites, pawns and partners: disability research and the role of non-disabled researchers. The British Journal of Sociology, 47(4), 699-716.
Strauss, A. & J. Corbin (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Summers, J., Hoffman, L., Marquis, J., Turnbull, A., Poston, D., & Nelson, L. (2005). Measuring the quality of family-professional partnerships in special education services. Exceptional Children, 72(1), 65-80.
Taylor, I. & Riche, P.L. (2006) What do we know about partnership with service users and carers in social work education and how robust is the evidence base?Health & Social Care in the Community, 14(5),418-425.
Trotter, C. (1999).Working with Involuntary Clients: A Guide to Practice. London: Sage.
Turnbull, A. P., & Turnbull, H. R. (2001). Families, professionals, and exceptionality: A special partnership (4th ed.). NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
Turner, F. J. (1996). Social work treatment: Interlocking theoretical approaches. New York: The Free Press.
Turner, S. G. (2001). Resilience and social work practice: Three case studies. Families in Society, 82(5), 441-448.
Van Manen,M.(2004)。探索生活經驗:建立敏思行動教育學的人文科學(高淑清、
連雅慧、林月琴譯)。嘉義市:濤石文化(原著出版於1997)。
Webster’s II New Riverside University Dictionary. (1984). Springfield, MA: Merriam- Webster.
Weick, A., Rapp, C., Sullivan, W. P., & Kisthardt, W. (1989). A strength perspective for social work practice. Social Work, 34, 350-354.
Whitley, D. M., White, K. R., Kelley, S. J. & Yorke, B. (1999). Strengths-based case management: The application to grandparents raising grandchildren. Family in Society, 80(1), 110-119.
Will, M. (1985). Ms. Will speaks on the least restrictive environment. Programs for the handicapped, Jan/Feb, 1-2.
Witkin, S. (2000). Ethics-r-us. Social Work, 45, 197-200.
Wolin, S. J., & Wolin, S. (1993). The resilient self: How survivors of troubled families rise above adversity. New York: Villard.
Yip, K. S.(2006). A strengths perspective in working with on adolescent with self-cutting behaviors. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 23(2), 134-146.

 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE