:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:折枝畫於趨簡現象下之開枝散葉
書刊名:藝術學報
作者:徐永賢
作者(外文):Shyu, Yeong-shyan
出版日期:2015
卷期:11:1=96
頁次:頁19-70
主題關鍵詞:折枝花象徵寓意花鳥畫花卉Plucked branches and flowersSymbolImplicationFlower-and-bird paintingFlower
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:168
  • 點閱點閱:35
本文像就「趨簡」現象作為面向基礎點,論述折枝畫在畫史上演化進程現象與意義。 就畫史演進來看,從花鳥畫之「全景式J 走向「折枝」圖式,其實是文人畫思想體象下所講化 而成地;然而就「折枝」圖式而言,更能成為「聚焦」 地表達情戚與思想、之核心,並擴展至社會集 體意識中,因此「趨簡」形式之思考是藝文思潮與畫史必然發展。 本文從傳統花鳥畫史之位置經營上,簡略區分為「全景式」及「折枝式」兩種;從花鳥畫發展 進程來看,所謂「全景式」花鳥畫,亦可視為五代北宋山水畫部份截景之樣式,故而在審視兩宋山 水畫及花鳥畫,從「全景式」山水畫衍化至「邊角」山水畫之發展,與花鳥畫「全景式」及「折枝 式」問,在位置經營上相互影響之可能性? 折枝畫之原型是傳統花鳥畫史中具有傳承性及反覆出現之因數,它以不同的人文精神轉化出各 具時代性,及特有之精神世界。以折技花作為原型,進行論述,主要動機在於它是畫史發展中逐漸 形成一種可供歸納之模式與現象,因此進一步,從折枝畫相關歷代主學中、題畫詩跋中,梳理出折 枝畫初始之源由,及各個時代之審美特質。 是故探討由「全景式」花鳥畫轉化至「拆枝式J 位置經營,其間又如何區別呢?然而,從現存 可見「全景式」及「折枝式」花鳥畫作係屬相對位置經營所衍生之樣態,雖分屬不同構成,但也 並非可截然劃分開來,而是以相互交融之畫史現象,如欲將「折枝」一詞,強以明確界定,事實上 頗為尷尬,深怕引喻失義,適得其反;折枝畫概念應如何界定呢?它所形成的邏輯性之轉變過程? 及其所反映的是何種審美心理或社會心理?各朝代折枝畫在型態上,與過往歷史中呈現了何種面 貌?其社會心理與意識所催化之脈絡與痕跡又何在?以上種種,透過本文試探討之。
By the view point of Chinese painting evolving history ,it is under the influence of Literati paintings, that the "full-view"schemata of flower-bird paintings goes towards the "twig-and-leaf' (partial-view) schemata. For the"twig-and-leaf'schemata, thinking in simplication of paintings is evitable in the trend of literary thoughts, and what symbolizing in it is to show the psychological demands. The compositions of Chinese traditional flower-bird paintings can be roughly divided into the "full-view"and the"twig-and-leaf view"two schemata. In the flower-bird painting history, the"full-views"schemata itself also actually is the partial view fonn of the natural landscape panorama view. This article is to discuss how above two schemata influenced landscape painting from Sung dynasty ,furthennore, how to distinguish each other when the full-view transfonned into twig-and-leaf view schemata? How to define the concept of twig-and-leaf paintings? What is the process in logic transfonning? And what is the aesthetic conception of beauty? What are the aspects of the "twig-and-leaf' view showed in the past history? And where are the tracks of its social consciousness left? The prototype of "twig-and-leaf' painting embodies the heritage element in traditional Chinese flower-bird painting history. This element which were repeated in flower-bird paintings , through the painting history, transfonned into different flower-bird works in different time period with literati. It also combined the literature genre with connotation to fonn an unique spiritual world. Further, we can card the original source of the paintings and the features of aesthetic conception of beauty in the works. From existing works, the"full-view"and"twig-and-leaf'view are only defined by the objects position shown on the painting so to speak. Although these are different schemata in painting, they represent the interactive phenomena in painting history. Ifwe are to give the "twing-and-leaf'a clear definition, perhaps we would fail embarrassingly. However, the reason this article discusses the" twig-and-leaf' schemata in flower-bird paintings as the main thought is that comparing to the full-view flower-bird paintings, the "twig-and-leaf' schemata, by its structure gradually formed a recognizable pattem under the flower-bird painting category, it is able to search further the psychological demands to connotation in collecting public.
期刊論文
1.(1990)。朵雲。中國畫研究季刊,1990(2)=25。  延伸查詢new window
2.(1987)。朵雲。中國畫研究季刊,1987(2)=12。  延伸查詢new window
3.(1993)。朵雲。中國畫研究季刊,1993(2)=37。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.劉建平(1996)。揚州畫派書畫全集。天津市:天津人民美術出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳慧蓀、鐘文斌(1985)。八大山人書集。江西省:江西人民美術出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.長北(2007)。中國古代藝術論著集注與研究。天津市:天津人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.俞劍華(2007)。中國畫選讀。南精:鳳凰出版傳媒集團江蘇美術出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.俞劍華(1975)。中國畫論類編。臺北市:河洛圖書出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.馬良書(2011)。中國畫型態學。北京:清華大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.高木森(1994)。宋畫思想探微。臺北市:臺北市立美術館。  延伸查詢new window
8.張乾元(2006)。象外之意。北京:中國書店。  延伸查詢new window
9.陳中浙(2006)。蘇軾書畫藝術與佛教。北京:商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
10.彭修銀、劉建蓉(2012)。中國畫美學探驪。北京:北京大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.曾祖蔭(1887)。中國古代美學範疇。臺北市:丹青圖書有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.黃霖蔣凡(2007)。中國歷代文論選新編•宋金元卷。  延伸查詢new window
13.葉朗(1985)。中國美學史大綱。臺北市:滄浪出版社。  延伸查詢new window
14.董欣賓、鄭奇(1998)。中國繪畫對偶範疇論。江蘇:江蘇美術出版社。  延伸查詢new window
15.鄭昶(1987)。中國畫全史。臺北市:臺灣中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
16.嚴善鋳(2005)。文人與畫。江蘇:江蘇教育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
17.洪再新(2005)。中國美術史圖像手冊•繪畫卷。杭州市:中國美術學院出版社。  延伸查詢new window
18.韋政通、王冰(2009)。中國哲學辭典。吉林市:吉林出版集團有限責任公司。  延伸查詢new window
19.曹利華(1999)。中華傳統美學體系探源。北京市:北京圖書館出版社。  延伸查詢new window
20.何懷碩(199106)。近代中國美術論集--藝海鈎沈。臺北市:藝術家出版社。  延伸查詢new window
21.李來源、林木(1997)。中國古代畫論發展史實。上海:上海人民美術出版社。  延伸查詢new window
22.李福順(2008)。蘇軾與書畫文獻集。北京市:榮寶齋出版社。  延伸查詢new window
23.葛路(2009)。中國繪畫美學範疇體系。北京:北京大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
24.敏澤(1989)。中國美學思想史。齊魯書社。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE