:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:非結構式諮商團體不同歷程階段成員氣氛知覺與自我揭露因素之相關探究
書刊名:中華輔導與諮商學報
作者:許育光 引用關係
作者(外文):Hsu, Yu-kuang
出版日期:2016
卷期:45
頁次:頁95-122
主題關鍵詞:自我揭露自我揭露因素團體氣氛團體歷程團體諮商Factors of self-disclosureGroup climateGroup counselingGroup processSelf-disclosure
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:85
  • 點閱點閱:28
本研究旨在探討非結構式諮商團體轉換階段與工作階段,成員團體氣氛知覺對於在團體中是否願意自我揭露之相關。研究採實際進行團體並進行問卷調查,以14 個非結構式、各進行十次的諮商團體之96 個成員作為研究對象,分別於每次團體聚會結束後立即填寫「自我揭露量表」與「團體氣氛量表」,並針對轉換階段(第二至四次),以及工作階段(第七至九次)之自我揭露因素進行團體氣氛之多元迴歸分析。研究結果顯示:在諮商團體轉換階段,成員衝突氣氛知覺對於因打破沉默而願意揭露、以及因自我不確定性和無法自在等因素而不願意揭露具預測性;而在團體工作階段成員衝突氣氛知覺仍會因打破沉默願意揭露,而自我貶抑、自我不確定性、以及個人步調等因素對於不願意揭露因素具預測性;工作階段投入氣氛知覺則對於因團體和領導促發、打破沉默等因素,具有負向預測性。研究根據結論進行相關實務討論與建議。
The purpose of this study is to explore the relationships of members’ perceptions of group climates and their reasons of willingness or unwillingness to self-disclose through the group process. The correlation between members’ climate perceptions and self-disclosure reasons in the transition and work stages of counseling groups was explored. Ninety-six participants from fourteen unstructured counseling groups (each ten sessions) were invited to attend this study. The questionnaires "Self Disclosure Questionnaire" and "Group Climate Scale" were completed immediately after each group meeting two through nine. The second through fourth sessions which identified as the transition stage and the seventh through ninth which identified as the work stage were selected to analyze the regression between members’ climate perceptions and their self-disclosure reasons. Two parts of results were presented. In the transition stage of the counseling groups, reasons of being willing to disclose included discomfort with silence. Reasons of being unwilling (i.e., feeling uncertain and feeling uncomfortable) showed predictable positive relationship with the conflict climate perception. In the work stage, reasons of being willing to disclose (i.e., others-initiated and discomfort with silence) showed predictable negative relationship with the engagement climate perception, and reasons of being unwilling (i.e., self-devaluation, feeling uncertain and personal pace) showed predictable positive relationship with the conflict. The recommendations for practice and further research were discussed and proposed.
期刊論文
1.Stockton, R.、Rohde, R. I.、Haughey, J.(1992)。The effects of structured group exercises on cohesion, engagement, avoidance, and conflict。Small Group Research,23(2),155-168。  new window
2.Joyce, A. S.、MacNair-Semands, R.、Tasca, G. A.、Ogrodniczuk, J. S.(2011)。Factor structure and validity of the Therapeutic Factors Inventory-Short Form。Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice,15(3),201-219。  new window
3.Kivlighan, D. M.、Tarrant, J. M.(2001)。Does group climate mediate the group leadership-group member outcome relationship? A test of Yalom's hypotheses about leadership priorities。Group Dynamics,5(3),220-234。  new window
4.吳秀碧、洪雅鳳、羅家玲(20030300)。團體諮商歷程中領導者意圖與聚焦之分析研究。中華輔導學報,13,117-150。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.王郁琮、陳尚綾、王麗斐、林美珠(20120400)。個人知覺與團體脈絡之團體氣氛:多層次潛在變數分析應用。中華輔導與諮商學報,32,33-55。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Bernard, H.(1995)。The dynamics of the co-therapy relationship: A symposium introduction。Group,19,67-70。  new window
7.Fuhriman, A.、Drescher, S.、Hanson, E.、Henrie, R.、Rybicki, W.(1986)。Refining the measurement of curativeness: An empirical approach。Small Group Research,17(2),186-201。  new window
8.Johnson, J. E.、Pulsipher, D.、Ferrin, S. L.、Burlingame, G. M.、Davies, D. R.、Gleave, R.(2006)。Measuring group processes: A comparison of the GCQ and CCI。Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, And Practice,10(2),136-145。  new window
9.Slavin, R. L.(1993)。The significance of here-and-now disclosure in promoting cohesion in group psychotherapy。Group,17(3),143-151。  new window
10.Tuckman, B. W.、Jensen, M. A. C.(1977)。Stages in small group development revisited。Group and Organizational Studies,2,419-427。  new window
11.Kivlighan, D. M.、Multon, K. D.、Brossart, D. F.(1996)。Helpful impacts in group counseling: Development of a multidimensional rating system。Journal of Counseling psychology,43,347-355。  new window
12.吳秀碧(20100900)。系統化訓練模式對諮商團體領導者進階訓練效果之研究。中華輔導與諮商學報,28,99-142。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.吳秀碧、許育光、洪雅鳳、羅家玲(20040900)。非結構諮商團體過程中領導者技術運用之研究。中華心理衛生學刊,17(3),23-56。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.許育光(20110600)。諮商團體成員自我揭露因素之歷程變化分析。教育心理學報,42(4),655-676。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.王麗斐、林美珠(20001200)。團體治療性因素量表之發展與編製。中華輔導學報,9,1-24。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.吳秀碧(20050300)。諮商團體領導原理的建構:螺旋式領導方法。中華輔導學報,17,1-32。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.吳秀碧、許育光、李俊良(20031000)。諮商團體歷程中成員自我揭露頻率與深度之初探。彰化師大輔導學報,25,1-23。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.許育光、吳秀碧(20100300)。諮商團體領導者於情緒處理段落之介入策略研究。中華輔導與諮商學報,27,245-284。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.Tschuschke, V.、MacKenzie, K. R.、Haaser, B.、Janke, G.(1996)。Self-disclosure, feedback, and outcome in long-term inpatient psychotherapy groups。Journal of Psychotherapy Practice and Research,5,35-44。  new window
20.Kociunas, R.、Dragan, T.(2008)。The phenomenon of self-disclosure in a psychotherapy group。Existential Analysis,19,345-363。  new window
會議論文
1.吳秀碧、洪雅鳳、許育光(2006)。團體成員自我揭露行為與團體氣氛之分析研究。2006年中國輔導學會年會暨學術研討會議程:輔導新興議題的關懷與學校輔導人員的立法參與,中國輔導學會、台北市立教育大學 。台北。  延伸查詢new window
2.Hsu, K.、Woo, S.、Hung, Y. F.(2009)。Developing an instrument for assessing members' participation: Self-disclosure questionnaire。APA 117 annual convention。Toronto。  new window
3.Woo, S. P.、Hsu, K.、Hung, Y. F.(2005)。Why disclosing or not?: An investigation for the reasons of members' disclosing themselves in counseling groups。The 7th Pacific Rim Regional Congress of Group Psychotherapy。Taipei。  new window
學位論文
1.許育光(2005)。團體諮商轉換階段之人際歷程與領導者介入策略分析研究(博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Trotzer, J. P.(2006)。The counselor and the group: Integrating theory, training, and practice。Philadelphia, PA:Taylor & Francis。  new window
2.Jourard, S. M.(1971)。The Transparent Self。New York, NY:Van Nostrand Reinhold。  new window
3.MacKenzie, K. R.(1990)。Introduction to Time-Limited Group Psychotherapy。Washington, DC:American Psychiatric Press。  new window
4.Corey, M. S.、Corey, G.(2006)。Group Process and practice。Monterey, CA。  new window
5.Corey, M. S.、Corey, G.(2008)。The theory and practice of group counseling。Pacific Grove, CA:Brooks/Cole。  new window
6.Donigion, J.、Hulse-killacky, D.(1999)。Critical Incidents in Group Therapy。Pacific Grove, CA:Brooks/Cole Publishing Company。  new window
7.Erford, B. T.(2010)。Group work in the schools。Boston, MA:Pearson Education, Inc.。  new window
8.Gladding, S. T.(2008)。Group work: A counseling specialty。Upper Saddle River, NJ:Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall。  new window
9.Jacobs, E. E.、Masson, R. L.、Harvill, R. L.(2009)。Group counseling: Strategies and skills。Belmont, CA:Thomson Brooks/Cole。  new window
10.Johnson, D. W.、Johnson, F. P.(2006)。Joining together: Group theory and group skills。Boston, MA:Pearson Allyn and Bacon。  new window
11.Wheelan, A. S.(2005)。Group process: A developmental perspective。Boston, MA:Allyn & Bacon。  new window
12.Yalom, Irvin D.、Leszcz, Molyn(2005)。The theory and practice of group psychotherapy。Basic Books。  new window
13.許育光(20130000)。團體諮商與心理治療:多元場域應用實務。臺北:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.MacKenzie, K. R.(1983)。The clinical application of a group climate measure。Advances in group psychotherapy: Integrating research and practice。New York, NY:International Universities Press。  new window
2.Lewis, C. M.、Beck, A. P.、Dugo, J. M.、Eng, A. M.(2000)。The group development process analysis measures。The process of group psychotherapy: Systems for analyzing change。Washington, DC:American Psychological Association。  new window
3.Posthuma, B. W.(1996)。Group development。Small groups in counseling and therapy: Process and leadership。Massachusetts:Allyn & Bacon。  new window
4.Vinogradov, S.、Yalom, I. P.(1990)。Self-disclosure in group psychotherapy。Self-Disclosure in the therapeutic relationship。New York, NY:Plenum Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE