臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：科技教育融入STEM課程的核心價值與實踐
書刊名：教育科學研究期刊
作者：范斯淳／游光昭 引用關係
作者(外文)：Fan, Szu-chun／Yu, Kuang-chao
出版日期：2016
卷期：61:2
頁次：頁153-183
主題關鍵詞：STEM課程；科技教育；課程設計；STEM curriculum；Technology education；Curriculum design
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(16) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:16
  • 共同引用共同引用:5
  • 點閱點閱:71
發展STEM（Science, Technology, Engineering & Mathematics）課程是近年來美國教育界所關注的課題，亦普遍受到先進國家的重視。本研究之目的是從美國科技教育學者的觀點，探討科技教育融入STEM課程的核心價值與實踐方式，並據以提出對臺灣科技教育融入STEM課程的可行性及實施建議。本研究採深度訪談的方式訪談11位美國科技教育學者，以瞭解美國科技教育界如何闡述STEM課程之核心價值，及其課程發展與實踐方式。本研究歸納之結論如下：一、科技教育的STEM課程應是一種整合式的教學與學習途徑；二、科技教育的STEM課程應著重在實作學習（hands-on learning）以及心智學習（minds-on learning）的平衡；三、科技教育的STEM課程應以「科技與工程議題」為核心、「工程設計」歷程為架構，而「科學探究」、「數學分析」及「科技工具」為知識整合與應用的要項。據此，本研究針對臺灣邁向12年國教之科技教育提出三點建議：一、國中的科技教育課程著重設計與製作的內涵，培養學生解決生活問題的能力；高中著重工程設計的內涵，培養學生整合STEM知識以解決實務問題的能力；二、臺灣科技教育的STEM課程應提供學生更多設計、探究、分析、測試與綜合評估的學習機會，以建構更完整的整合與應用能力；三、提升臺灣生活科技教師對STEM課程的理解與教學專業知識的準備，是落實STEM課程理念的關鍵課題
The integrative science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) curriculum has become the primary focus of American education reform, as well as a new curriculum development trend in some developed countries in recent years. This study sought to develop a holistic understanding of the core value of the STEM curriculum and its implementation regarding American technology education. This study employed a qualitative in-depth interview method to explore and describe the educational philosophy and core value, curriculum design models, and instructional approaches involved in implementing the STEM curriculum. Eleven technology education experts from the United States were interviewed individually. The results are summarized as follows: (1) From the perspective of American technology education, the STEM curriculum is an integrative teaching and learning approach. (2) The core value of the STEM curriculum is to provide a balance between hands-on learning and minds-on learning. (3) Technological and engineering concerns should be the driving force of STEM-based projects; specifically, “engineering design” should be the foundation, and “science inquiry” and “mathematics analysis” should be the key capabilities for integrating and applying knowledge. From the results, three recommendations are offered for Taiwanese technology education: (1) The inclusion of “design and make” in the Taiwanese technology education curriculum should be considered as the major content for developing students’ problem-solving abilities, whereas “engineering design” should be the core content used in high school to develop students’ problem-solving abilities with STEM knowledge; (2) Technology education should provide students with more learning experiences in design, inquiry, analysis, testing, and evaluation; (3) The key to successfully implementing the STEM curriculum is to equip technology teachers with an understanding of the curriculum and the involved teaching approaches
期刊論文
1.Herschbach, Dennis R.(2011)。The STEM initiative: Constraints and challenges。Journal of STEM Teacher Education，48(1)，96-122。  new window
2.Lewis, T.(2004)。A turn to engineering: The continuing struggle of technology education for legitimization as a school subject。Journal of Technology Education，16(1)，21-39。  new window
3.Moye, J. J.、Dugger, W. E., Jr.、Starkweather, K. N.(2012)。The status of technology and engineering education in the United States: A fourth report of the findings from the States (2011-12)。Technology and Engineering Teacher，71(8)，25-31。  new window
4.Foster, P.(1994)。Must we MST?。Journal of Technology Education，6(1)，76-84。  new window
5.Wicklein, R. C.、Schell, J. W.(1995)。Case studies of multidisciplinary approaches to integrating mathematics, science and technology education。Journal of Technology Education，6(2)，59-76。  new window
6.Daugherty, J. L.(2009)。Engineering professional development design for secondary school teachers: A multiple case study。Journal of Technology Education，21(1)，10-24。  new window
7.范斯淳、楊錦心(20120900)。美日科技教育課程及其啟示。教育資料集刊，55，71-102。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Asunda, P. A.(2012)。Standards for technological literacy and STEM education delivery through career and technical education programs。Journal of Technology Education，23(2)，44-60。  new window
9.Cantrell, P.、Pekcan, G.、Itani, A.、Velasquez‐Bryant, N.(2006)。The effects of engineering modules on student learning in middle school science classrooms。Journal of Engineering Education，95(4)，301-309。  new window
10.Berry, R. Q. III、Reed, P. A.、Ritz, J. M.、Lin, C. Y.、Hsiung, S.、Frazier, W.(2004)。Stem initiatives: Stimulating students to improve science and mathematics achievement。The Technology Teacher，64(4)，23-30。  new window
11.Carr, R. L.、Bennett, L. D. IV、Strobel, J.(2012)。Engineering in the K-12 STEM standards of the 50 U.S. states: An analysis of presence and extent。Journal of Engineering Education，101(3)，539-564。  new window
12.Clark, A. C.、Ernst, J. V.(2008)。STEM-based computational modeling for technology education。Journal of Technology Studies，34(1)，20-27。  new window
13.Crismond, D. P.、Adams, R. S.(2012)。The informed design teaching and learning matrix。Journal of Engineering Education，101(4)，738-797。  new window
14.Custer, R. L.、Daugherty, J.(2009)。Professional development for teachers of engineering: Research and related activities。The Bridge，39(3)，18-24。  new window
15.Dixon, R. A.、Brown, R. A.(2012)。Transfer of learning: Connecting concepts during problem solving。Journal of Technology Education，24(1)，2-16。  new window
16.Fishman, B. J.、Marx, R. W.、Best, S.、Tal, R. T.(2003)。Linking teacher and student learning to improve professional development in systemic reform。Teaching and Teacher Education，19(6)，643-658。  new window
17.Kelley, T. R.(2008)。Cognitive processes of students participating in engineering-focused design instruction。Journal of Technology Education，19(2)，50-64。  new window
18.Kelley, T. R.(2010)。Staking the claim for the 'T' in STEM。The Journal of Technology Studies，36(1)，2-11。  new window
19.Lewis, T.(2005)。Coming to terms with engineering design as content。Journal of Technology Education，16(2)，37-54。  new window
20.Mativo, J.、Wicklein, R.(2011)。Learning effects of design strategies on high school students。Journal of STEM Teacher Education，48(3)，66-92。  new window
21.Moore, T. J.、Miller, R. L.、Lesh, R. A.、Stohlmann, M. S.、Kim, Y. R.(2013)。Modeling in engineering: The role of representational fluency in students' conceptual understanding。Journal of Engineering Education，102(1)，141-178。  new window
22.McMullin, K.(2014)。Identifying perceptions that contribute to the development of successful project lead the way pre-engineering programs in Utah。Journal of Technology Education，26(1)，22-46。  new window
23.Mehalik, M. M.、Doppelt, Y.、Schuun, C. D.(2008)。Middle-school science through design-based learning versus scripted inquiry: Better overall science concept learning and equity gap reduction。Journal of Engineering Education，97(1)，71-85。  new window
24.Merrill, C.、Custer, R. L.、Daugherty, J.、Westrick, M.、Zeng, Y.(2009)。Delivering core engineering concepts to secondary level students。Journal of Technology Education，20(1)，48-64。  new window
25.Morrison, J.、Bartlett, R.(2009)。STEM as curriculum: An experiential approach。Education Week，23，28-31。  new window
26.Moye, J. J.、Dugger, W. E.、Starkweather, K. N.(2014)。"Learning by doing" research introduction。Technology & Engineering Teacher，74(1)，24-27。  new window
27.Ortiz, A. M.(2015)。Examining students' proportional reasoning strategy levels as evidence of the impact of an integrated LEGO robotics and mathematics learning experience。Journal of Technology Education，26(2)，46-69。  new window
28.Pinelli, T. E.、Haynie, W. J., III.(2010)。A case for the nationwide inclusion of engineering in the K-12 curriculum via technology education。Journal of Technology Education，21(2)，52-68。  new window
29.Pitt, J.(2009)。Blurring the boundaries-STEM education and education for sustainable development。Design and Technology Education: An International Journal，14(1)，37-48。  new window
30.Ritz, J. M.、Fan, S.-C.(2015)。STEM and technology education: International state-of-the-art。International Journal of Technology and Design Education，25(4)，429-451。  new window
31.Sanders, M.(2009)。STEM, STEM education, STEM mania。The Technology Teacher，68(4)，20-26。  new window
32.Schnittka, C. G.、Bell, R. L.(2011)。Engineering design and conceptual change in science: Addressing thermal energy and heat transfer in eighth grade。International Journal of Science Education，33(13)，1861-1887。  new window
33.Wells, J. G.(2013)。Integrative STEM education at Virginia Tech: Graduate preparation for tomorrow's leaders。Technology & Engineering Teacher，72(5)，28-35。  new window
34.Wendell, K. B.、Rogers, C. B.(2013)。Engineering design-based science, science content performance, and science attitudes in elementary school。Journal of Engineering Education，102(4)，513-540。  new window
35.Williams, P. J.(2011)。STEM education: Proceed with caution。Design and Technology Education: An International Journal，16(1)，26-35。  new window
36.Zollman, A.(2012)。Learning for STEM literacy: STEM literacy for learning。School Science and Mathematics，112(1)，12-19。  new window
37.Rosenthal, D. B.(1989)。Two approaches to STS education。Science Education，73(5)，581-589。  new window
38.Bybee, R. W.(2010)。Advancing STEM education: A 2020 vision。Technology and Engineering Teacher，70(1)，30-35。  new window
39.Fogarty, Robin(1991)。Ten Ways to Integrate Curriculum。Educational Leadership，49(2)，61-65。  new window
40.Burke, Barry N.(2014)。The ITEEA 6E Learning ByDeSIGN™ Model: Maximizing Informed Design and Inquiry in the Integrative STEM Classroom。Technology and Engineering Teacher，73(6)，14-19。  new window
會議論文
1.Dugger, W. E.(2010)。Evolution of STEM in the United States。The 6th Biennial International Conference on Technology Education Research。Gold Coast, Queensland。  new window
2.Roberts, A.、Cantu, D.(201206)。Applying STEM instructional strategies to design and technology curriculum。The PATT 26 Conference。Stockholm, Sweden。  new window
3.Silk, E. M.、Schunn, C. D.(2008)。Core concepts in engineering as a basis for understanding and improving K-12 engineering education in the United States。The National Academy of Engineering/National Research Council workshop on K-12 Engineering Education。Washington, DC。  new window
研究報告
1.李隆盛、吳正己、游光昭、周麗瑞、葉家棟、盧秋珍、沈章平(2013)。十二年國民基本教育生活與科技領域綱要內容之前導研究 (計畫編號：NAER-102-06-A-1-02-09-1-18)。臺北市：國家教育研究院。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Next Generation Science Standards Lead States(2013)。Next generation science standards: For states, by states。National Academies Press。  new window
2.Bybee, Rodger W.(2013)。The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities。Arlington, Virginia：National Science Teachers Association Press。  new window
3.Wiggins, Grant P.、Mctighe, Jay(2005)。Understanding by design。Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development。  new window
4.Bayer Corporation(2010)。Planting the seeds for a diverse U.S. STEM pipeline: A compendium of best practice K-12 STEM education programs。Pittsburgh, PA：Bayer Corporation。  new window
5.Bybee, R. W.、McCrae, B. J.(2009)。PISA science 2006: Implications for science teachers and teaching。Arlington, VA：NSTA Press。  new window
6.Gardner, D. P.、Larsen, Y. W.、Baker, W. O.、Campbell, A.、Crosby, E. A.、Foster, C. A.、Wallace, R.(1983)。A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform (A report to the Nation and the Secretary of Education)。Washington, DC：The National Commission on Excellence in Education, United States Department of Education。  new window
7.Kelley, T.、Brenner, D. C.、Pieper, J. T.(2010)。PLTW and Epics‐High: Curriculum comparisons to support problem solving in the context of engineering design。Utah, UT：National Center for Engineering and Technology Education (NCETE)。  new window
8.International Technology and Engineering Educators Association。Standards for technological literacy: Content for the study of technology。Reston, VA：International Technology and Engineering Educators Association。  new window
9.National Academy of Engineering, & National Research Council(2014)。STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research。Washington, DC：The National Academies Press。  new window
10.National Research Council(2009)。Engineering in K-12 education: Understanding the status and improving the prospects。National Academies Press。  new window
11.National Research Council(2011)。Successful K-12 STEM education: Identifying effective approaches in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics。Washington, DC：The National Academies Press。  new window
12.Toulmin, C.、Groome, M.(2007)。Building a science, technology, engineering, and math agenda。Washington, DC：National Governors Association。  new window
13.Drake, S. M.(1998)。Creating integrated curriculum: Proven ways to increase student learning。Thousand Oaks, California：Corwin Press。  new window
其他
1.National Governors Association(2007)。Building a science, technology, engineering and math agenda，http://www.nga.org/Files/pdf/0702INNOVATIONStem.pdf。  new window
2.Dayton Regional STEM Center(2011)。STEM education quality framework，http://daytonregionalstemcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Final-Framework-copyrighted.pdf。  new window
3.Indiana Department of Education(2012)。High school STEM full implementation，http://www.doe.in.gov/sites/default/files/ccr/high-school-stem-implementationv2.pdf。  new window
4.Lantz, H. B., Jr.(2009)。Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education what form? What function?，http://dornsife.usc.edu/assets/sites/1/docs/jep/STEMEducationArticle.pdf。  new window
5.North Carolina Department of Public Instruction(2013)。STEM attribute implementation rubric: High school，https://www.ncsmt.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/STEMAttributesRubric_HIGH_v4_Aug2013_v1.pdf。  new window
6.Project Lead The Way(2014)。Our programs，https://www.pltw.org/our-programs。  new window
7.Sorenson, B.(2010)。Alaska S.T.E.M.: Education and the economy report on the need for improved science, technology, engineering and mathematics education in Alaska，http://www.jedc.org/forms/STEMEducationJEDCFinal.pdf。  new window
8.Science Foundation Arizona(2012)。The STEM immersion matrix for schools and districts，http://www.paulofreireschool.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/STEM_Matrix.pdf。  new window
圖書論文
1.Havice, W.(2009)。The power and promise of a STEM education: Thriving in a complex technological world。The overlooked STEM imperatives: Technology and engineering。Reston, VA：International Technology and Engineering Educators Association。  new window
2.McComas, W. F.、McComas, K. K.(2009)。The contributions of science and mathematics to STEM education: A view from beyond the disciplines of technology and engineering。The overlooked STEM imperatives: Technology and engineering。Reston, VA：International Technology and Engineering Educators Association。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1237（臺灣：1221，外國：16） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1669892 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67470235
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上