:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:技術型高中工業類科學生科學素養內涵之建構
書刊名:教育科學研究期刊
作者:許綺婷譚克平
作者(外文):Hsu, Chi-tingTam, Hak-ping
出版日期:2020
卷期:65:4
頁次:頁203-240
主題關鍵詞:工業類科技術型高中科學素養德菲調查法Industrial sectorVocational senior high schoolScientific literacyDelphi survey
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:111
  • 點閱點閱:4
期刊論文
1.Howes, E. V.、Lim, M.、Campos, J.(2009)。Journeys into inquiry-based elementary science: Literacy practices, questioning, and empirical study。Science Education,93(2),189-217。  new window
2.Laugksch, R. C.(2000)。Scientific Literacy: A Conceptual Overview。Science Education,84(1),71-94。  new window
3.Kolstø, Stein D.(2001)。Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues。Science Education,85(3),291-310。  new window
4.Miller, J. D.(1983)。Scientific literacy: A conceptual and empirical review。Daedalus,112(2),29-48。  new window
5.靳知勤(20090800)。中等科學師資培育機構評鑑指標之發展研究。科學教育學刊,17(4),275-292。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.黃銘福、黃毅志(20141200)。臺灣地區出身背景、國中學業成績與高中階段教育分流之關聯。教育實踐與研究,27(2),67-98。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.洪振方(20101000)。思考導向的探究式學習對國二學生科學探究能力的影響。科學教育學刊,18(5),389-415。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Choi, K.、Lee, H.、Shin, N.、Kim, S.-W.、Krajcik, J.(2011)。Re-conceptualization of scientific literacy in South Korea for the 21st century。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,48(6),670-697。  new window
9.Skulmoski, G. J.、Hartman, F. T.、Krahn, J.(2007)。The Delphi method for graduate research。Journal of Information Technology Education,6(1),1-21。  new window
10.靳知勤(20071200)。科學教育應如何提升學生的科學素養--臺灣學術精英的看法。科學教育學刊,15(6),627-646。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.廖年淼(20021000)。高中職畢業生就業競爭力之長期比較分析。技術及職業教育,71,37-43。  延伸查詢new window
12.Altun-Yalçin, S.、Açışlı, S.、Turgut, Ü.(2011)。Determining the levels of pre-service science teachers' scientific literacy and investigating effectuality of the education faculties about developing scientific literacy。Procedia--Social and Behavioral Sciences,15,783-787。  new window
13.Bingle, W. H.、Gaskell, P. J.(1994)。Scientific literacy for decision making and the social construction of scientific knowledge。Science Education,78(2),185-201。  new window
14.Boujaoude, S.(2002)。Balance of scientific literacy themes in science curricula: The case of Lebanon。International Journal of Science Education,24(2),139-156。  new window
15.Colucci-Gray, L.、Camino, E.、Barbiero, G.、Gray, D.(2006)。From scientific literacy to sustainability literacy: An ecological framework for education。Science Education,90(2),227-252。  new window
16.紀惠英、林煥祥(20090200)。從PISA測驗結果看九年一貫課程成效與高中職學生成績的差異。教育政策論壇,12(1),1-39。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.DeBoer, G. E.(2000)。Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,37(6),582-601。  new window
18.Fensham, P. J.(2011)。Globalization of science education: comment and a commentary。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,48(6),698-709。  new window
19.Feinstein, N.(2011)。Salvaging science literacy。Science Education,95(1),168-185。  new window
20.Koballa, Thomas、Kemp, Andrew、Evans, Robert(1997)。The spectrum of scientific literacy。The Science Teacher,64(7),27-31。  new window
21.Ramaley, J. A.、Olds, B. M.、Earle, J.(2005)。Becoming a Learning Organization: New Directions in Science Education Research at the National Science Foundation。Journal of Science Education and Technology,14(2),173-189。  new window
22.Pierce, C.(2012)。The Promissory Future(s) of Education: Rethinking scientific literacy in the era of biocapitalism。Educational Philosophy and Theory,44(7),721-745。  new window
23.Pella, M. O.、O'Hearn, G. T.、Gale, C. W.(1966)。Referents to scientific literacy。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,4(3),199-208。  new window
24.Roth, W. M.(2007)。Toward a dialectical notion and praxis of scientific literacy。Journal of Curriculum Studies,39(4),377-398。  new window
25.Gardner, P. L.(1975)。Attitudes to Science : A Review。Studies in Science Education,2(1),1-41。  new window
26.黃茂在、吳敏而(2016)。科學素養與課程統整。教育脈動,5,1-16。  延伸查詢new window
27.陳冠利、劉湘瑤、陳柏熹、黃書涵(20150600)。以情境式試題評量中學生能源素養。教育科學研究期刊,60(2),167-196。new window  延伸查詢new window
28.范斯淳、游光昭(20160600)。科技教育融入STEM課程的核心價值與實踐。教育科學研究期刊,61(2),153-183。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.吳明雄、許碧珊、張德正、張可立(20090600)。高職高技術創造力學生團隊之創造歷程。教育與心理研究,32(2),1-25。new window  延伸查詢new window
30.賴香如、李碧霞、卓俊辰、呂昌明、溫婉玉、周維倫(20100300)。透過現職教師建構國中健康與體育學習領域之自尊教學指標。教育科學研究期刊,55(1),127-154。new window  延伸查詢new window
31.Lawshe, C. H.(1975)。A quantitative approach to content validity。Personnel Psychology,28(4),563-575。  new window
研究報告
1.黃台珠、蔡俊彥、陳忠志、李育諭(2012)。2012年科技與語文素養計畫--公民科技素養調查研究--子計畫二:自然資源相關情境的調查工具及效化。高雄市:中山大學公民素養推動研究中心。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.American Association for the Advancement of Science(2001)。Atlas of Science Literacy。Washington, DC:American Association for the Advancement of Science Press。  new window
2.Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development(2006)。Assessing scientific, reading and mathematical literacy: A framework for PISA 2006。Paris:Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development。  new window
3.Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development(2010)。PISA 2009 Assessment Framework: Key Competencies in Reading, Mathematics and Science。Paris:Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development。  new window
4.International Technology and Engineering Educator Association(2006)。Technology literacy for all: A rationale and structure for the study of technology。Reston, VA:International Technology and Engineering Educator Association。  new window
5.National Research Council(2000)。Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning。Washington, DC:National Academy Press。  new window
6.International Technology Education Association(2000)。Standards for technological literacy: Content for the study of technology。Reston, Virginia:International Technology Education Association。  new window
7.National Research Council(1996)。National Science Education Standards。National Academy Press。  new window
8.National Research Council(2013)。Next generation science standards: For states, by states。National Academies Press。  new window
9.American Association for the Advancement of Science(2007)。Atlas of Science Literacy。Washington, DC:American Association for the Advancement of Science Press。  new window
10.Bybee, R. W.(1997)。Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practical action。Portsmouth, NH:Heinemann。  new window
11.American Association for the Advancement of Science(1989)。Science for all Americans。New york:Oxford University Press。  new window
12.Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development(2015)。Draft science Framework。Paris:OECD。  new window
13.National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine(2016)。Science literacy: Concepts, contexts, and consequences。Washington, DC:The National Academies Press。  new window
14.National Research Council(2012)。A framework for K-12 science education: Practice, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas。Washington, DC:The National Academies Press。  new window
15.World Economic Forum(2018)。The future of jobs report 2018。Geneva:Centre for the New Economy and Society, World Economic Forum。  new window
16.American Association for the Advancement of Science(1993)。Benchmarks for science literacy。Oxford University Press。  new window
17.Shamos, Morris H.(1995)。The Myth of Scientific Literacy。Rutgers University Press。  new window
18.林煥祥、佘曉清(2017)。PISA 2015臺灣學生的表現。心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
19.Adler, Michael、Ziglio, Erio(1996)。Gazing into the oracle: The Delphi method and its application to social policy and public health。Jessica Kingsley。  new window
20.Linstone, Harold A.、Turoff, Murray(2002)。The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications。Addison-Wesley Publishing Company。  new window
21.Strauss, Anselm、Corbin, Juliet(1998)。Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounder Theory。Sage。  new window
單篇論文
1.Ford, C.,Yore, L. D.,Anthony, R. J.(1997)。Reforms, visions, and standards: A cross-cultural curricular view from an elementary school perspective(ED406168)。  new window
其他
1.European Commission(2007)。Key competences for lifelong learning: European reference framework,http://www.erasmusplus.org.uk/file/272/download。  new window
2.教育部(2011)。十二年國民基本教育實施計畫,http://12basic.tn.edu.tw/UpLoadFiles/C41B163A2A.pdf。  延伸查詢new window
3.教育部(2013)。教育部提升國民素養專案計畫報告書,臺北市:教育部提升國民素養專案辦公室。  延伸查詢new window
4.International Technology and Engineering Educators Association(2020)。A brief history of ITEEA,https://www.iteea.org/About/History.aspx。  new window
5.United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization(1982)。Curriculum development in technical and vocational education: A methodology guide,https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000089024。  new window
6.National Science Teachers Association(1982)。Science-technology-society: Science education for the 1980s,Washington, DC:National Science Teachers Association。  new window
圖書論文
1.陳文典(2006)。「創造思考」智能。九年一貫課程自然與生活科技學習領域科學素養的內涵與解析。臺北市:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
2.Roberts, D. A.(2007)。Scientific literacy/Science literacy。Handbook of research on science education。Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.。  new window
3.Shen, B. S. P.(1975)。Science literacy and the public understanding of science。Communication of scientific information。Karger Publishers。  new window
4.Yore, L. D.(2012)。Science Literacy for All: More than a Slogan, Logo, or Rally Flag!。Issues and Challenges in Science Education Research: Moving Forward。Springer。  new window
5.王夕堯(2006)。「綜合統整」的能力。九年一貫課程自然與生活科技學習領域科學素養的內涵與解析。臺北市:教育部:國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.沈家平、陳文典(2006)。「批判思考」智能。九年一貫課程自然與生活科技學習領域科學素養的內涵與解析。臺北市:教育部:國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.陳文典(2006)。「科學態度」的素養。九年一貫課程自然與生活科技學習領域科學素養的內涵與解析。臺北市:教育部:國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.陳文典(2006)。「推理論證」智能。九年一貫課程自然與生活科技學習領域科學素養的內涵與解析。臺北市:教育部:國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
9.Norris, S. P.、Phillips, L. M.、Burns, D. P.(2014)。Conceptions of scientific literacy: Identifying and evaluating their programmatic elements。International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching。Dordrecht, NL:Springer。  new window
10.McComas, W. F.、Clough, M. P.、Almazroa, H.(1998)。The Role and Character of the Nature of Science in Science Education。The Nature of Science in Science Education: Rationales and Strategies。Dordrecht:Kluwer Academic Publishers。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE